Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PT20 in Subjects With Hyperphosphataemia and Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of PT20 in Subjects With Hyperphosphataemia and Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02151643
Enrollment
153
Registered
2014-05-30
Start date
2014-05-07
Completion date
2015-03-18
Last updated
2018-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperphosphataemia

Keywords

Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease

Brief summary

The main purpose of this study is to see whether PT20 can help people with a high level of phosphate in their blood (called Hyperphosphatemia) that are being treated with dialysis for kidney disease.

Detailed description

PT20 represents a mechanism to address many of the limitations associated with current phosphate binding agents. The available clinical and non clinical evidence suggests that PT20 binds phosphate and prevents its uptake more efficiently than other phosphate binding drugs and may therefore either reduce the pill burden associated with controlling phosphate levels, or result in lower phosphate levels with the same pill burden. The this study is the first to investigate the efficacy and safety of PT20 in subjects with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Interventions

DRUGPT20

Modified ferric oxide adipate tablets

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo tablets matched to each PT20 dose arm

Sponsors

Clinipace Worldwide
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Phosphate Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men or women aged 18 90 years * Subject must have a stable dialysis prescription for at least 28 days prior to start of Screening. * Subject must have the most recent serum phosphate measurement, taken during the 28 days prior to the start of Screening, of ≥ 4.0 mg/dL and ≤ 8 mg/dL.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject's most recent historical pre-dialysis serum bicarbonate value within 14 days prior to the start of Screening (Visit 1) is \< 18 mg/dL. * Subject has, in the opinion of the investigator, severe chronic lung disease and/or carbon dioxide retention.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Serum Phosphate Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)Day 1 to Day 29The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in serum phosphate concentration from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29). All study specific blood samples were collected, processed and analysed using a central laboratory.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)Day 1 to Day 29Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in haemoglobin concentration. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for haemoglobin. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.
Change in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)Day 1 to Day 29Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in serum ferritin concentration. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment and week (Visit), as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for serum ferritin. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.
Change in Transferrin Saturation From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)Day 1 to Day 29Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in transferrin saturation. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment and week, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for transferrin saturation. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.
Change in Calcium x Phosphate Product From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)Day 1 to Day 29Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in Calcium x Phosphate Product . An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for Calcium x Phosphate Product. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis. In CKD subjects (Stages 3-5), the clinical recommendation (KDOQI) is that serum calcium x phosphate product should be maintained at \< 55 mg\^2/dL\^2 (4.4 mmol\^2 /L\^2).
Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating System (GSRS) Overall Score From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)Day 1 to Day 29The GSRS assesses the impact of treatment-related GI complications. It includes 15 items divided into 5 subscales (diarrhoea, indigestion, abdominal pain, constipation, and reflux), and uses a seven-grade Likert scale to assess symptoms (1 = no discomfort at all, 7 = very severe discomfort). The total score was calculated as the average score of all 15 items. If data were missing from one or more subscales, the mean of the completed items within the subscale was to be used for the subscale score, provided that more than half of the subscale items were complete. If more than half of the items within a subscale were missing, the subscale score and overall score were also to be defined as missing. The change in overall GSRS score from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29) was summarised by treatment and a two-sample t-test was to be used to identify differences between the placebo and PT20 dose groups. The higher the score, the more severe the gastrointestinal symptoms.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Male/female subjects with dialysis dependent CKD on prescribed maintenance haemodialysis 3 times/week for 90d before Screening were recruited and randomised to receive PT20 or placebo. Prior to Screening, all subjects were taking at least 1 OPB for a minimum of 28d mean + serum phosphate level ≥ 4.0 mg/dL and ≤ 8.0 mg/dL for the preceding 28 days.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects underwent stratified randomisation into 1 of the 4 PT20 dose groups or equivalent placebo group based pre-randomisation serum phosphate level (ratio of 8:8:8:13:13) - serum phosphate \< 7.5 mg/dL were deemed to have a lower level of serum phosphate; serum phosphate ≥ 7.5 mg/dL were deemed to have a higher level of serum phosphate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 - PT20 400 mg Tid
PT20 400 mg tid (1.2 g/day) administered orally. Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study
24
Group 2 - PT20 800 mg Tid
PT20 800 mg tid (2.4 g/day) administered orally. Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study
23
Group 3 - PT20 1600 mg Tid
PT20 1600 mg tid (4.8 g/day) administered orally. Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study
22
Group 4 - PT20 3200 mg Tid
PT20 3200 mg tid (9.6 g/day) administered orally. Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study
36
Group 5 - Placebo Tid
Matched Placebo (for PT20) tid administered orally. Dosing was initiated with the subject's first meal/snack following receipt of study medication at Visit 7 (Day 1). There was to be no change in dose administration level with respect to each cohort in this study
36
Total141

