Skip to content

Effect of Dexlansoprazole 60 mg QD and 60 mg BID on Recurrence of Intestinal Metaplasia in Subjects Who Have Achieved Complete Eradication of Barrett's Esophagus With Radiofrequency Ablation

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Effect of Dexlansoprazole 60 mg QD and 60 mg BID on Recurrence of Intestinal Metaplasia in Subjects Who Have Achieved Complete Eradication of Barrett's Esophagus With Radiofrequency Ablation

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02162758
Enrollment
6
Registered
2014-06-13
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2017-05-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Barrett's Esophagus

Keywords

Drug therapy

Brief summary

This study is designed to evaluate the effect of dexlansoprazole once daily (QD) and twice daily (BID) dosing on the recurrence of intestinal metaplasia (IM) in participants who achieved complete eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) following radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called dexlansoprazole. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of 12 months of treatment with dexlansoprazole 60 mg QD or dexlansoprazole 60 mg BID on the recurrence of IM in participants who have achieved complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM) and dysplasia (CED) with RFA. The study will enroll approximately 150 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups which will remain undisclosed to the patient and study doctor during the study (unless there is an urgent medical need): * Dexlansoprazole 60 mg once a day and placebo (this is a capsule that looks like the study drug but has no active ingredient) once a day * Dexlansoprazole 60 mg twice a day. All participants will be asked to take one capsule twice a day at the same time each day throughout the study. This randomized, double-blind, multi-center, parallel group trial will be conducted in North America. The overall time to participate in this study is up to 13 months. Participants will make 5 visits to the clinic, and will undergo a safety follow-up assessment 30 days after the last dose of study drug.

Interventions

DRUGDexlansoprazole

Dexlansoprazole delayed-release capsules

DRUGDexlansoprazole Placebo

Dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules

Sponsors

Takeda
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Is male or female and aged 18 to 80 years, inclusive. 2. In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements. 3. The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures. 4. Has a history of initial CEIM following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia or low grade dysplasia within the past 3 years. 5. Had attained CEIM within 18 months of receiving his or her first RFA treatment. 6. Has endoscopic and histologic confirmed evidence of CEIM prior to randomization. 7. A male participant who is nonsterilized and sexually active with a female partner of childbearing potential agrees to use adequate contraception from signing of informed consent throughout the duration of the study and for 12 weeks after last dose. 8. A female participant of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner agrees to use routinely adequate contraception from signing of informed consent throughout the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Has evidence of cardiovascular, pulmonary, central nervous system, hepatic, hematopoietic, renal, metabolic, endocrine or gastrointestinal disease, or serious allergy, asthma, or allergic skin rash that suggests clinically significant, uncontrolled underlying disease or condition (other than the disease being studied), which may impact the ability of the participant to participate or potentially confound the study results. 2. Had previous ablative therapy with a modality other than RFA for Barrett's esophagus (photodynamic therapy, multipolar electrical coagulation, argon plasma coagulation, or laser treatment) with the exception of up to 3 treatments of thermal/coagulation therapy for focal residual disease following otherwise successful RFA therapy. 3. Has a co-existing disease affecting the esophagus (example, erosive esophagitis, esophageal varices, scleroderma, viral or fungal infection, or esophageal stricture), history of radiation therapy or cryotherapy to the esophagus, caustic or physiochemical trauma such as sclerotherapy to the esophagus. 4. Has a known history of eosinophilic esophagitis or endoscopic findings suggestive of eosinophilic esophagitis. 5. Has active gastric or duodenal ulcers within 4 weeks prior to Day -1. 6. Has any finding in his/her medical history, physical examination, or safety clinical laboratory tests giving reasonable suspicion of underlying disease that might interfere with the conduct of the trial. 7. Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to dexlansoprazole or any component of dexlansoprazole or any proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (including lansoprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, or esomeprazole) or antacid. 8. Is required to take excluded medications or it is anticipated that the participant will require treatment with at least one of the disallowed concomitant medications during the study evaluation period as specified in the Excluded Medications and Treatments Section.. 9. Has a history of malignant disease (except basal cell carcinoma) within 5 years prior to Screening. 10. Has a condition that may require inpatient surgery during the course of the study. 11. Requires dilatation of esophageal strictures and/or strictures preventing passage of the endoscope during the Screening endoscopy. Schatzki's ring (a ring of mucosal tissue near the lower esophageal sphincter) is acceptable. 12. Is known to have acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. 13. Has current or clinical history of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory condition. 14. Has a history of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer. A history of gastric tube and/or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is allowed. 15. Had an acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 4 weeks prior to endoscopy. 16. Has donated or lost greater than or equal to (\>=)300 milliliter (mL) blood volume, undergone plasmapheresis, or has had a transfusion of any blood product within 90 days prior to the first dose of study drug. 17. Has a known history of alcohol abuse or illegal drug use within the past 12 months prior to the first dose of study drug, or is unwilling to agree to abstain from alcohol or illegal drug use throughout the study. 18. If female, the participant is pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant before, during or within 30 days after last dose of study medication; or intending to donate ova during such time period. 19. If male, the participant intends to donate sperm during the course of this study or within 30 days after last dose of study drug. 20. Is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in the conduct of this study or may consent and assent under duress. Students of the institution/research facility who are under the supervision of, or in a subordinate role to, the investigator are also ineligible. 21. In the opinion of the investigator, is unlikely to comply with the protocol requirements or is unsuitable for any other reason. 22. Has been previously randomized in this study and received at least one dose of double blind study drug treatment. 23. Has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to Screening.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of Intestinal Metaplasia (IM)Month 12Recurrence of IM was defined as an esophageal biopsy result indicating BE with or without dysplasia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of IM With DysplasiaMonth 12Recurrence of IM with dysplasia was defined as an esophageal biopsy result indicating BE with dysplasia.
Percentage of Participants With Erosive Esophagitis (EE)Baseline up to Month 12The severity of EE was classified into following grades: Grade A: one or more mucosal breaks no longer than 5 millimeter (mm), none of which extends between the tops of the mucosal folds; Grade B: one or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm long, none of which extends between the tops of two mucosal folds; Grade C: mucosal breaks that extend between the tops of two or more mucosal folds, but which involve less than 75 percent (%) of the esophageal circumference; Grade D: mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.
Change From Baseline in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total ScoreBaseline and Month 12The GERD-HRQL score consisted of 10 questions, where participants were required to answer each question on a scale of 0 to 5 (0: no symptoms; 1: symptoms noticeable but not bothersome; 2: symptoms noticeable and bothersome but not every day; 3: symptoms bothersome every day; 4: symptoms affect daily activity; 5: symptoms are incapacitating to do daily activities). The total score was derived by simply adding the individual score of each question. The total score ranged from 0 to 50 where a higher score indicated more severe disease. The best possible total GERD-HRQL score was 0 (asymptomatic in all questions) and the worst possible score is 50 (incapacitated in all questions).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 2 investigative sites in the United States from 16 July 2014 to 09 May 2016.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE) who had achieved complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM) with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were enrolled in 1 of the 2 treatment groups: Dexlansoprazole 60 milligram (mg), once-daily (QD); Dexlansoprazole 60 mg, twice daily (BID).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg QD
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg, delayed-release capsules, orally, QD and dexlansoprazole placebo-matching capsules, orally, QD for up to 12 months.
3
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg BID
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg, capsules, orally, BID for up to 12 months.
3
Total6

