Skip to content

A Study Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) of FF/UMEC/VI With the FDC of FF/VI and UMEC/VI; Administered Once-daily Via a Dry Powder Inhaler (DPI) in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

A Phase III, 52 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, 3-arm Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combinations of FF/VI and UMEC/VI, All Administered Once-daily in the Morning Via a Dry Powder Inhaler in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02164513
Enrollment
10355
Registered
2014-06-16
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2017-07-17
Last updated
2018-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

COPD, umeclidinium, fluticasone furoate, vilanterol, triple therapy, exacerbation

Brief summary

The study evaluates the efficacy of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) to reduce the annual rate of moderate and severe exacerbations compared with dual therapy of FF/VI or UMEC/VI in subjects with COPD. Published studies which assessed the use of an 'open' triple therapy (use of Inhaled Corticosteroid \[ICS\]/ Long-acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists \[LAMA\])/ Long Acting Beta-Agonist \[LABA\] delivered via multiple inhalers) in moderate-severe COPD patients, reported improvements in lung function, Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), hospitalization rates and rescue medication use, compared to dual therapy (ICS/LABA) or LAMA alone. These studies have also shown similar safety profile with dual or monotherapy doses for periods of up to one year. Given the clinical experience with FF, UMEC and VI, and that the associated risks with these compounds are anticipated from their known pharmacology, the potential benefit of a new therapy option in patients with moderate to severe COPD supports the further development of the closed triple combination (delivered via one inhaler). In the current study subjects meeting all inclusion/exclusion criteria will complete 2-week run-in period; 52 week treatment period and a 1-week safety follow-up period. Eligible subjects will be randomized to one of the following double-blind treatment groups FF/UMEC/VI 100 micrograms (mcg)/62.5 mcg/25 mcg once daily (QD), FF/VI 100 mcg/25 mcg QD, or UMEC/VI 62.5 mcg/25 mcg QD

Interventions

FF will be available in combination as dry powder for inhalation as FF/UMEC/VI 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg and FF/VI 100 mcg/25 mcg

DRUGvilanterol (VI)

VI will be available in combination as dry powder for inhalation as FF/UMEC/VI 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg, FF/VI 100 mcg/25 mcg and UMEC/VI 62.5 mcg/25 mcg

DRUGumeclidinium bromide (UMEC)

UMEC will be available in combination as dry powder for inhalation as FF/UMEC/VI 100 mcg/62.5 mcg/25 mcg, and UMEC/VI 62.5 mcg/25 mcg

