Skip to content

Speech Therapy for Aphasia: Comparing Two Treatments

A Prospective, Controlled Study of Rehabilitation of Anomia in Aphasia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02153710
Acronym
PMvSFA
Enrollment
58
Registered
2014-06-03
Start date
2014-03-11
Completion date
2017-09-29
Last updated
2019-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Aphasia, Anomia

Brief summary

This is a behavioral speech therapy trial for individuals who have suffered a stroke on the left side of the brain and have difficulty speaking. The name of this disorder is called aphasia. Individuals in this study will receive one of two treatments. The first is a phonological (sound level) treatment and the second is a semantic (word level) treatment. Individuals in both groups will receive 60 hours of therapy for free (2 hours/day, 5 days/week, 6 weeks).

Detailed description

Purpose: The ultimate goal of anomia treatment should be to achieve gains in exemplars trained in the therapy session as well as generalization to untrained exemplars and contexts. Phonomotor treatment (PMT) has shown such effects but has not yet been compared to a commonly used lexical/semantic based treatment (semantic feature analysis; SFA). Methods: In a between group randomized controlled trial, 58 persons with aphasia characterized by anomia and phonological dysfunction were randomized to receive 56-60 hours of intensively delivered treatment over 6 weeks with testing pre-, post- and three-months post treatment termination.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSemantic Feature Analysis therapy

Control therapy; current standard of care therapy

BEHAVIORALPhonomotor Therapy

Experimental therapy.

Sponsors

Portland State University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Single, left-hemisphere stroke * English as primary language prior to stroke

Exclusion criteria

* Other neurological disorders * Untreated depression

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spoken Word Production (Confrontation Naming)Pretreatment to 3 months following treatment termination changeReporting a change in percent correct scores pre-treatment versus 3-months post treatment. (0-100% scale)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response LatencyPretreatment to 3 months following treatment termination changeChange in response latency of confrontation naming pre-treatment versus 3 months post treatment.
Verbs Correctly NamedPretreatment to 3 months following treatment termination changeChange in confrontation naming of verbs were scored for accuracy and percent correct (0% to 100%) was analyzed before versus 3 months post treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phonomotor Therapy
Experimental group Phonomotor Therapy: Experimental therapy.
28
Semantic Feature Analysis Therapy
Current standard of care therapy Semantic Feature Analysis therapy: Control therapy; current standard of care therapy
30
Total58

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhonomotor TherapySemantic Feature Analysis TherapyTotal
Age, Continuous63.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
63.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
63.35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.07
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
28 Participants30 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants12 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants18 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 280 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 280 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 280 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Spoken Word Production (Confrontation Naming)

Reporting a change in percent correct scores pre-treatment versus 3-months post treatment. (0-100% scale)

Time frame: Pretreatment to 3 months following treatment termination change

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phonomotor TherapySpoken Word Production (Confrontation Naming)53.01 percent correctStandard Deviation 29.71
Semantic Feature Analysis TherapySpoken Word Production (Confrontation Naming)50.37 percent correctStandard Deviation 29.79
Secondary

Response Latency

Change in response latency of confrontation naming pre-treatment versus 3 months post treatment.

Time frame: Pretreatment to 3 months following treatment termination change

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phonomotor TherapyResponse Latency1.49 secondsStandard Deviation 0.54
Semantic Feature Analysis TherapyResponse Latency1.40 secondsStandard Deviation 0.67
Secondary

Verbs Correctly Named

Change in confrontation naming of verbs were scored for accuracy and percent correct (0% to 100%) was analyzed before versus 3 months post treatment.

Time frame: Pretreatment to 3 months following treatment termination change

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phonomotor TherapyVerbs Correctly Named3.36 percent correctStandard Deviation 7.19
Semantic Feature Analysis TherapyVerbs Correctly Named2.46 percent correctStandard Deviation 9.11

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026