Skip to content

Treatment of Chronic Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Post-Thrombotic Syndrome (PTS) With the EkoSonic® Endovascular System

ACCElerated ThrombolySiS for Post-Thrombotic Syndrome Using the EKOS System

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02159521
Acronym
ACCESS PTS
Enrollment
81
Registered
2014-06-10
Start date
2014-07-10
Completion date
2017-11-30
Last updated
2021-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep Vein Thrombosis, Post-thrombotic Syndrome

Keywords

deep vein thrombosis, post-thrombotic syndrome, chronic deep vein thrombosis

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis using the EkoSonic® Endovascular System with standard infusion of thrombolytic drug for post-thrombotic syndrome from chronic venous occlusion.

Detailed description

The study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis using the EkoSonic® Endovascular System with standard infusion of a thrombolytic drug for PTS and chronic DVT. Clinical effectiveness will be evaluated using a standard measure of severity of post-thrombotic syndrome over a year.

Interventions

DEVICEEkoSonic® Endovascular System
BIOLOGICALAlteplase

Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator

Sponsors

EKOS Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion criteria: 1. Male or female greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age and less than or equal to (≤) 75 years of age. 2. Proximal DVT (iliac vein, common femoral vein, deep femoral vein, and femoral vein) that was objectively diagnosed with duplex imaging and/or venography ≥ 6 months prior to study screening. 3. Persistent chronic DVT causing restrictive flow, as confirmed by imaging, within 60 days prior to the study procedure. 4. Villalta score ≥8 for the affected limb within 30 days prior to the study procedure. 5. Failed a minimum of 3 consecutive months of conservative treatment (therapeutic anticoagulation and compression stockings) according to the completed Adherence to Conservative Treatment Form. Key

