Skip to content

A Phase II, Single Arm Study of BGJ398 in Patients With Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma

A Phase II Multicenter, Single Arm Study of Oral BGJ398 in Adult Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma With FGFR2 Gene Fusions or Other FGFR Genetic Alterations Who Failed or Are Intolerant to Platinum-based Chemotherapy

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02150967
Enrollment
143
Registered
2014-05-30
Start date
2014-07-23
Completion date
2022-02-07
Last updated
2023-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma, FGFR2 Gene Mutation

Keywords

cholangiocarcinoma,, FGFR2 gene fusion,, FGFR genetic alteration

Brief summary

This is a multi-center, open label, single arm phase II study evaluating BGJ398 (infigratinib) anti-tumor activity in advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) genetic alterations.

Detailed description

Adult patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions or translocations or other FGFR genetic alterations have been enrolled. Subjects must have received at least one prior regimen containing gemcitabine with or without cisplatin for advanced/metastatic disease. Subjects should have had evidence of progressive disease following their prior regimen or if prior treatment was discontinued due to toxicity must have continued evidence of measurable disease. Up to approximately 160 adult patients over age 18, both male and female were planned for enrollment. Three cohorts of subjects comprise the study population: Cohort 1: subjects with FGFR2 gene fusions (ie, fusions or rearrangements \[formerly translocations\]). Cohort 2: subjects with FGFR genetic alterations other than FGFR2 gene fusions or rearrangements. Cohort 3: subjects with FGFR2 gene fusions or rearrangements who have received a prior FGFR inhibitor. All subjects received oral BGJ398 (infigratinib), once-daily, on a three weeks on (21 days), one week off (7 days) schedule. One treatment cycle consists of 28 days. Notes: Cohort 1 was pre-specified as the primary analysis population. Results of these analyses were previously disclosed (posted 22 June 2022). There were no additional efficacy or safety endpoints to assess in Cohort 1 after primary completion (01 March 2021). Cohorts 2 and 3 were added at protocol amendment (PA) 4 to support only exploratory efficacy objectives of the study. These cohorts were ongoing the time of primary completion (01 March 2021). After interim review of the data from these cohorts (as permitted by the protocol) only limited efficacy was observed and the sponsor terminated the study early. Therefore, a formal efficacy analysis was not performed for Cohorts 2 and 3. However, baseline characteristics and safety data were analyzed.

Interventions

DRUGBGJ398 (infigratinib)