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyStudy termination01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDexlansoprazole 60 mg QDDexlansoprazole 60 mg BIDTotal
Age, Continuous70.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
67.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.81
69.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.04
Alcohol History
Drank alcohol
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Alcohol History
Never drank alcohol
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)29.95 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.992
31.93 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.212
30.94 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.908
Current Alcohol Status
Current drinker
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Current Alcohol Status
Non-drinker
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Current Smoking Status
Non smoker
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Current Smoking Status
Smoker
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Height179.3 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.04
167.3 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.53
173.3 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.09
Number of Drinking Years
>20 years
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Number of Drinking Years
Unknown
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Number of Drinks Per Week
0-5 drinks
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Number of Drinks Per Week
>30 drinks
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Number of Drinks Per Week
6-10 drinks
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Number of Packs Per Year
101-200 packs
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Number of Packs Per Year
301-400 packs
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Number of Packs Per Year
>400 packs
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Number of Packs Per Year
Unknown
0 participants2 participants2 participants
Number of Smoking Years for Ever Smoked
16-20 years
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Number of Smoking Years for Ever Smoked
Greater than (>) 20 years
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Smoking History
Ever smoked
2 participants3 participants5 participants
Smoking History
Never smoked
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Weight96.80 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.264
88.83 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.17
92.82 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.491

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 32 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 32 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of Intestinal Metaplasia (IM)

Recurrence of IM was defined as an esophageal biopsy result indicating BE with or without dysplasia.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population where Month 12 esophageal biopsy assessment was available. The ITT population included all randomized participants who had documented CEIM at screening and took at least 1 dose of study drug during the treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of Intestinal Metaplasia (IM)0 percentage of participants
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of Intestinal Metaplasia (IM)50 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total Score

The GERD-HRQL score consisted of 10 questions, where participants were required to answer each question on a scale of 0 to 5 (0: no symptoms; 1: symptoms noticeable but not bothersome; 2: symptoms noticeable and bothersome but not every day; 3: symptoms bothersome every day; 4: symptoms affect daily activity; 5: symptoms are incapacitating to do daily activities). The total score was derived by simply adding the individual score of each question. The total score ranged from 0 to 50 where a higher score indicated more severe disease. The best possible total GERD-HRQL score was 0 (asymptomatic in all questions) and the worst possible score is 50 (incapacitated in all questions).

Time frame: Baseline and Month 12

Population: The ITT population included all randomized participants who had documented CEIM at screening and took at least 1 dose of study drug during the treatment period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total ScoreBaseline7.3 units on scaleStandard Deviation 10.21
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg QDChange From Baseline in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total ScoreChange at Month 12-3.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 3
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total ScoreChange at Month 12-11.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 8.54
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg BIDChange From Baseline in the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Total ScoreBaseline12.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Erosive Esophagitis (EE)

The severity of EE was classified into following grades: Grade A: one or more mucosal breaks no longer than 5 millimeter (mm), none of which extends between the tops of the mucosal folds; Grade B: one or more mucosal breaks more than 5 mm long, none of which extends between the tops of two mucosal folds; Grade C: mucosal breaks that extend between the tops of two or more mucosal folds, but which involve less than 75 percent (%) of the esophageal circumference; Grade D: mucosal breaks which involve at least 75% of the esophageal circumference.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 12

Population: The ITT population where EE assessment was available. The ITT population included all randomized participants who had documented CEIM at screening and took at least 1 dose of study drug during the treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Erosive Esophagitis (EE)0 percentage of participants
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Erosive Esophagitis (EE)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of IM With Dysplasia

Recurrence of IM with dysplasia was defined as an esophageal biopsy result indicating BE with dysplasia.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: The ITT population where Month 12 esophageal biopsy assessment was available. The ITT population included all randomized participants who had documented CEIM at screening and took at least 1 dose of study drug during the treatment period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg QDPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of IM With Dysplasia0 percentage of participants
Dexlansoprazole 60 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With Recurrence of IM With Dysplasia0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026