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Informed Consent: A signed and dated written informed consent prior to study participation * Type of subject: Outpatient * Age: Subjects 40 years of age or older at Visit 1 * Gender: Male or female subjects. A female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is of: Non-child bearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal or surgically sterile). Surgically sterile females are defined as those with a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation. Post-menopausal females are defined as being amenorrhoeic for greater than 1 year with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g. age appropriate, \> 45 years, in the absence of hormone replacement therapy OR Child bearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at screening, and agrees to one of the following acceptable contraceptive methods used consistently and correctly (i.e. in accordance with the approved product label and the instructions of the physician for the duration of the study - screening to safety follow-up contact): Abstinence; Oral Contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone; Injectable progestogen; Implants of levonorgestrel; Estrogenic vaginal ring; Percutaneous contraceptive patches; Intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS); Male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject. For this definition, documented refers to the outcome of the investigator's/designee's medical examination of the subject or review of the subject's medical history for study eligibility, as obtained via a verbal interview with the subject or from the subject's medical records. Double barrier method: condom and an occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with a vaginal spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository) * COPD Diagnosis: An established clinical history of COPD in accordance with the definition by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society * Smoking History: Current or former cigarette smokers with a history of cigarette smoking of \>=10 pack-years at screening (visit 1) \[number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day / 20) x number of years smoked (e.g., 20 cigarettes per day for 10 years, or 10 cigarettes per day for 20 years)\]. Previous smokers are defined as those who have stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1. Note: Pipe and/or cigar use cannot be used to calculate pack-year history * Severity of COPD symptoms: A score of \>=10 on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) at screening * Severity of COPD Disease: A post-albuterol/salbutamol FEV1/ Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) ratio of \<0.70 at Screening * Existing COPD maintenance treatment: Subject must be receiving daily maintenance treatment for their COPD for at least 3 months prior to Screening. Note: Subjects receiving only Pro re nata (PRN) COPD medications are not eligible * History of Exacerbations: Subjects must demonstrate: a post-bronchodilator FEV1 \<50% predicted normal and a documented history of \>= 1 moderate or severe COPD exacerbation in the previous 12 months OR a post-bronchodilator 50% \<=FEV1 \< 80% predicted normal and a documented history of \>= 2 moderate exacerbations or a documented history of \>=1 severe COPD exacerbation (hospitalized) in the previous 12 months. Note: Percent predicted will be calculated using the European Respiratory Society Global Lung Function Initiative reference equations. Note: A documented history of a COPD exacerbation (e.g., medical record verification) is a medical record of worsening COPD symptoms that required systemic/oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (for a moderate exacerbation) or hospitalization (for a severe exacerbation). Prior use of antibiotics alone does not qualify as an exacerbation history unless the use was associated with treatment of worsening symptoms of COPD, such as increased dyspnea, sputum volume, or sputum purulence (color). Subject verbal reports are not acceptable * Liver function tests: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \<2x upper limit of normal (ULN); alkaline phosphatase \<=1.5xULN; bilirubin \<=1.5xULN (isolated bilirubin \>1.5 x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin \<35%) * French subjects: In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy: Women who are pregnant or lactating or are planning on becoming pregnant during the study * Asthma: Subjects with a current diagnosis of asthma. (Subjects with a prior history of asthma are eligible if they have a current diagnosis of COPD) * Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency: Subjects with Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency as the underlying cause of COPD * Other respiratory disorders: Subjects with active tuberculosis, lung cancer, significant bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, lung fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases or other active pulmonary diseases * Lung resection: Subjects with lung volume reduction surgery within the 12 months prior to Screening * Risk Factors for Pneumonia: immune suppression (e.g. human immunodeficiency virus \[HIV\], Lupus) or other risk factors for pneumonia (e.g. neurological disorders affecting control of the upper airway, such as Parkinson's Disease, Myasthenia Gravis). Patients at potentially high risk (e.g. very low BMI, severely malnourished, or very low FEV1) will only be included at the discretion of the Investigator * Pneumonia and/or moderate or severe COPD exacerbation that has not resolved at least 14 days prior to Screening and at least 30 days following the last dose of oral/systemic corticosteroids (if applicable). In addition, any subject that experiences pneumonia and/or moderate or severe COPD exacerbation during the run-in period will be excluded * Other Respiratory tract infections that have not resolved at least 7 days prior to screening * Abnormal Chest x-ray(CXR): Chest x-ray (posteroanterior and lateral) reveals evidence of pneumonia or a clinically significant abnormality not believed to be due to the presence of COPD, or another condition that would hinder the ability to detect an infiltrate on CXR (e.g. significant cardiomegaly, pleural effusion or scarring). All subjects will have a chest x-ray at Screening Visit 1 (or historical radiograph or computerised tomography (CT) scan obtained within 3 months prior to screening) that will be over-read by a central vendor. Note: Subjects who have experienced pneumonia and/or moderate or severe COPD exacerbation within 3 months of screening must provide a post pneumonia/exacerbation chest x-ray to be over-read by the central vendor or have a chest x-ray conducted at screening. For sites in Germany: If a chest x-ray (or CT scan) within 3 months prior to Screening (Visit 1) is not available, approval to conduct a diagnostic chest x-ray will need to be obtained from the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz \[BfS\]) * Other diseases/abnormalities: Subjects with historical or current evidence of clinically significant cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, renal, hepatic, immunological, gastrointestinal, urogenital, nervous system, musculoskeletal, skin, sensory, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes or thyroid disease) or hematological abnormalities that are uncontrolled. Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through participation, or which would affect the efficacy or safety analysis if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study * Unstable liver disease as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, esophageal or gastric varices or persistent jaundice, cirrhosis, known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones). * Note: Chronic stable hepatitis B and C are acceptable if the subject otherwise meets entry criteria * Unstable or life threatening cardiac disease: subjects with any of the following at Screening (Visit 1) would be excluded: Myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 months; Unstable or life threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention in the last 3 months; New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV Heart failure * Abnormal and clinically significant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) finding: Investigators will be provided with ECG reviews conducted by a centralized independent cardiologist to assist in evaluation of subject eligibility. The Principal Investigator will determine the clinical significance of each abnormal ECG finding in relation to the subject's medical history and exclude subjects who would be at undue risk by participating in the trial. An abnormal and clinically significant finding that would preclude a subject from entering the trial is defined as a 12-lead tracing that is interpreted as, but not limited to, any of the following: atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular rate \>120 beats per minute); sustained or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT); Second degree heart block Mobitz type II and third degree heart block (unless pacemaker or defibrillator had been inserted); QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTcF) \>=500 milliseconds (msec) in patients with QRS \<120 msec and QTcF \>=530 msec in patients with QRS \>=120 msec * Contraindications: A history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any corticosteroid, anticholinergic/muscarinic receptor antagonist, beta2-agonist, lactose/milk protein or magnesium stearate or a medical condition such as narrow-angle glaucoma, prostatic hypertrophy or bladder neck obstruction that, in the opinion of the Investigator contraindicates study participation * Cancer: Subjects with carcinoma that has not been in complete remission for at least 5 years. Subjects who have had carcinoma in situ of the cervix, squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma of the skin would not be excluded based on the 5 year waiting period if the subject has been considered cured by treatment * Oxygen therapy: Use of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) described as resting oxygen therapy \>3 Liter/minute (L/min) (Oxygen use =\<3L/min flow is not exclusionary) * Medication prior to spirometry: Subjects who are medically unable to withhold their albuterol/salbutamol for the 4-hour period required prior to spirometry testing at each study visit * Pulmonary rehabilitation: Subjects who have participated in the acute phase of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program within 4 weeks prior to Screening or subjects who plan to enter the acute phase of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program during the study. Subjects who are in the maintenance phase of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program are not excluded * Drug/alcohol abuse: Subjects with a known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse within the last 2 years * Non-compliance: Subjects at risk of non-compliance, or unable to comply with the study procedures. Any infirmity, disability, or geographic location that would limit compliance for scheduled visits * Questionable validity of consent: Subjects with a history of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation or other conditions that will limit the validity of informed consent to participate in the study * Affiliation with investigator site: Study investigators, sub-investigators, study coordinators, employees of a participating investigator or study site, or immediate family members of the aforementioned that is involved with this study * Inability to read: In the opinion of the Investigator, any subject who is unable to read and/or would not be able to complete study related materials * Medication prior to screening: Use of the following medications within the following time intervals prior to Screening (Visit 1) or during the study: Long term antibiotic therapy Subjects receiving antibiotics for long term therapy are not eligible for the study (Antibiotics are allowed for the short term treatment of an exacerbation or for short term treatment of other acute infections during the study); Systemic, Oral, parenteral corticosteroids 30 days (Except during the study oral/systemic corticosteroids may be used to treat COPD exacerbations/pneumonia) Intra-articular injections are allowed; Any other investigational drug (30 days or 5 half lives whichever is longer)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Annual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI and FF/VIUp to Week 52The annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations which occurred during treatment was assessed. Moderate exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Analysis performed using a generalized linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution. ITT population was used which comprised of all randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VIBaseline and Week 52SGRQ is a disease specific-questionnaire, designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). SGRQ contains 14 questions with total of 40 items grouped into three domains (Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts). The overall summary score along with scores for the individual domains of symptoms, activity and impacts were assessed. Score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by sum of maximum weights for items in SGRQ. Total scores ranged from 0 to 100. A decrease in score indicates improvement in HRQoL and higher score implies worse quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 52 minus value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis.
Time to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VIUp to Week 52This measures the number of days, to the first onset of moderate or severe exacerbations. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. The Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards model with covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (\<=1, \>=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (Screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (Screening), have been reported. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. First quartile and median time to onset are taken from the Kaplan-Meier estimates. If \<25% (and \<50%) of participants experienced the event within a treatment then Q1 (and median) time to onset are displayed as NA (not applicable) for that treatment.
Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1), at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VIBaseline and Week 52FEV1 was defined as the amount of air a person exhales in one second. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value of FEV1 at Week 52 minus the value at Baseline. Baseline for trough FEV1 was defined as Day 1 (Pre-dose). Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed using a Repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (Screening), geographical region, visit, Baseline, Baseline by visit and treatment group by visit interactions.
Time to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Particpants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter at BaselineUp to Week 52This measures the number of days, to the first onset of moderate or severe exacerbations for participants with blood eosinophil count \>=150 cells per microliter, at Baseline has been reported. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates and non missing eosinophils at Baseline were included in the analysis. First quartile and median time to onset are taken from the Kaplan-Meier estimates. If \<25% (and \<50%) of participants experienced the event within a treatment then Q1 (and median) time to onset are displayed as NA (not applicable) for that treatment.
Annual Rate of On-treatment Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VIUp to Week 52The annual rate of severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment, has been reported. Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. The covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (\<=1, \>=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (Screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (Screening) were used. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis
Annual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Participants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per MicroliterUp to Week 52The annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment, for participants with blood eosinophil count \>=150 cells per microliter , has been reported. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates and non-missing eosinophil, at Baseline were included in the analysis.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), were randomized to the study. Study was conducted from 30 June 2014 to 17 July 2017, at total of 971 sites in 37 countries.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FF/UMEC/VI
The eligible participants in this arm received FF/UMEC/VI as a FDC as 100 µcg/62.5µcg/25µcg, QD via a DPI, in the morning, for duration of 52 weeks.
4,151
FF/VI
The eligible participants in this arm received FF/VI 100µcg/25µcg QD via DPI, in the morning for duration of 52 weeks.
4,134
UMEC/VI
The eligible participants in this arm received UMEC/VI 62.5µcg/25µcg QD via DPI, in the morning for duration of 52 weeks.
2,070
Total10,355

