Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of AMG0001 in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia

A Phase 3 Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AMG0001 in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02144610
Acronym
AGILITY
Enrollment
46
Registered
2014-05-22
Start date
2014-11-12
Completion date
2016-11-28
Last updated
2019-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Limb Ischemia

Keywords

CLI

Brief summary

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AMG0001 in Subjects with Critical Limb Ischemia.

Detailed description

This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3, multinational, multicenter study of AMG0001 (HGF plasmid) in subjects with Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALHGF Plasmid (AMG0001)

IM

BIOLOGICALMatching Placebo

IM

Sponsors

AnGes USA, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects with CLI (Severe Rutherford 4 and Rutherford 5) who have: * No option for revascularization by endovascular intervention or surgical bypass or * Poor option (high risk) for revascularization by surgery and no option for an endovascular intervention (see Section 3.1 Study Population for full definition for appropriate inclusions). 2. Subjects 40-90 years of either gender who have signed an informed consent form either directly or through a legally authorized representative. 3. Subjects currently are taking a statin and an anti-platelet agent (e.g., clopidogrel, ticlopidine, aspirin, etc.) for 2 weeks or more prior to Day 0 as part of their standard of care, unless contraindicated. Subjects for whom these agents are contraindicated will have the reason for contraindication recorded in their case report form (CRF). 4. If female, the subjects must not be of child bearing potential, e.g., post-menopausal or surgically sterile. 5. If a male subject is of reproductive potential, he must agree to use an accepted and effective (barrier) form of birth control starting with the first dose of study product and continue for 12 weeks from the last dose of study product. This applies to both courses of treatment. 6. Subjects with a previous medical history of myocardial infarction and/or stroke should have adequate management of risk factors to prevent secondary occurrence. (See Section 4.2 Medical History for guidelines on appropriate secondary prevention.) 7. Subjects should have the ability to understand the requirements of the protocol and agree to return for the required study visits, assessments and follow up. * The index leg will be the leg with the greater severity of CLI disease. Entry requirements apply to the index leg. The index leg may also be referred to as the treated leg or affected leg in the text of this protocol or other study documents. If the subject has two legs that have the same Rutherford classification (severe Rutherford 4 or Rutherford 5) and are both eligible for treatment, the leg with greater disease severity (based on more extensive necrosis or more extensive/deeper ulceration(s), difference in ABI (ankle brachial index) or TBI (toe brachial index) ≥ 0.1, and/or more extensive vascular disease based on the angiogram) will be chosen as the index leg. If there is no clinical, hemodynamic or angiographic or other evidence to determine which leg has greater disease severity, the subject will be excluded from the study. * These entry criteria will be enforced (prior to randomization) by the Sponsor, as well as an Entry Committee who will review all relevant clinical data including but not limited to medical illness, CLI status, the findings of an angiogram, ulcer photographs and measurements and hemodynamic data.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects whose CLI status is unstable (spontaneous marked improvement or marked worsening during the screening period) or who have excessive tissue necrosis that is unlikely to benefit from medication, or those poor option subjects requiring immediate revascularization by surgery. Stability of the CLI status will be confirmed by the Principal Investigator prior to randomization and retrospectively reviewed by the Adjudication Committee. 2. Subjects who may require a major amputation (amputation at or above the ankle) within 4 weeks of Day 0 (± 4 weeks of Day 0). 3. Subjects with ulcers with exposure of tendons, osteomyelitis or uncontrolled infection or with the largest ulcer that is greater than 20 cm2 in area (\>10 cm2 area if on the heel). 4. Subjects with purely neuropathic, or with venous ulcers. 5. Subjects in Rutherford 6 class. 6. Subjects who have had revascularization by surgery or angioplasty within 3 months, unless the procedure has failed based on the anatomy or the hemodynamic measurements. 7. Subjects with a diagnosis of Buerger's disease (Thrombo-angiitis Obliterans). 8. Subjects currently receiving immunosuppressive, chemo or radiation therapy. 9. Evidence or history of malignant neoplasm (clinical, laboratory or imaging) except for successfully excised basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma, or successfully excised early melanoma of the skin. Subjects, who had successful tumor resection or radio-chemotherapy of breast cancer more than 10 years prior to inclusion in the study, and with no recurrence, may be enrolled in the study. Subjects, who had successful tumor resection or radio-chemotherapy of all other tumor types and have been in remission for more than 5 years prior to inclusion in the study, and with no recurrence, may be enrolled in the study. A dermatological exam will have ruled out any skin cancer. 10. Subjects who have proliferative retinopathy, or moderate or severe non-proliferative retinopathy, from any cause (ETDRS Score \> 35), clinically significant macular oedema or previous panretinal photocoagulation therapy (Results from the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Ophthalmology May 1991 Supplement 98: 823-833). 11. Females of child-bearing potential defined as subjects that are not surgically sterile or post-menopausal. 12. Subjects with severe renal disease defined as significant renal dysfunction evidenced by an estimated creatinine clearance of \<30 mL/minute (calculated using the Cockcroft Gault formula), or receiving chronic hemodialysis therapy. 13. Any co-morbid condition likely to interfere with assessment of safety or efficacy endpoints, acute cardiovascular events (i.e., CVA (cardiovascular accident), MI (myocardial infarction), etc.) within 3 months of treatment, or any disease that in the opinion of the Investigator may result in subject mortality in less than 3 months. 14. Subjects with known liver disease (e.g., hepatitis B or C or cirrhosis of the liver). 15. A subject with HIV, AIDS, severe uncontrolled inflammatory disease or severe uncontrolled autoimmune disease (e.g., ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, etc). 16. Subjects who have a significant psychiatric disorder or mental disability that could interfere with the subject's ability to provide informed consent or comply with study procedures. 17. Subjects with a current, uncorrected history of alcohol or substance abuse. 18. Diabetic subjects with an uncorrected HbA1c \> 9.0% during the screening period. 19. Subjects that have been administered rhPDGF (e.g, becaplermin) or other growth factors locally within one month of randomization. 20. Subjects who have received another investigational drug within 30 days of randomization or have previously received any gene transfer therapy within 3 years of entering the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)18 monthsA frequency table for Day 0 to 6 months, Day 0 to 12 months and Day 0 to 18 months intervals by treatment group; the Fisher's Exact test was used for treatment comparison.
