Skip to content

Oral Appliance in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Randomized Controlled Blinded Multicenter Study Comparing Two Devices

Oral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A Randomized Controlled Blinded Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy of Two Devices

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02148510
Enrollment
313
Registered
2014-05-28
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2017-05-15
Last updated
2017-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

human, sleep apnea, adults, oral appliance, efficacy, safety, polygraphy, bruxism, cost

Brief summary

The hypothesis of the study is that a bibloc-apnea splint has a comparable efficacy on respiratory measures as a monobloc-apnea splint and that the cost of treatment is the same. The goal is primarily to compare the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) after 6 weeks of treatment and the cost of treatment during one year. This randomized controlled parallel group multicenter study includes 316 subjects referred for the treatment of moderate to severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). The subjects visit the clinic at 5 scheduled occasions.

Detailed description

The study includes 2 arms. Secondary measures are obtained by respiratory analysis and questionnaires. Electromyography (EMG) of the masseter muscle is recorded and the influence of bruxism is evaluated in terms effect on efficacy and adverse events

Interventions

DEVICEMonobloc

Construction fitted to upper and lower jaw

DEVICEBibloc

Biblock construction

Sponsors

Uppsala University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea with AHI \> 15 * Odontological status that allows retention of oral devices and with at least one molar in each quadrant * Maximal protrusion \>6 mm * Subject giving his/her informed concent * Understands and can communicate in Swedish * Subject understands the instruction on how to put on the polygraphy equipment at home * Valid AHI data at baseline respiratory analysis

Exclusion criteria

* age\< 18 år * BMI \>35 * Jaw complaints requiring treatment the past year * Pain or locking of the jaw at the enrollment visit * At the discretion of the investigator judged not being able to attach to the study directives * Hypersensitive to the material of the devices * Ongoing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) treatment or oral device treatment or such treatment terminated within a month from enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apnoea-Hypopnea-Index (AHI)9 weeks after start of studyAHI defined by American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI)9 weeksNumber of episodes per hour with arterial oxygen saturation decline of 3% or more
Sleepiness9 weeks and 1 yearEpworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Sleep bruxism9 weeksBruxism episodes during sleep
Adverse events1 yearSubject reported and objective investigator observed events
Quality of life9 weeks and 1 yearFunctional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ )

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cost of care1 yearTotal cost calculation including the device, repairs and adjustments and consumption of dentist time

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026