Capsule for oral use

Sponsors

Helsinn Healthcare SA
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
QED Therapeutics, a BridgeBio company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Adult patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma at the time of diagnosis. Patients with cancers of the gallbladder or ampulla of Vater are not eligible. \- Patients must have received at least one prior regimen containing gemcitabine with or without cisplatin for advanced/ metastatic disease. Patient should have evidence of progressive disease following prior regimen, or if prior treatment discontinued due to toxicity must have continued evidence of measurable or evaluable disease.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior or current treatment with a MEK inhibitor (all Cohorts), BGJ398 (infigratinib) (all Cohorts), or selective FGFR inhibitor (Cohorts 1 and 2 only). * insufficient organ function * Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \< 1,000/mm3 \[1.0 x 10\^9/L\] * Platelets \< 75,000/mm3 \[75 x 10\^9/L\] * Hemoglobin \< 109.0 g/dL * Total bilirubin \> 1.5x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Aspartate aminotransferase/glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (AST/SGOT) and alanine aminotransferase/glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT/SGPT) \> 2.5x ULN (AST and ALT \> 5x ULN in the presence of liver metastases) * Serum creatinine \> 1.5x ULN and a calculated or measured creatinine clearance \< 45 mL/min * Inorganic phosphorus outside of normal limits * Total and ionized serum calcium outside of normal limits Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Imaging Review (BICR)Analysis was conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.ORR is defined as the percentage (%) of subjects with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.1, evaluated by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans every 28 days. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria were as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions). Results were previously disclosed (22 June 2022). There are no additional efficacy endpoints to assess for Cohort 1, thus efficacy data were not re-analyzed for the final analysis. Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the InvestigatorAnalysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff for the primary analysis was 01 March 2021.ORR is defined as the percentage (%) of subjects with a best overall response of CR or PR, evaluated by CT or MRI scans every 28 days. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria were as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) only. These results were previously disclosed (22 June 2022). There are no additional efficacy endpoints to assess for Cohort 1, thus efficacy data were not re-analyzed for the final analysis. Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.
Best Overall Response (BOR)Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.BOR is defined as the best overall response a subject achieved during the study before any subsequent antineoplastic therapy. The endpoint is summarized for the rate of BOR of CR, PR, progressive disease (PD), and stable disease (SD), evaluated by CT or MRI scans every 28 days. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria were as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions from that of the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase in target lesion of at least 5mm. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusion)
Disease Control Rate (DCR)Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.DCR is the percentage (%) of subjects with a BOR of CR, PR, or SD, evaluated by CT or MRI scans every 28 days. Results are based on both BICR and on Investigator assessment. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria were as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). There are no additional efficacy endpoints to assess for Cohort 1, thus efficacy data were not re-analyzed for the final analysis. Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.
Overall Survival (OS)Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.OS was defined as the time (months) from the date of start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.
Duration of Response (DOR)Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.DOR is defined as the time (months) from the initial response to the time of the event; defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. Note that results are based on a subgroup of subjects with confirmed responses (CR or PR) as assessed by BICR or by the Investigator. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria was as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.
Response OnsetAnalysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.Response onset was defined as the time (months) from the first study treatment administration date to the initial response. Note that results are based on a subgroup of subjects with confirmed responses (CR or PR) as assessed by BICR or by the Investigator. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria was as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.PFS was calculated as the number of months from the first dose of study drug to the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Subjects without an assessment of progression or death were censored at the last adequate tumor assessment. For subjects who had an event after ≥2 missed visits, the subject was censored at the last adequate tumor assessment before the missing visit. Disease progression was assessed per RECIST (v1.1) and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions from that of the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase in target lesion of at least 5mm. Results are based on both BICR and on Investigator assessment. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Growth Modulation Index (GMI)Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.The GMI is defined as the ratio of PFS (months) during treatment with infigratinib relative to the time (months) to progression (TTP) during treatment with last prior line of therapy. Subjects served as their own control. Results are provided for both BICR and Investigator assessment. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Italy, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Thailand, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants with a diagnosis of advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma were recruited to this open-label, single-arm global study across 20 centers (9 in the US, 5 in W. Europe, 6 in Asia) based on documented evidence of FGFR gene alteration. The first participant was treated on 23 July 2014. The data cutoff for the primary analysis (Cohort 1 only) was 01 March 2021.The data cutoff for the final analysis (Cohort 2 and 3 only) was 07 February 2022.

Pre-assignment details

Subjects meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled into the following cohorts: Cohort 1 (FGFR2 fusions): Primary analysis population (N=108). Cohort 2 (Other FGFR alterations): N=25. Cohort 3 (FGFR2 fusions and prior FGFR inhibitor): N=10. Note: Primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1. Cohorts 2 and 3 were added following PA 4 to support exploratory objectives only. Cohorts 2 and 3 are not the primary analysis population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: FGFR2 Fusions
Infigratinib 125 mg once daily (3 wk on/1 wk off treatment)
108
Cohort 2: Other FGFR Genetic Alterations
Infigratinib 125 mg once daily (3 wk on/1 wk off treatment)
25
Cohort 3: FGFR2 Fusions and Prior FGFR Inhibitor
Infigratinib 125 mg once daily (3 wk on/1 wk off treatment)
10
Total143

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 2: Other FGFR Genetic AlterationsTotalCohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsCohort 3: FGFR2 Fusions and Prior FGFR Inhibitor
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
8 Participants36 Participants26 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
17 Participants107 Participants82 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.89
54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.88
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.08
51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.07
ECOG PS
0
11 Participants59 Participants45 Participants3 Participants
ECOG PS
1
13 Participants82 Participants62 Participants7 Participants
ECOG PS
2
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Histological Grade
Moderately differentiated
14 Participants63 Participants42 Participants7 Participants
Histological Grade
Not Applicable
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Histological Grade
Poorly differentiated
2 Participants37 Participants33 Participants2 Participants
Histological Grade
Undifferentiated
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Histological Grade
Unknown/missing
7 Participants30 Participants22 Participants1 Participants
Histological Grade
Well differentiated
2 Participants11 Participants9 Participants0 Participants
Non-Liver Metastatic Site
Bone
1 Participants31 Participants28 Participants2 Participants
Non-Liver Metastatic Site
Lung
9 Participants85 Participants74 Participants2 Participants
Non-Liver Metastatic Site
Node
5 Participants68 Participants62 Participants1 Participants
Non-Liver Metastatic Site
Other
6 Participants49 Participants41 Participants2 Participants
Non-Liver Metastatic Site
Had metastatic site
21 Participants133 Participants102 Participants10 Participants
Non-Liver Metastatic Site
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Non-Liver Metastatic Site
No metastatic site
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants0 Participants
Primary site of cancer
Bile Duct
24 Participants139 Participants105 Participants10 Participants
Primary site of cancer
Cholangiocarcinoma
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Primary site of cancer
Liver
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants13 Participants11 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants7 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants15 Participants15 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants108 Participants78 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
11 Participants40 Participants24 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
North America
12 Participants94 Participants77 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
0 Participants4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants82 Participants67 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants61 Participants41 Participants7 Participants
Stage at Time of Study Entry
Stage II
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Stage at Time of Study Entry
Stage III
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Stage at Time of Study Entry
Stage IV
20 Participants137 Participants107 Participants10 Participants
Time from initial diagnosis to first dose day16.49 months15 months12.75 months22.11 months
Time from the most recent recurrence/progression to the first dose day1.31 months1.36 months1.40 months1.36 months

