Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Ciclesonide Nasal Spray in Participants With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) in Russia

A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Two-Arm, Parallel-Group, Phase III (Registration) Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Ciclesonide Nasal Spray (Omnaris®) 200 mcg Once Daily in the Treatment of the Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) in Russia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02155881
Enrollment
80
Registered
2014-06-04
Start date
2014-08-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2017-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Drug therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of Ciclesonide Nasal Spray 200 microgram (mcg) once daily in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in Russian participants.

Detailed description

The drug being tested in this study is called ciclesonide. Ciclesonide is being tested to treat allergy symptoms in people who have SAR. This study will look at improvement of allergy symptoms in Russian participants who take ciclesonide nasal spray. The study will enroll approximately 80 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of the two treatment groups-which will remain undisclosed to the participant and study doctor during the study (unless there is an urgent medical need): * Ciclesonide nasal spray 200 mcg * Placebo nasal spray (dummy inactive nasal spray) - this is a nasal spray that looks like the study drug but has no active ingredient. All participants will be asked to take 2 actuations per nostril at the same time each day throughout the study, and will be asked to record the severity of their allergy symptoms twice a day in a diary. This multi-centre trial will be conducted in Russia. The overall time to participate in this study is up to 5 weeks. Participants will make 3 visits to the clinic, and will be contacted by telephone 14 days after last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.

Interventions

DRUGCiclesonide

Ciclesonide nasal spray 50 mcg/actuation

DRUGCiclesonide Placebo

Ciclesonide placebo-matching nasal spray

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Informed consent signed by a participant for participation in the study. 2. SAR male and female participants aged greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years (with a history of SAR of 2 years on longer). In the Investigator's judgment the SAR must have been of sufficient severity to have required treatment (either continuous or intermittent) during this period, and was expected to require treatment for the duration of the study. 3. To have a demonstrated positive skin prick test or other serologic tests to at least 1 relevant seasonal allergen. A positive skin test is generally defined as a wheal 3 mm larger than the diluents control wheal for prick testing. 4. If female less than or equal to (\<=) 65 years of age, must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening. Females of childbearing potential must be instructed to and agree to avoid pregnancy during the study and must use an acceptable method of birth control: 1. An oral contraceptive, an intrauterine device (IUD), implantable contraceptive, transdermal or injectable contraceptive for at least 1 month prior to entering the study with continued use throughout the study and for thirty days following study participation; 2. Barrier method of contraception, for example (eg), condom and/or diaphragm with spermicide while participating in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Nasal pathology, including nasal polyps, clinically relevant respiratory tract malformations, recent nasal biopsy (within 60 days), nasal trauma, nasal surgery, atrophic rhinitis, rhinitis medicamentosa (within 60 days), vasomotor rhinitis. 2. Initiation of immunotherapy during the study period or dose escalation during the study period. However, initiation of immunotherapy 90 days or more prior to the Screening Visit AND use of a stable (maintenance) dose (30 days more) may be considered for inclusion. 3. Hypersensitivity to corticosteroid or any of the excipients in the formulation of ciclesonide. 4. A history of respiratory tract infection or disorder within 2 weeks of the screening visit or had a respiratory tract infection during baseline. 5. Presence of ocular herpes simplex or cataracts or a history of glaucoma. 6. Active asthma requiring treatment with inhaled or systemic corticosteroids and/or routine use of beta (β)-agonists; intermittent use of β-agonists is acceptable. 7. Use of intranasal immunosuppressive drugs for 30 days before Baseline. 8. Female participant who is pregnant or lactating. 9. Participation in any investigational drug trial within the 30 days preceding the Screening Visit or planned participation in another investigational drug trial at any time during this trial. 10. History of a positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B or hepatitis C. 11. History of alcohol or drug abuse within the preceding two years. 12. Use of any prohibited concomitant medications within the prescribed (per protocol) time spent last dose period to the Screening Visit (Visit 0) and during entire treatment duration. 13. Any condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, can be clinically significant and/or affect the participant's ability to participate in the clinical trial. 14. Exposure to systemic corticosteroids for any indication, chronic or intermittent (e.g.: contact dermatitis), during the past 2 months, or presence of an underlying condition that can reasonably be expected to require treatment with corticosteroids during the course of the study. 15. Use of topical corticosteroids in concentrations in excess of 1 percent (%) hydrocortisone for dermatological conditions during the past 1 month, or presence of an underlying condition that can reasonably be expected to require treatment with such preparations during the course of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS)Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)The reflective TNSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated reflective symptom scores for the 4 nasal symptoms of runny nose, itchy nose, sneezing, and nasal congestion over the past 12 hours. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). TNSS score ranges from 0-12 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS)Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)The reflective TOSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated reflective symptom scores for 3 ocular symptoms of itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes over the past 12 hours. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). Reflective TOSS score ranges from 0-9 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and 9 representing severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.
Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom ScoresBaseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)The instantaneous TOSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated instantaneous symptom scores for 3 ocular symptoms of itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes at the time of evaluation. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). Instantaneous TOSS score ranges from 0-9 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and 9 representing severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.
Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreBaseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)The reflective TNSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated reflective symptom scores for the 4 nasal symptoms of runny nose, itchy nose, sneezing, and nasal congestion over the past 12 hours. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). TNSS score ranges from 0-12 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.
Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom ScoresBaseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)The instantaneous TNSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated instantaneous symptom scores for the 4 nasal symptoms of runny nose, itchy nose, sneezing, and nasal congestion at the time of evaluation. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). TNSS score ranges from 0-12 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.
Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total ScoreBaseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)The RQLQ is a 28-item, disease-specific quality of life questionnaire that measures the functional (physical, emotional, and social) problems troublesome to adults with allergies. The RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms and emotional). All 28 questions were evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a 7-point severity scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 = least severe to 6 = extremely severe. Overall total score was calculated by taking the mean of the response of all individual 28 questions. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.
Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreBaseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)The RQLQ is a 28-item, disease-specific quality of life questionnaire that measures the functional (physical, emotional, and social) problems troublesome to adults with allergies. The RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms and emotional). All 28 questions were evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a 7-point severity scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 = least severe to 6 = extremely severe. Overall domain scores were calculated by taking the mean of the response of the relevant questions. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.
Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreBaseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)The reflective TOSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated reflective symptom scores for 3 ocular symptoms of itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes over the past 12 hours. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). Reflective TOSS score ranges from 0-9 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and 9 representing severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Countries

