Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone For Induction Of Labour: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT02168881

Enrollment

342

Registered

2014-06-20

Start date

2014-05-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2014-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labour Induction

Keywords

labour, induction, misoprostol, dinoprostone

Brief summary

This study is to compare between oral misoprostol in solution and vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labour in primiparous women with singleton pregnancy as regards efficiency and safety to both mother and fetus.

Interventions

DRUGMisoprostol

DRUGDinoprostone

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Primigravida * \>37 wks

Exclusion criteria

* Scarred uterus * Macrosomia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
induction delivery time	2 hourly

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMarwan Osama Elkady

+201205533315

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026