Skip to content

GreenLight XPS Laser System Retrospective Chart Review

GreenLight XPS Laser System for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy, and Quality of Life Through Retrospective Chart Review

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02139969
Enrollment
956
Registered
2014-05-16
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2020-11-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to gain information on the safety, efficacy, and quality of life in subjects who have had the GreenLight XPS procedure.

Detailed description

This is a retrospective chart review conducted at six centers in the United States and Canada. This review will evaluate the safety and efficacy of GreenLight XPS in subjects who received treatment on or after 01-Aug-2010.

Interventions

DEVICEGreenLight XPS Laser System

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men who have had a GreenLight XPS procedure with a MoXy Fiber since 01-Aug-2010.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has had prior radiation. * Subject has a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder confirmed by urodynamic studies (BOO, detrusor overactivity (DO), impaired detrusor contractor (IDC)) * Subject has a neurologic disorder that would impact bladder function (MS, Parkinson, Spinal Cord Injury) (note: Stroke patients not excluded) * Subject has an artificial urinary sphincter

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)6 months post-procedureEvaluate the proportion of subjects who have mild or no BPH symptoms at six months post-procedure; e.g. an IPSS of eight or less at 6-month follow-up. An IPSS of eight or less indicates the subject is asymptomatic or has mild symptoms, a score of 9-21 indicates the subject has moderate symptoms, and a score of \>21 indicates the subject has severe symptoms. IPSS scores can range from 0-35.
Occurrence of Adverse Events Related to the Study Treatment.365 DaysTreatment-related adverse events include: * Event related to the study device or procedure * Intra-operative adverse event related to the study device or procedure * Serious adverse events related to the study device or procedure The number of events as well as the number and percentage of subjects with the event will be calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess Changes in Quality of Life Related to BPH Symptoms.Baseline through six months post-procedureSummarize IPSS-QOL from baseline through six months post-procedure for all data available during the retrospective review. The quality of life assessment responses includes: Delighted, Pleased, Mostly Satisfied, Mixed-neither satisfied or dissatisfied, Mostly Dissatisfied, Unhappy, or Terrible (range of 0 to 6).The results presented below represent the change from baseline to six months post-procedure for any response. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Assess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function.Baseline through six months post-procedure.Changes in objective measures of urologic function from baseline through six months post-procedure using Peak Flow Rate (Qmax)
Number of Participants With ER Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Surgical Re-treatments for Treatment-related Adverse Events Up to 90 Days Post-ProcedureUp to 90 days post-procedure.* Emergency room visit for an adverse event related to the study device or procedure within 90 days of procedure * Hospital admission for an adverse event related to the study device or procedure within 90 days of procedure * Surgical intervention for an adverse event related to the study device or procedure within 90 days of procedure
Evaluate the Percentage of Participants Experience Ongoing Treatment-related Urinary Incontinence90 days, 180 daysThe percentage (count/n) of subjects with an ongoing urinary incontinence event at 90 and 180 days post-procedure. An incontinence event is considered ongoing if the onset was on or before the specified time point and the event is either unresolved or resolved after that time point.
Assess the Occurrence of Surgical Retreatment for BPH in GreenLight XPS Patients.Procedure through five years post-procedure.Number of surgical re-treatment for BPH as a result of prostate tissue regrowth or insufficient prostatic tissue removal.
Characteristics of the Study ProcedureParticipants will be followed from admission through discharge from the medical facility, an expected average of 2 days.Summary of the study procedure, including length of procedure and lasing time
Type of Hospital StayData will be collected during the time of their hospital stay from admission through dischargeSummarize characteristics of the type of hospital stay (in-patient vs out-patient with an overnight stay)
Number of Participants Stratified by Number of Fibers Used During ProcedureParticipants will be followed from admission through discharge from the medical facility, an expected average of 2 days.Summarize characteristics of the study procedure and immediate outcomes: number of fibers used
Assess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic FunctionBaseline through six months post-procedureChanges in objective measures of urologic function from baseline through six months post-procedure using post void residual
Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic FunctionBaseline through six months post-procedure.Changes in objective measures of urologic function from baseline through six months post-procedure using prostate volume
Length of Hospital StayThe number of days from admission through discharge from the medical facility will be measured.Summarize length of hospital stay (in days) from admission through discharge
Characteristics of the Study Procedure and Immediate OutcomesParticipants will be followed from admission through discharge from the medical facility, an expected average of 2 days.Summary of characteristics of the study procedure and immediate outcomes: total energy used (kJ)

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
GreenLight XPS Laser System
Treatment of BPH in men using the GreenLight XPS Laser System
956
Total956

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGreenLight XPS Laser System
Age, Continuous68.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
Region of Enrollment
Canada
199 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
757 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
956 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
182 / 956
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 956

Outcome results

Primary

International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

Evaluate the proportion of subjects who have mild or no BPH symptoms at six months post-procedure; e.g. an IPSS of eight or less at 6-month follow-up. An IPSS of eight or less indicates the subject is asymptomatic or has mild symptoms, a score of 9-21 indicates the subject has moderate symptoms, and a score of \>21 indicates the subject has severe symptoms. IPSS scores can range from 0-35.

