Skip to content

Initial Efficacy Study of Supporting Play, Exploration, & Early Development Intervention

Initial Efficacy Study of Supporting Play, Exploration, & Early Development Intervention (SPEEDI) - Phase 1 Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02153736
Acronym
SPEEDI
Enrollment
14
Registered
2014-06-03
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2018-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain White Matter Disease Periventricular, Infant, Premature, Diseases

Brief summary

The primary aims of this randomized controlled trial are to evaluate efficacy potential of SPEEDI at enhancing reaching and play based problem solving compared to infants receiving usual care.

Detailed description

The primary aims of this randomized controlled trial are to evaluate efficacy potential of SPEEDI at enhancing reaching and play based problem solving compared to infants receiving usual care. The secondary aim is to assess the efficacy potential of SPEEDI to impact motor and cognitive development as assessed using commonly used clinical outcome measures. The exploratory aims are to assess the impact of SPEEDI on parent child interactions and feeding skills. The findings will provide crucial initial efficacy estimates to be used in a larger definitive clinical trial of SPEEDI.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSPEEDI Intervention

Behavioral intervention provided through a collaboration between the mother of enrolled subjects and a physical therapist. Intervention starts in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and continues after discharge. SPEEDI includes both parent education and developmental activities.

Sponsors

Foundation for Physical Therapy, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Children's Hospital Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Virginia Commonwealth University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 18 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* born extremely preterm (˂29 weeks of gestation) OR 10 born preterm and diagnosed with a neonatal brain injury including intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, periventricular white matter injury, or hydrocephalus requiring a shunt. * Medically stable by 40 weeks of gestation, including being off ventilator support * Live within 50 minutes of the hospital. * English Speaking mother * Mother willing and able to participate in the study with the infant subject

Exclusion criteria

* Genetic syndromes or musculoskeletal deformities

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reaching (Toy Contact Duration)1 month post interventionDuration the infant is in contact with the target is used to quantify changes in reaching.
Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI)End of intervention, 1 and 3 months post interventionProblem-solving behaviors were assessed using the Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI). The EPSI is the cognitive subtest of the Individual Growth and Development Indicators designed to measure infant and toddler play-based problem-solving through 36 months of age. It defines problem-solving as consisting of visual exploration, object manipulation and memory. The infant was video-recorded interacting with 3 standard toys: pop-up animals toy, 6 seriated, plastic cups, and a gum ball machine with 5 balls. Infants were given each toy for 2 minutes. The frequency of 4 mutually exclusive behaviors (look, explore, function, solution) were coded using definitions from the EPSI protocol. time. The total number of problem solving behaviors was calculated as a sum of look, explore, function, and solution for each infant at each visit and reported as the total EPSI frequency with a higher frequency reflecting more problem solving behaviors.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)Baseline, End phase 1, End of intervention, 1 and 3 months post interventionThe Early Feeding Skills (EFS) was used to assess the infant's oral feeding skills during the video recorded feeding described above. The EFS is a 26-item observational tool that can be used from the start of oral feeding through the maturation of feeding skills. Each item can score 1-3 with one representing the least skill or high frequency of problem (an area of clinical concern), and three representing mature skill or absence of problem (area of strength). Subscales included were ability to maintain engagement in feeding, ability to organize oral-motor functioning, ability to coordinate swallowing, and ability to maintain physiological stability. The sum of all the items in a subscale divided by the number of items in the subscale gives the subscale score of 1-3. The sum of all subscales was used to create an EFS total score which could range from 2 to 12 with a higher score reflecting a better feeding performance.
Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)Baseline, End phase 1, End of intervention, 1 month post interventionThe Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA; Clark, 2010; Clark, 1999) was designed to assess mother-infant interaction. In this study PCERA was scored from a video of the feeding interaction. The PCERA is a 65-item observational rating scale (29 parental, 27 infant, and 8 dyadic), designed to assess the amount, duration, and intensity of interaction. Each item was rated on a 3-point ordinal scale with 1-2 indicating an area of concern, 3 indicating an area for some concern and 4- 5 indicating an area of strength. Eight subscales constructed from items of the PCERA have been theoretically derived and confirmed by factor analysis (Clark, 1999; Clark et al., 1997). For ease of analysis this scale was transformed to a -1 to +1 range. Scores were recorded as 1 or 2 = -1, 3= 0, 4 or 5 = 1. The total PCERA score is the mean of all the subscale mean scores and ranged -1 (highest risk of atypical interactions) to +1 (most positive interactions).
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley).3 month post interventionThe Bayley-III is a norm references standardized developmental assessment of Motor, Cognitive, and Language skills. Composite scores for each domain have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 85-115 is considered average. Higher composite scores represent higher or better performance on that subtest. The Bayley was administered at the final follow-up visit and 3 months after the intervention ended.
Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP)Baseline to End of interventionThe TIMP is a standardized and norm references test of motor control and posture in infants 4 months of age and younger which is commonly used with infants starting at 34 weeks of post-menstrual age. Change in raw score from baseline to end of the intervention is reported. The TIMP raw score ranges from 0 to 142. A higher score represented greater performance in motor control and posture.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care Group
This group of subjects will receive usual care provided in the medial system and community.
7
SPEEDI Intervention
This group will receive and parent and physical therapy provided intervention to increase the infants opportunities for play which will enhance development. SPEEDI Intervention: Behavioral intervention provided through a collaboration between the mother of enrolled subjects and a physical therapist. Intervention starts in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and continues after discharge. SPEEDI includes both parent education and developmental activities.
7
Total14

