Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of FP MDPI Compared With FS MDPI in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Persistent Asthma

A 12-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Fluticasone Propionate Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler Compared With Fluticasone/Salmeterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Persistent Asthma Symptomatic Despite Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02141854
Enrollment
882
Registered
2014-05-20
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2021-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluticasone propionate (Fp) multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate (FS) MDPI when administered over 12 weeks in patients 12 years of age and older with persistent asthma.

Detailed description

Study drug and placebo were supplied in Teva multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) devices and provided for participants to use at home. Participants performed spirometry at every visit. Each participant was given a diary at each visit for use until the next visit. Rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol) was dispensed at each visit, if needed, as determined by the investigational center personnel.

Interventions

DRUGAlbuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI

Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.

FS MDPI is an inhalation-driven multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) containing fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate dispersed in a lactose monohydrate excipient and contained within a reservoir. A metered dose of drug is delivered to a dose cup via an air pulse activated when the cap is opened. During the treatment period, participants were randomized to either fluticasone propionate/salmeterol MDPI 200/12.5 mcg or fluticasone propionate/salmeterol MDPI 100/12.5 mcg twice a day for a total daily dose of 200/25 mcg or 400/25 mcg. Participants were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

Fp MDPI is an inhalation-driven multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) containing fluticasone propionate (Fp) dispersed in a lactose monohydrate excipient and contained within a reservoir. A metered dose of drug is delivered to a dose cup via an air pulse activated when the cap is opened. During the treatment period, participants were randomized to either 200 mcg or 100 mcg of Fp one inhalation twice a day for a total daily dose of 400 mcg or 200 mcg. Participants were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

The placebo multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) was identical to the devices used to deliver active drug, and indistinguishable from the active treatments. Patients took one inhalation twice a day (approximately 12 hours apart). Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Best pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 40 to 85% of their predicted normal value. 2. Current Asthma Therapy: Patients must have a short-acting β2-agonist (for rescue use) for a minimum of 8 weeks before the Screening Visit (SV) and a qualifying dose of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). The ICS may be either as ICS monotherapy or as an ICS/long-acting beta agonist (LABA) combination. The ICS component of the patient's asthma therapy should be stable for a minimum of 1 month before providing consent. 3. Reversibility of Disease: Patients must have at least 15% reversibility (all patients) and at least a 200 mL increase from baseline FEV1 (patients age 18 and older) within 30 minutes after 2 to 4 inhalations of albuterol/salbutamol at the SV. Note: Patients who do not qualify for the study due to failure to meet reversibility will be permitted to perform a retest once within 7 days. 4. Patients must provide written informed consent/assent.. For minor patients (ages 12 to 17 years, or as applicable per local regulations), the written ICF must be signed and dated by the parent/legal guardian and the written assent form must be signed and dated by the patient (if applicable). Note: Age requirements are as specified by local regulations. 5. Outpatient \>= 12 years of age on the date of consent/assent. In countries where the local regulations permit enrollment of adult patients only, patients must be 18 years of age and older. 6. Asthma diagnosis: The patient has a diagnosis of asthma as defined by the National Institute of Health (NIH). The asthma diagnosis has been present for a minimum of 3 months and has been stable (defined as no exacerbations and no changes in asthma medication) for at least 30 days. 7. The patient is able to perform acceptable and repeatable spirometry. 8. The patient is able to perform peak expiratory flow (PEF) with a handheld peak flow meter. 9. The patient is able to use a metered dose inhaler (MDI) device without a spacer device and a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) device. 10. The patient is able to withhold (as judged by the investigator) his or her regimen of ICS or study drug, and rescue medication for at least 6 hours before the screening visit (SV) and before all treatment visits. 11. The patient/parent/legal guardian/caregiver is capable of understanding the requirements, risks, and benefits of study participation, and, as judged by the investigator, capable of giving informed consent/assent and being compliant with all study requirements. 12. SABAs: All patients must be able to replace their current SABA with albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI inhalation aerosol for the duration of the study. 13. Female patients may not be pregnant, breastfeeding, or attempting to become pregnant. * other criteria may apply, please contact the investigator for more information

