Skip to content

A Study of Subcutaneous Abatacept to Treat Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Subcutaneous Abatacept vs. Placebo in Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis- a Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02161406
Acronym
ASSET
Enrollment
88
Registered
2014-06-11
Start date
2014-09-30
Completion date
2018-10-17
Last updated
2020-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis

Keywords

Scleroderma

Brief summary

The study hypothesis is that SC abatacept is safe and shows evidence of efficacy (improvement in modified Rodnan score \[mRSS\]) in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcScc) compared to matching placebo.

Detailed description

This study is a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind phase 2 trial of patients with dcSSc. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either 125 mg SC abatacept or matching placebo, stratified by duration of dcSSc disease duration (\<18 months vs \>18 to \</=36 months). Study participants will be treated for 12 months on double-blind study medication, followed by an additional 24 weeks of open-label SC abatacept therapy. 86 patients will be randomized in approximately 35 centers in the US, Canada and Europe, with the goal of analyzing 74 participants. The investigators study will test whether abatacept is statistically superior to placebo in reducing the MRSS at month 12 and explore the ability of abatacept to prevent or reverse progression in patients with early disease duration and lower MRSS scores, and reverse established disease in patients with longer disease duration and higher MRSS scores.

Interventions

DRUGAbatacept

Subjects will be treated with injections of 125 mg of abatacept or placebo weekly for 52 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

125 mg of Placebo

Sponsors

Bristol-Myers Squibb
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
CollaboratorNIH
Dinesh Khanna, MD, MS
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of Systematic Sclerosis (SSc), as defined using the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/ European Union League Against Rheumatism classification of SSc 2. Diffuse Systemic Sclerosis (dcSSc) as defined by LeRoy and Medsger 3. Disease duration of ≤ 36 months (defined as time from the first non-Raynaud phenomenon manifestation) 4. For disease duration of ≤ 18 months: ≥ 10 and ≤ 35 mRSS units at the screening visit 5. For disease duration of \>18-36 months: ≥ 15 and ≤ 45 mRSS units at the screening visit and one of the following: * Increase ≥ 3 in mRSS units compared with the last visit within previous 1-6 months * Involvement of one new body area with ≥ 2 mRSS units compared with the last visit within the previous 1-6 months * Involvement of two new body areas with ≥ 1 mRSS units compared with the last visit within the previous 1-6 months * Presence of 1 or more Tendon Friction Rub 6. Age ≥ 18 years at the screening visit 7. If female of childbearing potential, the patient must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and baseline visits 8. Oral corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs are permitted if the patient is on a stable dose regimen for * 2 weeks prior to and including the baseline visit. 9. ACE inhibitors, calcium-channel blockers, proton-pump inhibitors, and/or oral vasodilators are permitted if the patient is on a stable dose for ≥ 2 weeks prior to and including the baseline visit.