Change in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale18 monthsThe severity of rest pain (based on the average over previous 7 days) recorded using the 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). VAS is a 10-cm line (with score ranges 0 to 10), oriented horizontally; the left end of the line (0 mark) indicates no pain; the right end indicates pain as bad as it can be. 1. The subject is asked to mark a place on the line corresponding to the average pain intensity experienced in the last 7 days. 2. The distance along the scale is converted into a numeric reading by measuring the distance of the subjects mark in cm from the beginning of the scale (the 0 mark).
Ulcer Improvement18 monthsA table showing the number of subjects with complete healing of the target ulcer by treatment. Ulcer healing of the largest ulcer on the index limb was assessed clinically by the Principal Investigator by direct visual inspection at each study visit. If the largest ulcer on the index leg was considered completely healed, photographs of the healed ulcer area was captured. If an ulcer healed completely during the study period, the ulcer was re-evaluated 2 weeks later to confirm it has remained healed. Confirmation of complete ulcer healing was made by an outside physician unconnected with the study and nominated for this purpose.
VAS Improvement18 monthsA table showing the number of subjects with improvement in VAS (≥ 20 mm) by treatment.
Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic Pressure18 monthsSummary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for right/left brachial systolic pressure by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.
Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic Pressure18 monthsSummary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for ankle systolic pressure measured at dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.
Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic Pressure18 monthsSummary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for toe systolic pressure by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.
Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index Leg18 monthsSummary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for calculated ABI by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.
Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index Leg18 monthsSummary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for calculated TBI by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.
Changes in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 Months18 monthsThe VascuQol contains 5 domains (pain, symptom, activities, social, and emotional functioning); responses were scored from 0 (lowest QOL, death) to 7 (best QOL, maximum health). Responses were averaged for composite overall and domain-specific scores, giving equal weight to each question and domain. The composite overall is the average of domain-specific scores. Responses after revascularization or major amputation were included in the analysis. In the event of death, subjects were scored as 0. For the effect of treatment on individual domains, pain, symptoms, and activities were considered the most important of the 5 domains. Summary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline by visit and treatment for VascuQol, including subscore, for subjects who had a non-missing value at both baseline and the specific visit. A two-way ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.
Changes in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 Months18 monthsThe EQ-5D-5L descriptive system covers 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5); death was coded as a worst case. The EQ-5D-5L health state for each subject, referred to as a 5 digit code that combines 1 level from each of the 5 dimensions, was converted into a single index value using a published weighing system. The index value ranges from -0.109 to 1, where 1 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions, and is reduced when a patient reports increasing problems. Summary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline by visit and treatment for EQ-5D-5L, including subscore, for subjects who had a non-missing value at both baseline and the specific visit. A two-way ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study enrolled patients with critical limb ischemia from 69 sites across the United States, Canada, and Europe. The last patient completed in November 28, 2016.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 98 subjects screened, 46 met the entry criteria and were randomized (1:1) into the study to receive AMG0001 or placebo as 4 sets of injections 2 weeks apart at Day 0, Month 3, Month 9, and Month 12.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)
Randomized subjects will receive 4 sets of intramuscular injections of HGF plasmid two weeks apart starting at Day 0 and again at Month 3 (first cycle) and at Month 9 and again at Month 12 (second cycle) in muscles of the affected lower limb. HGF Plasmid (AMG0001): IM
23
Placebo
Randomized subjects will receive 4 sets of intramuscular injections of matching placebo two weeks apart starting at Day 0 and again at Month 3 (first cycle) and at Month 9 and again at Month 12 (second cycle) in muscles of the affected lower limb. Matching Placebo: IM
23
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath22
Overall StudyOther01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudyStudy Discontinuation by Sponsor1914
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants9 Participants18 Participants
Age, Continuous67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.79
67.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83
Alcohol Use
No
15 Participants17 Participants32 Participants
Alcohol Use
Yes
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Ankle-brachial index (ABI) at baseline0.449 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1944
0.360 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2239
0.392 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.218
Current Tobacco Use
No
17 Participants17 Participants34 Participants
Current Tobacco Use
Yes
6 Participants6 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
23 Participants23 Participants46 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ischemic Rest Pain (cm)5.03 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.92
6.04 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.82
5.52 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.89
Past Tobacco Use
No
9 Participants5 Participants14 Participants
Past Tobacco Use
Yes
14 Participants18 Participants32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants21 Participants39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
8 participants6 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants12 participants24 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants16 Participants33 Participants
Toe-brachial index (TBI) at baseline0.134 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.128
0.167 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.166
0.149 ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.146
Ulcer Present11 Participants13 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
3 / 232 / 23
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 237 / 23
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 239 / 23

