Skip to content

To Demonstrate Equivalence of Pharmacokinetics and Noninferiority of Efficacy for CT-P10 in Comparison With Rituxan

A Phase 3, Randomised, Parallel-Group, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Demonstrate Equivalence of Pharmacokinetics and Noninferiority of Efficacy for CT-P10 in Comparison With Rituxan, Each Administered in Combination With Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CVP) in Patients With Advanced Follicular Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02162771
Acronym
rituximab
Enrollment
140
Registered
2014-06-13
Start date
2014-07-14
Completion date
2018-12-29
Last updated
2020-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma, Follicular

Keywords

Advanced Follicular Lymphoma

Brief summary

This study is a Phase 3 prospective, randomised, parallel-group, active controlled, double blind, multicentre, international study with 2 coprimary endpoints designed to demonstrate equivalence in pharmacokinetics (Part 1), as well as noninferiority in efficacy (Part 2), of CT-P10 to Rituxan when coadministered with CVP and to assess efficacy and safety in patients with advanced (stage III-IV) FL. Part 1 and Part 2 of the study will run in parallel.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALRituxan
BIOLOGICALCT-P10
DRUGCyclophosphamide
DRUGVincristine
DRUGPrednisone

Sponsors

Celltrion
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient is male or female older than 18 years. 2. Patient has histologically confirmed FL according to the World Health Organization 2008 classification (Jaffe 2009); grades 1 to 3a based on local laboratory review. 3. Patient has at least 1 measurable tumour mass that has not previously been irradiated, and the mass must be: * greater than 1.5 cm in the longest dimension or * between 1.1 and 1.5 cm in the longest dimension and greater than 1.0 cm in the shortest axis 4. Patient has confirmed CD20+ lymphoma, as assessed by local laboratory review. (Tissue obtained within 6 months before Day 1 of Cycle 1 will be reviewed by a central independent reviewer to detect pathological type.) 5. Patient has Ann Arbor stage III or IV disease.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient has received rituximab (or a rituximab biosimilar), cyclophosphamide, or vincristine. 2. Patient has allergies or hypersensitivity to murine, chimeric, human or humanised proteins, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, or prednisone. 3. Patient has evidence of histological transformation to high-grade or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. 4. Patient has known central nervous system involvement. 5. Patient has received previous treatment for NHL: * Previous treatment including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or surgery (except previous biopsy) * All doses of corticoid therapy for treatment of NHL * Corticoid therapy during the previous 4 weeks from Day 1 of Cycle 1 with prednisone \>20 mg per day for the treatment for any purpose

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve at Steady State (AUCtau)Core Cycle 4 (Week 12)AUCtau: Area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve within a dosing interval at steady state. PK sampling was done at pre-dose and 1 hour after the end of infusion (EOI) at Core Cycles 1-3 and 5-8. At Core Cycle 4 (i.e. steady state), intensive PK samplings were done as follows: predose, EOI, 1 hour after EOI, 24 hour after EOI, 168 hour after EOI, 336 hour after EOI, 504 hour after EOI. Lastly, one sample at any time of the end of treatment (EOT) 1 visit was obtained.
Maximum Serum Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss)Core Cycle 4 (Week 12)Cmax,ss: Maximum concentration of drug in plasma at steady state on administering a fixed dose at equal dosing intervals. PK sampling was done at pre-dose and 1 hour after the end of infusion (EOI) at Core Cycles 1-3 and 5-8. At Core Cycle 4 (i.e. steady state), intensive PK samplings were done as follows: predose, EOI, 1 hour after EOI, 24 hour after EOI, 168 hour after EOI, 336 hour after EOI, 504 hour after EOI. Lastly, one sample at any time of the end of treatment (EOT) 1 visit was obtained.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) According to the 1999 International Working Group (IWG) CriteriaDuring the Core Study Period (up to 8 cycles; Week 24)ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with the best response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), or partial response (PR) by central review. Per 1999 IWG criteria, the disease status was assessed by using contrasted CT, and CR, CRu, and PR were defined as followings; CR=Disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease: regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of B-symptoms, bone marrow involvement, and organomegaly, and normal LDH level; CRu=Regression of measurable disease: \>=75% decrease in SPD of target lesions and in each target lesions. no increase in the size of non-target lesions, neither new lesion nor organomegaly measured; PR=Regression of measurable disease: \>=50% decrease in SPD of target lesions and no evidence of disease progression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Cycles 1 to 8 during the Core Study PeriodB-cell kinetics were demonstrated by median values of B-cell counts (Lower limit of quantification was 20 cells/uL).

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 184 participants were screened for the study. Of those, 44 participants failed screening and 140 participants were enrolled in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CT-P10
Patient treated with CT-P10 (375 mg/m2 IV) in combination with cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2 IV), vincristine (1.4 mg/m2 \[max 2 mg\] IV), and prednisone 40 mg/m2 orally) up to 8 cycles every 3 weeks during the Core Study Period. Patients having responses during Core Study Period treated with CT-P10 (375 mg/m2 IV) monotherapy up to 12 cycles every 2 months during the Maintenance Study Period.
70
Rituxan
Patient treated with Rituxan (375 mg/m2 IV) in combination with cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2 IV), vincristine (1.4 mg/m2 \[max 2 mg\] IV), and prednisone 40 mg/m2 orally) up to 8 cycles every 3 weeks during the Core Study Period. Patients having responses during Core Study Period treated with Rituxan (375 mg/m2 IV) monotherapy up to 12 cycles every 2 months during the Maintenance Study Period.
70
Total140