Exclusion criteria

1. A history of a life-threatening asthma exacerbation (an asthma episode that required intubation and/or was associated with hypercapnia, respiratory arrest, or hypoxic seizures). 2. The patient is pregnant or lactating, or plans to become pregnant during the study period or for 30 days after the study. 3. The patient has participated as a randomized patient in any investigational drug study within 30 days of the SV. 4. The patient has previously participated as a randomized patient in a study of Fp MDPI or FS MDPI. 5. The patient has a known hypersensitivity to any corticosteroid, salmeterol, or any of the excipients in the study drug or rescue medication formulation (ie, lactose). 6. The patient has been treated with any known strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors (eg, azole antifungals, ritonavir, or clarithromycin) within 30 days before the SV. 7. The patient has been treated with any of the prohibited medications during the prescribed (per protocol) washout periods before the SV. 8. The patient currently smokes or has a smoking history of 10 pack years or more (a pack year is defined as smoking 1 pack of cigarettes/day for 1 year). The patient must not have used tobacco products within the past year (eg, cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, or pipe tobacco). 9. The patient has a culture-documented or suspected bacterial or viral infection of the upper or lower respiratory tract, sinus, or middle ear that has not resolved at least 2 weeks before the SV. 10. The patient has a history of alcohol or drug abuse within 2 years preceding the SV. 11. The patient has had an asthma exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids within 30 days before the SV, or has had any hospitalization for asthma within 2 months before the SV. 12. Initiation or dose escalation of immunotherapy (administered by any route) is planned during the study period. However, patients on stable immunotherapy may be considered for inclusion. 13. The patient has used immunosuppressive medications within 4 weeks before the SV. 14. The patient is unable to tolerate or unwilling to comply with the appropriate washout periods and withholding of all applicable medications. 15. The patient has untreated oral candidiasis at the SV. Patients with clinical visual evidence of oral candidiasis who agree to receive treatment and comply with appropriate medical monitoring may enter the study. 16. The patient has a history of a positive test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), active hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C infection. 17. The patient is either an employee or an immediate relative of an employee of the clinical investigational center. 18. A member of the patient's household is participating in the study at the same time. However, after the enrolled patient completes or discontinues participation in the study, another patient from the same household may be screened. 19. The patient has a disease/condition that in the medical judgment of the investigator would put the safety of the patient at risk through participation or that could affect the efficacy or safety analysis if the disease/condition worsened during the study. * other criteria may apply, please contact the investigator for more information