Exclusion criteria

1. Rheumatic disease other than dcSSc; it is acceptable to include patients with fibromyalgia and scleroderma-associated myopathy 2. Limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis or sine scleroderma at the screening visit 3. Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening visit 4. Infected ulcer prior to randomization 5. Treatment with any investigational agent within ≤ 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer) of the baseline visit 6. Previous treatment with cell-depleting therapies, including investigational agents, including but not limited to, CAMPATH, anti-CD4, anti-CD5, anti-CD3, anti-CD19, and ABA 7. Anti-CD20, and cyclophosphamide within 12 months prior to baseline visit. 8. Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) within 12 weeks prior to baseline visit 9. Previous treatment with chlorambucil, bone marrow transplantation, or total lymphoid irradiation 10. Immunization with a live/attenuated vaccine within ≤ 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit 11. Treatment with methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine A, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil rapamycin, colchicine, or D-penicillamine, within≤ 4 weeks prior to the baseline visit 12. Treatment with etanercept within ≤ 2 weeks, infliximab, certolizumab, golimumab, ABA or adalimumab within ≤ 8 weeks, anakinra within ≤ 1 week prior to the baseline visit 13. Pulmonary disease with FVC ≤ 50% of predicted, or DLCO (uncorrected for hemoglobin ) ≤ 40% of predicted at the screening visit 14. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as determined by right heart catheterization or on PAH approved medications for PAH. It is acceptable to use PDFE-5 inhibitors for Raynaud's and digital ulcers. 15. Subjects at risk for tuberculosis (TB). Specifically excluded from this study will be participants with a history of active TB within the last 3 years, even if it was treated; a history of active TB greater than 3 years ago, unless there is documentation that the prior anti-TB treatment was appropriate in duration and type; current clinical, radiographic, or laboratory evidence of active TB; and latent TB that was not successfully treated (≥ 4 weeks). 16. Positive for hepatitis B surface antigen prior to the baseline visit 17. Positive for hepatitis C antigen, if the presence of hepatitis C virus was also shown with polymerase chain reaction or recombinant immunoblot assay prior to baseline visit 18. Subjects at risk for tuberculosis (TB). Specifically excluded from this study will be participants with a history of active TB within the last 3 years, even if it was treated; a history of active TB greater than 3 years ago, unless there is documentation that the prior anti-TB treatment was appropriate in duration and type; current clinical, radiographic, or laboratory evidence of active TB; and latent TB that was not successfully treated (≥ 4 weeks). 19. Any of the following at the screening visit: Hemoglobin \<8.5 g/dL; WBC \< 3,000/mm3 (\<3 x 109/L); platelets \< 100,000/mm3 (\<3 x 109/L); serum creatinine \> 2 x ULN; serum ALT or AST \> 2 x ULN 20. Severe skin thickening (mRSS 3) on the inner aspects of thighs, upper arms, or abdomen 21. Patients with a history of anaphylaxis to abatacept

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious AEs (SAEs) in 1 Year52 weeksSafety is measured using AEs, including clinical significant changes in vital signs, laboratory test abnormalities and clinical tolerability of abatacept, and using serious AEs
Change From Baseline in the Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) to Month 12Baseline and 52 weeksThe efficacy of treatment on skin fibrosis will be measured by changes from baseline to month 12 in mRSS, a measure of skin thickness. mRSS scores have a range from 0 to 51, with higher score indicating greater severity of SSc (worse outcome).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in % Predicted FVCBaseline and 52 weeksFVC is Forced vital capacity, a measure of lung function. FVC % Predicted is calculated using equations from Hankinson \[Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):179-87\], incorporating age, gender, and race. It is calculated as the (FVC Observed / FVC predicted) \* 100, where FVC predicted is calculated relative to a reference population.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in FVC (in ml)Baseline and Week 52FVC = forced vital capacity, a measure of lung function
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - OverallBaseline and Week 52The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI overall score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). Higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Overall DiseaseBaseline and Week 52Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for disease severity ranges from 0 (no disease) to 150 (very severe). A higher score means a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - BreathingBaseline and Week 52Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for how much breathing problems interfered with daily activities ranges from 0 (do not limit activities) to 150 (very severe limitation). A higher score means a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Raynaud'sBaseline and Week 52Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for how much Raynaud's interfered with daily activities ranges from 0 (does not limit activities) to 150 (very severe limitation). A higher score means a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Burden of Digital UlcersBaseline and Week 52Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for how much finger ulcers interfered with daily activities ranges from 0 (do not limit activities) to 150 (very severe limitation). A higher score means a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - GI InvolvementBaseline and Week 52Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for how much intestinal problems interfered with daily activities ranges from 0 (do not limit activities) to 150 (very severe limitation). A higher score means a worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Swollen Joint CountBaseline and 52 weeks28 joints are assessed for swelling (positive or negative). The number of swollen joint count ranges from 0 to 28. A higher number indicates worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Tender Joint CountsBaseline and 52 weeks28 joints are assessed for tenderness (positive or negative). The number of tender joint counts ranges from 0 to 28. A higher number indicates worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Physical FunctionBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the physical function domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., better outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - AnxietyBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the anxiety domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - DepressionBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the depression domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS 29 - FatigueBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the fatigue domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Sleep DisturbanceBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the sleep disturbance domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e.,worse outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Patient Global Assessment for Overall DiseaseBaseline and Week 52Patient global assessment for overall disease represents the patient's assessment of the patient's global scleroderma on a 0 (excellent) -10 (extremely poor) Likert scale. Higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles & ActivitiesBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the ability to participate in social roles and activities domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., better outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Pain IntensityBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the pain intensity domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SCTC GIT - Composite ScoreBaseline and Week 52The SCTC GIT is the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Instrument. It assesses scleroderma-related gastrointestinal symptoms. The composite score ranges from 0 to 2.83; 0 indicates better health and higher score indicates worse health.
ACR CRISS at 12 MonthsWeek 52The American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index in Systemic Sclerosis is a composite endpoint. It is determined in a 2-step process. The first step assesses whether the patient has had a significant decline in renal or cardiopulmonary involvement. If none of these apply, the second step assesses the probability of improvement by measuring changes in five outcomes and integrating them into a single number using an equation described in Khanna D, Berrocal VJ, et al. \[The American College of Rheumatology Provisional Composite Response Index for Clinical Trials in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis and Rheumatology. 2016; 68(2):299-311.\]. It incorporates changes in the modified Rodnan skin score, percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), patient and physician global assessments, and SHAQ-DI over 1 year. The score ranges from 0 to 1; a higher score indicates better outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - FatigueBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8-question short-form health-reported quality of life measure fatigue domain was administered. The transformed score (T-score) was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Sleep DisturbanceBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 4-question short-form health-reported quality of life measure sleep disturbance domain was administered. The transformed score (T-score) was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., better outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Sleep ImpairmentBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8-question short-form health-reported quality of life measure sleep impairment domain was administered. The transformed score (T-score) was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Dressing and GroomingBaseline and Week 52The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - HygieneBaseline and Week 52The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - ArisingBaseline and Week 52The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - ReachBaseline and Week 52The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - EatingBaseline and Week 52The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - GripBaseline and Week 52The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - WalkingBaseline and Week 52The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Common Daily ActivitiesBaseline and Week 52The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Pain InterferenceBaseline and Week 52The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the pain interference domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Physician Global Assessment for Overall DiseaseBaseline and Week 52This assessment represents the physician's assessment of the patient's current disease activity on a 0 (excellent) -10 (extremely poor) Likert scale. Higher score means worse outcome.