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event162180111
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up303622
Overall StudyOther: Reason not provided by site100
Overall StudyOther: Study Closed or terminated524
Overall StudyPhysician Decision475728
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject192261130

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFF/UMEC/VITotalUMEC/VIFF/VI
Age, Continuous65.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.24
65.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.27
65.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.26
65.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
87 Participants218 Participants45 Participants86 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
6 Participants10 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - East Asian Heritage
362 Participants913 Participants177 Participants374 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese Heritage
151 Participants385 Participants82 Participants152 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
149 Participants371 Participants75 Participants147 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
122 Participants264 Participants43 Participants99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
41 Participants103 Participants17 Participants45 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
2 Participants7 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
31 Participants100 Participants24 Participants45 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
3200 Participants7983 Participants1604 Participants3179 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1385 Participants3485 Participants714 Participants1386 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2766 Participants6870 Participants1356 Participants2748 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
68 / 4,15176 / 4,13449 / 2,070
other
Total, other adverse events
1,389 / 4,1511,278 / 4,134596 / 2,070
serious
Total, serious adverse events
895 / 4,151850 / 4,134470 / 2,070

Outcome results

Primary

Annual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI and FF/VI

The annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations which occurred during treatment was assessed. Moderate exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Analysis performed using a generalized linear model assuming a negative binomial distribution. ITT population was used which comprised of all randomized participants, excluding those who were randomized in error. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
FF/UMEC/VIAnnual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI and FF/VI0.91 Exacerbations per participant per year
FF/VIAnnual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI and FF/VI1.07 Exacerbations per participant per year
UMEC/VIAnnual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI and FF/VI1.21 Exacerbations per participant per year
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.7, 0.81]Negative binomial model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.8, 0.9]Negative binomial model
Secondary

Annual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Participants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter

The annual rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment, for participants with blood eosinophil count \>=150 cells per microliter , has been reported. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates and non-missing eosinophil, at Baseline were included in the analysis.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
FF/UMEC/VIAnnual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Participants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter0.95 Exacerbations per participant per year
FF/VIAnnual Rate of On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Participants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter1.39 Exacerbations per participant per year
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.62, 0.75]Negative binomial Model
Secondary

Annual Rate of On-treatment Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VI

