Brain White Matter Disease Periventricular, Infant, Premature, Diseases
Conditions
Brief summary
The primary aims of this randomized controlled trial are to evaluate efficacy potential of SPEEDI at enhancing reaching and play based problem solving compared to infants receiving usual care.
Detailed description
The primary aims of this randomized controlled trial are to evaluate efficacy potential of SPEEDI at enhancing reaching and play based problem solving compared to infants receiving usual care. The secondary aim is to assess the efficacy potential of SPEEDI to impact motor and cognitive development as assessed using commonly used clinical outcome measures. The exploratory aims are to assess the impact of SPEEDI on parent child interactions and feeding skills. The findings will provide crucial initial efficacy estimates to be used in a larger definitive clinical trial of SPEEDI.
Interventions
Behavioral intervention provided through a collaboration between the mother of enrolled subjects and a physical therapist. Intervention starts in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and continues after discharge. SPEEDI includes both parent education and developmental activities.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* born extremely preterm (˂29 weeks of gestation) OR 10 born preterm and diagnosed with a neonatal brain injury including intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, periventricular white matter injury, or hydrocephalus requiring a shunt. * Medically stable by 40 weeks of gestation, including being off ventilator support * Live within 50 minutes of the hospital. * English Speaking mother * Mother willing and able to participate in the study with the infant subject
Exclusion criteria
* Genetic syndromes or musculoskeletal deformities
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Reaching (Toy Contact Duration) | 1 month post intervention | Duration the infant is in contact with the target is used to quantify changes in reaching. |
| Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI) | End of intervention, 1 and 3 months post intervention | Problem-solving behaviors were assessed using the Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI). The EPSI is the cognitive subtest of the Individual Growth and Development Indicators designed to measure infant and toddler play-based problem-solving through 36 months of age. It defines problem-solving as consisting of visual exploration, object manipulation and memory. The infant was video-recorded interacting with 3 standard toys: pop-up animals toy, 6 seriated, plastic cups, and a gum ball machine with 5 balls. Infants were given each toy for 2 minutes. The frequency of 4 mutually exclusive behaviors (look, explore, function, solution) were coded using definitions from the EPSI protocol. time. The total number of problem solving behaviors was calculated as a sum of look, explore, function, and solution for each infant at each visit and reported as the total EPSI frequency with a higher frequency reflecting more problem solving behaviors. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | Baseline, End phase 1, End of intervention, 1 and 3 months post intervention | The Early Feeding Skills (EFS) was used to assess the infant's oral feeding skills during the video recorded feeding described above. The EFS is a 26-item observational tool that can be used from the start of oral feeding through the maturation of feeding skills. Each item can score 1-3 with one representing the least skill or high frequency of problem (an area of clinical concern), and three representing mature skill or absence of problem (area of strength). Subscales included were ability to maintain engagement in feeding, ability to organize oral-motor functioning, ability to coordinate swallowing, and ability to maintain physiological stability. The sum of all the items in a subscale divided by the number of items in the subscale gives the subscale score of 1-3. The sum of all subscales was used to create an EFS total score which could range from 2 to 12 with a higher score reflecting a better feeding performance. |
| Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA) | Baseline, End phase 1, End of intervention, 1 month post intervention | The Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA; Clark, 2010; Clark, 1999) was designed to assess mother-infant interaction. In this study PCERA was scored from a video of the feeding interaction. The PCERA is a 65-item observational rating scale (29 parental, 27 infant, and 8 dyadic), designed to assess the amount, duration, and intensity of interaction. Each item was rated on a 3-point ordinal scale with 1-2 indicating an area of concern, 3 indicating an area for some concern and 4- 5 indicating an area of strength. Eight subscales constructed from items of the PCERA have been theoretically derived and confirmed by factor analysis (Clark, 1999; Clark et al., 1997). For ease of analysis this scale was transformed to a -1 to +1 range. Scores were recorded as 1 or 2 = -1, 3= 0, 4 or 5 = 1. The total PCERA score is the mean of all the subscale mean scores and ranged -1 (highest risk of atypical interactions) to +1 (most positive interactions). |
| Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley). | 3 month post intervention | The Bayley-III is a norm references standardized developmental assessment of Motor, Cognitive, and Language skills. Composite scores for each domain have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 85-115 is considered average. Higher composite scores represent higher or better performance on that subtest. The Bayley was administered at the final follow-up visit and 3 months after the intervention ended. |
| Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) | Baseline to End of intervention | The TIMP is a standardized and norm references test of motor control and posture in infants 4 months of age and younger which is commonly used with infants starting at 34 weeks of post-menstrual age. Change in raw score from baseline to end of the intervention is reported. The TIMP raw score ranges from 0 to 142. A higher score represented greater performance in motor control and posture. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Usual Care Group This group of subjects will receive usual care provided in the medial system and community. | 7 |
| SPEEDI Intervention This group will receive and parent and physical therapy provided intervention to increase the infants opportunities for play which will enhance development.