Exclusion criteria

1. Treated with mechanical thrombectomy within 2 weeks of the study thrombolysis procedure. 2. Treated with thrombolysis drugs within 48 hours of the study thrombolytic procedure. 3. Life expectancy less than (\<) 1 year. 4. Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than (\>) 40 kilograms/square meter (kg/m\^2) or per Investigator's discretion participant is able tolerate the procedure and be compliant with post-procedure increased physical activity. 5. No flow in popliteal vein on duplex imaging 6. Isolated iliac vein only thrombus. 7. Thrombus extending ≥ 3 centimeters (cm) into the inferior vena cava (IVC). If central venous occlusion, consider computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance venography (MRV). For participants with bilateral DVT, it is recommended that central imaging be performed prior to treatment to evaluate the status of the IVC. 8. Active bleeding, recent (\<3 months) gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, active peptic ulcer, severe liver dysfunction, and bleeding diathesis. 9. Recent (\<3 months) internal eye surgery or hemorrhagic retinopathy; recent (\<10 days) major surgery, cataract surgery, trauma, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), obstetrical delivery, or other invasive procedure. 10. History of stroke or intracranial/intraspinal bleed, tumor, vascular malformation, or aneurysm. 11. Active cancer (metastatic, progressive, or treated within the last 6 months). Participants with non-melanoma primary skin cancers are eligible to participate in the study. 12. Hemoglobin \<9.0 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) within 24 hours prior to the procedure 13. International normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.5 nanograms/deciliter (ng/dL) within 24 hours prior to the procedure. 14. Platelet count \<100,000 cells/cubic millimeter (cells/mm\^3) or \>700,000 cells/mm\^3 within 24 hours prior to the procedure. 15. Creatinine outside the normal range for the treating institution and considered clinically significant by the Investigator. 16. Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as systolic \>175 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and a diastolic \>110 mmHg. 17. Use of clopidogrel, ticlopidine, or other thienopyridine antiplatelet drug within 7 days of the study procedure. 18. In the judgment of the clinician, the participant is at high risk for catastrophic bleeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Villalta Score at Day 30 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment ProcedureBaseline (within 30 days of treatment), Day 30Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Villalta score at Baseline compared to 30 days Post-EkoSonic® study treatment procedure. Villalta scale (post thrombotic syndrome score) is used for the assessment of symptoms and clinical signs. Participants rated the following symptoms for each leg: pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus, and paresthesia on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). The study coordinator or nurse rated the following clinical signs in participants for each leg: pre-tibial edema, induration of the skin, hyperpigmentation, new venous extasia, redness during calf compression, and pain during calf compression on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). Total score ranged from 0 to 33. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
Percentage of Segments of Limbs That Achieved at Least 4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Villalta Score at Day 30Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Day 30Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Villalta score at Baseline compared to 30 days Post-EkoSonic® study treatment procedure. Limbs with revascularization procedures were considered non-responders. Villalta scale (post thrombotic syndrome score) is used for the assessment of symptoms and clinical signs. Participants rated the following symptoms for each leg: pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus, and paresthesia on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). The study coordinator or nurse rated the following clinical signs in participants for each leg: pre-tibial edema, induration of the skin, hyperpigmentation, new venous extasia, redness during calf compression, and pain during calf compression on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). Total score ranged from 0 to 33. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
Change From Baseline in Blood Flow (Calculated by Time to Washout in the Affected Segment) at Post-Adjunctive TherapyBaseline (Within 30 days of treatment), Day 0Change in blood flow was calculated by time to washout in the affected segments in the participants. Time to femoral vein (FV) washout and external iliac vein (EIV) washout was reported.
Number of Participants With Major BleedingFrom start of study drug infusion up to 72 hoursMajor bleeding was defined as: Fatal bleeding; and/or symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intraarticular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome; and/or bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin of ≥2.0 grams/deciliter (g/dL), or leading to transfusion of ≥2 units of whole blood or red blood cells. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Treated Veins Segments of Limbs With Absence of Re-Occlusion, as Documented by Duplex ImagingDay 365Absence of re-occlusion in following treated veins has been reported: common femoral vein (CFV), common iliac vein (CIV), distal femoral vein (FV), external iliac vein (EIV), popliteal vein, and proximal femoral vein (FV).
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 30, 90, 180, and 365SF- 36 investigates the standard of quality of life through a general health assessment. It is a 36-item questionnaire measuring 8 domains (physical functioning \[PF\], role physical \[RP\], bodily pain \[BP\], general health \[GH\], vitality \[VT\], social functioning \[SF\], role emotional \[RE\], and mental health \[MH\]). Each domain score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), with higher scores reflecting better health-related functional status. The PCS score summarizes the subscales physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. Total score range for PCS was 0 (lowest level of physical functioning) to 100 (highest level of physical functioning).
Number of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Status of clinical signs and symptoms of lower limb venous disease was measured by CEAP classification. The CEAP clinical Categories were as follows: C0- no visible or palpable signs of venous disease, C1- telangiectasies or reticular veins, C2- varicose veins, C3- edema, C4a- pigmentation and eczema, C4b- lipodermatosclerosis and atrophie blanche, C5- healed venous ulcer, and C6- active venous ulcer. C0 was of the least clinical concern and C6 was the worst stage. Each clinical class was further characterized by the (clinical stages) presence or absence of symptoms (ache, pain, tightness, skin irritation, heaviness, muscle cramps, as well as other complaints attributable to venous dysfunction): asymptomatic and symptomatic.
