Retinitis Pigmentosa
Conditions
Keywords
Cystoid Macular Edema, Minocycline, Microglia, Retinitis Pigmentosa
Brief summary
Background: \- Some people with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) have macular edema (swelling) in the central retina. This can cause decreased central vision. The cause of macular edema is unknown, but may involve inflammation. The drug minocycline might help prevent inflammation and therefore might help treat macular edema and improve central visual function . Objectives: \- To see if minocycline helps people with RP and macular edema. Eligibility: \- People 12 years and older with RP who have macular edema in at least on eye. Design: * Participants will be screened with medical and eye disease history. They will have an eye exam and blood tests. One eye with macular edema will be the study eye. If both eyes are affected, one will be designated the study eye. * Participants will visit the clinic at least 9 times over at least 14 months. The first 3 study visits will be monthly, then every 2 months. * Participants will start taking minocycline after visit 3. They will take 1 pill twice daily for at least 1 year. * Participants will keep a medicine diary and bring it to each visit with their pill bottle and unused pills. At each study visit, participants will have some or all of the following tests: * eye and thyroid exams * blood and pregnancy tests * microperimetry: participants will press a button when they see a light on a computer screen * visual field measurement: participants will look at spots on a white screen to test side vision * electroretinogram: A person will be dark adapted by sitting in the dark for 30 minutes. After the placement of numbing eye drops, special contact lenses will be placed . The participant will watch flashing lights and recordings will be made.
Detailed description
Objective: Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a broad category of genetically heterogeneous diseases involving progressive visual loss by a constriction of visual field and loss of night vision. In up to one-third of patients, the peripheral vision loss can be compounded by central visual acuity loss from the development of cystic macular changes. While RP is a genetic disease, the etiology of progressive cell death, including that of associated cystoid macular edema (CME), is not completely understood. Inflammatory processes involving the activation of resident immune cells of the retina called microglia have been hypothesized to contribute. Minocycline inhibits the activation of microglia, decreasing the production of inflammatory factors implicated in RP progression. The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and possible efficacy of oral minocycline in participants with CME and RP. Study Population: Five participants, ages 12 and older, with unilateral or bilateral CME associated with RP will be enrolled initially. However, up to an additional five participants may be enrolled to replace participants who may withdraw from the study prior to reaching the Month 6 visit. Design: This is a pilot, single-center, uncontrolled, open-label, prospective, Phase 1/2 clinical trial to evaluate minocycline as a potential treatment for CME secondary to RP. A pre-treatment phase lasting two months will be instituted prior to investigational product (IP) initiation to assess the anatomical variability of CME as well as variability of other measurable parameters as part of the natural history of the disease. Participants will receive an oral dose of 100 mg (or appropriate weight adjusted pediatric dose) of minocycline twice daily for 12 months. There will be a common termination date, which will take place when the last recruited participant has received 12 months of IP. Participants who were recruited in the earlier part of the study will continue taking IP and be followed every two months until the common termination date. At each visit, participants will have visual acuity measured and will undergo optical coherence tomography (OCT) testing to measure retinal thickness. Measures of central visual field sensitivity full-field electroretinograms (ERG) and microperimetry (MP-1) will also be collected. Outcome Measures: The primary outcome is the change in CME based on OCT measurements in the study eye at 6 months compared to pre-treatment values. Secondary outcomes include changes in OCT thickness, changes in amplitude of photopic and scotopic responses on ERG testing, changes in microperimetry, and changes in visual field as measured by HVF 30-2 visual field testing at 6 months and 12 months compared to pre-treatment values, as well as CME changes on OCT at 12 months compared to pre-treatment values. Pre-treatment measurements will be analyzed to measure the natural variability of the CME as well as to measure the variability of the functional testing. Safety outcomes will include the number and severity of adverse events (AEs). Ocular safety outcomes will be indicated by changes in visual acuity, ocular surface changes, intraocular inflammation and any other ocular changes not consistent with the natural progression of RP.
Interventions
Oral dose of 100 mg (or appropriate weight-adjusted pediatric dose) of minocycline twice daily for 12 months.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* INCLUSION CRITERIA: * To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met, where applicable. * Participant must be 12 years of age or older. * Participant (or legal guardian) must understand and sign the protocol's informed consent document. * Participant must have evidence of retinitis pigmentosa (RP) as defined by characteristic electroretinogram (ERG) responses and visual fields. * Participant must be able to swallow pills. * Participant must have normal renal function and liver function or have mild abnormalities not above grade 1 as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE). * Participant must agree to minimize exposure to sunlight or artificial ultraviolet (UV) rays and to wear protective clothing, sunglasses and sunscreen \[minimum sun protection factor (SPF) 15\] if s/he must be out in the sun. * Any female participant of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and be willing to undergo pregnancy tests throughout the study. * Any female participant of childbearing potential and any male participant able to father children must have (or have a partner who has) had a hysterectomy or vasectomy, be completely abstinent from intercourse or must agree to practice two acceptable methods of contraception throughout the course of the study and for at least one week after investigational product (IP) discontinuation. Acceptable methods of contraception include: * hormonal contraception (i.e., birth control pills, injected hormones, dermal patch or vaginal ring), * intrauterine device, * barrier methods (diaphragm, condom) with spermicide, or * surgical sterilization (hysterectomy or tubal ligation).