Russia

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 6 investigative sites in Russia from 12 August 2014 to 14 November 2014.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a historical diagnosis of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) were enrolled in 1 of 2 treatment groups as follows: Ciclesonide 200 microgram (mcg) and Placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ciclesonide 200 mcg
Ciclesonide 200 mcg, 2 puffs per nostril (50 mcg/puff), nasal spray, once daily for up to 14 days.
40
Placebo
Ciclesonide placebo-matching puffs, 2 puffs per nostril, nasal spray, once daily for up to 14 days.
40
Total80

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyInappropriately randomized22
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCiclesonide 200 mcgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous40.98 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.16
38.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.94
39.76 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.55
Gender
Female
28 Participants17 Participants45 Participants
Gender
Male
12 Participants23 Participants35 Participants
Height166.45 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.87
171.45 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.45
168.95 centimeter (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.16
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
40 participants40 participants80 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
40 participants40 participants80 participants
Smoking Status
Current Smoker
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Smoking Status
Ex-Smoker
1 participants5 participants6 participants
Smoking Status
Had Never Smoked
37 participants34 participants71 participants
Weight70.03 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.69
72.51 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.81
71.27 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.75

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 4010 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 400 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS)

The reflective TNSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated reflective symptom scores for the 4 nasal symptoms of runny nose, itchy nose, sneezing, and nasal congestion over the past 12 hours. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). TNSS score ranges from 0-12 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had 1 baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value. Missing data was imputed using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS)Baseline7.81 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS)Change Over 2 Weeks-2.85 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS)Baseline7.71 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (TNSS)Change Over 2 Weeks-2.68 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.11
Comparison: An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.971695% CI: [-0.98, 1.01]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score

The reflective TNSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated reflective symptom scores for the 4 nasal symptoms of runny nose, itchy nose, sneezing, and nasal congestion over the past 12 hours. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). TNSS score ranges from 0-12 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had 1 baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreNasal Congestion: Baseline2.19 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreNasal Congestion: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.70 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreRunny nose: Baseline2.04 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreRunny nose: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.79 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreItchy Nose: Baseline1.77 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreItchy Nose: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.64 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreSneezing: Baseline1.80 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreSneezing: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.71 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreSneezing: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.64 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreNasal Congestion: Baseline2.22 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreItchy Nose: Baseline1.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreNasal Congestion: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.62 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreSneezing: Baseline1.73 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreRunny nose: Baseline2.01 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreItchy Nose: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.64 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Nasal Symptom ScoreRunny nose: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.77 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
Comparison: Nasal congestion: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.559395% CI: [-0.35, 0.19]ANCOVA
Comparison: Runny nose: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.708595% CI: [-0.22, 0.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: Itching: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.730995% CI: [-0.22, 0.31]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sneezing: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.958495% CI: [-0.29, 0.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Score

The reflective TOSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated reflective symptom scores for 3 ocular symptoms of itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes over the past 12 hours. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). Reflective TOSS score ranges from 0-9 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and 9 representing severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had 1 baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreItching/Burning Eyes: Baseline1.85 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreItching/Burning Eyes: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.63 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreRedness: Baseline1.57 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreRedness: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.59 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreTearing/Watering Eyes: Baseline1.37 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreTearing/Watering Eyes: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.45 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreTearing/Watering Eyes: Baseline1.29 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreItching/Burning Eyes: Baseline1.79 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreRedness: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.52 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreItching/Burning Eyes: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.73 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreTearing/Watering Eyes: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.43 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Individual Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom ScoreRedness: Baseline1.67 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Comparison: Itching/Burning Eyes: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.226695% CI: [-0.11, 0.46]ANCOVA
Comparison: Redness: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.488895% CI: [-0.35, 0.17]ANCOVA
Comparison: Tearing/Watering Eyes: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.831695% CI: [-0.22, 0.27]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Scores