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyMedical status change made ineligible10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual Care GroupSPEEDI InterventionTotal
Age, Continuous35 Weeks of post menstrual age39 Weeks of post menstrual age38 Weeks of post menstrual age
Brain Injury (GIII/IV intraventricular hemorrhage , Periventricular leukomalacia, Hypoxic Ischemic E2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Gestational age26 weeks of gestation25 weeks of gestation25.5 weeks of gestation
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 participants7 participants14 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI)

Problem-solving behaviors were assessed using the Early Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI). The EPSI is the cognitive subtest of the Individual Growth and Development Indicators designed to measure infant and toddler play-based problem-solving through 36 months of age. It defines problem-solving as consisting of visual exploration, object manipulation and memory. The infant was video-recorded interacting with 3 standard toys: pop-up animals toy, 6 seriated, plastic cups, and a gum ball machine with 5 balls. Infants were given each toy for 2 minutes. The frequency of 4 mutually exclusive behaviors (look, explore, function, solution) were coded using definitions from the EPSI protocol. time. The total number of problem solving behaviors was calculated as a sum of look, explore, function, and solution for each infant at each visit and reported as the total EPSI frequency with a higher frequency reflecting more problem solving behaviors.

Time frame: End of intervention, 1 and 3 months post intervention

Population: Same as primary population with the 2 infants lost to follow up not included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupEarly Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI)End of intervention58.00 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 minStandard Deviation 39.59
Usual Care GroupEarly Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI)1 months post intervention95.2 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 minStandard Deviation 52.95
Usual Care GroupEarly Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI)3 months post intervention146 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 minStandard Deviation 86.17
SPEEDI InterventionEarly Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI)End of intervention103.2 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 minStandard Deviation 28.89
SPEEDI InterventionEarly Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI)1 months post intervention131.80 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 minStandard Deviation 61.44
SPEEDI InterventionEarly Problem Solving Indicator (EPSI)3 months post intervention212 # of Problem Solving Behaviors in 6 minStandard Deviation 54.98
Primary

Reaching (Toy Contact Duration)

Duration the infant is in contact with the target is used to quantify changes in reaching.

Time frame: 1 month post intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupReaching (Toy Contact Duration)20.2 SecondsStandard Deviation 21.45
SPEEDI InterventionReaching (Toy Contact Duration)28.02 SecondsStandard Deviation 16.3
Secondary

Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley).

The Bayley-III is a norm references standardized developmental assessment of Motor, Cognitive, and Language skills. Composite scores for each domain have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. A score of 85-115 is considered average. Higher composite scores represent higher or better performance on that subtest. The Bayley was administered at the final follow-up visit and 3 months after the intervention ended.

Time frame: 3 month post intervention

Population: At 3 months post intervention the sample was consistent with that described in the study sample post lose to followup.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley).Motor 3 months post intervention79.6 Mean Composite Score on BayleyStandard Deviation 20.8
Usual Care GroupBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley).Cognitive 3 months post intervention80.0 Mean Composite Score on BayleyStandard Deviation 13.5
Usual Care GroupBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley).Language 3 months post intervention89.0 Mean Composite Score on BayleyStandard Deviation 19.6
SPEEDI InterventionBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley).Motor 3 months post intervention98.6 Mean Composite Score on BayleyStandard Deviation 11.4
SPEEDI InterventionBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley).Cognitive 3 months post intervention91.0 Mean Composite Score on BayleyStandard Deviation 8.9
SPEEDI InterventionBayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley).Language 3 months post intervention98.2 Mean Composite Score on BayleyStandard Deviation 9.6
Secondary

Early Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)

The Early Feeding Skills (EFS) was used to assess the infant's oral feeding skills during the video recorded feeding described above. The EFS is a 26-item observational tool that can be used from the start of oral feeding through the maturation of feeding skills. Each item can score 1-3 with one representing the least skill or high frequency of problem (an area of clinical concern), and three representing mature skill or absence of problem (area of strength). Subscales included were ability to maintain engagement in feeding, ability to organize oral-motor functioning, ability to coordinate swallowing, and ability to maintain physiological stability. The sum of all the items in a subscale divided by the number of items in the subscale gives the subscale score of 1-3. The sum of all subscales was used to create an EFS total score which could range from 2 to 12 with a higher score reflecting a better feeding performance.