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 12Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12 and was performed at the following times relative to the administration of study drug (±5 minutes): 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hoursA subset of patients performed postdose serial spirometry. Data from these assessments were used to analyze the primary endpoint of baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC0-12h at week 12 using the trapezoidal rule based on actual time of measurement. It was standardized by dividing it by the number of hours between the start time of dose administration and the end time of the last nonmissing FEV1 measurement. The baseline FEV1 was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose). If 1 of these was missing, the nonmissing value was used; if both were missing, baseline was treated as missing. Baseline-adjusted FEV1 was calculated as postdose FEV1 after subtracting the baseline FEV1 value.
Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12Trough FEV1 is a morning spirometry taken predose and pre-rescue bronchodilator. The baseline for predose FEV1 was defined as the average of the 30-minute and 10-minute predose measurements obtained at the randomization visit (Day 1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment PeriodDays -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), up to week 12Patients recorded the number of inhalations of rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI) each AM and PM in the diary. The average number of daily inhalations over the 7 days before the randomization visit was the baseline value. The weekly average was based on the available data for the 7 days before each analysis week. The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12up to Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodThe analysis of probability of remaining in the study at Week 12 used the time to patient withdrawal for worsening asthma, defined as the number of days elapsed from the date of randomization to the date of withdrawal due to worsening asthma. Patients who were lost to follow-up, who had not withdrawn due to worsening asthma by week 12, or who had withdrawn due to reasons other than worsening asthma were right-censored at the date of last assessment.
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week TreatmentDays -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), Day 1 (postdose) daily until Week 12Morning PEF tests were performed before administration of study drug or rescue medications (data were excluded if the time of PEF measurement was more than 5 minutes after the dose time). The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the patient diary. The baseline PEF was the average value of recorded (nonmissing) morning assessments over the 7 days prior to randomization on Day 1. For efficacy analyses of weekly average morning PEF measurements, values were the averages based on available data for that week.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1Day 1 of the Treatment Period (predose and postdose)The baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose) on Day 1. If one of these was missing, the other measurement was used as baseline value. If both were missing, the baseline trough FEV1 was treated as missing. Time to target improvement (15% or 12%) was defined as the time elapsed from the time of first dose to the first time the target improvement in FEV1 was achieved. If an exact target increase was not achieved at a measured timepoint, then the time was estimated by linear interpolation between the timepoint when target was reached and the timepoint immediately before. Patients who did not achieve the target improvement were censored at the time of last serial spirometry assessment. Values of NA indicate the values could not be estimated which happened when the estimated probability of not achieving target is more than 50%.
Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodDay 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment PeriodAn adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Change From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years OldDay 1 (predose, baseline), end of trial (up to week 12)The AQLQ(S) (September 2010 version; patients aged ≥18 years) was self administered by the patients at the investigational center at the randomization visit and at Week 12 or end of trial. The questionnaire is a tool to measure the impact of asthma on a patient's quality of life (physical, emotional, social, and occupational) with a recall period of 2 weeks. The AQLQ(S) was administered only to patients 18 years and older. The 32 individual questions in the AQLQ were equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score was the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions, and ranged from 1 to 7. A score 7.0 indicated that the patient had no impairments due to asthma and a score of 1.0 indicated severe impairment. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improved quality of life.
Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment PeriodDays -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), to Week 12The total daily asthma symptom score is the average of the daytime and nighttime scores as recorded in the patient diary. Daytime Symptom Score: * 0=No symptoms * 1=Symptoms for 1 short period * 2=Symptoms for 2+ short periods * 3=Symptoms for most of the day - did not affect normal daily activities * 4=Symptoms for most of the day - did affect normal daily activities * 5=Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities Nighttime Symptom Score (determined in the AM): * 0=No symptoms * 1=Symptoms causing me to wake once (or wake early) * 2=Symptoms causing me to wake twice or more (including waking early) * 3=Symptoms causing me to be awake for most of the night * 4=Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep Baseline was the average of recorded scores over the 7 days before randomization. The change from baseline in the weekly average over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).

Countries

Canada, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Thailand, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 1661 patients with persistent asthma were screened and 882 patients enrolled. 154 patients were not randomized, most commonly (76 patients) because of not meeting randomization criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation twice a day using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
146
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg
Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
145
Fp MDPI 200 mcg
Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
146
Fp MDPI 100 mcg
Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate (Fp) for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
146
Placebo MDPI
Following randomization, participants in this treatment arm took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. Albuterol/salmeterol HFA MDI: Albuterol/salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered dose inhaler (MDI) was supplied to participants throughout the study to be used as needed as a rescue medication.
145
Total728

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Run-In Period (Pre-assignment)Adverse Event1000000
Run-In Period (Pre-assignment)Exclusion criteria met1400000
Run-In Period (Pre-assignment)Inclusion criteria not met2500000
Run-In Period (Pre-assignment)Lost to Follow-up600000
Run-In Period (Pre-assignment)Other1400000
Run-In Period (Pre-assignment)Randomization criteria not met7600000
Run-In Period (Pre-assignment)Withdrawal by Subject900000
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event022022
Treatment PeriodDisease progression0213018
Treatment PeriodLack of Efficacy000117
Treatment PeriodLost to Follow-up011101
Treatment PeriodNoncompliance000100
Treatment PeriodOther012012
Treatment PeriodPregnancy010000
Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation010221
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject023347

