Skip to content

Comparison of Intrapleural Urokinase and Video-Assisted Thorascopic Surgery in the Treatment of Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion in Children

Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pleural Drainage by Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic With Pleural Drainage by Percutaneous Drain Associated With Urokinase in the Treatment of Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion in Children

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02165891
Acronym
UROVATS
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-06-18
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2020-06-30
Last updated
2018-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Empyema, Pleural

Brief summary

Despite the improvement in the technology available for diagnosing and treating empyema, the management of empyema in children remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two common technical approach used for pleural effusion drainage in the treatment of childhood empyema.

Interventions

Other interventions except drainage procedure are the same in both arms

Sponsors

Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients under the age of 17 * pleural fluid depth of at least 15mm, confirmed by ultrasound * at least one of the following severity criteria : 1. fever continuing 48h after starting correct antibiotherapy 2. respiratory distress 3. mediastinal displacement on the chest X-ray

Exclusion criteria

* previous drainage by either Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic or pleural drainage by percutaneous drain associated with urokinase- congenital pulmonary disorders with lung function impairment * congenital pulmonary disorders with lung function impairment * chronic pulmonary disease associated with lung function impairment * hemodynamic instability * congenital immunodeficiency disease * secondary immune deficiency induced * hemostasis disorder (contraindication of thrombolytic therapy) * pregnancy or breastfeeding patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
duration of drainageend of drainage defined per protocole as < 1ml/kg/24h with an expected average time of two days to seven days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of oxygen therapyup to the end of patient hospitalisation with an expected average time of 48 hours to five days
duration of intravenous antibiotic therapyup to the last intravenous antibiotic injection, minimum of 48 hours for a simple pleural effusion and a minimum of 14 days for an empyema with a maximum of one month
length of hospital stayHospital departure with an expected average time of two weeks to one month
Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse EventsUp to the end of the hospitalisation, until three months corresponding to the end of follow up period
Patient discomfortUp to chest drain removal with an average expected time of 48 hours up to seven days
Duration of fever > 38.5°CUp to fever resolution, with an average expected time of five days to 14 days

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026