Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Between Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Therapy and Motilitone in Functional Dyspepsia

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Between Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Therapy and Motilitone in Functional Dyspepsia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02162316
Enrollment
136
Registered
2014-06-12
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2015-10-31
Last updated
2014-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Functional Dyspepsia

Brief summary

This is a clinical study to evaluate the efficacy between Helicobacter pylori Eradication therapy and Motilitone in Functional Dyspepsia

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparative clinical study to evaluate the efficacy between Helicobacter pylori Eradication therapy and Motilitone in Functional Dyspepsia

Interventions

DRUGMotilitone®
DRUGA-Cilin®, Clari® and Pantoline®

Sponsors

Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Roman III criteria * One or more conditions are applied: epigastric pain, epigastric burning, bothersome, postprandial fullness or early satiety * No organic lesion * Helicobacter pylori infection

Exclusion criteria

* has taken prokinetics, H2 antagonists, PPIs, NSAIDs, anticholinergics, antibiotics, antidepressants, anticoagulants within a month * had a surgery that might affect gastrointestinal motility

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Volunteer global assessment of improvement rate of functional dyspepsia by using 5-Likert scale12 weeks5-Likert scale 1. deteriorated 2. not changed 3. moderately improved 4. markedly improved 5. symptom-free

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Volunteer global assessment by using 5-Likert scale6 weeks
The improvement rate of 4 types of dyspepsia symptoms12 weeks
The change of each score and total score of dyspeptic symptoms6, 12 weeks
Assessment of NDI-K Quality of Life6,12 weeks
The proportion of the patients who answered yes for the question about symptom improvement6, 12 weeks

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactJae Gyu Kim, M.D., Ph.D
jgkimd@cau.ac.kr82-2-6299-3147

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026