Skip to content

A More Engaging Visual Field Test to Increase Use and Reliability in Pediatrics

A More Engaging Visual Field Test to Increase Use and Reliability in Pediatrics

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02157025
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-06-05
Start date
2015-02-28
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Congenital Coloboma of the Optic Nerve, Glaucoma, Suspect, Optic Nerve Head Pits, Bilateral Congenital, Optic Nerve Hypoplasia and Abnormalities of the Central Nervous System

Keywords

Humphrey visual fields, perimetry, pediatrics

Brief summary

The majority of young children do not think that visual field (VF) testing of peripheral vision is similar to a game; therefore, it is not surprising that they have difficulty maintaining attention during VF testing and thus the test reliability suffers as a consequence. Poor VF reliability has been a longstanding, major issue since it leads to an increased number of tests and/or longer duration of time needed to determine when there are true vision losses. Providers are less likely to obtain VF tests in children since the results are of doubtful value and challenging to interpret when they are inconsistent. Effectively this means that children with untreated, slowly progressive eye diseases may go undiagnosed and incur greater visual losses. The investigators aim to create a prototype device that the investigators hypothesize will make VF testing more engaging for young children, thus increasing their attention and consistency of their responses to the test stimuli, which in turn should improve VF reliability. The components include a microdisplay video screen (1.5 diameter) as the fixation target (instead of the standard LED light) displaying video clips of popular cartoon characters, and audio clips of impersonated cartoon character voices presented by the test operator to provide instructional feedback based on the child's performance during testing. Improved VF reliability from the investigators intervention would translate to improved diagnosis and care for young childrens' peripheral vision loss through widespread implementation of the investigators innovative, affordable and readily adoptable system at eye care providers' offices.

Interventions

DEVICECartoon video fixation target and cartoon character voice audio instructions during Humphrey perimetry
OTHERUsual Care procedures during Humphrey perimetry for children

Sponsors

Nova Southeastern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 5-8 * Seen previously in the clinics at Nova Southeastern University's The Eye Care Institute with a diagnosis for glaucoma suspect or optic nerve abnormalities * Able and willing to complete VF testing at 2 study visits about a week apart * Provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of having previously completed a VF test using Humphrey static perimetry * Inability to understand study or communicate responses (cognitive impairment) * Unable to understand, read and speak English fluently

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Humphrey Visual Field Test-Retest Variability of Mean Deviation scores (dB)1 weekWithin subject, the investigators will determine the coefficient of variation in the mean deviation scores obtained at the two sessions a week apart (dB). The investigators will test for significant differences between subjects who receive the intervention versus the usual care control group for the test-retest variability.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Humphrey Visual Field Reliability Indices and Ratings1 weekThe investigators will test for significant differences between subjects who receive the intervention versus the usual care control group for the visual field reliability criteria (false negatives, false positives and fixation losses; expressed as %), and operator ratings (subjects' fixation, cooperation and fatigue; scale 1 to 5).

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactSo Yeon Lee, OD
slee@nova.edu954-262-1478
Backup ContactAva Bittner, OD, PhD
abittne1@jhmi.edu

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026