Skip to content

Long Term Follow-up Study on Safety and Maintenance of Efficacy of ATX-101

Long-term Follow-up Study of Subjects Who Completed Kythera-sponsored Trials of ATX-101 (Sodium Deoxycholate Injection) for the Reduction of Localized Subcutaneous Fat in the Submental Area

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02159729
Enrollment
205
Registered
2014-06-10
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2020-02-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy, Submental Fat

Brief summary

This was a long-term follow-up study of participants who completed Kythera-sponsored trials of ATX-101 (06-03, 07-07, 09-15)

Detailed description

No study medication was administered in this study.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Clinical evaluation, patient reported outcome questionnaires, photographs, caliper measurements and recording adverse events

DRUGATX-101 (1 mg/cm^2)

Clinical evaluation, patient reported outcome questionnaires, photographs, caliper measurements and recording adverse events

DRUGATX-101 (2 mg/cm^2)

Clinical evaluation, patient reported outcome questionnaires, photographs, caliper measurements and recording adverse events

DRUGATX-101 (4 mg/cm^2)

Clinical evaluation, patient reported outcome questionnaires, photographs, caliper measurements and recording adverse events

Sponsors

Kythera Biopharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Any subject who successfully completed a Kythera-sponsored clinical trial of ATX-101 (06-03, 07-07, 09-15) * Signed informed consent * Willingness to comply with schedule and procedures of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who have had or are undergoing treatment that may affect the evaluation of the submental area will be excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsUp to 60 months from long-term follow-up (LTFU) baseline (the last visit in the previous study)The investigator evaluated the participant's chin and neck area using the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=absent submental convexity (best) to 4= extreme submental convexity (worst). Non-responders at LTFU baseline in each treatment group (including placebo) were not included in the analysis.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsUp to 60 months from long-term follow-up (LTFU) baseline (the last visit in the previous study)The participant evaluated their chin and neck area using the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=no chin fat at all (best) to 4= a very large amount of chin fat (worst). Non-responders at LTFU baseline in each treatment group (including placebo) were not included in the analysis.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsUp to 60 months from long-term follow-up (LTFU) baseline (the last visit in the previous study)The investigator evaluated the participant's chin and neck area using the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=absent submental convexity (best) to 4= extreme submental convexity (worst). The participant evaluated their chin and neck area using the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=no chin fat at all (best) to 4= a very large amount of chin fat (worst). Non-responders at LTFU baseline in each treatment group (including placebo) were not included in the analysis.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsUp to 60 months from long-term follow-up (LTFU) baseline (the last visit in the previous study)The investigator evaluated the participant's chin and neck area using the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=absent submental convexity (best) to 4= extreme submental convexity (worst). The participant evaluated their chin and neck area using the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=no chin fat at all (best) to 4= a very large amount of chin fat (worst). Non-responders at LTFU baseline in each treatment group (including placebo) were not included in the analysis.

Countries

Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The objective of this non-treatment, placebo-controlled, 5-year follow-up study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) injections of deoxycholic acid (ATX-101) in the submental area. No treatment was administered in this study.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who previously received deoxycholic acid or placebo injections in studies ATX-101-06-03, ATX-101-07-07, & ATX-101-09-15 were enrolled in this non-treatment follow-up study to further evaluate safety and efficacy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) Injection
This is a non-treatment follow-up study. Participants were previously treated with deoxycholic acid injection, 10 mg/mL in 1 of 3 predecessor studies ATX-101-06-03, ATX-101-07-07, and ATX-101-09-15
140
Placebo
This is a non-treatment follow-up study. Participants were previously treated with placebo in 1 of 3 predecessor studies ATX-101-06-03, ATX-101-07-07, and ATX-101-09-15
65
Total205

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up249
Overall StudyNon compliance20
Overall StudyOther Unspecified31
Overall StudySubject's Request1310

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous46.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.86
48.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.94
47.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.22
Baseline weight (kg)80.64 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.683
85.93 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.983
82.32 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.61
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
131 Participants56 Participants187 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
111 Participants43 Participants154 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants22 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1401 / 65
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1400 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 1403 / 65

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU Visits

The investigator evaluated the participant's chin and neck area using the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=absent submental convexity (best) to 4= extreme submental convexity (worst). The participant evaluated their chin and neck area using the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=no chin fat at all (best) to 4= a very large amount of chin fat (worst). Non-responders at LTFU baseline in each treatment group (including placebo) were not included in the analysis.