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scale

The severity of rest pain (based on the average over previous 7 days) recorded using the 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). VAS is a 10-cm line (with score ranges 0 to 10), oriented horizontally; the left end of the line (0 mark) indicates no pain; the right end indicates pain as bad as it can be. 1. The subject is asked to mark a place on the line corresponding to the average pain intensity experienced in the last 7 days. 2. The distance along the scale is converted into a numeric reading by measuring the distance of the subjects mark in cm from the beginning of the scale (the 0 mark).

Time frame: 18 months

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to early discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Change in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 30.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Change in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 60.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.002
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Change in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 9-0.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.281
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Change in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 12-2.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.156
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Change in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 15-0.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.825
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Change in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at LOCF-1.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.863
PlaceboChange in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 152.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
PlaceboChange in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 3-0.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.889
PlaceboChange in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 120.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
PlaceboChange in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 6-1.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.704
PlaceboChange in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at LOCF-0.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.087
PlaceboChange in Ischemic Rest Pain (in the Index Leg) From Baseline Using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScaleChange from Baseline at Month 9-0.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.801
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 3p-value: 0.514ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 6p-value: 0.445ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 9p-value: 0.863ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 12p-value: 0.111ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 15p-value: 0.153ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at last observation carried forward (LOCF)p-value: 0.002ANCOVA
Primary

Changes in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 Months

The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system covers 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4), and extreme problems (5); death was coded as a worst case. The EQ-5D-5L health state for each subject, referred to as a 5 digit code that combines 1 level from each of the 5 dimensions, was converted into a single index value using a published weighing system. The index value ranges from -0.109 to 1, where 1 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions, and is reduced when a patient reports increasing problems. Summary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline by visit and treatment for EQ-5D-5L, including subscore, for subjects who had a non-missing value at both baseline and the specific visit. A two-way ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to early discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 30.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 60.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.127
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 9-0.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.168
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 120.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.193
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 15-0.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.043
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at LOCF0.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.194
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 18-0.02 score on a scale
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 120.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.097
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 30.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.149
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at LOCF0.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.153
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 60.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.114
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 150.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.156
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life From Baseline Using the EQ-5D-5L Over 18 MonthsChange from Baseline at Month 90.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.092
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 3p-value: 0.941ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 6p-value: 0.584ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 9p-value: 0.1ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 12p-value: 0.916ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 15p-value: 0.486ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at LOCFp-value: 0.835ANCOVA
Primary