Countries

Canada, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Abatacept
125 mg SC abatacept vs SC placebo administered weekly for 12 months, with a 24-week open-label extension Abatacept: Subjects will be treated with injections of 125 mg of abatacept or placebo weekly for 52 weeks
44
Placebo
125mg Placebo Placebo: 125 mg of Placebo
44
Total88

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath21
Overall Studyinvestigator withdrew subject31
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up21
Overall Studyrelocation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAbataceptPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
dcSSc Disease Duration <= 18 months26 Participants27 Participants53 Participants
Disease Duration1.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84
1.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79
1.59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81
DLCO% Predicted, Corrected for Hemoglobin79.57 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.117
76.45 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.439
78.01 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.241
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
40 Participants36 Participants76 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
FVC% Predicted84.19 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.504
86.49 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.597
85.34 percent predicted
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.087
HAQ-DI1.14 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.716
0.97 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.701
1.05 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.71
mRSS23.34 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.947
21.57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.328
22.45 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.652
Patient Global Assessment3.88 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.206
4.31 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.561
4.09 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.384
Physician Global Assessment4.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.669
4.76 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.665
4.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.657
Proportion of Participants with >= 1 Large Joint Contractures31 Participants32 Participants63 Participants
Proportion of Participants with >= 1 Swollen Joint Count21 Participants21 Participants42 Participants
Proportion of Participants with >= 1 Tendon Friction Rubs19 Participants13 Participants32 Participants
Proportion of Participants with Previous Use of Immunosuppressives12 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Proportion of Participants with Previous Use of Prednisone12 Participants5 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
35 Participants37 Participants72 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants35 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants9 Participants22 Participants
Swollen Joint Count3.64 number of swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.62
3.86 number of swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.849
3.75 number of swollen joints
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.704

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 441 / 44
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 4440 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 4412 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) to Month 12

The efficacy of treatment on skin fibrosis will be measured by changes from baseline to month 12 in mRSS, a measure of skin thickness. mRSS scores have a range from 0 to 51, with higher score indicating greater severity of SSc (worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline in the Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) to Month 12-6.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) to Month 12-4.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.14
p-value: 0.28Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Proportion of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious AEs (SAEs) in 1 Year

