Skip to content

Effects of a New Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support Training Program

Clinical Effects of a New Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support Training Program in a Metropolitan City: A Before-and-After Intervention Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02142387
Acronym
HEROS
Enrollment
18822
Registered
2014-05-20
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2020-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

cardiac arrest, dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, survival

Brief summary

Despite aggressive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, the outcome of cardiac arrest is not good. The problem is method of education. So, the investigators want to add the dispatcher-assisted CPR simulation into conventional CPR training. In this study, the study is aimed to investigate the effect of newer CPR training program.

Detailed description

The training program focuses on working in team with dispatcher, performing all steps from recognizing cardiac arrest to performing CPR, together with the dispatcher. The one hours training session is split into four parts: 1. Video self-instruction manikin practice (30 min), including a brief introduction to automated external defibrillator (AED). 2. Practice in pairs (15 min). Practicing the dispatcher and rescuer role in a simulation to enhance learning. 3. Debriefing. Questions, answers and reflection (15 min). 4. Homework. Leaflet with tasks like learn how to activate the speaker function on your own phone. The main difference between dispatcher-assisted basic life support (DA-BLS) and traditional BLS training is that DA-BLS provides the scenes and interactive experiences on calling emergency medical service (EMS) and receiving CPR instruction via telephone speaker function, following up the skill training by scenario simulation training.

Interventions

OTHERBLS CPR program with dispatcher assisted CPR simulation

the training program more focuses on cooperation with a dispatcher, from recognition to perform DA-CPR and hands-on practice.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with presumed cardiac etiology who are 19 years of age or older and assessed and treated by EMS providers after dispatched by the EMS dispatch center will be included.

Exclusion criteria

* We will exclude patients with non-cardiac etiology, prolonged cardiac arrest with a suspected duration more than 30 minutes, cases such as livor mortis or rigor mortis, and decapitated or decomposed body, and patients who have Do-Not-Resuscitate card documented by doctor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Surviving to Hospital Dischargefrom date of discharge, assessed up to 3 monthsThe study end points are survival to hospital discharge. Survival to discharge will be measured as proportions of patients who were discharged from a hospital with their spontaneous circulation recovered. This information will be collected from medical record review.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)from date of cardiac arrest occurred, assessed up to 1 weekThe return of spontaneous circulation will be measured as proportion of the patients who were recovered their circulation at emergency department. This information will be collected from the medical review.
Number of Participants With Good Neurological Recoveryfrom date of discharge, assessed up to 3 monthsThe Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) score will be used to measure neurological recovery status: CPC 1 (good cerebral performance), CPC 2 (moderate cerebral disability), CPC 3 (severe cerebral disability), CPC 4 (coma or vegetative state), CPC 5 (brain death). We defined the good neurological recovery as CPC 1 or CPC 2. This information will be collected from medical record review.

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Districts Which Implement New DA-BLS Training Program
A one-hour training course that includes a 30-minute video-based self-instruction (VSI) training session, a short role-play, and a debriefing. The video consists of a bystander CPR simulation with dispatcher instructions using the trainee's own phone and practice session following demonstration by a simulated layperson. After watching the video clip, all trainees are divided into two groups and conduct a role-play as dispatchers and laypersons for 15 minutes. Finally, there is a 15-minute debriefing session with several assignments. The HEROS program focuses on cooperation with a dispatcher, from recognition of cardiac arrest to performing DA-CPR, with hands-on practice so that laypersons can provide bystander CPR immediately in a real situation. Moreover, the HEROS program emphasizes practice for providing the correct address of the scene and switching to speakerphone mode, especially for the elderly.
1,486
Districts Which Keep Current BLS Training Program
A one-hour training program that was developed by the Korea CDC and it was based on the AHA guideline (http://www.cdc.go.kr/board.es?mid=a20503050000&bid=0021&tag=&act=view&list\_no=127655). The program consists of a 30-minute VSI, and a 30-minute practice debriefing session. It focuses on detailed techniques for performing high-quality chest compressions including the correct hands and body position of the bystanders.
8,641
Total10,127

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall Study<19 years old49326
Overall StudyCPR not performed74473
Overall Studyincomplete data19
Overall Studynon-cardiac etiology5043,431
Overall Studyoccurred not at home2982,474
Overall Studywitnessed by paramedic139917

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalDistricts Which Keep Current BLS Training ProgramDistricts Which Implement New DA-BLS Training Program
Age, Continuous74 years74 years74 years
bystander CPR6140 Participants5281 Participants859 Participants
DA-CPR7856 Participants6717 Participants1139 Participants
level of ED
Level 1
1098 Participants1086 Participants12 Participants
level of ED
Level 2
7809 Participants6533 Participants1276 Participants
level of ED
Level 3
1220 Participants1022 Participants198 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10127 Participants8641 Participants1486 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4110 Participants3487 Participants623 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6017 Participants5154 Participants863 Participants
shockable rhythm1267 Participants1080 Participants187 Participants
witnessed by laypersons4674 Participants3993 Participants681 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1,401 / 1,4868,090 / 8,641
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1,4860 / 8,641
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1,401 / 1,4868,090 / 8,641

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Surviving to Hospital Discharge

The study end points are survival to hospital discharge. Survival to discharge will be measured as proportions of patients who were discharged from a hospital with their spontaneous circulation recovered. This information will be collected from medical record review.

Time frame: from date of discharge, assessed up to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Districts Which Implement Newer DA-BLS Training ProgramNumber of Participants Surviving to Hospital Discharge85 Participants
Districts Which Keep Traditional BLS Training ProgramNumber of Participants Surviving to Hospital Discharge551 Participants
p-value: 0.34Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Good Neurological Recovery

The Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) score will be used to measure neurological recovery status: CPC 1 (good cerebral performance), CPC 2 (moderate cerebral disability), CPC 3 (severe cerebral disability), CPC 4 (coma or vegetative state), CPC 5 (brain death). We defined the good neurological recovery as CPC 1 or CPC 2. This information will be collected from medical record review.

Time frame: from date of discharge, assessed up to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Districts Which Implement Newer DA-BLS Training ProgramNumber of Participants With Good Neurological Recovery42 Participants
Districts Which Keep Traditional BLS Training ProgramNumber of Participants With Good Neurological Recovery316 Participants
p-value: 0.11Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)

The return of spontaneous circulation will be measured as proportion of the patients who were recovered their circulation at emergency department. This information will be collected from the medical review.

Time frame: from date of cardiac arrest occurred, assessed up to 1 week

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Districts Which Implement Newer DA-BLS Training ProgramNumber of Participants With Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)544 Participants
Districts Which Keep Traditional BLS Training ProgramNumber of Participants With Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)3118 Participants
p-value: 0.7Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026