Skip to content

Videolaryngoscope Versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for the Awake Intubation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02169232
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-06-23
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2014-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Need of Awake Intubation for Difficult Airways

Keywords

Awake intubation, Videolaryngoscope, Fiberoptic

Brief summary

Endotracheal intubation of the morbidly obese is often performed awake. Fiberoptic bronchoscope assisted endotracheal intubation, a commonly utilized technique for securing an airway while a patient is awake, has many limitations. The video laryngoscope is a device that is similar to a conventional laryngoscope but uses a video system to visualize the larynx. Because of its low cost, ease of use, and usefulness in the presence of edema or bleeding that may obstruct the airway, video assisted laryngoscopy has been shown to be useful for awake endotracheal intubations. However, a direct comparison of the fiberoptic bronchoscope with video assisted laryngoscopy has not been performed for awake endotracheal intubations in of obese patients. Patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypas andrecquiring awake intubations will be randomized for either fiberoptic bronchoscope or video assisted laryngoscopy. The investigators primary outcome will be the time required for successful intubation.

Interventions

Sponsors

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* morbidly obese patient presenting for bariatric surgery at the Royal Victoria Hospital

Exclusion criteria

* moderate to severe systemic illness, i.e. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 4 or higher * inability to communicate in English or French * contraindications to the drugs used in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The time required for successful intubation10 minutesThe time required for successful intubation, which will be measured as the time from which the bronchoscope or videolaryngoscope is initially introduced into the oropharynx, until the time that CO2 is registered on the capnogram.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of intubation attempts, defined as a complete withdrawal and re-insertion of the airway instrument.10 minutes

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
The ease of intubation using a 10 cm visual analogue scale, completed both by the person performing the intubation, and an independent observer.one hour
Post-operatively the patient's satisfaction24 hoursPost-operatively the patient's satisfaction with the procedure using a 10 cm visual analogue scale, a discomfort scale using a 10 cm visual analogue scale, whether they would recommend this procedure to a future patient, and the severity of sore throat using a 10 cm visual analogue scale.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactAlbert Moore, MD
moore_albert@hotmail.com
Backup ContactAly Elbahrawy, MD
abahrawy@yahoo.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026