Safety is measured using AEs, including clinical significant changes in vital signs, laboratory test abnormalities and clinical tolerability of abatacept, and using serious AEs

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AbataceptProportion of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious AEs (SAEs) in 1 Year35 Participants
PlaceboProportion of Participants With at Least One Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious AEs (SAEs) in 1 Year40 Participants
Secondary

ACR CRISS at 12 Months

The American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index in Systemic Sclerosis is a composite endpoint. It is determined in a 2-step process. The first step assesses whether the patient has had a significant decline in renal or cardiopulmonary involvement. If none of these apply, the second step assesses the probability of improvement by measuring changes in five outcomes and integrating them into a single number using an equation described in Khanna D, Berrocal VJ, et al. \[The American College of Rheumatology Provisional Composite Response Index for Clinical Trials in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis. Arthritis and Rheumatology. 2016; 68(2):299-311.\]. It incorporates changes in the modified Rodnan skin score, percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), patient and physician global assessments, and SHAQ-DI over 1 year. The score ranges from 0 to 1; a higher score indicates better outcome.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
AbataceptACR CRISS at 12 Months0.72 units on a scale
PlaceboACR CRISS at 12 Months0.02 units on a scale
p-value: 0.03van Elteren test
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in FVC (in ml)

FVC = forced vital capacity, a measure of lung function

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in FVC (in ml)-36.39 mlStandard Error 43.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in FVC (in ml)-121.6 mlStandard Error 46.39
p-value: 0.19Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Arising

The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Arising-0.23 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.103
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Arising0.04 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.109
p-value: 0.0751Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Common Daily Activities

The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Common Daily Activities-0.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.113
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Common Daily Activities0.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.121
p-value: 0.2906Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Dressing and Grooming

The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Dressing and Grooming-0.25 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.115
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Dressing and Grooming0.14 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.119
p-value: 0.0193Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Eating

The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Eating-0.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.118
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Eating0.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.122
p-value: 0.1604Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Grip

The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Grip-0.29 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.142
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Grip-0.22 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.149
p-value: 0.7281Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Hygiene

The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Hygiene-0.08 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.125
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Hygiene0.40 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.132
p-value: 0.0097Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Overall

The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI overall score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). Higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Overall-0.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Overall0.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
p-value: 0.005Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Reach

The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Reach-0.12 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.176
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Reach0.03 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.127
p-value: 0.4927Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Walking

The HAQ-DI is the Health Assessment Question Disability Index that assesses the extent of a patient's functional ability. The HAQ-DI subscore ranges from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability). A higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Walking-0.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in HAQ-DI - Walking0.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.106
p-value: 0.1679Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Patient Global Assessment for Overall Disease

Patient global assessment for overall disease represents the patient's assessment of the patient's global scleroderma on a 0 (excellent) -10 (extremely poor) Likert scale. Higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Patient Global Assessment for Overall Disease-0.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.423
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Patient Global Assessment for Overall Disease-0.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.457
p-value: 0.73Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Physician Global Assessment for Overall Disease

This assessment represents the physician's assessment of the patient's current disease activity on a 0 (excellent) -10 (extremely poor) Likert scale. Higher score means worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Physician Global Assessment for Overall Disease-1.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Physician Global Assessment for Overall Disease-0.35 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.318
p-value: 0.03Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles & Activities

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the ability to participate in social roles and activities domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., better outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles & Activities-1.11 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles & Activities-1.26 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.14
p-value: 0.92Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Anxiety

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the anxiety domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Anxiety-3.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Anxiety-1.09 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.37
p-value: 0.21Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Depression

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the depression domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Depression-0.02 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Depression-0.41 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
p-value: 0.81Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS 29 - Fatigue

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the fatigue domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS 29 - Fatigue-0.65 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS 29 - Fatigue-0.98 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.36
p-value: 0.86Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Pain Intensity

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the pain intensity domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Pain Intensity-0.72 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Pain Intensity-0.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
p-value: 0.24Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Pain Interference

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the pain interference domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Pain Interference-4.10 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Pain Interference-1.56 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.22
p-value: 0.13Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Physical Function

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the physical function domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., better outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Physical Function-1.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Physical Function-0.17 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.69
p-value: 0.15Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Sleep Disturbance

