Validation Study of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

PRO-CTCAE, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Questionnaire, Adverse Events, Symptoms

Brief summary

This study is being done to try out questions from a large set of questions called the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). The PRO-CTCAE is a set of questions which asks patients about their symptoms. This study will look at properties of these questions and will provide information about how these questions can be improved for research studies. PRO-CTCAE questions were developed under a contract from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to allow patients to self-report symptoms in future cancer clinical trials. Patients with cancer receiving treatment will complete a web-based questionnaire containing PRO-CTCAE questions and a paper booklet containing a commonly used questionnaire for assessing quality of life, functioning, and symptoms at two visits one to six weeks apart. Some patients will additionally complete web-based questionnaires containing PRO-CTCAE questions weekly for four to five weeks, while completing a daily questionnaire containing PRO-CTCAE questions using an automated telephone system. Lastly, a small number of patients will complete only a single visit in which a web-based, telephone-based, and paper-based questionnaire containing PRO-CTCAE items is completed in addition to a paper booklet containing a commonly used questionnaire for assessing quality of life, functioning, and symptoms. The primary hypothesis is that scores for PRO-CTCAE questions will differ between patients with high versus low general well-being as measured by your doctor using a scale called the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score.

Antonia V. Bennett, Amylou C. Dueck, Deborah Schrag, Carolyn Mead‐Harvey, Lauren Rogak et al. (15 authors)

UNC Libraries2026-06-30

10.17615/wx65-6e95

Psychometric Properties and Interpretability of PRO-CTCAE<sup>®</sup> Average Composite Scores as a Summary Metric of Symptomatic Adverse Event Burden.

Lee MK, Mitchell SA, Basch E, Deal AM, Langlais BT, Thanarajasingam G, Ginos BF, Rogak L, Mendoza TR, Bennett AV, Noble BN, Mazza GL, Dueck AC.

2025-10-28

10.3390/cancers17213459

Identification of meaningful individual-level change thresholds for worsening on the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE®).

Minji K. Lee, Sandra A. Mitchell, Ethan Basch, Gina L. Mazza, Blake Langlais et al. (19 authors)

UNC Libraries2024-11-15

10.17615/f048-py10

Identification of meaningful individual-level change thresholds for worsening on the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE®)

Minji K. Lee, Sandra A. Mitchell, Ethan Basch, Gina L. Mazza, Blake Langlais et al. (19 authors)

Quality of Life Research2024-11-062 citations

10.1007/s11136-024-03819-5

Statistical properties of items and summary scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE <sup>®</sup> ) in a diverse cancer sample

Carolyn Mead‐Harvey, Ethan Basch, Lauren Rogak, Blake Langlais, Gita Thanarajasingam et al. (15 authors)

Clinical Trials2024-10-231 citations

10.1177/17407745241286065

Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Antonia V. Bennett, Amylou C. Dueck, Sandra A. Mitchell

UNC Libraries2019-08-18

10.17615/b941-wk27

Software for Administering the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Usability Study

Martin W. Schoen, Ethan Basch, Lori L. Hudson, Arlene E. Chung, Tito R. Mendoza et al. (19 authors)

JMIR Human Factors2018-05-0831 citations

10.2196/10070

Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).

Bennett AV, Dueck AC, Mitchell SA, Mendoza TR, Reeve BB, Atkinson TM, Castro KM, Denicoff A, Rogak LJ, Harness JK, Bearden JD, Bryant D, Siegel RD, Schrag D, Basch E, National Cancer Institute PRO-CTCAE Study Group.

2016-02-1988 citations

10.1186/s12955-016-0426-6

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

CASE_ONLY

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

No

Inclusion criteria

* Age greater than or equal to 18 years * Disease and treatment matching 1 of 7 following cohorts: breast cancer receiving chemotherapy or initiating chemotherapy in the next 7 days; lymphoma/myeloma receiving chemotherapy or initiating chemotherapy in the next 7 days; metastatic prostate or bladder cancer receiving chemotherapy or initiating chemotherapy in the next 7 days; metastatic or locally advanced lung cancer receiving chemotherapy or initiating chemotherapy in the next 7 days or receiving radiation therapy for greater than or equal to 21 more days; metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy or initiating chemotherapy in the next 7 days; head, neck, or gastroesophageal cancer receiving radiation therapy for greater than or equal to 21 more days; any cancer enrolled through an National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program site * Willing to return to registering institution in 1-6 weeks (subset only) * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-4 * Ability to understand English and read questions on a computer screen * Ability to hear and respond to questions in English using a telephone keypad (subset only) * Ability to complete questionnaire(s) by themselves or with assistance * Provide informed written consent * Willing to be reached at a single telephone number (without extension or operator involvement) for the next 21 to 28 days (subset only) * Ability to participate in the study visit lasting 45-60 minutes total, including the informed consent process, being shown by study staff how to use each mode of administration (computer, automated telephone, and paper), and completing questionnaires (subset only)

Exclusion criteria

* Clinically significant cognitive or memory impairment in the opinion of clinical or research staff

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Difference in PRO-CTCAE item scores between patients with good and poor performance status at the first visit (study day 1)	1 day

Countries

United States

Outcome results