The instantaneous TNSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated instantaneous symptom scores for the 4 nasal symptoms of runny nose, itchy nose, sneezing, and nasal congestion at the time of evaluation. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). TNSS score ranges from 0-12 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had 1 baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom ScoresBaseline7.81 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom ScoresChange Over 2 Weeks-2.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.34
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom ScoresBaseline7.64 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom ScoresChange Over 2 Weeks-2.62 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Comparison: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.871395% CI: [-0.87, 1.02]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores

The instantaneous TOSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated instantaneous symptom scores for 3 ocular symptoms of itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes at the time of evaluation. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). Instantaneous TOSS score ranges from 0-9 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and 9 representing severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had 1 baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom ScoresBaseline4.74 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom ScoresChange Over 2 Weeks-1.56 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom ScoresBaseline4.69 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom ScoresChange Over 2 Weeks-1.61 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Comparison: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.66395% CI: [-0.55, 0.86]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS)

The reflective TOSS is defined as the sum of the participant-rated reflective symptom scores for 3 ocular symptoms of itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, and redness of eyes over the past 12 hours. Each symptom was evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary, once in the morning (AM score) and after 12 hours in the evening (PM score) over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a severity scale ranging from 0 to 3, where: 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe (symptom hard to tolerate, interferes with daily activities/sleeping). Reflective TOSS score ranges from 0-9 with 0 representing an absence of symptoms and 9 representing severe symptoms. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had 1 baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS)Baseline4.78 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS)Change Over 2 Weeks-1.68 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS)Baseline4.75 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.32
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Participant-Reported Morning and Evening Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (TOSS)Change Over 2 Weeks-1.68 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
Comparison: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.778995% CI: [-0.61, 0.81]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain Score

The RQLQ is a 28-item, disease-specific quality of life questionnaire that measures the functional (physical, emotional, and social) problems troublesome to adults with allergies. The RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms and emotional). All 28 questions were evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a 7-point severity scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 = least severe to 6 = extremely severe. Overall domain scores were calculated by taking the mean of the response of the relevant questions. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had 1 baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreActivities: Baseline4.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.77
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreActivities: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.55 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreSleep: Baseline3.22 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreSleep: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.38 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.52
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreNon-Nose/Eye Symptoms: Baseline2.74 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreNon-Nose/Eye Symptoms: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.07 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScorePractical Problems: Baseline4.01 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScorePractical Problems: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.76 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreNasal Symptoms: Baseline4.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreNasal Symptoms: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.78 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreEye Symptoms: Baseline3.01 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreEye Symptoms: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.28 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreEmotional: Baseline2.82 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreEmotional: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.39 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreEye Symptoms: Baseline2.91 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreActivities: Baseline4.05 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScorePractical Problems: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.18 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreActivities: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreEmotional: Baseline2.89 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreSleep: Baseline3.15 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreNasal Symptoms: Baseline3.90 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreSleep: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.02 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreEye Symptoms: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.03 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreNon-Nose/Eye Symptoms: Baseline2.85 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreNasal Symptoms: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.44 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.45
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreNon-Nose/Eye Symptoms: Change Over 2 Weeks-0.90 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScoreEmotional: Change Over 2 Weeks-1.06 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Individual Domain ScorePractical Problems: Baseline3.50 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
Comparison: Activities: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.353395% CI: [-0.85, 0.31]ANCOVA
Comparison: Sleep: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.371295% CI: [-0.84, 0.32]ANCOVA
Comparison: Non-nose/Eye symptoms: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.409895% CI: [-0.69, 0.29]ANCOVA
Comparison: Practical Problems: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.268395% CI: [-1, 0.28]ANCOVA
Comparison: Nasal Symptoms: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.464395% CI: [-0.82, 0.38]ANCOVA
Comparison: Eye symptoms: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.450295% CI: [-0.74, 0.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: Emotional: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.17795% CI: [-0.95, 0.18]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total Score

The RQLQ is a 28-item, disease-specific quality of life questionnaire that measures the functional (physical, emotional, and social) problems troublesome to adults with allergies. The RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms and emotional). All 28 questions were evaluated by the participant in an assessment diary over 2 weeks of treatment period and was rated on a 7-point severity scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 = least severe to 6 = extremely severe. Overall total score was calculated by taking the mean of the response of all individual 28 questions. The baseline value was defined as the average score over the Day -6 to Day 0. Change from Baseline was thus calculated as the 2-week average score recorded from Day 1 up to Day 14 minus the Baseline score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 1 up to Week 2 (entire treatment period)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had 1 baseline and at least 1 post-baseline value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total ScoreBaseline3.31 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Ciclesonide 200 mcgChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total ScoreChange Over 2 Weeks-1.40 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total ScoreBaseline3.24 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
PlaceboChange From Baseline Over 2 Weeks in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Total ScoreChange Over 2 Weeks-1.09 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.08
Comparison: An ANCOVA model adjusted for treatment, site and the baseline score was used to test a null hypothesis of no difference between the treatment groups against a two-sided alternative hypothesis at the 5% level of significance.p-value: 0.296895% CI: [-0.8, 0.25]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026