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29-item short-form health-reported quality of life measures (PROMIS-29) were administered. The transformed score (T-score) for the sleep disturbance domain was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e.,worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Sleep Disturbance-0.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS-29 - Sleep Disturbance-0.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
p-value: 0.91Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Fatigue

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8-question short-form health-reported quality of life measure fatigue domain was administered. The transformed score (T-score) was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Fatigue-2.44 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.209
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Fatigue-0.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.285
p-value: 0.1769Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Sleep Disturbance

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 4-question short-form health-reported quality of life measure sleep disturbance domain was administered. The transformed score (T-score) was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., better outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Sleep Disturbance-0.31 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.573
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Sleep Disturbance-0.21 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.62
p-value: 0.9075Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Sleep Impairment

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 8-question short-form health-reported quality of life measure sleep impairment domain was administered. The transformed score (T-score) was used, where 50 (10) is the mean (standard deviation) of a relevant reference population. Higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (i.e., worse outcome).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Sleep Impairment0.46 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.267
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in PROMIS - Sleep Impairment-0.54 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.32
p-value: 0.5831Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SCTC GIT - Composite Score

The SCTC GIT is the UCLA Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Instrument. It assesses scleroderma-related gastrointestinal symptoms. The composite score ranges from 0 to 2.83; 0 indicates better health and higher score indicates worse health.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SCTC GIT - Composite Score0.07 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.047
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SCTC GIT - Composite Score-0.05 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
p-value: 0.07Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Breathing

Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for how much breathing problems interfered with daily activities ranges from 0 (do not limit activities) to 150 (very severe limitation). A higher score means a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Breathing9.30 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.51
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Breathing16.95 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.85
p-value: 0.34Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Burden of Digital Ulcers

Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for how much finger ulcers interfered with daily activities ranges from 0 (do not limit activities) to 150 (very severe limitation). A higher score means a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Burden of Digital Ulcers-3.18 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Burden of Digital Ulcers8.67 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.52
p-value: 0.12Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - GI Involvement

Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for how much intestinal problems interfered with daily activities ranges from 0 (do not limit activities) to 150 (very severe limitation). A higher score means a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - GI Involvement9.98 score on a scaleStandard Error 6
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - GI Involvement8.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 6.42
p-value: 0.82Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Overall Disease

Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for disease severity ranges from 0 (no disease) to 150 (very severe). A higher score means a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Overall Disease-7.42 score on a scaleStandard Error 5.638
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Overall Disease3.52 score on a scaleStandard Error 6.045
p-value: 0.19Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Raynaud's

Scleroderma-Health Assessment Question Disability Index visual analogue scales (VAS) assess the burden of digital ulcers, Raynaud's, gastrointestinal involvement, breathing, and overall disease. The VAS scale for how much Raynaud's interfered with daily activities ranges from 0 (does not limit activities) to 150 (very severe limitation). A higher score means a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Raynaud's7.58 score on a scaleStandard Error 6.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in SHAQ-DI VAS - Raynaud's-3.64 score on a scaleStandard Error 7.17
p-value: 0.25Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Swollen Joint Count

28 joints are assessed for swelling (positive or negative). The number of swollen joint count ranges from 0 to 28. A higher number indicates worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Swollen Joint Count-0.11 number of swollen jointsStandard Error 0.595
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Swollen Joint Count-0.86 number of swollen jointsStandard Error 0.601
p-value: 0.37Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Tender Joint Counts

28 joints are assessed for tenderness (positive or negative). The number of tender joint counts ranges from 0 to 28. A higher number indicates worse outcome.

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Tender Joint Counts-0.71 number of tender jointsStandard Error 0.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Tender Joint Counts-1.47 number of tender jointsStandard Error 0.91
p-value: 0.55Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in % Predicted FVC

FVC is Forced vital capacity, a measure of lung function. FVC % Predicted is calculated using equations from Hankinson \[Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):179-87\], incorporating age, gender, and race. It is calculated as the (FVC Observed / FVC predicted) \* 100, where FVC predicted is calculated relative to a reference population.

Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

Population: mITT population includes all of the randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
AbataceptChange in % Predicted FVC-1.34 percent predictedStandard Error 1.24
PlaceboChange in % Predicted FVC-4.13 percent predictedStandard Error 1.22
p-value: 0.11Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026