Change From Baseline in Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) Score At Days 30, 90, 180, and 360Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 30, 90, 180, and 365The VEINES-QOL/Sym is a participant-based questionnaire designed for self-completion and measures deep vein thrombosis (DVT) impact on symptoms and quality of life from the participants' perspective. It contains 26 items covering participant DVT: symptoms, limitations in daily activities, and psychological impact. A separate summary score VEINES-QOL ranges from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life). Higher scores indicated a better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) in Study Leg at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 30, 90, 180, and 365The VCSS system includes 10 clinical descriptions (pain, varicose veins, venous edema, skin pigmentation, inflammation, induration, number of active ulcers, duration of active ulceration, size of active ulceration, and level of compliance with medical compression therapy), scored from 0 to 3 (total possible score, 30) with 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. Total VCSS was the sum of all VCSS assessment scores from categories for a given time point. Total score ranged from 0 (absent) to 30 (severe). Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a level of pain less than that experienced at baseline.
Change From Baseline in Ouriel Score (Venous Volumetric Index [VVI]) at Post-Adjunctive TherapyBaseline (Within 30 days of treatment), Day 0The Ouriel score was designed to provide a more accurate quantitative estimate of the thrombus mass by calculating a volumetric index for all the venous segments. 10 venous segments were considered. Included segments were the inferior vena cava, common iliac veins, external iliac veins, internal iliac veins, common femoral veins, superficial and deep femoral veins, and popliteal veins and segments of the anterior tibial veins, posterior tibial veins, and peroneal veins. A normalized volumetric score was calculated for each segment by combining measurements from computed tomography, ultrasonography, and venography. Partially occluded veins were assigned a score of one-half the score value for the segment. The score varies from 1 for a single calf vein to 26 for the infrarenal inferior vena cava. The maximum score was 63 per limb. Higher score indicated worse disease prognoses.
Time From Starting Initial Thrombolytic Infusion to Discharge From the HospitalFrom the time of the EkoSonic® procedure (Day 0) up to 365 daysThis Outcome Measure was to measure the time that the participant's initial thrombolytic infusion started to the time the participant was discharged from the hospital.
Number of Participants Who Had Symptomatic PE During Hospitalization for Study ProcedureFrom starting the initial thrombolytic infusion (Day 0) through discharge from hospital (up to Day 38)Symptomatic PE was diagnosed using computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA), single positron emission computed tomography (SPECT), and ventilation-perfusion (VQ).
Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any CauseBaseline (within 30 days of treatment) up to Day 365Number of participants who died due to any cause for up to 365 days following the conclusion of the study procedure, were reported.
Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Related (to the Study Procedure/Device/Medications) AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline (within 30 days of treatment) up to Day 30An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A summary of non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.
Number of Participants With PTS-induced Admission to an Emergency Room or Unplanned Visits to a Physician's Office or HospitalizationFrom the time of the EkoSonic® procedure (Day 0) up to 365 daysNumber of participants with PTS-induced admission to an emergency room or unplanned visits to a physician's office or hospitalization, are reported. A participant can have more than one PTS-induced health issue.
Number of Participants With at Least 5-Point Reduction From Baseline in Ouriel Score at Post-Adjunctive TherapyBaseline (Within 30 days of treatment), Day 0The Ouriel score was designed to provide a more accurate quantitative estimate of the thrombus mass by calculating a volumetric index for all the venous segments. 14 venous segments were considered. Included segments were the inferior vena cava, common iliac veins, external iliac veins, internal iliac veins, common femoral veins, superficial femoral veins, deep femoral veins, and popliteal veins and segments of the anterior tibial veins, posterior tibial veins, and peroneal veins. A normalized volumetric score was calculated for each segment by combining measurements from computed tomography, ultrasonography, and venography. Partially occluded veins were assigned a score of one-half the score value for the segment. The score varies from 1 for a single calf vein to 26 for the infrarenal inferior vena cava. The maximum score was 63 per limb. Higher score indicated worse disease prognoses.
Change From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment ProcedureBaseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 90, 180, and 365Villalta scale (post thrombotic syndrome score) is used for the assessment of symptoms and clinical signs. Participants rated the following symptoms for each leg: pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus, and paresthesia on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). The study coordinator or nurse rated the following clinical signs in participants for each leg: pre-tibial edema, induration of the skin, hyperpigmentation, new venous extasia, redness during calf compression, and pain during calf compression on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). Total score ranged from 0 to 33. Higher scores represent more severe disease.
Percentage of Segments of Limbs That Achieved at Least 4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 90, 180, and 365Limbs with revascularization procedures were considered non-responders. Villalta scale (post thrombotic syndrome score) is used for the assessment of symptoms and clinical signs. Participants rated the following symptoms for each leg: pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus, and paresthesia on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). The study coordinator or nurse rated the following clinical signs in participants for each leg: pre-tibial edema, induration of the skin, hyperpigmentation, new venous extasia, redness during calf compression, and pain during calf compression on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). Total score ranged from 0 to 33. Higher scores represent more severe disease.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EkoSonic® Endovascular System
Thrombolytic infusion (Alteplase), at an infusion rate of 0.5-1.0 mg/hr was delivered to the participants with chronic lower extremity venous obstruction after DVT and PTS, through EkoSonic® Endovascular System for at least 12 hours and overnight as needed up to a maximum of 48 hrs. The alteplase dose could have been adjusted per investigator discretion, but was not exceeded 1 mg/hr or a total dose of 48 mg.
78
Total78

