Skip to content

Performance Evaluation of FullCeram Implants in Single Tooth Gaps

A Prospective Open Label Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Performance of Straumann Monotype FullCeram (Zirconium Dioxide) Implants in Single Tooth Gaps in the Maxilla and Mandible

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02163395
Enrollment
44
Registered
2014-06-13
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2023-11-21
Last updated
2023-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Loss

Keywords

Ceramic implant

Brief summary

* Straumann Monotype FullCeram implants serve as a suitable alternative for implant therapy especially in the aesthetic zone * The survival rate of Straumann Ceramic implants should be at least 85% (max 6 implant losses out of 40 patients) after the first year

Detailed description

This is a prospective, open label, single arm, multicenter study. The total study duration for each patient was prolonged to 10 years follow-up. It is acceptable to have the visit performed up to 6 month after the aspired date. The primary study parameter will be analyzed as soon as every patient passed visit 6 (annual follow-up visit, 12 month +/- 4 weeks). Implants will be placed transmucosally and will be protected by a thermoplastic splint for healing. A provisional prosthesis will be placed (out of occlusion) 12-14 weeks post implant placement. The final crown will be done between study week 24 and 28. Implant survival, implant success, bone loss, periodontal parameters and adverse events will be assessed in the follow-up visits. In total 10 visits are scheduled in this study. The investigational device: Straumann FullCeram Implant is a monotype ZrO2 implant with a diameter of 4.1 mm, available in lengths of 8, 10, 12 and 14 mm and abutment heights of 4.0 or 5.5 mm. This is a CE marked product. Three centres in Germany are participating. The study and any amendments will be performed as far as possible according to ISO 14155 (Second Edition, 2011-02-01) and conform to the Declaration of Helsinki (last revised Seoul 2008) and local legal and regulatory requirements.

Interventions

DEVICEFullCeram implant

FullCeram implantation

Sponsors

Institut Straumann AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subject must have voluntary signed the informed consent and the data protection consent form before any study related action * Males and females with at least 18 years of age (including 18 years) * Implant placement planned in the maxilla or mandible * The missing tooth site must have a tooth with a natural root * Substantially healed and augmented extraction sockets (minimal 8 weeks) * Autogenous bone augmentation until 3 month pre-implantation were bone deficiency jeopardizing the implant position

Exclusion criteria

Pre-surgical

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Implant SurvivalMeasured at 12 months +/- 4 weeks after implant placementA surviving implant is an integrated implant in the patient's jaw bone at the time of assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Implant SuccessMeasured at Week 26, Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36According to Buser et al 1992 an implant will be deemed a success if all of the following success criteria apply. * Absence of persisting subjective discomfort such as pain, foreign body perception and or dysaesthesia (painful sensation) * Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics) * Absence of implant mobility on manual palpation * Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency
Mean Bone Level Changes (Distal and Mesial)Measured at Week 26, Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36A radiographic stent was produced to have a standard measurement. The distal and mesial bone levels were combined into a single value by averaging the two values. Negative bone level changes representing bone loss between baseline and follow-up visits, vice versa positive changes representing bone gain.
The Implant SurvivalMeasured at Week 26, Month 24 and Month 36A surviving implant is an integrated implant in the patient's jaw bone at the time of assessment.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FullCeram Implant
Straumann FullCeram Implant is a monotype ZrO2 implant with a diameter of 4.1 mm, available in lengths of 8, 10, 12 and 14 mm and abutment heights of 4.0 or 5.5 mm FullCeram implant: FullCeram implantation
44
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFullCeram Implant
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
40 Participants
Age, Continuous48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Region of Enrollment
Germany
44 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

The Implant Survival

A surviving implant is an integrated implant in the patient's jaw bone at the time of assessment.

Time frame: Measured at 12 months +/- 4 weeks after implant placement

Population: Implant survival rates provided for the patients of the ITT population, who had valid data. Missing data were not imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FullCeram ImplantThe Implant Survival97.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Bone Level Changes (Distal and Mesial)

A radiographic stent was produced to have a standard measurement. The distal and mesial bone levels were combined into a single value by averaging the two values. Negative bone level changes representing bone loss between baseline and follow-up visits, vice versa positive changes representing bone gain.

Time frame: Measured at Week 26, Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36

Population: Standardised bone level measurements provided for the ITT population. Missing data were not imputed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FullCeram ImplantMean Bone Level Changes (Distal and Mesial)Month 12 (n=39)-1.02 mmStandard Deviation 0.9
FullCeram ImplantMean Bone Level Changes (Distal and Mesial)Week 26 (n=39)-0.88 mmStandard Deviation 0.86
FullCeram ImplantMean Bone Level Changes (Distal and Mesial)Month 24 (n=38)-1.24 mmStandard Deviation 0.94
FullCeram ImplantMean Bone Level Changes (Distal and Mesial)Month 36 (n=37)-0.97 mmStandard Deviation 0.88
Secondary

The Implant Success

According to Buser et al 1992 an implant will be deemed a success if all of the following success criteria apply. * Absence of persisting subjective discomfort such as pain, foreign body perception and or dysaesthesia (painful sensation) * Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration (where an infection is termed recurrent if it is observed at two or more follow-up visits after treatment with systemic antibiotics) * Absence of implant mobility on manual palpation * Absence of any continuous peri-implant radiolucency

Time frame: Measured at Week 26, Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36

Population: Implant success rates provided for the patients of the ITT population, who had valid data. Missing data were not imputed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FullCeram ImplantThe Implant SuccessWeek 26 (n=43)93.0 percentage of participants
FullCeram ImplantThe Implant SuccessMonth 12 (n=42)97.6 percentage of participants
FullCeram ImplantThe Implant SuccessMonth 24 (n=41)95.1 percentage of participants
FullCeram ImplantThe Implant SuccessMonth 36 (n=40)97.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

The Implant Survival

A surviving implant is an integrated implant in the patient's jaw bone at the time of assessment.

Time frame: Measured at Week 26, Month 24 and Month 36

Population: Implant survival rates provided for the patients of the ITT population, who had valid data. Missing data were not imputed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
FullCeram ImplantThe Implant SurvivalWeek 26 (n= 43)97.7 percentage of participants
FullCeram ImplantThe Implant SurvivalMonth 24 (n= 41)97.6 percentage of participants
FullCeram ImplantThe Implant SurvivalMonth 36 (n= 40)97.5 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026