Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Conditions
Keywords
Macular degeneration, age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), vision loss, macula damage, retina damage, dry macular degeneration, wet macular degeneration, AMD
Brief summary
AMD (Age Related Macular Degeneration) is the leading cause of severe visual loss and blindness registration in the UK . It is a disease which affects the retina (the nerve and blood vessel network at the back of the eye responsible for vision). Patients can suffer with severe visual loss and have difficulties with every day tasks such as recognising faces, reading & driving. There are two variations of the disease, a 'dry' type & a 'wet' type also known as neovascular AMD (nAMD). In wet/nAMD new vessels grow from the blood supply underneath the retina, in part due to higher than normal levels of a protein called Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). Since the introduction of drugs which block VEGF, visual outcomes for patients with wAMD have dramatically improved. There are 2 widely used treatments; ranibizumab and aflibercept. Whilst the majority of patients have a successful outcome with treatment, many patients experience suboptimal response. This study evaluated if these patients experience a benefit from a switch to a different antiVEGF drug treatment. In this study nAMD patients who are showing no or poor to response to treatment with aflibercept were switched to ranibizumab to assess if there is any benefit in terms of treatment outcomes. Patients visited the hospital clinic 8 times over the 7 - 8 month study period. Monthly ranibizumab injections were given for the first 3 months, then monthly as required for the next 3 months.
Interventions
Intraveal injections of 0.5mg ranibizumab
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥23 ETDRS letters in study eye * Evidence of active choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) involving the center of the fovea in study eye Patient subgroup specific inclusion criteria: - Group 1. Primary treatment failure * Initiated treatment with aflibercept \<130 days prior to the Screening Visit. * No increase in BCVA (≥5 letters) since commencing treatment with aflibercept. * Disease activity has never been controlled in the study eye after initiating aflibercept as defined by at least one of the following: evidence of unchanged or increasing retinal or subretinal fluid; new PED; unchanged or increasing size of preexisting PED. Group 2. Suboptimal treatment response * Aflibercept commenced ≥6 months prior to the Screening Visit. * Received ≥3 aflibercept injections into the study eye within 6 months of the Screening Visit. * Evidence of previous reduced disease activity (as defined by reduction of ≥50μm in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness on OCT) noted in the study eye after initiating aflibercept. * At Screening Visit, disease activity has worsened (as defined by increasing retinal\* or subretinal fluid, or new or increasing size of PED) in the study eye compared to prior visits.
Exclusion criteria
* History of cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack or myocardial infarction within 3 months of the Screening visit. * Uncontrolled blood pressure * Evidence of bilateral active CNV during the Screening Period or at Baseline requiring bilateral antiVEGF injections. * Prior intravitreal injection of ranibizumab or bevacizumab into the study eye and/or prior intravitreal injection of bevacizumab into the fellow eye. * Cataract (if causing significant visual impairment), aphakia, severe vitreous hemorrhage, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, proliferative retinopathy or choroidal neovascularization of any other cause than wet AMD (e.g. ocular histoplasmosis, pathologic myopia (≥8 dioptres)) at the time of Screening and Baseline. * Irreversible structural damage involving the center of the fovea (e.g. advanced fibrosis or geographic atrophy) which in the opinion of the Investigator is sufficient to irreversibly impair visual acuity. * Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), RPE tear, central serous retinopathy (CSR), or significant vitreomacular traction identified during Screening period or within 4 months of Baseline visit. * Unable to obtain at Screening OCT images of sufficient quality to be analyzed
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90. | Baseline and Day 90 | Measurement of the change in CSRT, determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) after 3 monthly injections of ranibizumab. OCT is a non-invasive technique which can determine and measure thickness of the retina. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement (less retinal fluid and lower disease activity). Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Measurement of change in CSRT from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Change in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Measurement of change in CSRV from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Intraretinal Fluid. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline to Day 180 | Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Subretinal Fluid. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Pigment Epithelial Detachments. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Change in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Measurement of change in SRT from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Change in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Height. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Change in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Diameter. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Change in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Intraretinal Cyst (IRC) Height. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
| Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye | Baseline, Day 90 and Day 180 | BCVA was assessed as letters read and measured in a sitting position using subjective refraction and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. |
| Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Number of patients gaining at least 15 letters from Baseline to Day 180 |
| Incidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline to Day 180 | Incidence of ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the study eye reported by ≥2% patients by preferred term. |
| Number of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline and Day 180 | Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Dry Retina. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy. |
Countries
Germany, United Kingdom
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Patients were recruited from 22 sites located in the United Kingdom and 6 sites located in Germany. A total of 103 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Pre-assignment details
Of the 103 patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug, 3 patients did not have any post-baseline safety or CSRT assessments and were therefore excluded from the SAF and FAS, in accordance with the analysis set definitions. Therefore, 100 patients were included in the SAF and FAS.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Ranibizumab All patients received 3 monthly intraveal injections of 0.5mg ranibizumab followed by monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5mg for a further 3 months on a prn (as required) basis, as determined by the study doctor. | 100 |
| Total | 100 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Ranibizumab |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 77 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.51 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Caucasian | 99 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 55 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 45 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 100 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 52 / 100 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 10 / 100 |
Outcome results
Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90.