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyEnrolled but not treated3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up6
Overall StudyOther than specified1
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEkoSonic® Endovascular System
Age, Continuous54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American, not of Hispanic origin
12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian or Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian, not of Hispanic origin
58 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 78
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Blood Flow (Calculated by Time to Washout in the Affected Segment) at Post-Adjunctive Therapy

Change in blood flow was calculated by time to washout in the affected segments in the participants. Time to femoral vein (FV) washout and external iliac vein (EIV) washout was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Within 30 days of treatment), Day 0

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed'/'Overall Number of Units Analyzed' signifies the number of participants/units evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' signifies number of limbs/participants analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Blood Flow (Calculated by Time to Washout in the Affected Segment) at Post-Adjunctive TherapyFV washout: Baseline4.39 secondsStandard Deviation 2.55
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Blood Flow (Calculated by Time to Washout in the Affected Segment) at Post-Adjunctive TherapyFV washout: Change at Day 0-2.17 secondsStandard Deviation 2.24
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Blood Flow (Calculated by Time to Washout in the Affected Segment) at Post-Adjunctive TherapyEIV washout: Baseline3.28 secondsStandard Deviation 2.73
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Blood Flow (Calculated by Time to Washout in the Affected Segment) at Post-Adjunctive TherapyEIV washout: Change at Day 0-0.96 secondsStandard Deviation 2.99
Primary

Change From Baseline in Villalta Score at Day 30 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment Procedure

Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Villalta score at Baseline compared to 30 days Post-EkoSonic® study treatment procedure. Villalta scale (post thrombotic syndrome score) is used for the assessment of symptoms and clinical signs. Participants rated the following symptoms for each leg: pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus, and paresthesia on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). The study coordinator or nurse rated the following clinical signs in participants for each leg: pre-tibial edema, induration of the skin, hyperpigmentation, new venous extasia, redness during calf compression, and pain during calf compression on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). Total score ranged from 0 to 33. Higher scores represent more severe disease.

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Day 30

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies number of limbs analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Villalta Score at Day 30 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment ProcedureBaseline15.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.17
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Villalta Score at Day 30 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment ProcedureChange at Day 30-5.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.75
Primary

Number of Participants With Major Bleeding

Major bleeding was defined as: Fatal bleeding; and/or symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intraarticular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome; and/or bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin of ≥2.0 grams/deciliter (g/dL), or leading to transfusion of ≥2 units of whole blood or red blood cells. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame: From start of study drug infusion up to 72 hours

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants With Major Bleeding1 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Segments of Limbs That Achieved at Least 4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Villalta Score at Day 30

Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Villalta score at Baseline compared to 30 days Post-EkoSonic® study treatment procedure. Limbs with revascularization procedures were considered non-responders. Villalta scale (post thrombotic syndrome score) is used for the assessment of symptoms and clinical signs. Participants rated the following symptoms for each leg: pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus, and paresthesia on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). The study coordinator or nurse rated the following clinical signs in participants for each leg: pre-tibial edema, induration of the skin, hyperpigmentation, new venous extasia, redness during calf compression, and pain during calf compression on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). Total score ranged from 0 to 33. Higher scores represent more severe disease.

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Day 30

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Segments of Limbs That Achieved at Least 4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Villalta Score at Day 3064 percentage of segments
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365

SF- 36 investigates the standard of quality of life through a general health assessment. It is a 36-item questionnaire measuring 8 domains (physical functioning \[PF\], role physical \[RP\], bodily pain \[BP\], general health \[GH\], vitality \[VT\], social functioning \[SF\], role emotional \[RE\], and mental health \[MH\]). Each domain score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), with higher scores reflecting better health-related functional status. The PCS score summarizes the subscales physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health. Total score range for PCS was 0 (lowest level of physical functioning) to 100 (highest level of physical functioning).