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
93 / 10819 / 257 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
107 / 10825 / 2510 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
35 / 10811 / 252 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Imaging Review (BICR)

ORR is defined as the percentage (%) of subjects with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.1, evaluated by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans every 28 days. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria were as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions). Results were previously disclosed (22 June 2022). There are no additional efficacy endpoints to assess for Cohort 1, thus efficacy data were not re-analyzed for the final analysis. Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis was conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsOverall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Imaging Review (BICR)23.1 Percentage (%) of subjects with CR or PR
Secondary

Best Overall Response (BOR)

BOR is defined as the best overall response a subject achieved during the study before any subsequent antineoplastic therapy. The endpoint is summarized for the rate of BOR of CR, PR, progressive disease (PD), and stable disease (SD), evaluated by CT or MRI scans every 28 days. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria were as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions from that of the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase in target lesion of at least 5mm. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusion)

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by InvestigatorConfirmed CR0 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by InvestigatorConfirmed PR35 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by BICRConfirmed CR1 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by BICRConfirmed PR24 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by BICRStable Disease66 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by BICRProgressive Disease11 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by BICRNot Done6 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by InvestigatorStable Disease56 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by InvestigatorProgressive Disease11 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsBest Overall Response (BOR)BOR by InvestigatorNot Done6 Participants
Secondary

Disease Control Rate (DCR)

DCR is the percentage (%) of subjects with a BOR of CR, PR, or SD, evaluated by CT or MRI scans every 28 days. Results are based on both BICR and on Investigator assessment. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria were as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). There are no additional efficacy endpoints to assess for Cohort 1, thus efficacy data were not re-analyzed for the final analysis. Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsDisease Control Rate (DCR)DCR by BICR84.3 Percentage (%) with CR, PR, or SD
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsDisease Control Rate (DCR)DCR by Investigator84.3 Percentage (%) with CR, PR, or SD
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the time (months) from the initial response to the time of the event; defined as the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever was earlier. Note that results are based on a subgroup of subjects with confirmed responses (CR or PR) as assessed by BICR or by the Investigator. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria was as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib. Conducted in a subgroup of subjects who were confirmed responders (CR or PR) as assessed by BICR (N = 25) or by the Investigator (N = 35).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsDuration of Response (DOR)DOR by BICR5.55 months
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsDuration of Response (DOR)DOR by Investigator7.23 months
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator

ORR is defined as the percentage (%) of subjects with a best overall response of CR or PR, evaluated by CT or MRI scans every 28 days. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria were as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) only. These results were previously disclosed (22 June 2022). There are no additional efficacy endpoints to assess for Cohort 1, thus efficacy data were not re-analyzed for the final analysis. Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff for the primary analysis was 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsOverall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator32.4 Percentage (%) of subjects with CR or PR
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time (months) from the date of start of treatment to the date of death due to any cause. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsOverall Survival (OS)11.86 months
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was calculated as the number of months from the first dose of study drug to the first documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred earlier. Subjects without an assessment of progression or death were censored at the last adequate tumor assessment. For subjects who had an event after ≥2 missed visits, the subject was censored at the last adequate tumor assessment before the missing visit. Disease progression was assessed per RECIST (v1.1) and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of all target lesions from that of the smallest sum on study and an absolute increase in target lesion of at least 5mm. Results are based on both BICR and on Investigator assessment. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsProgression-Free Survival (PFS)PFS by BICR7.29 months
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsProgression-Free Survival (PFS)PFS by Investigator6.74 months
Secondary

Response Onset

Response onset was defined as the time (months) from the first study treatment administration date to the initial response. Note that results are based on a subgroup of subjects with confirmed responses (CR or PR) as assessed by BICR or by the Investigator. RECIST (v1.1) response criteria was as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib. Conducted in a subgroup of subjects who were confirmed responders (CR or PR) as assessed by BICR (N = 25) or by the Investigator (N = 35).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsResponse OnsetResponse onset by BICR3.61 months
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsResponse OnsetResponse onset by Investigator1.94 months
Other Pre-specified