Time frame: 6 months post-procedure

Population: This study was retrospective chart review of available data collected in the medical records. The intention was to collect and analyze data through five years post-procedure; however, the data collected was minimal. Results posted here are reflective of the results that have been published (through 6-months).

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemInternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Score of <=8437 Participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemInternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Score of 9-21118 Participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemInternational Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)Score of >2117 Participants
Primary

Occurrence of Adverse Events Related to the Study Treatment.

Treatment-related adverse events include: * Event related to the study device or procedure * Intra-operative adverse event related to the study device or procedure * Serious adverse events related to the study device or procedure The number of events as well as the number and percentage of subjects with the event will be calculated.

Time frame: 365 Days

Population: Number of participants with a treatment-related adverse event.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemOccurrence of Adverse Events Related to the Study Treatment.249 Treatment-related Events
Secondary

Assess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function

Changes in objective measures of urologic function from baseline through six months post-procedure using post void residual

Time frame: Baseline through six months post-procedure

Population: This study was retrospective chart review of available data collected in the medical records. The intention was to collect and analyze data through five years post-procedure; however, the data collected was minimal. Results posted here are reflective of the results that have been published (through 6-months).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic FunctionPVR Baseline (ml)204.3 mlStandard Deviation 221.2
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic FunctionPVR 6 Months (ml)46.1 mlStandard Deviation 95.2
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic FunctionPVR Change from Baseline-172 mlStandard Deviation 215.4
Secondary

Assess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function.

Changes in objective measures of urologic function from baseline through six months post-procedure using Peak Flow Rate (Qmax)

Time frame: Baseline through six months post-procedure.

Population: This study was retrospective chart review of available data collected in the medical records. The intention was to collect and analyze data through five years post-procedure; however, the data collected was minimal. Results posted here are reflective of the results that have been published (through 6-months).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function.Peak Flow Rate (Qmax) Baseline (ml/sec)8.7 ml/secStandard Deviation 5.7
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function.Qmax 6 months (ml/sec)18.0 ml/secStandard Deviation 8.9
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function.Qmax Change from Baseline10.9 ml/secStandard Deviation 10
Secondary

Assess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function.

Changes in objective measures of urologic function from baseline through six months post-procedure using prostate specific antigen

Time frame: From baseline through six months post-procedure.

Population: This study was retrospective chart review of available data collected in the medical records. The intention was to collect and analyze data through five years post-procedure; however, the data collected was minimal. Results posted here are reflective of the results that have been published (through 6-months).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function.PSA (ng/ml) Baseline4.9 ng/mlStandard Deviation 7.8
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function.PSA (ng/ml) 6 Months2.6 ng/mlStandard Deviation 7.6
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function.PSA (ng/ml) Change from Baseline-2.0 ng/mlStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

Assess Changes in Quality of Life Related to BPH Symptoms.

Summarize IPSS-QOL from baseline through six months post-procedure for all data available during the retrospective review. The quality of life assessment responses includes: Delighted, Pleased, Mostly Satisfied, Mixed-neither satisfied or dissatisfied, Mostly Dissatisfied, Unhappy, or Terrible (range of 0 to 6).The results presented below represent the change from baseline to six months post-procedure for any response. Lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline through six months post-procedure

Population: This study was retrospective chart review of available data collected in the medical records. The intention was to collect and analyze data through five years post-procedure; however, the data collected was minimal. Results posted here are reflective of the results that have been published (through 6-months).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess Changes in Quality of Life Related to BPH Symptoms.1.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Secondary

Assess the Occurrence of Surgical Retreatment for BPH in GreenLight XPS Patients.

Number of surgical re-treatment for BPH as a result of prostate tissue regrowth or insufficient prostatic tissue removal.

Time frame: Procedure through five years post-procedure.

