Skip to content

Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) vs Placebo in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (LUME-Colon 1)

A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Phase III Study of Nintedanib Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02149108
Enrollment
768
Registered
2014-05-29
Start date
2014-09-25
Completion date
2016-08-25
Last updated
2017-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Brief summary

The objective of this Phase III study is to evaluate the efficacy of nintedanib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of previous treatment with standard chemotherapy and biological agents.

Interventions

DRUGNintedanib (BIBF 1120)
DRUGPlacebo
DRUGBSC

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>= 18 years * Signed informed consent * Histologically or cytologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma * Metastatic or locally advanced disease not amenable to curative surgery and/or radiotherapy * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status = 1 * At least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 * Progression on standard therapies or withdrawn from standard treatment due to unacceptable toxicity. Previous standard treatment must include all of the following: * \- fluoropyrimidine * \- oxaliplatin: Patients treated with oxaliplatin in adjuvant setting should have progressed within 6 months of completion of adjuvant therapy or they must have been treated with oxaliplatin for metastatic disease * \- irinotecan * \- bevacizumab or aflibercept * \- cetuximab or panitumumab for patients with K-Ras wt or Ras wt tumours * \- The remaining standard available therapy as recommended by investigator is best supportive care (note: previous treatment with regorafenib and TAS 102 are allowed and these agents should be administered before study if available to patient according to local standards) * \- Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks * \- Hepatic function: aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT) = 1.5 X Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) and bilirubin = ULN for patients without liver metastases. AST/ALT = 2.5 X ULN and bilirubin = ULN for patients with liver metastases. Patients with Gilbert syndrome and bilirubin \< 2 X ULN and normal AST/ALT are eligible * Coagulation parameters: International normalised ratio (INR) \< 2 and partial prothrombin Time (PTT) = 2xULN

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment with nintedanib * toxicity attributed to previous anticancer therapy that did not resolve to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade =1 * History of other malignancies in the last 5 years, in particular those that could interfere with interpretation of results. * Serious concomitant disease or medical condition affecting compliance with trial requirements or which are considered relevant for the evaluation of the efficacy or safety of the trial drug, * Significant cardiovascular diseases * History of severe haemorrhagic or thromboembolic event in the past 12 months * Bleeding or thrombotic disorders requiring anticoagulant therapy such as warfarin, or similar agents requiring therapeutic INR monitoring * Gastrointestinal disorders or abnormalities that would interfere with absorption of study drug * Patient with brain metastases that are symptomatic and/or require therapy. * Patients of childbearing potential who are sexually active and unwilling to use a highly effective method of contraception * Pregnancy or breast-feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Central Review AssessmentFrom randomisation until cut-off date 14JUN2016.PFS by central review assessment was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Median, 95% Confidence Interval were calculated from an unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curve for each treatment arm.
Overall Survival (OS)From randomisation until cut-off date 14JUN2016.OS was defined as the time from randomisation to the time of death from any cause. Median, 95% Confidence Interval were calculated from an unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curve for each treatment arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Tumour Response (Complete Response (CR)) + Partial Response (PR) by Central Review AssessmentFrom randomisation until cut-off date 14JUN2016.Objective tumour response was defined as best overall response of CR or PR determined by central review assessment.
Disease Control (Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease) by Central Review AssessmentFrom randomisation until cut-off date 14JUN2016.Disease control was defined as best overall response of CR, PR, or Stable Disease (SD).

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The completed patients were on treatment (2 patients on Placebo, 3 patients on Nintedanib) at the data cut-off date 14JUN2016. The NOT Completed patients were off-treatment (380 patients on Placebo, 383 patients on Nintedanib) at the data cut-off date 14JUN2016.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo soft gelatin capsule matching that of Nintedanib twice daily (b.i.d.) administered orally of 21-day treatment course. If required the dose of placebo, could be reduced to 150 mg b.i.d. or 100 mg b.i.d. (according to the protocol-defined dose-reduction scheme). No dose increase was allowed after a dose reduction.
382
Nintedanib
Nintedanib 200 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) administered orally in the form of a soft gelatin capsule of 21-day treatment course. If required the dose of Nintedanib, could be reduced to 150 mg b.i.d. or 100 mg b.i.d. (according to the protocol-defined dose-reduction scheme). No dose increase was allowed after a dose reduction.
386
Total768

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyNot treated12
Overall StudyOther Adverse Event (AE)818
Overall StudyOther not defined above02
Overall StudyProgressive Disease (PD)324318
Overall StudyRefusal to continue trial medication1511
Overall StudyWorsening/adverse event cancer disease3132

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboNintedanibTotal
Age, Continuous61.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
61.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
61.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Sex: Female, Male
Female
164 Participants150 Participants314 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
218 Participants236 Participants454 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
309 / 381351 / 384
serious
Total, serious adverse events
133 / 381149 / 384

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomisation to the time of death from any cause. Median, 95% Confidence Interval were calculated from an unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curve for each treatment arm.

Time frame: From randomisation until cut-off date 14JUN2016.

Population: Randomised Set: This patient set included all patients who were randomised to receive treatment, whether treated or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboOverall Survival (OS)6.05 Months
NintedanibOverall Survival (OS)6.44 Months
p-value: 0.865995% CI: [0.86, 1.19]Log Rank
Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Central Review Assessment

PFS by central review assessment was defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Median, 95% Confidence Interval were calculated from an unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curve for each treatment arm.

Time frame: From randomisation until cut-off date 14JUN2016.

Population: Randomised Set: This patient set included all patients who were randomised to receive treatment, whether treated or not.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboProgression-Free Survival (PFS) by Central Review Assessment1.38 Months
NintedanibProgression-Free Survival (PFS) by Central Review Assessment1.51 Months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.49, 0.69]Log Rank
Secondary

Disease Control (Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease) by Central Review Assessment

Disease control was defined as best overall response of CR, PR, or Stable Disease (SD).

Time frame: From randomisation until cut-off date 14JUN2016.

Population: Randomised Set: This patient set included all patients who were randomised to receive treatment, whether treated or not.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboDisease Control (Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease) by Central Review Assessment10.5 Percentage of participants
NintedanibDisease Control (Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease) by Central Review Assessment25.6 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2, 4.47]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Objective Tumour Response (Complete Response (CR)) + Partial Response (PR) by Central Review Assessment

Objective tumour response was defined as best overall response of CR or PR determined by central review assessment.

Time frame: From randomisation until cut-off date 14JUN2016.

Population: Randomised Set: This patient set included all patients who were randomised to receive treatment, whether treated or not.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboObjective Tumour Response (Complete Response (CR)) + Partial Response (PR) by Central Review Assessment0 Percentage of participants
NintedanibObjective Tumour Response (Complete Response (CR)) + Partial Response (PR) by Central Review Assessment0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026