Skip to content

Continuous Versus Intermittent Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Patients

Continuous Versus Intermittent Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Patients: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02159456
Enrollment
70
Registered
2014-06-10
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2021-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nutrition Disorders

Brief summary

1. Nutritional support during critical illness is important to improve the clinical outcome of patients. Recently, the apply of early enteral nutrition is recommend in critically ill patients on basis of data that enteral nutrition can be helpful to prevent the hospital-acquired infections. * However, in critically ill patients, the smooth progress of nutritional support is often hindered by gastrointestinal intolerance, underlying clinical condition, and temporal necessity of procedure or operation. * Continuous feeding method, compared with intermittent feeding, is expected to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal intolerance, and improve the nutritional support, but this hypothesis is not supported by appropriate evidences. 2. We will elucidate to compare the efficacy and safety of the continuous feeding method in critically ill patients, compared with the intermittent feeding method. * Prospective, randomized controlled study * Primary outcome: the achievement rate of target nutritional goal within 7 days after the start of enteral nutrition * Secondary outcome: gastrointestinal tolerance, In-ICU/hospital mortality, frequency of hospital-acquired infection, ICU/hospital length-of-stay, duration of mechanical ventilation

Interventions

OTHERContinuous enteral feeding via infusion pump
OTHERIntermittent enteral feeding via gravity-based infusion

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patient admitted in the intensive care unit * age 20 years old or more * The enteral nutritional support is expected to be available within 48 hours after ICU admission

Exclusion criteria

* previous abdominal surgery within 1 month * gastrointestinal bleeding, bowel obstruction, refractory vomiting/diarrhea * hypersensitivity to prokinetics, history of seizure or phechromocytoma * enteral feeding via enterostomy or gastrostomy * difficulty to insert or maintain nasogastric tube * need for specialized feeding (ex: hemodialysis diet, chronic renal failure diet, diabetes diet) * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Achievement rate of target nutritional goalWithin 7 days after the start of enteral feeding

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Gastrointestinal toleranceWithin 7 days after start of enteral feeding
ICU/hospital mortalityDuring hospital admission
Frequency of hospital-aquired infectionDuring hospital admission
ICU/hospital length-of-stayDuring hospital admission
Duration of mechanical ventilationDuring hospital admission

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026