Exclusion criteria
A participant is not eligible if any of the following
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) Based on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Measurements in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to the Average of the Pre-treatment Values. | Pre-treatment and 6 Months | Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the OCT measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Amplitude of Photopic and Scotopic Responses on Electroretinogram (ERG) Testing at 6 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | Pre-Treatment and 6 Months | This outcome measure will not be reported. |
| Changes in Amplitude of Photopic and Scotopic Responses on Electroretinogram (ERG) Testing at 12 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | Pre-treatment and 12 Months | This outcome measure will not be reported. |
| Change in Microperimetry at 6 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | Pre-treatment and 6 Months | Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the microperimetry measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value. |
| Change in Microperimetry at 12 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | Pre-treatment and 12 Months | Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the microperimetry measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value. |
| Change in Visual Field as Measured by HVF 30-2 Visual Field Testing at 6 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | Pre-treatment and 6 Months | Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the HVF 30-2 measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value. |
| Change in Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) Based on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Measurements in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to the Average of the Pre-treatment Values | Pre-treatment and 12 Months | Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the OCT measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value. |
| Number of Study Eyes Achieving a 15-letter or More Worsening in Electronic Visual Acuity (EVA) at 12 Months as Compared to Baseline | Baseline and 12 Months | Visual Acuity was measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. |
| Number of Ocular Adverse Events | Study Duration, up to 16 Months | — |
| Number of Non-ocular Adverse Events | Study Duration, up to 16 Months | — |
| Number of Severe Adverse Events | Study Duration, up to 16 Months | — |
| Change in Visual Field as Measured by HVF 30-2 Visual Field Testing at 12 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | Pre-treatment and 12 Months | Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the HVF 30-2 measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Five participants, ages 12 and older, with cystoid macular edema (CME) secondary to retinitis pigmentosa (RP) who meet the eligibility criteria will be initially accrued; however, up to an additional five participants may be enrolled to replace participants who may withdraw from the study prior to reaching Month 6
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Minocycline Oral administration of minocycline
Minocycline: Oral dose of 100 mg (or appropriate weight-adjusted pediatric dose) of minocycline twice daily for 12 months. | 7 |
| Total | 7 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) resolved | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Minocycline |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 7 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 27.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.81 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 3 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 6 / 7 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 7 |
Outcome results
Change in Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) Based on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Measurements in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to the Average of the Pre-treatment Values.
Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the OCT measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and 6 Months
Population: Participants receiving investigational product (IP) at the Month 6 visit were included in the primary efficacy analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Change in Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) Based on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Measurements in the Study Eye at 6 Months Compared to the Average of the Pre-treatment Values. | -16.7 microns | Standard Deviation 42.16 |
Change in Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) Based on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Measurements in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to the Average of the Pre-treatment Values
Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the OCT measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and 12 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Change in Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) Based on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Measurements in the Study Eye at 12 Months Compared to the Average of the Pre-treatment Values | -37.3 microns | Standard Deviation 52.9 |
Change in Microperimetry at 12 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values
Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the microperimetry measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and 12 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Change in Microperimetry at 12 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | -1.02 dB | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
Change in Microperimetry at 6 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values
Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the microperimetry measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and 6 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Change in Microperimetry at 6 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | -1.01 decibels (dB) | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
Change in Visual Field as Measured by HVF 30-2 Visual Field Testing at 12 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values
Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the HVF 30-2 measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and 12 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Change in Visual Field as Measured by HVF 30-2 Visual Field Testing at 12 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | 1.69 dB | Standard Deviation 5.52 |
Change in Visual Field as Measured by HVF 30-2 Visual Field Testing at 6 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values
Three visits (two pre-treatment and one baseline) were conducted prior to the receipt of investigational product (IP) and an average of the HVF 30-2 measurements at these three visits was used as the pre-treatment value.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and 6 Months
Population: Two participants had to switch to HVF 10-2; therefore they were not included in the analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Change in Visual Field as Measured by HVF 30-2 Visual Field Testing at 6 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values | -3.62 dB | Standard Deviation 5.8 |
Changes in Amplitude of Photopic and Scotopic Responses on Electroretinogram (ERG) Testing at 12 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values
This outcome measure will not be reported.
Time frame: Pre-treatment and 12 Months
Population: Participants had non-recordable ERGs; therefore, changes could not be measured.
Changes in Amplitude of Photopic and Scotopic Responses on Electroretinogram (ERG) Testing at 6 Months as Compared to the Average of Pre-treatment Values
This outcome measure will not be reported.
Time frame: Pre-Treatment and 6 Months
Population: Participants had non-recordable ERGs; therefore, changes could not be measured.
Number of Non-ocular Adverse Events
Time frame: Study Duration, up to 16 Months
Population: All participants were included in the safety analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Number of Non-ocular Adverse Events | 12 adverse events |
Number of Ocular Adverse Events
Time frame: Study Duration, up to 16 Months
Population: All participants were included in the safety analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Number of Ocular Adverse Events | 3 adverse events |
Number of Severe Adverse Events
Time frame: Study Duration, up to 16 Months
Population: All participants were included in the safety analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Number of Severe Adverse Events | 0 adverse events |
Number of Study Eyes Achieving a 15-letter or More Worsening in Electronic Visual Acuity (EVA) at 12 Months as Compared to Baseline
Visual Acuity was measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Minocycline | Number of Study Eyes Achieving a 15-letter or More Worsening in Electronic Visual Acuity (EVA) at 12 Months as Compared to Baseline | 0 eyes |