Skip to content

Stroke Treatment Associate to Rehabilitation Therapy and Transcranial DC Stimulation

A Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial on Stroke Treatment Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02156635
Acronym
START-tDCS
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-06-05
Start date
2016-02-29
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2015-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Cerebral Infarction

Keywords

Rehabilitation, Direct Current Stimulation, Acute Stroke

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether active stimulation of the affected hemisphere will be more effective than simulated current in treatment of stroke

Detailed description

Stroke is defined as an acute neurological dysfunction of vascular origin, with subtle development of clinical signs of cerebral function disturbs, lasting more than 24h. The traditional therapy includes drugs and physical rehabilitation, without systematization, with complicates its replication. The transcranial direct current (DC) stimulation might promote an increase in the motor function of the hands, when compared with placebo stimulation. In fact, some clinical trials point positive effects of transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) as a post-stroke intervention, however, in general, they only include patients in the chronic stage, with cerebral damage in different areas and diverse disabilities, most being assisted by non-standardized physical therapy treatments. tDCS combined with a standardized physiotherapy program, noted as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), could be able to modulate the cortical excitability and promote better functional recovery. However, no relate of longitudinal studies assessing patients in the acute stage submitted to tDCS and physiotherapy for more than 6 months have been found. Studies like this would help us elucidate the action mechanisms of this treatment in the early stages of stroke. With this in mind, START - tDCS, a phase II/III clinical trial, will be developed to assess the therapeutic effects of the tDCS in early stage enrolling 40 post-stroke patients. They will be allocated in 2 groups at random to receive active tDCS or sham, associate to CIMT. The protocol will be applied in a daily basis for 10 consecutive working days (2 weeks), after that, the patients will be followed for 1 month. By the end of the study, the participants that receive tDCS and show better clinical condition will be invited to participate in bimonthly stimulation for 12 months, as part of a longitudinal study regarding tDCS for stroke. An increase in the clinical condition will be considered as a final score higher than 10 points in the Barthel Index, our primary outcome, when compared with baseline, before the treatment protocol.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial direct current stimulation
OTHERPlacebo

Sponsors

Federal University of Paraíba
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ischaemic acute stroke * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* 25 ≤ National Institute of Health Stroke Scale ≤ 32 * Rankim ≥ 5 * Mini Mental State Examination ≤ 24 * tDCS criteria: use of modulators of the Central Nervous System drugs; patients with implanted metallic or electronic devices; pacemaker; seizures; pregnancy;any other condition that might limit or interfere in the sensorimotor system CIMT criteria: inability to actively execute the movements of wrist flexion, metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal active extension of 10º and wrist extension of 20º

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Functional Independence measured by Barthel IndexChange for functional independence at 4 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Executive functions (Victoria version of the Stroop Color and Word Test)Baseline (week 1) and Endpoint (week 4)
Attention and Working Memory (Digit span subtest)Baseline (week 1) and Endpoint (week 4)
SpasticityBaseline, Week 2 and Week 4
Muscle strengthBaseline, Week 2 and Week 4
BalanceBaseline, Week 2 and Week 4
Cognitive dysfunction (Montreal Cognitive Assessment)Baseline (week 1) and Endpoint (week 4)
Fear of falling during daily life activitiesBaseline, Week 2 and Week 4
Upper limb functionBaseline, Week 2 and Week 4
Quality of lifeBaseline, Week 2 and Week 4
Lower limb functionBaseline, Week 2 and Week 4
PostureBaseline, Week 2 and Week 4

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactSuellen Andrade
suellenandrade@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026