Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Switching From Aflibercept to Ranibizumab in Patients With nAMD

A Phase IV, Prospective, Open-label, Uncontrolled, European Study in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD), Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Switching From Intravitreal Aflibercept to Ranibizumab 0.5mg.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02161575
Acronym
SAFARI
Enrollment
103
Registered
2014-06-11
Start date
2014-08-28
Completion date
2017-09-14
Last updated
2019-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

Macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), vision loss, macula damage, retina damage, dry macular degeneration, wet macular degeneration, AMD

Brief summary

AMD (Age Related Macular Degeneration) is the leading cause of severe visual loss and blindness registration in the UK . It is a disease which affects the retina (the nerve and blood vessel network at the back of the eye responsible for vision). Patients can suffer with severe visual loss and have difficulties with every day tasks such as recognising faces, reading & driving. There are two variations of the disease, a 'dry' type & a 'wet' type also known as neovascular AMD (nAMD). In wet/nAMD new vessels grow from the blood supply underneath the retina, in part due to higher than normal levels of a protein called Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). Since the introduction of drugs which block VEGF, visual outcomes for patients with wAMD have dramatically improved. There are 2 widely used treatments; ranibizumab and aflibercept. Whilst the majority of patients have a successful outcome with treatment, many patients experience suboptimal response. This study evaluated if these patients experience a benefit from a switch to a different antiVEGF drug treatment. In this study nAMD patients who are showing no or poor to response to treatment with aflibercept were switched to ranibizumab to assess if there is any benefit in terms of treatment outcomes. Patients visited the hospital clinic 8 times over the 7 - 8 month study period. Monthly ranibizumab injections were given for the first 3 months, then monthly as required for the next 3 months.

Interventions

DRUGRanibizumab

Intraveal injections of 0.5mg ranibizumab

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥23 ETDRS letters in study eye * Evidence of active choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) involving the center of the fovea in study eye Patient subgroup specific inclusion criteria: - Group 1. Primary treatment failure * Initiated treatment with aflibercept \<130 days prior to the Screening Visit. * No increase in BCVA (≥5 letters) since commencing treatment with aflibercept. * Disease activity has never been controlled in the study eye after initiating aflibercept as defined by at least one of the following: evidence of unchanged or increasing retinal or subretinal fluid; new PED; unchanged or increasing size of preexisting PED. Group 2. Suboptimal treatment response * Aflibercept commenced ≥6 months prior to the Screening Visit. * Received ≥3 aflibercept injections into the study eye within 6 months of the Screening Visit. * Evidence of previous reduced disease activity (as defined by reduction of ≥50μm in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness on OCT) noted in the study eye after initiating aflibercept. * At Screening Visit, disease activity has worsened (as defined by increasing retinal\* or subretinal fluid, or new or increasing size of PED) in the study eye compared to prior visits.

Exclusion criteria

* History of cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack or myocardial infarction within 3 months of the Screening visit. * Uncontrolled blood pressure * Evidence of bilateral active CNV during the Screening Period or at Baseline requiring bilateral antiVEGF injections. * Prior intravitreal injection of ranibizumab or bevacizumab into the study eye and/or prior intravitreal injection of bevacizumab into the fellow eye. * Cataract (if causing significant visual impairment), aphakia, severe vitreous hemorrhage, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, proliferative retinopathy or choroidal neovascularization of any other cause than wet AMD (e.g. ocular histoplasmosis, pathologic myopia (≥8 dioptres)) at the time of Screening and Baseline. * Irreversible structural damage involving the center of the fovea (e.g. advanced fibrosis or geographic atrophy) which in the opinion of the Investigator is sufficient to irreversibly impair visual acuity. * Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), RPE tear, central serous retinopathy (CSR), or significant vitreomacular traction identified during Screening period or within 4 months of Baseline visit. * Unable to obtain at Screening OCT images of sufficient quality to be analyzed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90.Baseline and Day 90Measurement of the change in CSRT, determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) after 3 monthly injections of ranibizumab. OCT is a non-invasive technique which can determine and measure thickness of the retina. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement (less retinal fluid and lower disease activity). Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180Baseline and Day 180Measurement of change in CSRT from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Change in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180Baseline and Day 180Measurement of change in CSRV from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Baseline and Day 180Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Intraretinal Fluid. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Baseline to Day 180Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Subretinal Fluid. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Baseline and Day 180Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Baseline and Day 180Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Pigment Epithelial Detachments. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Change in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180Baseline and Day 180Measurement of change in SRT from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Change in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180Baseline and Day 180Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Height. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Change in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180Baseline and Day 180Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Diameter. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Change in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180Baseline and Day 180Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Intraretinal Cyst (IRC) Height. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeBaseline, Day 90 and Day 180BCVA was assessed as letters read and measured in a sitting position using subjective refraction and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.
Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180Baseline and Day 180Number of patients gaining at least 15 letters from Baseline to Day 180
Incidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180Baseline to Day 180Incidence of ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the study eye reported by ≥2% patients by preferred term.
Number of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Baseline and Day 180Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Dry Retina. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Countries

Germany, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited from 22 sites located in the United Kingdom and 6 sites located in Germany. A total of 103 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 103 patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, 3 patients did not have any post-baseline safety or CSRT assessments and were therefore excluded from the SAF and FAS, in accordance with the analysis set definitions. Therefore, 100 patients were included in the SAF and FAS.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ranibizumab
All patients received 3 monthly intraveal injections of 0.5mg ranibizumab followed by monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5mg for a further 3 months on a prn (as required) basis, as determined by the study doctor.
100
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event2
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyProtocol Violation8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRanibizumab
Age, Continuous77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.51
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100
other
Total, other adverse events
52 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90.

