Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Infarction
Conditions
Brief summary
The research will study the differences between interval training and continuous training among cardiac patients in a cardiac rehabilitation facility. The main objectives are: 1. Functional capacity measures (VO2 max). 2. Cardiac risk factors 3. Quality of life assessments. Study hypothesis: Interval training will be more effective in improving functional capacity, cardiac risk factors and quality of life, compared to continuous training.
Interventions
Exercise bouts in low and high intensities
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients undergone: * Myocardial infarction * Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty * Coronary artery bypass graft
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with: * Severe ischemia or angina * Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator * Pacemakers transplants * Severe left ventricular dysfunctions * Uncontrolled arrhythmias
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal functional capacity | 9 months | Outcome is assessed at baseline, after 3 months and at nine months |
Countries
Israel