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 30, 90, 180, and 365

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies number of limbs and the number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PF Score: Baseline48.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.75
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PF Score: Change at Day 309.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.72
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PF Score: Change at Day 9014.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.87
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PF Score: Change at Day 18015.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.75
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PF Score: Change at Day 36513.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.4
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RP Score: Baseline47.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.84
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RP Score: Change at Day 307.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.86
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RP Score: Change at Day 9017.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.65
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RP Score: Change at Day 18019.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.47
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RP Score: Change at Day 36517.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.42
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365BP Score: Baseline46.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.44
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365BP Score: Change at Day 306.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.92
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365BP Score: Change at Day 9014.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.04
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365BP Score: Change at Day 18015.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.26
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365BP Score: Change at Day 36516.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.92
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365GH Score: Baseline58.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.38
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365GH Score: Change at Day 301.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.17
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365GH Score: Change at Day 903.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365GH Score: Change at Day 1800.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.56
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365GH Score: Change at Day 3650.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365VT Score: Baseline50.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.18
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365VT Score: Change at Day 302.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.53
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365VT Score: Change at Day 908.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.35
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365VT Score: Change at Day 1806.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.83
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365VT Score: Change at Day 3655.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.81
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365SF Score: Baseline65.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.81
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365SF Score: Change at Day 302.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.14
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365SF Score: Change at Day 9011.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.4
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365SF Score: Change at Day 1809.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.05
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365SF Score: Change at Day 3659.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.06
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RE Score: Baseline70.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.77
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RE Score: Change at Day 303.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.83
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RE Score: Change at Day 9010.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RE Score: Change at Day 1809.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.9
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365RE Score: Change at Day 3653.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.11
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365MH Score: Baseline67.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.58
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365MH Score: Change at Day 303.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365MH Score: Change at Day 907.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.54
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365MH Score: Change at Day 1807.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.12
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365MH Score: Change at Day 3654.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.77
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PCS Score: Baseline38.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.47
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PCS Score: Change at Day 302.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.62
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PCS Score: Change at Day 905.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.52
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PCS Score: Change at Day 1805.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.24
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Sub-Scale Score and Physical Component Score (PCS) at Days, 30, 90, 180, and 365PCS Score: Change at Day 3655.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Ouriel Score (Venous Volumetric Index [VVI]) at Post-Adjunctive Therapy

The Ouriel score was designed to provide a more accurate quantitative estimate of the thrombus mass by calculating a volumetric index for all the venous segments. 10 venous segments were considered. Included segments were the inferior vena cava, common iliac veins, external iliac veins, internal iliac veins, common femoral veins, superficial and deep femoral veins, and popliteal veins and segments of the anterior tibial veins, posterior tibial veins, and peroneal veins. A normalized volumetric score was calculated for each segment by combining measurements from computed tomography, ultrasonography, and venography. Partially occluded veins were assigned a score of one-half the score value for the segment. The score varies from 1 for a single calf vein to 26 for the infrarenal inferior vena cava. The maximum score was 63 per limb. Higher score indicated worse disease prognoses.

Time frame: Baseline (Within 30 days of treatment), Day 0

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed'/'Overall Number of Units Analyzed' signifies the number of participants/units evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' signifies number of limbs/participants analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Ouriel Score (Venous Volumetric Index [VVI]) at Post-Adjunctive TherapyBaseline10.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.25
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Ouriel Score (Venous Volumetric Index [VVI]) at Post-Adjunctive TherapyChange at Post-EkoSonic® procedure6.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.69
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) in Study Leg at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365

The VCSS system includes 10 clinical descriptions (pain, varicose veins, venous edema, skin pigmentation, inflammation, induration, number of active ulcers, duration of active ulceration, size of active ulceration, and level of compliance with medical compression therapy), scored from 0 to 3 (total possible score, 30) with 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe. Total VCSS was the sum of all VCSS assessment scores from categories for a given time point. Total score ranged from 0 (absent) to 30 (severe). Lower values represent a better outcome, that is, a level of pain less than that experienced at baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 30, 90, 180, and 365

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies number of limbs and the number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) in Study Leg at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline12.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.33
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) in Study Leg at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Change at Day 30-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.33
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) in Study Leg at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Change at Day 90-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.97
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) in Study Leg at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Change at Day 180-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.68
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) in Study Leg at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Change at Day 365-5.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) Score At Days 30, 90, 180, and 360

The VEINES-QOL/Sym is a participant-based questionnaire designed for self-completion and measures deep vein thrombosis (DVT) impact on symptoms and quality of life from the participants' perspective. It contains 26 items covering participant DVT: symptoms, limitations in daily activities, and psychological impact. A separate summary score VEINES-QOL ranges from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life). Higher scores indicated a better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 30, 90, 180, and 365

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) Score At Days 30, 90, 180, and 360Baseline61.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.63
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) Score At Days 30, 90, 180, and 360Change at Day 3010.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.86
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) Score At Days 30, 90, 180, and 360Change at Day 9016.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.96
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) Score At Days 30, 90, 180, and 360Change at Day 18018.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.23
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) Score At Days 30, 90, 180, and 360Change at Day 36518.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.27
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment Procedure

Villalta scale (post thrombotic syndrome score) is used for the assessment of symptoms and clinical signs. Participants rated the following symptoms for each leg: pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus, and paresthesia on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). The study coordinator or nurse rated the following clinical signs in participants for each leg: pre-tibial edema, induration of the skin, hyperpigmentation, new venous extasia, redness during calf compression, and pain during calf compression on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). Total score ranged from 0 to 33. Higher scores represent more severe disease.

