Skip to content

Relaxation-Response-based Mental Health Promotion - Open and Calm 2013

Study of Potential Health Effects of a Relaxation-response-based Mental Health Promotion Course (RR-MHP) and the Possibilities for Its Applications in the Danish Public Health Sector

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02140307
Acronym
RR-MHP OC13
Enrollment
72
Registered
2014-05-16
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2014-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of Life, Stress Physiological, Stress Psychological

Keywords

Health Promotion, Prevention, Relaxation Response, Meditation, Cortisol

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate health-promoting and stress-reducing psychological, physiological and hormonal effects of a 9-week meditation-based course in personal health and to examine potential baseline factors for any such effects. Thus, the investigators will investigate the course format (individual course or group-based course) as a potential factor the course outcome, and also individual background factors such as demographics and genetic variations.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRelaxation Response-based Mental Health Promotion (RR-MHP)

The Open and Calm intervention is based on a standardized 9-week program. Week 1 uses a simple mantra-based meditation. Week 2 and 5 uses focus on the body. Week 3 and 6 uses focus on thoughts and emotions. Week 4 and 7 uses focus on social relationships. Weeks 8 and 9 were entitled The focus you feel like, where participants chose their own focus (e.g. two weeks of bodily focus if that was most relevant for a person, while another might chose 1 week focusing on emotions and another focusing on a social relationship).

Sponsors

Nordea-Fonden, Denmark
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Steen G Hasselbalch
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Experience of stress, defined as a Cohen's perceived stress scale score \> 12. * Speaks and reads Danish fluently. * Ability to use the internet to complete questionnaires. * Participation in face-to-face study information meeting. * Signed agreement to the study conditions and informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Other current treatment (psychological, medical or other) for stress, depression, anxiety, phobias, traumas or other psychological problems. * Other current treatment for bodily illnesses, such as pain, migraine, cancer. * More than one diagnose with psychiatric disease (e.g. anxiety, depression) within the past 3 years. * Body-Mass Index \> 30. * Major Depression Inventory score \> 25 at inclusion interview. * Physical handicaps affecting life stress or quality of life chronically. * Drug use (\> 50 times hash during the past two years; max 20 times harder drugs, max 2 times per month since the 18th birthday on average; no periods \> 3 years where the use of drugs exceeded two times per month). * Alcohol use \> 21 drinks/week for men, and \> 14 drinks/week for women and AUDIT-scores (a scale of alcohol-related problems) \>20. * Serious head trauma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in scores on Perceived Stress on Cohen's Perceived Stress ScaleFrom baseline to post-treatment (9 weeks later) and to 3-month follow-upThe investigators expect a decrease in perceived stress of significantly larger magnitude in interventional groups than in waitlist controls across the three time points
Cortisol secretion as measured by the cortisol awakening responseFrom baseline to post-treatment (after 9 weeks)The investigators expect a significant reduction of cortisol secretion in intervention groups and larger than in wait-list controls. Specifically, the investigators analyze the Area Under Curve with respect to Ground (total cortisol output) after awakening. Cortisol was only collected for 2/3 data waves (N = 48) due to logistics. COMMENT: The investigators have two primary outcomes, but both are measures of stress levels. The investigators expect to see both hormonal and perceived stress improvements.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Quality of Life on the WHO-5 scaleFrom baseline to post-treatment (9 weeks later) and to 3-month follow-upThe investigators expect a larger improvement in perceived quality of life in intervention groups compared to wait-list controls over the course of the three time points
Change in Major Depression InventoryFrom baseline to post-treatment (9 weeks later) and to 3-month follow-upThe investigators expect a significantly larger decrease in depressive symptoms in intervention groups than in wait-list controls over the course of the three time points.
Change in Short-Form Health Survey-36From baseline to post-treatment (9 weeks later) and to 3-month follow-upThe investigators expect a significantly larger improvement in quality of life (SF-36-Mental Component Summary Score and SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score) in intervention groups compared to wait-list controls over the course of the three time points.
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)From baseline to post-treatment (9 weeks later) and to 3-month follow-upThe investigators expect a larger improvement of sleep quality in the intervention groups than in the wait-list controls over the course of the three time points

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in physiological stress levels as measured by blood pressure, skin conductance, heart rate variability measures and respiratory measures during resting state (15 minutes).Baseline to post-treatment (9 weeks)The investigators expect larger improvements in intervention groups than in wait-list controls. Due to logistics, only N = 48 were tested physiologically.
Basic processes in visual attentionBaseline to post-treatment (9 weeks)The investigators expect larger improvements in intervention groups than wait-list controls for the speed of visual processing (threshold of conscious perception measured in ms) on the Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) task developed at the Center for Visual Cognition, Copenhagen University. The investigators expect a lowered threshold for conscious, visual perception (the TVA-t0 parameter) since they have demonstrated this effect after meditation-based training in a previous study (Jensen et al., 2012, J. Exp. Psych. Gen., MBSR affects Attention)

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026