Growth Modulation Index (GMI)

The GMI is defined as the ratio of PFS (months) during treatment with infigratinib relative to the time (months) to progression (TTP) during treatment with last prior line of therapy. Subjects served as their own control. Results are provided for both BICR and Investigator assessment. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib. Conducted in a subgroup of subjects with both a PFS measure while on infigratinib and available TTP for their last prior line of therapy (N = 103).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsGrowth Modulation Index (GMI)PFS by BICR1.22 Ratio (PFS/TTP) in Months
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsGrowth Modulation Index (GMI)PFS by Investigator1.24 Ratio (PFS/TTP) in Months
Post Hoc

Retrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BOR

Post-hoc subgroup assessment of efficacy in those subjects who were receiving infigratinib as a third or later line of treatment. Investigator-assessed BOR was obtained from subjects' medical histories to provide a baseline evaluation of their response after historical second-line antineoplastic treatment prior to infigratinib treatment. Investigator-assessed BOR was then calculated in the same subjects after third- or later-line infigratinib therapy. The endpoint is summarized for the rate of BOR of PD, SD, PR, and CR. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib Conducted in a subgroup of subjects who were receiving infigratinib as a third or later line of treatment (N=59).

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORAfter Second-Line Therapy (Prior to Infigratinib Treatment)Complete response0 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORAfter Second-Line Therapy (Prior to Infigratinib Treatment)Partial response0 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORAfter Second-Line Therapy (Prior to Infigratinib Treatment)Stable disease19 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORAfter Second-Line Therapy (Prior to Infigratinib Treatment)Progressive disease22 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORAfter Second-Line Therapy (Prior to Infigratinib Treatment)Unknown18 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORAfter Second-Line Therapy (Prior to Infigratinib Treatment)Not done0 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORThird or Later-Line Therapy (Infigratinib)Complete response0 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORThird or Later-Line Therapy (Infigratinib)Partial response17 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORThird or Later-Line Therapy (Infigratinib)Stable disease31 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORThird or Later-Line Therapy (Infigratinib)Progressive disease7 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORThird or Later-Line Therapy (Infigratinib)Unknown0 Participants
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on BORThird or Later-Line Therapy (Infigratinib)Not done4 Participants
Post Hoc

Retrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on ORR

Post-hoc subgroup assessment of efficacy in those subjects who were receiving infigratinib as a third or later line of treatment. Investigator-assessed ORR was obtained from subjects' medical histories to provide a baseline evaluation of their response after historical second-line antineoplastic treatment prior to infigratinib treatment. Investigator-assessed ORR was then calculated in the same subjects after third- or later-line infigratinib therapy. ORR is defined as the percentage (%) of patients with CR or PR, per RECIST (v1.1). RECIST (v1.1) response criteria were as follows: CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph node (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease from baseline in the sum of diameters of all target lesions. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (22 June 2022). No formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib Conducted in a subgroup of subjects who were receiving infigratinib as a third or later line of treatment (N = 59).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on ORRAfter Second-Line Therapy (Prior to Infigratinib Treatment)0 Percentage (%) of patients with CR or PR
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on ORRThird or Later-Line Therapy (Infigratinib)28.8 Percentage (%) of patients with CR or PR
Post Hoc

Retrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on PFS

Post-hoc subgroup assessment of efficacy in those subjects who were receiving infigratinib as a third or later line of treatment. Investigator-assessed PFS was obtained from subjects' medical histories to provide a baseline evaluation of their response after historical second-line antineoplastic treatment prior to infigratinib treatment. Investigator-assessed PFS was then calculated in the same subjects after third- or later-line infigratinib therapy. Note: The primary efficacy outcome measures were prespecified only for Cohort 1 (FGFR fusions) (disclosed 22 June 2022). Due to early termination of the study, no formal efficacy analyses were performed for Cohorts 2 and 3.

Time frame: Analysis conducted when all subjects in Cohort 1 had the opportunity to be followed for at least 10 months after their initial exposure to infigratinib. Data cutoff 01 March 2021.

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), defined as all subjects in Cohort 1 who had received at least one dose of infigratinib. Conducted in a subgroup of subjects who were receiving infigratinib as a third or later line of treatment (N=59).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on PFSAfter Second-Line Therapy (Prior to Infigratinib Treatment)5.36 months
Cohort 1: FGFR2 FusionsRetrospective Analysis of Post-second-line Antineoplastic Treatment Outcomes on PFSThird or Later-Line Therapy (Infigratinib)6.93 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026