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 90, 180, and 365

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies number of limbs and the number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment ProcedureBaseline15.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.17
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment ProcedureChange at Day 90-6.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.48
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment ProcedureChange at Day 180-7.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.09
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemChange From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment ProcedureChange at Day 365-8.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.43
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause

Number of participants who died due to any cause for up to 365 days following the conclusion of the study procedure, were reported.

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment) up to Day 365

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Related (to the Study Procedure/Device/Medications) AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A summary of non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section.

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment) up to Day 30

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Related (to the Study Procedure/Device/Medications) AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AEs34 Participants
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Related (to the Study Procedure/Device/Medications) AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Related to Thrombolytic/Angiographic Procedure15 Participants
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Related (to the Study Procedure/Device/Medications) AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Related to EKOS system3 Participants
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Related (to the Study Procedure/Device/Medications) AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Related to Thrombolytic Drug8 Participants
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Related (to the Study Procedure/Device/Medications) AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Related to Anticoagulant Drug15 Participants
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Related (to the Study Procedure/Device/Medications) AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Related to Post-procedure Adjunctive Treatment3 Participants
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants Who Had Adverse Events (AEs), Related (to the Study Procedure/Device/Medications) AEs, and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs12 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had Symptomatic PE During Hospitalization for Study Procedure

Symptomatic PE was diagnosed using computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA), single positron emission computed tomography (SPECT), and ventilation-perfusion (VQ).

Time frame: From starting the initial thrombolytic infusion (Day 0) through discharge from hospital (up to Day 38)

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants Who Had Symptomatic PE During Hospitalization for Study Procedure0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least 5-Point Reduction From Baseline in Ouriel Score at Post-Adjunctive Therapy

The Ouriel score was designed to provide a more accurate quantitative estimate of the thrombus mass by calculating a volumetric index for all the venous segments. 14 venous segments were considered. Included segments were the inferior vena cava, common iliac veins, external iliac veins, internal iliac veins, common femoral veins, superficial femoral veins, deep femoral veins, and popliteal veins and segments of the anterior tibial veins, posterior tibial veins, and peroneal veins. A normalized volumetric score was calculated for each segment by combining measurements from computed tomography, ultrasonography, and venography. Partially occluded veins were assigned a score of one-half the score value for the segment. The score varies from 1 for a single calf vein to 26 for the infrarenal inferior vena cava. The maximum score was 63 per limb. Higher score indicated worse disease prognoses.

Time frame: Baseline (Within 30 days of treatment), Day 0

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Number analyzed' signifies number of participants analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants With at Least 5-Point Reduction From Baseline in Ouriel Score at Post-Adjunctive Therapy0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With PTS-induced Admission to an Emergency Room or Unplanned Visits to a Physician's Office or Hospitalization

Number of participants with PTS-induced admission to an emergency room or unplanned visits to a physician's office or hospitalization, are reported. A participant can have more than one PTS-induced health issue.

Time frame: From the time of the EkoSonic® procedure (Day 0) up to 365 days

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants With PTS-induced Admission to an Emergency Room or Unplanned Visits to a Physician's Office or HospitalizationTotal24 Participants
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants With PTS-induced Admission to an Emergency Room or Unplanned Visits to a Physician's Office or HospitalizationEmergency Room13 Participants
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants With PTS-induced Admission to an Emergency Room or Unplanned Visits to a Physician's Office or HospitalizationUnplanned Physician Office Visit18 Participants
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Participants With PTS-induced Admission to an Emergency Room or Unplanned Visits to a Physician's Office or HospitalizationHospitalization8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365

Status of clinical signs and symptoms of lower limb venous disease was measured by CEAP classification. The CEAP clinical Categories were as follows: C0- no visible or palpable signs of venous disease, C1- telangiectasies or reticular veins, C2- varicose veins, C3- edema, C4a- pigmentation and eczema, C4b- lipodermatosclerosis and atrophie blanche, C5- healed venous ulcer, and C6- active venous ulcer. C0 was of the least clinical concern and C6 was the worst stage. Each clinical class was further characterized by the (clinical stages) presence or absence of symptoms (ache, pain, tightness, skin irritation, heaviness, muscle cramps, as well as other complaints attributable to venous dysfunction): asymptomatic and symptomatic.