Time frame: Baseline, End phase 1, End of intervention, 1 and 3 months post intervention

Population: Some infants were not able to orally feed in which case this measure was not included. In addition, some visits were missing feeding assessments for missing data. Thus the sample included varied some between visits.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)End phase 18.27 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 1.27
Usual Care GroupEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)1 month post intervention10.10 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 1.36
Usual Care GroupEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)End of intervention Phase 28.00 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 0.44
Usual Care GroupEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)3 months post intervention10.00 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 1.42
Usual Care GroupEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)Baseline8.32 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 0.48
SPEEDI InterventionEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)3 months post intervention10.40 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 1.57
SPEEDI InterventionEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)Baseline8.61 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 1.44
SPEEDI InterventionEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)End phase 18.82 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 1.58
SPEEDI InterventionEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)End of intervention Phase 29.65 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 1.17
SPEEDI InterventionEarly Feeding Skill Assessment (FES)1 month post intervention9.91 EFS Total scoreStandard Deviation 1.12
Secondary

Parent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)

The Parent-Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA; Clark, 2010; Clark, 1999) was designed to assess mother-infant interaction. In this study PCERA was scored from a video of the feeding interaction. The PCERA is a 65-item observational rating scale (29 parental, 27 infant, and 8 dyadic), designed to assess the amount, duration, and intensity of interaction. Each item was rated on a 3-point ordinal scale with 1-2 indicating an area of concern, 3 indicating an area for some concern and 4- 5 indicating an area of strength. Eight subscales constructed from items of the PCERA have been theoretically derived and confirmed by factor analysis (Clark, 1999; Clark et al., 1997). For ease of analysis this scale was transformed to a -1 to +1 range. Scores were recorded as 1 or 2 = -1, 3= 0, 4 or 5 = 1. The total PCERA score is the mean of all the subscale mean scores and ranged -1 (highest risk of atypical interactions) to +1 (most positive interactions).

Time frame: Baseline, End phase 1, End of intervention, 1 month post intervention

Population: The sample varied some between visits do to a lack of video taping the parent child interaction on a few occasions because the parent who consented to the study was not present at the time of the visit and the visit could not be rescheduled. The 3 month post intervention visit was dropped.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual Care GroupParent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)Baseline0.27 Mean Score on PCERAStandard Deviation 0.17
Usual Care GroupParent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)End phase 10.20 Mean Score on PCERAStandard Deviation 0.3
Usual Care GroupParent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)End of intervention Phase 20.34 Mean Score on PCERAStandard Deviation 0.24
Usual Care GroupParent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)1 months post intervention0.50 Mean Score on PCERAStandard Deviation 0.51
SPEEDI InterventionParent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)1 months post intervention0.26 Mean Score on PCERAStandard Deviation 0.25
SPEEDI InterventionParent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)Baseline0.13 Mean Score on PCERAStandard Deviation 0.29
SPEEDI InterventionParent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)End of intervention Phase 20.25 Mean Score on PCERAStandard Deviation 0.23
SPEEDI InterventionParent Child Early Relational Assessment (PCERA)End phase 10.38 Mean Score on PCERAStandard Deviation 0.33
Secondary

Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP)

The TIMP is a standardized and norm references test of motor control and posture in infants 4 months of age and younger which is commonly used with infants starting at 34 weeks of post-menstrual age. Change in raw score from baseline to end of the intervention is reported. The TIMP raw score ranges from 0 to 142. A higher score represented greater performance in motor control and posture.

Time frame: Baseline to End of intervention

Population: Full Sample after infants lost to follow up who are not included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Usual Care GroupTest of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP)Baseline54 Raw Score on the TIMP
Usual Care GroupTest of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP)End of Intervention82 Raw Score on the TIMP
SPEEDI InterventionTest of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP)Baseline61 Raw Score on the TIMP
SPEEDI InterventionTest of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP)End of Intervention99 Raw Score on the TIMP

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026