Skip to content

EndoMAXX Endoluminal Valve Technology (EVT) Compared to EndoMAXX

Prospective, Multicenter, Single Blind, Randomized Study Comparing the EndoMAXX Endoluminal Valve Technology (EVT) Fully Covered Esophageal Stent With Valve to the EndoMAXX Fully Covered Esophageal Stent for Malignant Strictures Requiring Stent Placement Across the Gastroesophageal Junction

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02159898
Enrollment
60
Registered
2014-06-10
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2018-06-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Esophageal Strictures

Keywords

Esophageal Cancer, Dysphagia, Regurgitation

Brief summary

This is a prospective, single blinded, randomized study of EndoMAXX Endoluminal Valve Technology (EVT) Fully Covered Esophageal Stent with Valve for the treatment of malignant strictures of the lower esophagus. The purpose of this study is to evaluate improvement of dysphagia due to esophageal stricture with EndoMAXX Endoluminal Valve Technology (EVT) Fully Covered Esophageal Stent with Valve (investigational device) compared to the EndoMAXX Fully Covered Esophageal Stent (reference device).

Interventions

DEVICEEndoMAXX Endoluminal Valve Technology (EVT)
DEVICEEndoMAXX

Sponsors

Geisinger Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical College of Wisconsin
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Florida
CollaboratorOTHER
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient is 18 years of age or older 2. Patient (or legal representative) is able to understand and provide signed informed consent 3. Patient has a malignant stricture of the distal esophagus or gastric cardia requiring stent placement across the gastroesophageal junction.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the follow-up schedule 2. Patient is contraindicated for endoscopic procedure for any reason 3. Patient presents with esophagorespiratory fistula 4. Patient has previously undergone esophageal stenting or esophagectomy 5. Female patient is pregnant, breastfeeding, or premenopausal and not using an effective method of contraception 6. Patient's esophageal tumor length exceeds that which can be treated with a single stent (maximum lesion length 9.5cm) 7. Removal of stent is scheduled to occur within six months 8. Patient has trouble swallowing or experiences regurgitation for reasons which are not related to his/her esophageal cancer 9. Any other factor identified by the Investigator that would disqualify the prospective patient from participation in the study including but not limited to coagulative disorders and anesthetic risk.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mellow and Pinkas Dysphagia Score at Baseline and 2 Weeks Following the Treatment2 Weeks Following TreatmentThe primary endpoint is to evaluate improvement of dysphagia due to esophageal strictures at 2 weeks following treatment. Scale: 0 = able to eat normal diet / no dysphagia. 1. = able to swallow some solid foods 2. = able to swallow only semi solid foods 3. = able to swallow liquids only 4. = unable to swallow anything / total dysphagia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GERD-HRQL4 Weeks Following TreamentEvaluate symptoms of gastric reflux as assessed by Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) instrument at 4 weeks following treatment. Scale: 0 = No symptom 1. = Symptoms noticeable but not bothersome 2. = Symptoms noticeable and bothersome but not every day 3. = Symptoms bothersome every day 4. = Symptoms affect daily activity 5. = Symptoms are incapacitating to do daily activities

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EndoMAXX EVT
EndoMAXX EVT Fully Covered Esophageal Stent with Valve EndoMAXX EVT
30
EndoMAXX
EndoMAXX Fully Covered Esophageal Stent EndoMAXX
30
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalEndoMAXX EVTEndoMAXX
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
31 Participants14 Participants17 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants16 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
59 Participants29 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
52 Participants25 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
12 / 2910 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 2911 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 2914 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Mellow and Pinkas Dysphagia Score at Baseline and 2 Weeks Following the Treatment

The primary endpoint is to evaluate improvement of dysphagia due to esophageal strictures at 2 weeks following treatment. Scale: 0 = able to eat normal diet / no dysphagia. 1. = able to swallow some solid foods 2. = able to swallow only semi solid foods 3. = able to swallow liquids only 4. = unable to swallow anything / total dysphagia

Time frame: 2 Weeks Following Treatment

Population: 1 patient was randomized but not treated and other patients are not included

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EndoMAXX EVTMellow and Pinkas Dysphagia Score at Baseline and 2 Weeks Following the Treatment0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
EndoMAXXMellow and Pinkas Dysphagia Score at Baseline and 2 Weeks Following the Treatment0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

GERD-HRQL

Evaluate symptoms of gastric reflux as assessed by Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) instrument at 4 weeks following treatment. Scale: 0 = No symptom 1. = Symptoms noticeable but not bothersome 2. = Symptoms noticeable and bothersome but not every day 3. = Symptoms bothersome every day 4. = Symptoms affect daily activity 5. = Symptoms are incapacitating to do daily activities

Time frame: 4 Weeks Following Treament

Population: Results at week 4, number of patients analyzed differs from baseline due to inability to continue to follow the patients due to death or lost to follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EndoMAXX EVTGERD-HRQL6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
EndoMAXXGERD-HRQL6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026