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgFp MDPI 200 mcgFp MDPI 100 mcgFS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgPlacebo MDPITotal
Age, Continuous44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.88
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.36
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.64
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.93
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.05
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.95
Age, Customized
Adolescents (12-17 years)
8 Participants10 Participants9 Participants12 Participants6 Participants45 Participants
Age, Customized
Adults (18-64 years)
125 Participants119 Participants124 Participants115 Participants125 Participants608 Participants
Age, Customized
Adults (65-84 years)
12 Participants17 Participants13 Participants19 Participants14 Participants75 Participants
Body Mass Index30.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.27
29.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.62
29.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.35
29.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.41
29.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.44
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)2.157 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6402
2.075 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5696
2.069 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6017
2.083 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6532
2.141 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6849
2.105 liters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6303
History of Smoking
No tobacco use
117 Participants125 Participants118 Participants126 Participants122 Participants608 Participants
History of Smoking
Prior Smoker
28 Participants21 Participants28 Participants20 Participants23 Participants120 Participants
Previous Asthma Therapy
Inhaled corticosteroid
67 Participants63 Participants58 Participants73 Participants68 Participants329 Participants
Previous Asthma Therapy
Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta2-agonist
78 Participants83 Participants88 Participants73 Participants77 Participants399 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
28 Participants23 Participants31 Participants20 Participants18 Participants120 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants10 Participants11 Participants10 Participants8 Participants49 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
135 Participants136 Participants134 Participants136 Participants136 Participants677 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
5 Participants3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants1 Participants14 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
112 Participants116 Participants111 Participants125 Participants124 Participants588 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
79 Participants88 Participants94 Participants87 Participants91 Participants439 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
66 Participants58 Participants52 Participants59 Participants54 Participants289 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 14320 / 14526 / 14520 / 14620 / 144
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1432 / 1451 / 1451 / 1461 / 144

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12

Trough FEV1 is a morning spirometry taken predose and pre-rescue bronchodilator. The baseline for predose FEV1 was defined as the average of the 30-minute and 10-minute predose measurements obtained at the randomization visit (Day 1).

Time frame: Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12

Population: If the patient inadvertently administered asthma medication/study drug at home on the AM of the visit, or if the patient took rescue medication within 6 hours of testing, the visit was rescheduled.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 120.272 litersStandard Error 0.0307
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 120.271 litersStandard Error 0.0311
Fp MDPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 120.179 litersStandard Error 0.0308
Fp MDPI 100 mcgChange From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 120.119 litersStandard Error 0.0311
Placebo MDPIChange From Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12-0.004 litersStandard Error 0.0312
Comparison: A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the fifth in the sequence.p-value: 095% CI: [0.191, 0.361]ANCOVA
Comparison: A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the sixth in the sequence.p-value: 095% CI: [0.189, 0.36]ANCOVA
Comparison: A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the seventh in the sequence.p-value: 095% CI: [0.098, 0.268]ANCOVA
Comparison: A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the eighth in the sequence.p-value: 0.004795% CI: [0.038, 0.208]ANCOVA
Primary

Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 12

A subset of patients performed postdose serial spirometry. Data from these assessments were used to analyze the primary endpoint of baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC0-12h at week 12 using the trapezoidal rule based on actual time of measurement. It was standardized by dividing it by the number of hours between the start time of dose administration and the end time of the last nonmissing FEV1 measurement. The baseline FEV1 was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose). If 1 of these was missing, the nonmissing value was used; if both were missing, baseline was treated as missing. Baseline-adjusted FEV1 was calculated as postdose FEV1 after subtracting the baseline FEV1 value.

Time frame: Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12 and was performed at the following times relative to the administration of study drug (±5 minutes): 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours

Population: A subset of patients who performed postdose serial spirometry at the baseline visit and week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgStandardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 120.446 litersStandard Error 0.0463
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgStandardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 120.442 litersStandard Error 0.0496
Fp MDPI 200 mcgStandardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 120.267 litersStandard Error 0.0466
Fp MDPI 100 mcgStandardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 120.260 litersStandard Error 0.0463
Placebo MDPIStandardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 120.121 litersStandard Error 0.0472
Comparison: A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the first in the sequence.p-value: 0.000995% CI: [0.074, 0.285]ANCOVA
Comparison: A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the second in the sequence.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [0.074, 0.291]ANCOVA
Comparison: A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the third in the sequence.p-value: 095% CI: [0.221, 0.431]ANCOVA
Comparison: A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the fourth in the sequence.p-value: 095% CI: [0.212, 0.432]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old

The AQLQ(S) (September 2010 version; patients aged ≥18 years) was self administered by the patients at the investigational center at the randomization visit and at Week 12 or end of trial. The questionnaire is a tool to measure the impact of asthma on a patient's quality of life (physical, emotional, social, and occupational) with a recall period of 2 weeks. The AQLQ(S) was administered only to patients 18 years and older. The 32 individual questions in the AQLQ were equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score was the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions, and ranged from 1 to 7. A score 7.0 indicated that the patient had no impairments due to asthma and a score of 1.0 indicated severe impairment. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improved quality of life.