SPEEDI Intervention: Behavioral intervention provided through a collaboration between the mother of enrolled subjects and a physical therapist. Intervention starts in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and continues after discharge. SPEEDI includes both parent education and developmental activities. | 7 |
| Total | 14 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Medical status change made ineligible | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Usual Care Group | SPEEDI Intervention | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 35 Weeks of post menstrual age | 39 Weeks of post menstrual age | 38 Weeks of post menstrual age |
| Brain Injury (GIII/IV intraventricular hemorrhage , Periventricular leukomalacia, Hypoxic Ischemic E | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Gestational age | 26 weeks of gestation | 25 weeks of gestation | 25.5 weeks of gestation |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 5 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 7 participants | 7 participants | 14 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 8 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 |
Outcome results
Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI)
Problem-solving behaviors were assessed using the Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI). The EPSI is the cognitive subtest of the Individual Growth and Development Indicators designed to measure infant and toddler play-based problem-solving through 36 months of age. It defines problem-solving as consisting of visual exploration, object manipulation and memory. The infant was video-recorded interacting with 3 standard toys: pop-up animals toy, 6 seriated, plastic cups, and a gum ball machine with 5 balls. Infants were given each toy for 2 minutes. The frequency of 4 mutually exclusive behaviors (look, explore, function, solution) were coded using definitions from the EPSI protocol. time. The total number of problem solving behaviors was calculated as a sum of look, explore, function, and solution for each infant at each visit and reported as the total EPSI frequency with a higher frequency reflecting more problem solving behaviors.
Time frame: End of intervention, 1 and 3 months post intervention
Population: Same as primary population with the 2 infants lost to follow up not included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care Group | Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI) | End of intervention | 58.00 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 min | Standard Deviation 39.59 |
| Usual Care Group | Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI) | 1 months post intervention | 95.2 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 min | Standard Deviation 52.95 |
| Usual Care Group | Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI) | 3 months post intervention | 146 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 min | Standard Deviation 86.17 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI) | End of intervention | 103.2 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 min | Standard Deviation 28.89 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI) | 1 months post intervention | 131.80 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 min | Standard Deviation 61.44 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI) | 3 months post intervention | 212 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 min | Standard Deviation 54.98 |
Reaching (Toy Contact Duration)
Duration the infant is in contact with the target is used to quantify changes in reaching.
Time frame: 1 month post intervention
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care Group | Reaching (Toy Contact Duration) | 20.2 Seconds | Standard Deviation 21.45 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Reaching (Toy Contact Duration) | 28.02 Seconds | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley).
The Bayley-III is a norm references standardized developmental assessment of Motor, Cognitive, and Language skills. Composite scores for each domain have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 85-115 is considered average. Higher composite scores represent higher or better performance on that subtest. The Bayley was administered at the final follow-up visit and 3 months after the intervention ended.