Measurement of the change in CSRT, determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) after 3 monthly injections of ranibizumab. OCT is a non-invasive technique which can determine and measure thickness of the retina. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement (less retinal fluid and lower disease activity). Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 90

Population: FAS - Missing values at Day 90 were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) where possible. For the change from baseline, only patients with a value at both baseline and Day 90 were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
RanibizumabChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90.Change from Baseline to Day 90-30.75 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90.Baseline384.00 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90.Day 90318.00 micrometer
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the change in CSRT from baseline to Day 90 was zerop-value: <0.000195% CI: [-59.5, -20.5]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye

BCVA was assessed as letters read and measured in a sitting position using subjective refraction and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 90 and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
RanibizumabChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeBaseline71.5 letters
RanibizumabChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 9074.0 letters
RanibizumabChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeDay 18075.0 letters
RanibizumabChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeChange from Baseline to Day 1801.0 letters
RanibizumabChange in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study EyeChange from Day 90 to Day 1800.0 letters
Secondary

Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180

Measurement of change in CSRT from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
RanibizumabChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180CSRT at Day 180343.00 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180CSRT change from Baseline to Day 180-28.00 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180CSRT at Baseline384.00 micrometer
Secondary

Change in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180

Measurement of change in CSRV from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
RanibizumabChange in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180CSRV at Baseline0.3050 cubic micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180CSRV at Day 1800.2750 cubic micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180CSRV change from Baseline to Day 180-0.0200 cubic micrometer
Secondary

Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180

Number of patients gaining at least 15 letters from Baseline to Day 180

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RanibizumabChange in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180>=15 (Gain of at least 15 letters)11 Participants
RanibizumabChange in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 18010 to <156 Participants
RanibizumabChange in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 1805 to <1017 Participants
RanibizumabChange in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 1800 to <525 Participants
RanibizumabChange in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180>-15 to <031 Participants
RanibizumabChange in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180<=-15 (Loss of at least 15 letters)7 Participants
RanibizumabChange in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180NA3 Participants
Secondary

Change in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180

Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Intraretinal Cyst (IRC) Height. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
RanibizumabChange in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180Baseline121.50 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180Day 180105.50 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180Change from Baseline to Day 1800.00 micrometer
Secondary

Change in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180

Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Diameter. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
RanibizumabChange in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180Baseline2205.00 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180Day 1802428.00 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180Change from Baseline to Day 18059.50 micrometer
Secondary

Change in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180

Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Height. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
RanibizumabChange in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180Baseline236.00 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180Day 180203.50 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180Change from Baseline to Day 180-2.50 micrometer
Secondary

Change in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180

Measurement of change in SRT from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
RanibizumabChange in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180SRT at Baseline346.00 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180SRT at Day 180302.00 micrometer
RanibizumabChange in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180SRT change from Baseline to Day 180-23.50 micrometer
Secondary

Incidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180

Incidence of ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the study eye reported by ≥2% patients by preferred term.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 180

Population: SAF

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RanibizumabIncidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180Eye pain3 Participants
RanibizumabIncidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180Visual impairment3 Participants
RanibizumabIncidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180Blepharitis2 Participants
RanibizumabIncidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180Posterior capsule opacification2 Participants
RanibizumabIncidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180Intraocular pressure increased3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180

Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Dry Retina. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineYes, Definitive0 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineNo100 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Yes, Definitive0 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180No94 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180

Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Intraretinal Fluid. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineYes, Definitive32 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineYes, Subtle11 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineNo56 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineQuestionable1 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Yes, Definitive24 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Yes, Subtle15 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180No55 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Questionable0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180

Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineYes, Definitive38 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineYes, Subtle6 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineNo5 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineQuestionable1 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineNA50 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Yes, Definitive26 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Yes, Subtle12 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180No15 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Questionable1 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180NA40 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180

Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Pigment Epithelial Detachments. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineYes, Definitive86 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineYes, Subtle2 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineNo12 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineNot gradable0 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Yes, Definitive80 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Yes, Subtle4 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180No8 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Not gradable2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180

Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Subretinal Fluid. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.

Time frame: Baseline to Day 180

Population: FAS

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineNo12 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineYes, Definitive83 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180BaselineYes, Subtle5 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Yes, Definitive49 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180Yes, Subtle15 Participants
RanibizumabNumber of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180Day 180No30 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026