Time frame: Day 1 (predose, baseline), end of trial (up to week 12)

Population: Full analysis set of participants who contributed at least once to analysis and were \>= 18 years old

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old0.534 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0741
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old0.592 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0725
Fp MDPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old0.384 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0742
Fp MDPI 100 mcgChange From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old0.340 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.074
Placebo MDPIChange From Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire With Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old-0.089 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0747
Comparison: The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).p-value: 095% CI: [0.269, 0.677]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).p-value: 095% CI: [0.224, 0.632]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).p-value: 095% CI: [0.418, 0.828]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).p-value: 095% CI: [0.478, 0.885]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).p-value: 0.14995% CI: [-0.054, 0.354]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).p-value: 0.014395% CI: [0.051, 0.455]ANCOVA
Comparison: The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).p-value: 0.043595% CI: [0.006, 0.411]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment

Morning PEF tests were performed before administration of study drug or rescue medications (data were excluded if the time of PEF measurement was more than 5 minutes after the dose time). The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the patient diary. The baseline PEF was the average value of recorded (nonmissing) morning assessments over the 7 days prior to randomization on Day 1. For efficacy analyses of weekly average morning PEF measurements, values were the averages based on available data for that week.

Time frame: Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), Day 1 (postdose) daily until Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment20.235 liters/minuteStandard Error 2.3845
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment18.610 liters/minuteStandard Error 2.4137
Fp MDPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment7.464 liters/minuteStandard Error 2.3887
Fp MDPI 100 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment5.731 liters/minuteStandard Error 2.4102
Placebo MDPIChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment-10.987 liters/minuteStandard Error 2.4784
Comparison: The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [11.751, 25.15]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [9.988, 23.449]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [24.513, 37.93]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [22.839, 36.354]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.000295% CI: [6.179, 19.363]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.000295% CI: [6.216, 19.541]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [4.511, 17.782]mixed model for repeated measures
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

Patients recorded the number of inhalations of rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI) each AM and PM in the diary. The average number of daily inhalations over the 7 days before the randomization visit was the baseline value. The weekly average was based on the available data for the 7 days before each analysis week. The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures.

Time frame: Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), up to week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period-0.898 puffsStandard Error 0.1069
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period-0.821 puffsStandard Error 0.108
Fp MDPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period-0.534 puffsStandard Error 0.107
Fp MDPI 100 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period-0.439 puffsStandard Error 0.1081
Placebo MDPIChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period0.168 puffsStandard Error 0.1102
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [-1.001, -0.403]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.000195% CI: [-0.908, -0.307]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [-1.365, -0.766]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [-1.291, -0.686]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.01695% CI: [-0.659, -0.068]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.012495% CI: [-0.681, -0.083]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.058895% CI: [-0.584, 0.011]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

The total daily asthma symptom score is the average of the daytime and nighttime scores as recorded in the patient diary. Daytime Symptom Score: * 0=No symptoms * 1=Symptoms for 1 short period * 2=Symptoms for 2+ short periods * 3=Symptoms for most of the day - did not affect normal daily activities * 4=Symptoms for most of the day - did affect normal daily activities * 5=Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities Nighttime Symptom Score (determined in the AM): * 0=No symptoms * 1=Symptoms causing me to wake once (or wake early) * 2=Symptoms causing me to wake twice or more (including waking early) * 3=Symptoms causing me to be awake for most of the night * 4=Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep Baseline was the average of recorded scores over the 7 days before randomization. The change from baseline in the weekly average over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).

Time frame: Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), to Week 12

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period-0.391 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0328
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period-0.364 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0332
Fp MDPI 200 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period-0.242 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0329
Fp MDPI 100 mcgChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period-0.282 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0333
Placebo MDPIChange From Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period-0.087 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0342
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-0.248, -0.063]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [-0.288, -0.102]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [-0.397, -0.212]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 095% CI: [-0.37, -0.184]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.001495% CI: [-0.239, -0.058]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.081895% CI: [-0.174, 0.01]mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.p-value: 0.009495% CI: [-0.213, -0.03]mixed model for repeated measures
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12

The analysis of probability of remaining in the study at Week 12 used the time to patient withdrawal for worsening asthma, defined as the number of days elapsed from the date of randomization to the date of withdrawal due to worsening asthma. Patients who were lost to follow-up, who had not withdrawn due to worsening asthma by week 12, or who had withdrawn due to reasons other than worsening asthma were right-censored at the date of last assessment.