Changes in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 Months

The VascuQol contains 5 domains (pain, symptom, activities, social, and emotional functioning); responses were scored from 0 (lowest QOL, death) to 7 (best QOL, maximum health). Responses were averaged for composite overall and domain-specific scores, giving equal weight to each question and domain. The composite overall is the average of domain-specific scores. Responses after revascularization or major amputation were included in the analysis. In the event of death, subjects were scored as 0. For the effect of treatment on individual domains, pain, symptoms, and activities were considered the most important of the 5 domains. Summary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline by visit and treatment for VascuQol, including subscore, for subjects who had a non-missing value at both baseline and the specific visit. A two-way ANCOVA with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to early discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsPain (LOCF)1.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.158
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsSymptom (LOCF)0.79 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.475
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsActivities (LOCF)0.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsSocial (LOCF)0.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.086
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsEmotional Functioning (LOCF)0.77 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.247
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Changes in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsComposite Overall (LOCF)0.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.843
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsEmotional Functioning (LOCF)0.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.458
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsPain (LOCF)0.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.557
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsSocial (LOCF)0.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.852
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsSymptom (LOCF)0.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.468
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsComposite Overall (LOCF)0.74 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.068
PlaceboChanges in the Quality of Life Using the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQol) Over 18 MonthsActivities (LOCF)0.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.981
Comparison: Pain (LOCF)p-value: 0.105ANCOVA
Comparison: Symptom (LOCF)p-value: 0.557ANCOVA
Comparison: Activities (LOCF)p-value: 0.94ANCOVA
Comparison: Social (LOCF)p-value: 0.905ANCOVA
Comparison: Emotional Functioning (LOCF)p-value: 0.782ANCOVA
Comparison: Composite Overall (LOCF)p-value: 0.802ANCOVA
Primary

Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index Leg

Summary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for calculated ABI by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to early discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 3-0.009 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2612
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 60.097 ratioStandard Deviation 0.092
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 90.098 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1001
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 120.303 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3481
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 15-0.077 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2101
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at LOCF0.115 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3662
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 150.090 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1556
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 30.105 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1661
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 120.098 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0964
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 60.028 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2257
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at LOCF0.111 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1855
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in ABI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 90.246 ratioStandard Deviation 0.3272
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 3p-value: 0.268ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 6p-value: 0.32ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 9p-value: 0.315ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 12p-value: 0.327ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 15p-value: 0.643ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at LOCFp-value: 0.74ANCOVA
Primary

Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic Pressure

Summary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for ankle systolic pressure measured at dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to early discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 3 (Dorsalis Pedis)4.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 35.66
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 6 (Dorsalis Pedis)12.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 19.96
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 9 (Dorsalis Pedis)3.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 40.59
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 12 (Dorsalis Pedis)59.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 47
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 15 (Dorsalis Pedis)18.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 10.61
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF (Dorsalis Pedis)32.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 41.55
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 3 (Posterior Tibial)15.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 35.02
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 6 (Posterior Tibial)28.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 28.32
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 9 (Posterior Tibial)4.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 24.64
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline atMonth 12 (Posterior Tibial)45.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 28.86
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline atMonth 15 (Posterior Tibial)40.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 51.62
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF (Posterior Tibial)35.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 33.97
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline atMonth 15 (Posterior Tibial)-10.0 mmHg
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 3 (Dorsalis Pedis)11.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 30.15
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 3 (Posterior Tibial)16.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 31.81
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 6 (Dorsalis Pedis)9.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 22.73
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline atMonth 12 (Posterior Tibial)4.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.86
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 9 (Dorsalis Pedis)3.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 57.86
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 6 (Posterior Tibial)19.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 37.04
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 12 (Dorsalis Pedis)12.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 15.62
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF (Posterior Tibial)13.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 24.98
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 15 (Dorsalis Pedis)3.0 mmHg
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 9 (Posterior Tibial)-3.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 15.5
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Ankle (Dorsalis Pedis/Posterior Tibial) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF (Dorsalis Pedis)16.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 34.25
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 3 (Dorsalis Pedis)p-value: 0.803ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 6 (Dorsalis Pedis)p-value: 0.668ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 9 (Dorsalis Pedis)p-value: 0.789ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 12 (Dorsalis Pedis)p-value: 0.28ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at LOCF (Dorsalis Pedis)p-value: 0.324ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 3 (Posterior Tibial)p-value: 0.759ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 6 (Posterior Tibial)p-value: 0.414ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 9 (Posterior Tibial)p-value: 0.886ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 12 (Posterior Tibial)p-value: 0.114ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at LOCF (Posterior Tibial)p-value: 0.051ANCOVA
Primary

Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic Pressure

Summary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for right/left brachial systolic pressure by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to early discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 3 (right)0.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 27.27
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 6 (right)-2.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 23.49
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 9 (right)2.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 14.5
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 12 (right)-5.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 16.76
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 15 (right)5.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 22.81
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF (right)-2.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 24.36
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 3 (left)7.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 27.37
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 6 (left)-1.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 28.61
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 9 (left)-0.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 14.52
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 12 (left)0.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 14
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 15 (left4.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 21.01
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF (left)2.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 26.68
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF (right)8.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 23.94
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 12 (left)10.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 11.36
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 3 (left)-5.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 22.24
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 3 (right)2.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 18.78
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF (left)-0.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 19.2
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 6 (right)0.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 33.58
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 6 (left)-15.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 30.04
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 9 (right)-7.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 26.52
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 15 (left-18.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 38.89
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 12 (right)5.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 15.6
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 9 (left)-25.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 30.78
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 15 (right)13.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.08
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 18 (right)23.0 mmHg
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Brachial (Right/Left) Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 18 (left)-2.0 mmHg
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 3 (right brachial)p-value: 0.733ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 6 (right brachial)p-value: 0.808ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 9 (right brachial)p-value: 0.487ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 12 (right brachial)p-value: 0.216ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 15 (right brachial)p-value: 0.896ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at last observation carried forward (LOCF) (right brachial)p-value: 0.167ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 3 (left brachial)p-value: 0.378ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 6 (left brachial)p-value: 0.39ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 9 (left brachial)p-value: 0.521ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 12 (left brachial)p-value: 0.044ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at Month 15 (left brachial)p-value: 0.423ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from baseline at LOCF (left brachial)p-value: 0.989ANCOVA
Primary

Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index Leg

Summary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for calculated TBI by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to early discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 30.024 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1661
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 60.133 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1398
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 90.134 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1493
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 120.303 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2945
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 150.110 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2261
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at LOCF0.168 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2692
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 180.070 ratio
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 120.238 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2045
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 3-0.078 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1536
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at LOCF-0.044 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1846
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 6-0.037 ratioStandard Deviation 0.2175
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 150.035 ratioStandard Deviation 0.0495
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in TBI of Index LegChange from Baseline at Month 90.112 ratioStandard Deviation 0.1747
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 3p-value: 0.147ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 6p-value: 0.032ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 9p-value: 0.709ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 12p-value: 0.771ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 15p-value: 0.83ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at LOCFp-value: 0.033ANCOVA
Primary

Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic Pressure

Summary statistics were provided for baseline and change from baseline for toe systolic pressure by visit and treatment (only subjects with non-missing baseline and visit values). A two-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment and region as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate were performed for each visit and LOCF.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: The number analyzed in one or more rows differs from overall number analyzed due to early discontinuation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 34.4 mmHgStandard Deviation 19.96
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 619.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 18.44
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 920.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 20.38
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 1234.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 37.38
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 1516.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 33.05
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Hemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF18.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 32.51
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 1814.0 mmHg
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 1239.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 19.63
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 3-9.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 25.07
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at LOCF-2.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 30.04
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 6-6.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 33.76
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 156.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 9.19
PlaceboHemodynamic Measurements - Mean Change From Baseline in Toe Systolic PressureChange from Baseline at Month 929.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 28.79
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 3p-value: 0.211ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 6p-value: 0.036ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 9p-value: 0.725ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 12p-value: 0.468ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at Month 15p-value: 0.854ANCOVA
Comparison: Change from Baseline at LOCFp-value: 0.233ANCOVA
Primary

Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)