Time frame: Up to 60 months from long-term follow-up (LTFU) baseline (the last visit in the previous study)

Population: Analysis population included all who received study treatment from a previous study, and who were composite SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at LTFU Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 1 (Month 3)84.6 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 2 (Month 6)82.6 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 3 (Month 9)82.8 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 4 (Month 12)79.3 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 5 (Month 18)73.1 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 6 (Month 24)73.1 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 7 (Month 36)65.2 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 8 (Month 48)60.9 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 9 (Month 60)73.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 7 (Month 36)85.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 4 (Month 12)71.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 5 (Month 18)71.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 1 (Month 3)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 9 (Month 60)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 2 (Month 6)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 6 (Month 24)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 3 (Month 9)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 8 (Month 48)83.3 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU Visits

The investigator evaluated the participant's chin and neck area using the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=absent submental convexity (best) to 4= extreme submental convexity (worst). The participant evaluated their chin and neck area using the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=no chin fat at all (best) to 4= a very large amount of chin fat (worst). Non-responders at LTFU baseline in each treatment group (including placebo) were not included in the analysis.

Time frame: Up to 60 months from long-term follow-up (LTFU) baseline (the last visit in the previous study)

Population: Analysis population included all who received study treatment from a previous study, and who were composite SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at LTFU Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 5 (Month 18)0.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 2 (Month 6)66.7 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 6 (Month 24)100.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 1 (Month 3)0.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 7 (Month 36)100.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 3 (Month 9)66.7 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 8 (Month 48)100.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 4 (Month 12)100.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 9 (Month 60)100.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 9 (Month 60)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 1 (Month 3)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 2 (Month 6)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 4 (Month 12)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 5 (Month 18)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 6 (Month 24)100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 7 (Month 36)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 8 (Month 48)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining Composite SMFRS 2-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS 2-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 3 (Month 9)100.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU Visits

The investigator evaluated the participant's chin and neck area using the Clinician-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=absent submental convexity (best) to 4= extreme submental convexity (worst). Non-responders at LTFU baseline in each treatment group (including placebo) were not included in the analysis.

Time frame: Up to 60 months from long-term follow-up (LTFU) baseline (the last visit in the previous study)

Population: Analysis population included all who received study treatment from a previous study, and who were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at LTFU Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 1 (Month 3)93.1 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 2 (Month 6)94.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 3 (Month 9)94.9 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 4 (Month 12)94.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 5 (Month 18)95.1 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 6 (Month 24)89.6 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 7 (Month 36)80.8 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 8 (Month 48)85.2 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 9 (Month 60)71.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 7 (Month 36)76.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 5 (Month 18)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 1 (Month 3)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 9 (Month 60)71.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 2 (Month 6)68.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 6 (Month 24)75.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 3 (Month 9)81.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 8 (Month 48)64.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were CR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 4 (Month 12)82.4 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU Visits

The participant evaluated their chin and neck area using the Patient-Reported Submental Fat Rating Scale (a 5-point scale) where: 0=no chin fat at all (best) to 4= a very large amount of chin fat (worst). Non-responders at LTFU baseline in each treatment group (including placebo) were not included in the analysis.

Time frame: Up to 60 months from long-term follow-up (LTFU) baseline (the last visit in the previous study)

Population: Analysis population included all who received study treatment from a previous study, and who were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at LTFU Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 9 (Month 60)84.8 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 1 (Month 3)94.7 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 2 (Month 6)94.1 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 3 (Month 9)87.5 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 4 (Month 12)85.0 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 5 (Month 18)80.6 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 6 (Month 24)85.7 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 7 (Month 36)81.8 percentage of participants
ATX-101 (Deoxycholic Acid) InjectionPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 8 (Month 48)78.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 8 (Month 48)80.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 6 (Month 24)82.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 7 (Month 36)94.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 9 (Month 60)93.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 3 (Month 9)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsBaseline100.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 5 (Month 18)83.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 1 (Month 3)73.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 4 (Month 12)94.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Maintaining PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Response During 5 Years of Follow up, i.e. % of Participants Who Were PR-SMFRS 1-Grade Responders at Both Long-term LTFU Baseline and at Subsequent LTFU VisitsVisit 2 (Month 6)80.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026