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 30, 90, 180, and 365

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed'/'Overall Number of Units Analyzed' signifies the number of participants/units evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' signifies number of limbs/participants analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline to Day 30Symptomatic - Symptomatic67 Limbs
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline to Day 30Symptomatic - Asymptomatic12 Limbs
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline to Day 90Symptomatic - Symptomatic56 Limbs
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline to Day 90Symptomatic - Asymptomatic19 Limbs
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline to Day 180Symptomatic - Symptomatic45 Limbs
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline to Day 180Symptomatic - Asymptomatic25 Limbs
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline to Day 365Symptomatic - Symptomatic40 Limbs
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemNumber of Treated Limbs With Shift From Baseline in Clinical Stages (Symptomatic and Asymptomatic) of Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Classification at Days 30, 90, 180, and 365Baseline to Day 365Symptomatic - Asymptomatic25 Limbs
Secondary

Percentage of Segments of Limbs That Achieved at Least 4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365

Limbs with revascularization procedures were considered non-responders. Villalta scale (post thrombotic syndrome score) is used for the assessment of symptoms and clinical signs. Participants rated the following symptoms for each leg: pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus, and paresthesia on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). The study coordinator or nurse rated the following clinical signs in participants for each leg: pre-tibial edema, induration of the skin, hyperpigmentation, new venous extasia, redness during calf compression, and pain during calf compression on a scale ranging from 0 (not present/minimal) to 3 (severe). Total score ranged from 0 to 33. Higher scores represent more severe disease.

Time frame: Baseline (within 30 days of treatment), Days 90, 180, and 365

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed'/'Overall Number of Units Analyzed' signifies the number of participants/units evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' signifies number of limbs/participants analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Segments of Limbs That Achieved at Least 4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365Day 9066 percentage of segments
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Segments of Limbs That Achieved at Least 4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365Day 18074 percentage of segments
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Segments of Limbs That Achieved at Least 4-Point Reduction From Baseline in Villalta Score at Days 90, 180, and 365Day 36574 percentage of segments
Secondary

Percentage of Treated Veins Segments of Limbs With Absence of Re-Occlusion, as Documented by Duplex Imaging

Absence of re-occlusion in following treated veins has been reported: common femoral vein (CFV), common iliac vein (CIV), distal femoral vein (FV), external iliac vein (EIV), popliteal vein, and proximal femoral vein (FV).

Time frame: Day 365

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom EkoSonic® treatment was initiated. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed'/'Overall Number of Units Analyzed' signifies the number of participants/units evaluable for this outcome measure and 'Number analyzed' signifies number of limbs/participants analyzed at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Treated Veins Segments of Limbs With Absence of Re-Occlusion, as Documented by Duplex ImagingCFV100 percentage of segments
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Treated Veins Segments of Limbs With Absence of Re-Occlusion, as Documented by Duplex ImagingCIV100 percentage of segments
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Treated Veins Segments of Limbs With Absence of Re-Occlusion, as Documented by Duplex ImagingDistal FV100 percentage of segments
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Treated Veins Segments of Limbs With Absence of Re-Occlusion, as Documented by Duplex ImagingEIV100 percentage of segments
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Treated Veins Segments of Limbs With Absence of Re-Occlusion, as Documented by Duplex ImagingPopliteal Vein97.9 percentage of segments
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemPercentage of Treated Veins Segments of Limbs With Absence of Re-Occlusion, as Documented by Duplex ImagingProximal FV100 percentage of segments
Secondary

Time From Starting Initial Thrombolytic Infusion to Discharge From the Hospital

This Outcome Measure was to measure the time that the participant's initial thrombolytic infusion started to the time the participant was discharged from the hospital.

Time frame: From the time of the EkoSonic® procedure (Day 0) up to 365 days

Population: ITT population included all enrolled participants for whom the EkoSonic® treatment was initiated.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EkoSonic® Endovascular SystemTime From Starting Initial Thrombolytic Infusion to Discharge From the Hospital2 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026