A frequency table for Day 0 to 6 months, Day 0 to 12 months and Day 0 to 18 months intervals by treatment group; the Fisher's Exact test was used for treatment comparison.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (MI)1 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (MI)2 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (MI)2 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Stroke)0 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (Stroke)1 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (Stroke)1 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Major Amputation)5 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (Major Amputation)6 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (Major Amputation)6 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Revascularization)3 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (Revascularization)6 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (Revascularization)6 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (All-cause Death)0 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (All-cause Death)2 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (All-cause Death)3 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Major Amputation or Death)5 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (Major Amputation or Death)7 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (Major Amputation or Death)8 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Major Amputation or Revascularization)7 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Month (Major Amputation or Revascularization)11 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Major Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Month (Major Amputation or Revascularization)11 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (Revascularization)3 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (MI)0 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Major Amputation or Revascularization)9 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (MI)0 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (Revascularization)3 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (MI)0 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (Major Amputation or Death)9 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Stroke)1 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (All-cause Death)1 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (Stroke)1 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Month (Major Amputation or Revascularization)10 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (Stroke)1 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (All-cause Death)2 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Major Amputation)7 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (Major Amputation or Death)9 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Months (Major Amputation)7 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (All-cause Death)2 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-18 Months (Major Amputation)7 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-12 Month (Major Amputation or Revascularization)10 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Revascularization)2 Participants
PlaceboMajor Amputation or Revascularization (of the Index Leg), All-cause Death, and Incidence of Stroke and Myocardial Infarction (MI)0-6 Months (Major Amputation or Death)8 Participants
Comparison: MI at 0-6 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: MI at 0-12 Monthsp-value: 0.4889Fisher Exact
Comparison: MI at 0-18 Monthsp-value: 0.4889Fisher Exact
Comparison: Stroke at 0-6 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: Stroke at 0-12 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: Stroke at 0-18 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: Major amputation at 0-6 Monthsp-value: 0.7381Fisher Exact
Comparison: Major amputation at 0-12 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: Major amputation at 0-18 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: Revascularization at 0-6 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: Revascularization at 0-12 Monthsp-value: 0.4591Fisher Exact
Comparison: Revascularization at 0-18 Monthsp-value: 0.4591Fisher Exact
Comparison: All-cause death at 0-6 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: All-cause death at 0-12 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: All-cause death at 0-18 Monthsp-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: 0-6 Months (Major Amputation or Death)p-value: 0.5136Fisher Exact
Comparison: 0-12 Months (Major Amputation or Death)p-value: 0.7575Fisher Exact
Comparison: 0-18 Months (Major Amputation or Death)p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: 0-6 Months (Major Amputation or Revascularization)p-value: 0.7575Fisher Exact
Comparison: 0-12 Months (Major Amputation or Revascularization)p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Comparison: 0-18 Months (Major Amputation or Revascularization)p-value: >0.999Fisher Exact
Primary

Ulcer Improvement

A table showing the number of subjects with complete healing of the target ulcer by treatment. Ulcer healing of the largest ulcer on the index limb was assessed clinically by the Principal Investigator by direct visual inspection at each study visit. If the largest ulcer on the index leg was considered completely healed, photographs of the healed ulcer area was captured. If an ulcer healed completely during the study period, the ulcer was re-evaluated 2 weeks later to confirm it has remained healed. Confirmation of complete ulcer healing was made by an outside physician unconnected with the study and nominated for this purpose.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: The number of participants analyzed are those that have an ulcer on the index leg at the time of enrollment (n=11 in HGF plasmid group, n=13 in placebo group).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Ulcer ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 62 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Ulcer ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 123 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Ulcer ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 183 Participants
PlaceboUlcer ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 61 Participants
PlaceboUlcer ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 121 Participants
PlaceboUlcer ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 181 Participants
Primary

VAS Improvement

A table showing the number of subjects with improvement in VAS (≥ 20 mm) by treatment.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)VAS ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 64 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)VAS ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 129 Participants
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)VAS ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 189 Participants
PlaceboVAS ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 66 Participants
PlaceboVAS ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 126 Participants
PlaceboVAS ImprovementBaseline and up to Month 186 Participants
Post Hoc

Time to Major Amputation (of the Index Leg) or All-cause Death

The median time to major amputation or death was analyzed over the duration of the study as a post-hoc analysis; all reports of major amputation or death were included in this post hoc analysis, irrespective of pre-defined study windows.

Time frame: Month 36

Population: Subjects who had a major amputation or died during the study

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Gene Therapy HGF Plasmid (AMG0001)Time to Major Amputation (of the Index Leg) or All-cause Death505 Days
PlaceboTime to Major Amputation (of the Index Leg) or All-cause Death381 Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026