Skip to content

Using the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce Model to Reduce Problem Behaviors in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Using the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce Model to Reduce Problem Behaviors in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02153203
Enrollment
42
Registered
2014-06-02
Start date
2014-10-31
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2016-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Child Development Disorders, Pervasive

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder, Problem behavior

Brief summary

Children with autism spectrum disorders often engage in problem behaviors such as self-injury, destruction, aggression, and stereotypy. Prior research has clearly shown that these problem behaviors may interfere with learning, daily functioning, and social participation. As such, engaging in problem behaviors has a negative impact on the health and quality of life of children with autism spectrum disorders and their families. One promising solution to reduce problem behaviors in this population is the Prevent-Teach-Reinforce (PTR) model, which relies on the evidence-based practices of positive behavior support. Although the use of PTR has been gaining considerably support in schools, the model has never been evaluated as part of a rigorous large-scale study using parents as interventionists. Thus, the purpose of the project is to conduct an assessment of the effectiveness of a home-based version of the PTR model in reducing problem behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorders and in improving families' quality of life. Our hypotheses are that implementing the PTR will (a) produce larger reductions in problem behaviors than participating in an individual parent training session, (b) increase engagement in prosocial behaviors, (c) decrease parental stress, and (c) improve the quality of life of the family. The results of the study will allow an examination of whether PTR is an effective and acceptable model to reduce problem behaviors at home in this population. Given that problem behaviors incur high societal costs when they persist into adolescence and adulthood, the study may potentially lead to large cost reductions in the treatment of difficulties associated with autism spectrum disorders. By reducing engagement in problem behaviors, the implementation of the model may also promote and facilitate the social participation as well as improve the quality of life and health of children with autism spectrum disorders and their families.

Interventions

OTHERIndividual Parent Training Session

One 2- to 3-hour individual parent training session on the assessment and treatment of problem behavior

BEHAVIORALPrevent-Teach-Reinforce Model

Implementation of the model once to twice per week over a period of 8 weeks

Sponsors

Université de Montréal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder * Must exhibit problem behavior

Exclusion criteria

* Already receiving services to reduce problem behaviors at home

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in parental report of problem behavior at 8 weeksPrior to the start of the intervention and 8 weeks laterProblem behavior scale of the Problem Behavior Inventory

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in parental report of stress at 20 weeksPrior to the start of the intervention and 20 weeks laterParenting Stress Index Short Form
Change from baseline in parental report of stress at 8 weeksPrior to the start of the intervention and 8 weeks laterParenting Stress Index Short Form
Change from baseline in quality of life at 20 weeksPrior to the start of the intervention and 20 weeks laterBeach Center Family Quality of Life Scale
Change from baseline in quality of life at 8 weeksPrior to the start of the intervention and 8 weeks laterBeach Center Family Quality of Life Scale
Change from baseline in parental report of problem behavior at 20 weeksPrior to the start of the intervention and 20 weeks laterProblem behavior scale of the Problem Behavior Inventory
Change from baseline in parental report of positive social behavior at 20 weeksPrior to the start of the intervention and 20 weeks laterPositive social behavior scale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form
Change from baseline in parental report of positive social behavior at 8 weeksPrior to the start of the intervention and 8 weeks laterPositive social behavior scale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form
Social validity of the interventionAfter 8 weeks of interventionTreatment Acceptability Rating Form - Revised

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026