Time frame: up to Week 12 of the Treatment Period

Population: Full analysis set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 120.9719 probability
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 120.9929 probability
Fp MDPI 200 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 120.9786 probability
Fp MDPI 100 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 120.9930 probability
Placebo MDPIKaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 120.8528 probability
p-value: 0.0001Log Rank
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
p-value: 0.0003Log Rank
p-value: <0.0001Log Rank
p-value: 0.7203Log Rank
p-value: 0.996Log Rank
p-value: 0.325Log Rank
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1

The baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose) on Day 1. If one of these was missing, the other measurement was used as baseline value. If both were missing, the baseline trough FEV1 was treated as missing. Time to target improvement (15% or 12%) was defined as the time elapsed from the time of first dose to the first time the target improvement in FEV1 was achieved. If an exact target increase was not achieved at a measured timepoint, then the time was estimated by linear interpolation between the timepoint when target was reached and the timepoint immediately before. Patients who did not achieve the target improvement were censored at the time of last serial spirometry assessment. Values of NA indicate the values could not be estimated which happened when the estimated probability of not achieving target is more than 50%.

Time frame: Day 1 of the Treatment Period (predose and postdose)

Population: Patients who did not achieve the target improvement were censored at the time of last serial spirometry assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 115% improvement0.8 hours
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 112% improvement0.4 hours
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 115% improvement0.9 hours
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 112% improvement0.4 hours
Fp MDPI 200 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 115% improvementNA hours
Fp MDPI 200 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 112% improvement6.9 hours
Fp MDPI 100 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 112% improvementNA hours
Fp MDPI 100 mcgKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 115% improvementNA hours
Placebo MDPIKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 115% improvementNA hours
Placebo MDPIKaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement From Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 112% improvementNA hours
Secondary

Patients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period

An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.

Time frame: Day 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment Period

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE resulting in death0 Participants
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 nonserious TEAE61 Participants
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe TEAE3 Participants
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 serious TEAE2 Participants
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe treatment-related TEAE1 Participants
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 treatment-related TEAE8 Participants
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal2 Participants
FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE61 Participants
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 serious TEAE2 Participants
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE59 Participants
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal2 Participants
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe TEAE2 Participants
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 nonserious TEAE58 Participants
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE resulting in death1 Participants
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 treatment-related TEAE4 Participants
FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe treatment-related TEAE0 Participants
Fp MDPI 200 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 serious TEAE1 Participants
Fp MDPI 200 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE resulting in death0 Participants
Fp MDPI 200 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal0 Participants
Fp MDPI 200 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe TEAE0 Participants
Fp MDPI 200 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe treatment-related TEAE0 Participants
Fp MDPI 200 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 nonserious TEAE60 Participants
Fp MDPI 200 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE60 Participants
Fp MDPI 200 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 treatment-related TEAE9 Participants
Fp MDPI 100 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe treatment-related TEAE0 Participants
Fp MDPI 100 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 serious TEAE1 Participants
Fp MDPI 100 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal2 Participants
Fp MDPI 100 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE53 Participants
Fp MDPI 100 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 treatment-related TEAE6 Participants
Fp MDPI 100 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE resulting in death0 Participants
Fp MDPI 100 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe TEAE1 Participants
Fp MDPI 100 mcgPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 nonserious TEAE52 Participants
Placebo MDPIPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal2 Participants
Placebo MDPIPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 nonserious TEAE52 Participants
Placebo MDPIPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE resulting in death0 Participants
Placebo MDPIPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe TEAE1 Participants
Placebo MDPIPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 serious TEAE1 Participants
Placebo MDPIPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 severe treatment-related TEAE0 Participants
Placebo MDPIPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 treatment-related TEAE5 Participants
Placebo MDPIPatients With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period>=1 TEAE52 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 9, 2026