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event20140
Overall StudyHigh Ferritin levels33221
Overall StudyHyperphosphataemia10001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01111

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 2 - PT20 800 mg TidGroup 3 - PT20 1600 mg TidGroup 4 - PT20 3200 mg TidGroup 1 - PT20 400 mg TidGroup 5 - Placebo TidTotal
Age, Continuous58.0 years60.3 years55.9 years60.4 years55.0 years57.5 years
Baseline Serum Phosphate Concentrations
< 7.5 mg/dL
15 Participants11 Participants20 Participants13 Participants20 Participants79 Participants
Baseline Serum Phosphate Concentrations
≥ 7.5 mg/dL
8 Participants11 Participants16 Participants11 Participants16 Participants62 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants8 Participants14 Participants9 Participants13 Participants53 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants14 Participants22 Participants15 Participants23 Participants88 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants9 Participants12 Participants7 Participants16 Participants52 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants13 Participants20 Participants12 Participants16 Participants72 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
23 Participants22 Participants36 Participants24 Participants36 Participants141 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants11 Participants16 Participants8 Participants14 Participants58 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants11 Participants20 Participants16 Participants22 Participants83 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 240 / 230 / 220 / 360 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 2411 / 2313 / 2216 / 3616 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 241 / 231 / 225 / 365 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Serum Phosphate Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in serum phosphate concentration from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29). All study specific blood samples were collected, processed and analysed using a central laboratory.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group 1 - PT20 400 mg TidChange in Serum Phosphate Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-0.4 mg/dL
Group 2 - PT20 800 mg TidChange in Serum Phosphate Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-0.59 mg/dL
Group 3 - PT20 1600 mg TidChange in Serum Phosphate Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-1.29 mg/dL
Group 4 - PT20 3200 mg TidChange in Serum Phosphate Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-1.363 mg/dL
Group 5 - Placebo TidChange in Serum Phosphate Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-0.165 mg/dL
Comparison: ITT population - statistical analysis of linear model fit using an F-test at the 0.05 level.~It was determined that 150 subjects randomised at a ratio of 8:8:8:13:13 (low dose to high dose, placebo) would have \>90% power to detect either a statistically significant slope for the dose-response relationship, or, if the relationship was not linear, a statistically significant difference between the highest-dose group and the placebo group, using a two-sided 0.05 significance level.p-value: 0.784F-test
Comparison: ITT population sensitivity analysis using baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) to assess statistical analysis of linear model fit using an F-test at the 0.05 level.p-value: 0.905F-test
Comparison: ITT population sensitivity analysis using multiple imputation (MI) to assess statistical analysis of linear model fit using an F-test at the 0.05 level.p-value: 0.976F-test
Comparison: Per protocol (PP) population sensitivity analysis to assess statistical analysis of linear model fit using an F-test at the 0.05 level.p-value: 0.914F-test
Comparison: ITT population - statistical analysis of the linear model log(PT20 dose)-response relationship to examine whether the linear trend of the change in phosphate level as a function of the log-transformed dose was statistically significant.p-value: <0.001linear model - log (dose) - response
Comparison: ITT population supportive analysis - Type 3 tests of fixed effects - treatment groupp-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: ITT population supportive analysis - Type 3 tests of fixed effects - visitp-value: 0.436Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: ITT population supportive analysis - Type 3 tests of fixed effects - treatment group versus Visit interactionp-value: 0.959Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: ITT population supportive analysis - Type 3 tests of fixed effects - baseline serum phosphate concentrationp-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: ITT population supportive analysis - Type 3 tests of fixed effects - baseline serum phosphate concentration versus Visit interactionp-value: 0.144Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: ITT population supportive analysis - mixed model repeated measures for change in serum phosphate concentration
Comparison: ITT population supportive analysis - mixed model repeated measures for change in serum phosphate concentration
Comparison: ITT population supportive analysis - mixed model repeated measures for change in serum phosphate concentration
Comparison: ITT population supportive analysis - mixed model repeated measures for change in serum phosphate concentration
Secondary

Change in Calcium x Phosphate Product From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in Calcium x Phosphate Product . An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for Calcium x Phosphate Product. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis. In CKD subjects (Stages 3-5), the clinical recommendation (KDOQI) is that serum calcium x phosphate product should be maintained at \< 55 mg\^2/dL\^2 (4.4 mmol\^2 /L\^2).