Time frame: 3 month post intervention
Population: At 3 months post intervention the sample was consistent with that described in the study sample post lose to followup.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care Group | Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley). | Motor 3 months post intervention | 79.6 Mean Composite Score on Bayley | Standard Deviation 20.8 |
| Usual Care Group | Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley). | Cognitive 3 months post intervention | 80.0 Mean Composite Score on Bayley | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
| Usual Care Group | Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley). | Language 3 months post intervention | 89.0 Mean Composite Score on Bayley | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley). | Motor 3 months post intervention | 98.6 Mean Composite Score on Bayley | Standard Deviation 11.4 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley). | Cognitive 3 months post intervention | 91.0 Mean Composite Score on Bayley | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley). | Language 3 months post intervention | 98.2 Mean Composite Score on Bayley | Standard Deviation 9.6 |
Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)
The Early Feeding Skills (EFS) was used to assess the infant's oral feeding skills during the video recorded feeding described above. The EFS is a 26-item observational tool that can be used from the start of oral feeding through the maturation of feeding skills. Each item can score 1-3 with one representing the least skill or high frequency of problem (an area of clinical concern), and three representing mature skill or absence of problem (area of strength). Subscales included were ability to maintain engagement in feeding, ability to organize oral-motor functioning, ability to coordinate swallowing, and ability to maintain physiological stability. The sum of all the items in a subscale divided by the number of items in the subscale gives the subscale score of 1-3. The sum of all subscales was used to create an EFS total score which could range from 2 to 12 with a higher score reflecting a better feeding performance.
Time frame: Baseline, End phase 1, End of intervention, 1 and 3 months post intervention
Population: Some infants were not able to orally feed in which case this measure was not included. In addition, some visits were missing feeding assessments for missing data. Thus the sample included varied some between visits.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care Group | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | End phase 1 | 8.27 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| Usual Care Group | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | 1 month post intervention | 10.10 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 1.36 |
| Usual Care Group | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | End of intervention Phase 2 | 8.00 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Usual Care Group | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | 3 months post intervention | 10.00 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 1.42 |
| Usual Care Group | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | Baseline | 8.32 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | 3 months post intervention | 10.40 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 1.57 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | Baseline | 8.61 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | End phase 1 | 8.82 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 1.58 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | End of intervention Phase 2 | 9.65 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 1.17 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES) | 1 month post intervention | 9.91 EFS Total score | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)
The Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA; Clark, 2010; Clark, 1999) was designed to assess mother-infant interaction. In this study PCERA was scored from a video of the feeding interaction. The PCERA is a 65-item observational rating scale (29 parental, 27 infant, and 8 dyadic), designed to assess the amount, duration, and intensity of interaction. Each item was rated on a 3-point ordinal scale with 1-2 indicating an area of concern, 3 indicating an area for some concern and 4- 5 indicating an area of strength. Eight subscales constructed from items of the PCERA have been theoretically derived and confirmed by factor analysis (Clark, 1999; Clark et al., 1997). For ease of analysis this scale was transformed to a -1 to +1 range. Scores were recorded as 1 or 2 = -1, 3= 0, 4 or 5 = 1. The total PCERA score is the mean of all the subscale mean scores and ranged -1 (highest risk of atypical interactions) to +1 (most positive interactions).
Time frame: Baseline, End phase 1, End of intervention, 1 month post intervention
Population: The sample varied some between visits do to a lack of video taping the parent child interaction on a few occasions because the parent who consented to the study was not present at the time of the visit and the visit could not be rescheduled. The 3 month post intervention visit was dropped.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care Group | Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA) | Baseline | 0.27 Mean Score on PCERA | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Usual Care Group | Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA) | End phase 1 | 0.20 Mean Score on PCERA | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Usual Care Group | Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA) | End of intervention Phase 2 | 0.34 Mean Score on PCERA | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Usual Care Group | Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA) | 1 months post intervention | 0.50 Mean Score on PCERA | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA) | 1 months post intervention | 0.26 Mean Score on PCERA | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA) | Baseline | 0.13 Mean Score on PCERA | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA) | End of intervention Phase 2 | 0.25 Mean Score on PCERA | Standard Deviation 0.23 |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA) | End phase 1 | 0.38 Mean Score on PCERA | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP)
The TIMP is a standardized and norm references test of motor control and posture in infants 4 months of age and younger which is commonly used with infants starting at 34 weeks of post-menstrual age. Change in raw score from baseline to end of the intervention is reported. The TIMP raw score ranges from 0 to 142. A higher score represented greater performance in motor control and posture.
Time frame: Baseline to End of intervention
Population: Full Sample after infants lost to follow up who are not included in this analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care Group | Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) | Baseline | 54 Raw Score on the TIMP |
| Usual Care Group | Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) | End of Intervention | 82 Raw Score on the TIMP |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) | Baseline | 61 Raw Score on the TIMP |
| SPEEDI Intervention | Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) | End of Intervention | 99 Raw Score on the TIMP |