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Core Study Period (Part 2)Adverse Event41
Core Study Period (Part 2)Death10
Core Study Period (Part 2)Physician Decision02
Core Study Period (Part 2)Progressive Disease23
Core Study Period (Part 2)Withdrawal by Subject12
Maintenance Study Period (Part 2)Adverse Event33
Maintenance Study Period (Part 2)Death21
Maintenance Study Period (Part 2)Progressive Disease1113
Maintenance Study Period (Part 2)Protocol Violation01
Maintenance Study Period (Part 2)Stable Disease01
Maintenance Study Period (Part 2)Withdrawal by Subject03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCT-P10RituxanTotal
Age, Continuous57.0 years58.5 years57.5 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
40 Participants37 Participants77 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants33 Participants63 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 7057 / 70
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 7013 / 70

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve at Steady State (AUCtau)

AUCtau: Area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve within a dosing interval at steady state. PK sampling was done at pre-dose and 1 hour after the end of infusion (EOI) at Core Cycles 1-3 and 5-8. At Core Cycle 4 (i.e. steady state), intensive PK samplings were done as follows: predose, EOI, 1 hour after EOI, 24 hour after EOI, 168 hour after EOI, 336 hour after EOI, 504 hour after EOI. Lastly, one sample at any time of the end of treatment (EOT) 1 visit was obtained.

Time frame: Core Cycle 4 (Week 12)

Population: Pharmacokinetic Population consisted of all patients who had at least 1 posttreatment PK concentration result after receiving at least 1 dose of study drug (CT-P10 or Rituxan) in Part 1. Patients considered outliers identified by a robust regression model (95% CI) were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
CT-P10Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve at Steady State (AUCtau)41002.43 h*ug/mLStandard Error 1.136
RituxanArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve at Steady State (AUCtau)40099.08 h*ug/mLStandard Error 1.143
Comparison: Equivalence in AUCtau between CT-P10 and Rituxan90% CI: [94.05, 111.17]ANCOVA
Primary

Maximum Serum Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss)

Cmax,ss: Maximum concentration of drug in plasma at steady state on administering a fixed dose at equal dosing intervals. PK sampling was done at pre-dose and 1 hour after the end of infusion (EOI) at Core Cycles 1-3 and 5-8. At Core Cycle 4 (i.e. steady state), intensive PK samplings were done as follows: predose, EOI, 1 hour after EOI, 24 hour after EOI, 168 hour after EOI, 336 hour after EOI, 504 hour after EOI. Lastly, one sample at any time of the end of treatment (EOT) 1 visit was obtained.

Time frame: Core Cycle 4 (Week 12)

Population: Pharmacokinetic Population consisted of all patients who had at least 1 posttreatment PK concentration result after receiving at least 1 dose of study drug (CT-P10 or Rituxan) in Part 1. Patients considered outliers identified by a robust regression model (95% CI) were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
CT-P10Maximum Serum Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss)256.19 ug/mLStandard Error 1.115
RituxanMaximum Serum Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss)254.49 ug/mLStandard Error 1.12
Comparison: Equivalence in Cmax,ss between CT-P10 and Rituxan90% CI: [93.84, 108]ANCOVA
Primary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) According to the 1999 International Working Group (IWG) Criteria

ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with the best response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu), or partial response (PR) by central review. Per 1999 IWG criteria, the disease status was assessed by using contrasted CT, and CR, CRu, and PR were defined as followings; CR=Disappearance of all clinical/radiographic evidence of disease: regression of lymph nodes to normal size, absence of B-symptoms, bone marrow involvement, and organomegaly, and normal LDH level; CRu=Regression of measurable disease: \>=75% decrease in SPD of target lesions and in each target lesions. no increase in the size of non-target lesions, neither new lesion nor organomegaly measured; PR=Regression of measurable disease: \>=50% decrease in SPD of target lesions and no evidence of disease progression.

Time frame: During the Core Study Period (up to 8 cycles; Week 24)

Population: Efficacy population consisted of all patients who had at least 1 response evaluation after receiving at least 1 treatment cycle in the Core Study Period without any major protocol deviation that was relevant to the efficacy endpoint in Part 2.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CT-P10Overall Response Rate (ORR) According to the 1999 International Working Group (IWG) Criteria64 Participants
RituxanOverall Response Rate (ORR) According to the 1999 International Working Group (IWG) Criteria63 Participants
Secondary

B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)

B-cell kinetics were demonstrated by median values of B-cell counts (Lower limit of quantification was 20 cells/uL).

Time frame: Cycles 1 to 8 during the Core Study Period

Population: Pharmacodynamic (PD) population consisted of all patients who had at least 1 posttreatment PD result after receiving at least 1 dose of study drug (CT-P10 or Rituxan) without any major protocol deviation that was relevant to the PD endpoint in Part 2.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
CT-P10B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 7 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 4 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 2 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 5 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 1 (1 hour after the end of infusion)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 6 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 3 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 8 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
CT-P10B-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 1 (Predose)92.5 cells/uL
RituxanB-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 8 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanB-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 6 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanB-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 1 (Predose)62.0 cells/uL
RituxanB-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 1 (1 hour after the end of infusion)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanB-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 2 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanB-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 3 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanB-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 4 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanB-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 5 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL
RituxanB-cell Kinetics (B-cell Depletion and Recovery)Core Cycle 7 (Predose)20.0 cells/uL

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026