Skip to content

Respiratory Event-Related Potentials in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

Respiratory Event-Related Potentials in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: An Evaluation of Somatosensory Afferents

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02163551
Enrollment
14
Registered
2014-06-13
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2016-11-30
Last updated
2017-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

dyspnea, respiratory sensation, event-related potentials, spinal cord injury

Brief summary

Dyspnea is a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations that vary in intensity. It is known that sensory information from the respiratory system activates regions of the cerebral cortex to produce the perception of dyspnea but far less is known about the neurophysiology of dyspnea than about vision, hearing, or even pain. Dyspnea likely arises from multiple nervous system sources, but the exact locations have not been well identified. Investigations of the mechanisms underlying respiratory sensations have included studies of airway anesthesia, chest wall strapping, exercise, heart-lung transplantation, hyperventilation, and opioid use. Study of the perception of breathing sensations in individuals with a spinal cord injury presents additional opportunity. The goal of the proposed project is to examine the effects of increasingly severe levels of spinal cord injury on the perception of breathing sensations in participants who are able to breathe without the use of a ventilator. The investigators hypothesize that the perception of breathing varies with the extent of somatosensory information that reaches cerebral cortex.

Detailed description

Dyspnea is a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations that vary in intensity. Dyspnea, or shortness of breath, is a common problem affecting up to half of hospitalized patients; and shortness of breath and labored or difficult breathing accounts for 3 to 4 million emergency department visits annually. Dyspnea can represent a sensation, a symptom, or an illness. Each set of experiences involves distinct sensory, perceptual, and cognitive processes, including: the detection of signals; the perception of threat or remarkable challenge; and, the construction, or mental representation, of illness. As a sensory experience dyspnea can be compared to the sensation of pain. Although labored breathing is not painful in the usual sense of the word dyspnea, like pain, is a concept varying along multiple dimensions. Like pain, dyspnea can signal the need for medical attention; but unlike pain dyspnea is a localized sensation originating in the cardiopulmonary system rather than a generalized danger signal. Research demonstrates that sensory information from the respiratory system activates regions of the cerebral cortex to produce the perception of dyspnea but far less is known about the neurophysiology of dyspnea than about vision, hearing, or even pain. Dyspnea likely arises from multiple nervous system sources. Investigations of the mechanisms underlying respiratory sensations have included studies of airway anesthesia, chest wall strapping, exercise, heart-lung transplantation, hyperventilation, and opioid use. Study of the perception of breathing sensations in individuals with a spinal cord injury presents additional opportunity. The goal of the proposed project is to examine the effects of increasingly severe levels of spinal cord injury on the perception of breathing sensations in participants who are able to breathe without the use of a ventilator. Afferent pathways that transmit somatosensory signals to the central nervous system (i.e., brain and spinal cord) are well described and event-related potentials have been used to measure respiratory somatosensation with high temporal resolution. Event-related potentials (ERPs) are time-locked cortical signals that are measured non-invasively from the surface of the scalp in response to brief (\< 200 msec), presentations of respiratory stimuli during normal breathing. Davenport et al. first identified sensory-perceptual ERPs to inspiratory stimuli (those occurring about 50-150 msec after stimulus delivery) and Harver et al. first examined perceptual-cognitive ERPs to inspiratory stimuli (those occurring about 150-400 msec post-stimulus). Study of respiratory-related ERPs in patients with spinal cord injuries presents a rare opportunity to examine the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the perception of breathing because the extent of somatosensory information that reaches cerebral cortex varies with level of lesion.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Wake Forest University Health Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants with spinal cord injury (n = 20) will be age 30-60 years with motor complete spinal cord injuries, otherwise known as American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification A or B, between the levels of C3 and T12. Subjects will be divided equally into four different injury level categories. The four categories are high tetraplegia (C3 - C5), low tetraplegia (C6-C8), high paraplegia (T1-T6), and low paraplegia (T7-T12). Twenty healthy age-matched adults will also participate.

Exclusion criteria

* History or presence of lung disease (asthma, chronic bronchitis, etc) * Current smoker (more than one cigarette per day the past year) * History of traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, or seizure; using psychotropic medication of any type * And, if patient, more than six months since spinal cord injury and clinically stable.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event-Related PotentialsBaseline, 2-3 hoursTo record event-related potentials, surface electrodes will be attached with electrode collars and paper tape. Electrodes will be positioned at Fz (frontal midline), Cz (central midline), Pz (parietal midline), 1 cm below the center of the right eye to monitor eye movements, on the right mastoid (reference site), and on the forehead (ground site).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
General Health StatusBaseline,1 hourParticipants will complete general and respiratory health histories, a standardized Respiratory Disease Questionnaire, and a measure of quality of life (SF-36).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lung FunctionBaseline, 1 hourParticipants perform lung function testing, hold their breaths for as a long as possible, and produce maximal inspiratory and expiratory efforts against a closed airway.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026