Measurement of the change in CSRT, determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) after 3 monthly injections of ranibizumab. OCT is a non-invasive technique which can determine and measure thickness of the retina. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement (less retinal fluid and lower disease activity). Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 90
Population: FAS - Missing values at Day 90 were imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) where possible. For the change from baseline, only patients with a value at both baseline and Day 90 were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90. | Change from Baseline to Day 90 | -30.75 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90. | Baseline | 384.00 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 90. | Day 90 | 318.00 micrometer |
Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye
BCVA was assessed as letters read and measured in a sitting position using subjective refraction and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90 and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye | Baseline | 71.5 letters |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye | Day 90 | 74.0 letters |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye | Day 180 | 75.0 letters |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye | Change from Baseline to Day 180 | 1.0 letters |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye | Change from Day 90 to Day 180 | 0.0 letters |
Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180
Measurement of change in CSRT from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180 | CSRT at Day 180 | 343.00 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180 | CSRT change from Baseline to Day 180 | -28.00 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness (CSRT) From Baseline to Day 180 | CSRT at Baseline | 384.00 micrometer |
Change in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180
Measurement of change in CSRV from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Change in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180 | CSRV at Baseline | 0.3050 cubic micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180 | CSRV at Day 180 | 0.2750 cubic micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Central Subfield Retinal Volume (CSRV) From Baseline to Day 180 | CSRV change from Baseline to Day 180 | -0.0200 cubic micrometer |
Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180
Number of patients gaining at least 15 letters from Baseline to Day 180
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180 | >=15 (Gain of at least 15 letters) | 11 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180 | 10 to <15 | 6 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180 | 5 to <10 | 17 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180 | 0 to <5 | 25 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180 | >-15 to <0 | 31 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180 | <=-15 (Loss of at least 15 letters) | 7 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Change in ETDRS Letters for Study Eye From Baseline to Day 180 | NA | 3 Participants |
Change in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180
Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Intraretinal Cyst (IRC) Height. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Change in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline | 121.50 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180 | Day 180 | 105.50 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Maximum IRC Height From Baseline to Day 180 | Change from Baseline to Day 180 | 0.00 micrometer |
Change in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180
Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Diameter. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Change in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline | 2205.00 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180 | Day 180 | 2428.00 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Maximum PED Diameter From Baseline to Day 180 | Change from Baseline to Day 180 | 59.50 micrometer |
Change in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180
Change from Baseline to Day 180 in Maximum Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) Height. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Change in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180 | Baseline | 236.00 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180 | Day 180 | 203.50 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Maximum PED Height From Baseline to Day 180 | Change from Baseline to Day 180 | -2.50 micrometer |
Change in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180
Measurement of change in SRT from Baseline to Day 180 as determined by high definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT). A reduction indicates an improvement in overall disease activity. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Change in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180 | SRT at Baseline | 346.00 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180 | SRT at Day 180 | 302.00 micrometer |
| Ranibizumab | Change in Subfoveal Retinal Thickness (SRT) From Baseline to Day 180 | SRT change from Baseline to Day 180 | -23.50 micrometer |
Incidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180
Incidence of ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in the study eye reported by ≥2% patients by preferred term.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 180
Population: SAF
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Incidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180 | Eye pain | 3 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Incidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180 | Visual impairment | 3 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Incidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180 | Blepharitis | 2 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Incidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180 | Posterior capsule opacification | 2 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Incidence of Ocular TEAEs in the Study Eye Reported by ≥2% Patients From Baseline to Day 180 | Intraocular pressure increased | 3 Participants |
Number of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180
Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Dry Retina. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Yes, Definitive | 0 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | No | 100 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Yes, Definitive | 0 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Dry Retina Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | No | 94 Participants |
Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180
Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Intraretinal Fluid. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Yes, Definitive | 32 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Yes, Subtle | 11 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | No | 56 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Questionable | 1 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Yes, Definitive | 24 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Yes, Subtle | 15 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | No | 55 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Questionable | 0 Participants |
Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180
Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Yes, Definitive | 38 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Yes, Subtle | 6 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | No | 5 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Questionable | 1 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | NA | 50 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Yes, Definitive | 26 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Yes, Subtle | 12 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | No | 15 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Questionable | 1 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Intraretinal/Subretinal Fluid Within the Central Subfield Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | NA | 40 Participants |
Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180
Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Pigment Epithelial Detachments. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline and Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Yes, Definitive | 86 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Yes, Subtle | 2 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | No | 12 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Not gradable | 0 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Yes, Definitive | 80 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Yes, Subtle | 4 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | No | 8 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Not gradable | 2 Participants |
Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180
Presence or absence of qualitative OCT parameter Subretinal Fluid. Data collected on the study eye were used for the evaluation of efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 180
Population: FAS
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | No | 12 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Yes, Definitive | 83 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Baseline | Yes, Subtle | 5 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Yes, Definitive | 49 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | Yes, Subtle | 15 Participants |
| Ranibizumab | Number of Patients With Subretinal Fluid Assessed at Baseline and Day 180 | Day 180 | No | 30 Participants |