The annual rate of severe COPD exacerbations during the treatment, has been reported. Severe exacerbations were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. The covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (\<=1, \>=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (Screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (Screening) were used. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
FF/UMEC/VIAnnual Rate of On-treatment Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VI0.13 Exacerbations per participant per year
FF/VIAnnual Rate of On-treatment Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VI0.15 Exacerbations per participant per year
UMEC/VIAnnual Rate of On-treatment Severe Exacerbations Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VI0.19 Exacerbations per participant per year
p-value: 0.06495% CI: [0.76, 1.01]Negative binomial model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.56, 0.78]Negative binomial model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI

SGRQ is a disease specific-questionnaire, designed to measure impact of respiratory disease and its treatment on a COPD participant's Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). SGRQ contains 14 questions with total of 40 items grouped into three domains (Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts). The overall summary score along with scores for the individual domains of symptoms, activity and impacts were assessed. Score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by sum of maximum weights for items in SGRQ. Total scores ranged from 0 to 100. A decrease in score indicates improvement in HRQoL and higher score implies worse quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated as total score at Week 52 minus value at Baseline. Baseline was defined as Day 1. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for this instrument is a 4-point improvement (decrease from Baseline). Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF/UMEC/VIChange From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI-5.5 Scores on SGRQ scaleStandard Error 0.23
FF/VIChange From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI-3.7 Scores on SGRQ scaleStandard Error 0.24
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.4, -1.1]Mixed Models Repeated Measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1), at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI

FEV1 was defined as the amount of air a person exhales in one second. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value of FEV1 at Week 52 minus the value at Baseline. Baseline for trough FEV1 was defined as Day 1 (Pre-dose). Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed using a Repeated measures model with covariates of treatment group, smoking status (Screening), geographical region, visit, Baseline, Baseline by visit and treatment group by visit interactions.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FF/UMEC/VIChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1), at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI0.094 LiterStandard Error 0.0042
FF/VIChange From Baseline in Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1), at Week 52 Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI-0.003 LiterStandard Error 0.0044
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.085, 0.109]Mixed Models Repeated Measures
Secondary

Time to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VI

This measures the number of days, to the first onset of moderate or severe exacerbations. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. The Hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards model with covariates of treatment group, sex, exacerbation history (\<=1, \>=2 moderate/severe), smoking status (Screening), geographical region and post-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV1 (Screening), have been reported. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates were included in the analysis. First quartile and median time to onset are taken from the Kaplan-Meier estimates. If \<25% (and \<50%) of participants experienced the event within a treatment then Q1 (and median) time to onset are displayed as NA (not applicable) for that treatment.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FF/UMEC/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VIFirst quartile time to onset112 Days
FF/UMEC/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VIMedian time to onsetNA Days
FF/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VIFirst quartile time to onset81 Days
FF/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VIMedian time to onsetNA Days
UMEC/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VIFirst quartile time to onset73 Days
UMEC/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With FF/VI and With UMEC/VIMedian time to onset306 Days
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.8, 0.91]Cox proportional hazard model
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.78, 0.91]Cox proportional hazard model
Secondary

Time to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Particpants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter at Baseline

This measures the number of days, to the first onset of moderate or severe exacerbations for participants with blood eosinophil count \>=150 cells per microliter, at Baseline has been reported. Moderate exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics (not involving hospitalization or resulting in death). Severe exacerbations, were defined as exacerbations that required hospitalization or resulted in death. Only those participants with non-missing co-variates and non missing eosinophils at Baseline were included in the analysis. First quartile and median time to onset are taken from the Kaplan-Meier estimates. If \<25% (and \<50%) of participants experienced the event within a treatment then Q1 (and median) time to onset are displayed as NA (not applicable) for that treatment.

Time frame: Up to Week 52

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FF/UMEC/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Particpants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter at BaselineFirst quartile time to onset107 Days
FF/UMEC/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Particpants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter at BaselineMedian time to onsetNA Days
FF/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Particpants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter at BaselineFirst quartile time to onset55 Days
FF/VITime to First On-treatment Moderate/Severe Exacerbation Comparing FF/UMEC/VI With UMEC/VI in the Subset of Particpants With a Blood Eosinophil Count >=150 Cells Per Microliter at BaselineMedian time to onset253 Days
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.7, 0.85]Cox proportional hazard model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026