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 - PT20 400 mg TidChange in Calcium x Phosphate Product From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-5.515 mg^2/dL^2Standard Deviation 13.7966
Group 2 - PT20 800 mg TidChange in Calcium x Phosphate Product From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-4.035 mg^2/dL^2Standard Deviation 13.5196
Group 3 - PT20 1600 mg TidChange in Calcium x Phosphate Product From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-11.127 mg^2/dL^2Standard Deviation 15.1683
Group 4 - PT20 3200 mg TidChange in Calcium x Phosphate Product From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-10.996 mg^2/dL^2Standard Deviation 19.3057
Group 5 - Placebo TidChange in Calcium x Phosphate Product From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-0.778 mg^2/dL^2Standard Deviation 10.286
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in Calcium x Phosphate Product from Baseline by PT20 dose group.p-value: 0.004ANCOVA
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in transferrin saturation from Baseline by Baseline Calcium x Phosphate Product.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating System (GSRS) Overall Score From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

The GSRS assesses the impact of treatment-related GI complications. It includes 15 items divided into 5 subscales (diarrhoea, indigestion, abdominal pain, constipation, and reflux), and uses a seven-grade Likert scale to assess symptoms (1 = no discomfort at all, 7 = very severe discomfort). The total score was calculated as the average score of all 15 items. If data were missing from one or more subscales, the mean of the completed items within the subscale was to be used for the subscale score, provided that more than half of the subscale items were complete. If more than half of the items within a subscale were missing, the subscale score and overall score were also to be defined as missing. The change in overall GSRS score from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29) was summarised by treatment and a two-sample t-test was to be used to identify differences between the placebo and PT20 dose groups. The higher the score, the more severe the gastrointestinal symptoms.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29

Population: Safety Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 - PT20 400 mg TidChange in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating System (GSRS) Overall Score From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.75
Group 2 - PT20 800 mg TidChange in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating System (GSRS) Overall Score From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)2.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.97
Group 3 - PT20 1600 mg TidChange in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating System (GSRS) Overall Score From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Group 4 - PT20 3200 mg TidChange in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating System (GSRS) Overall Score From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)1.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.48
Group 5 - Placebo TidChange in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating System (GSRS) Overall Score From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)0.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.16
p-value: 0.292paired z-test
p-value: 0.047paired z-test
p-value: 0.872paired z-test
p-value: 0.288paired z-test
Secondary

Change in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in haemoglobin concentration. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for haemoglobin. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 - PT20 400 mg TidChange in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)0.02 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.953
Group 2 - PT20 800 mg TidChange in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-0.25 g/dLStandard Deviation 1.085
Group 3 - PT20 1600 mg TidChange in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-0.22 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.958
Group 4 - PT20 3200 mg TidChange in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)0.18 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.913
Group 5 - Placebo TidChange in Haemoglobin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-0.13 g/dLStandard Deviation 0.892
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in haemoglobin concentration from Baseline by PT20 dose group.p-value: 0.497ANCOVA
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in haemoglobin concentration from Baseline by baseline hemoglobin.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in serum ferritin concentration. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment and week (Visit), as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for serum ferritin. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 - PT20 400 mg TidChange in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)50 ng/mLStandard Deviation 206.23
Group 2 - PT20 800 mg TidChange in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)48.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 231.41
Group 3 - PT20 1600 mg TidChange in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)10.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 107.05
Group 4 - PT20 3200 mg TidChange in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)69.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 172.85
Group 5 - Placebo TidChange in Serum Ferritin Concentration From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-67.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 181.73
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in serum ferritin concentration from Baseline by PT20 dose group.p-value: 0.243ANCOVA
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in serum ferritin concentration from Baseline by Visit.p-value: 0.867ANCOVA
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in serum ferritin concentration from Baseline by baseline serum ferritin concentrationp-value: 0.186ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Transferrin Saturation From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)

Descriptive statistics were to be used to summarise values and change from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11) in transferrin saturation. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was to be used to analyse the changes from Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Day 29 (Visit 11), which were to include the fixed, categorical effects of treatment and week, as well as the continuous, fixed covariates of Baseline concentrations for transferrin saturation. Only those subjects with available concentrations for both Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) and Visit 11 (Day 29) were to be included in this analysis.

Time frame: Day 1 to Day 29

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1 - PT20 400 mg TidChange in Transferrin Saturation From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)2.20 percentStandard Deviation 8.649
Group 2 - PT20 800 mg TidChange in Transferrin Saturation From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)0.40 percentStandard Deviation 11.856
Group 3 - PT20 1600 mg TidChange in Transferrin Saturation From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)5.84 percentStandard Deviation 15.178
Group 4 - PT20 3200 mg TidChange in Transferrin Saturation From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-4.59 percentStandard Deviation 14.735
Group 5 - Placebo TidChange in Transferrin Saturation From Baseline (Visit 7, Day 1) to Visit 11 (Day 29)-0.45 percentStandard Deviation 8.754
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in transferrin saturation from Baseline by PT20 dose group.p-value: 0.068ANCOVA
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in transferrin saturation from Baseline by Visit.p-value: 0.013ANCOVA
Comparison: Repeated measures ANCOVA for change in transferrin saturation from Baseline by Baseline Transferrin Saturation.p-value: <0.001ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026