Population: Data collected for this study was retrospective in nature and only data available in the medical records could be reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess the Occurrence of Surgical Retreatment for BPH in GreenLight XPS Patients.Reobstruction due to prostate regrowth4 Participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemAssess the Occurrence of Surgical Retreatment for BPH in GreenLight XPS Patients.Insufficient tissue removal3 Participants
Secondary

Changes in Objective Measures of Urologic Function

Changes in objective measures of urologic function from baseline through six months post-procedure using prostate volume

Time frame: Baseline through six months post-procedure.

Population: This study was retrospective chart review of available data collected in the medical records. The intention was to collect and analyze data through five years post-procedure; however, the data collected was minimal. Results posted here are reflective of the results that have been published (through 6-months).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemChanges in Objective Measures of Urologic FunctionProstate Volume (g) Baseline76.0 gramsStandard Deviation 49
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemChanges in Objective Measures of Urologic FunctionProstate Volume (g) 6 Months44.0 gramsStandard Deviation 36.2
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemChanges in Objective Measures of Urologic FunctionProstate Volume (g) Change from Baseline-31.8 gramsStandard Deviation 38.3
Secondary

Characteristics of the Study Procedure

Summary of the study procedure, including length of procedure and lasing time

Time frame: Participants will be followed from admission through discharge from the medical facility, an expected average of 2 days.

Population: Data collected for this study was retrospective in nature and only data available in the medical records could be reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemCharacteristics of the Study ProcedureLength of Procedure (minutes)57.1 minutesStandard Deviation 28.6
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemCharacteristics of the Study ProcedureLasing Time (minutes)33.2 minutesStandard Deviation 18.9
Secondary

Characteristics of the Study Procedure and Immediate Outcomes

Summary of characteristics of the study procedure and immediate outcomes: total energy used (kJ)

Time frame: Participants will be followed from admission through discharge from the medical facility, an expected average of 2 days.

Population: Data collected for this study was retrospective in nature and only data available in the medical records could be reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemCharacteristics of the Study Procedure and Immediate Outcomes275.8 kJStandard Deviation 180.7
Secondary

Characteristics of the Study Procedure and Immediate Outcomes

Summarize characteristics of the study procedure and immediate outcomes: length of catheterization

Time frame: Participants will be followed from admission through discharge from the medical facility, an expected average of 2 days.

Population: Data collected for this study was retrospective in nature and only data available in the medical records could be reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemCharacteristics of the Study Procedure and Immediate Outcomes1.2 days
Secondary

Evaluate the Percentage of Participants Experience Ongoing Treatment-related Urinary Incontinence

The percentage (count/n) of subjects with an ongoing urinary incontinence event at 90 and 180 days post-procedure. An incontinence event is considered ongoing if the onset was on or before the specified time point and the event is either unresolved or resolved after that time point.

Time frame: 90 days, 180 days

Population: This study was retrospective chart review of available data collected in the medical records. The intention was to collect and analyze data through five years post-procedure; however, the data collected was minimal. Results posted here are reflective of the results that have been published (through 6-months).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemEvaluate the Percentage of Participants Experience Ongoing Treatment-related Urinary IncontinenceIncontinence, Stress 90 Days0.9 percentage of incontinence events
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemEvaluate the Percentage of Participants Experience Ongoing Treatment-related Urinary IncontinenceIncontinence, Urge 90 Days0.9 percentage of incontinence events
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemEvaluate the Percentage of Participants Experience Ongoing Treatment-related Urinary IncontinenceIncontinence, Stress 180 Days1.3 percentage of incontinence events
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemEvaluate the Percentage of Participants Experience Ongoing Treatment-related Urinary IncontinenceIncontinence, Urge 180 Days1.1 percentage of incontinence events
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay

Summarize length of hospital stay (in days) from admission through discharge

Time frame: The number of days from admission through discharge from the medical facility will be measured.

Population: Data collected for this study was retrospective in nature and only data available in the medical records could be reported.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemLength of Hospital Stay0.5 days
Secondary

Number of Participants Stratified by Number of Fibers Used During Procedure

Summarize characteristics of the study procedure and immediate outcomes: number of fibers used

Time frame: Participants will be followed from admission through discharge from the medical facility, an expected average of 2 days.

Population: Data collected for this study was retrospective in nature and only data available in the medical records could be reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemNumber of Participants Stratified by Number of Fibers Used During ProcedureNumber of Fibers Used: 1873 participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemNumber of Participants Stratified by Number of Fibers Used During ProcedureNumber of Fibers Used: 276 participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemNumber of Participants Stratified by Number of Fibers Used During ProcedureNumber of Fibers Used: >=34 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With ER Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Surgical Re-treatments for Treatment-related Adverse Events Up to 90 Days Post-Procedure

* Emergency room visit for an adverse event related to the study device or procedure within 90 days of procedure * Hospital admission for an adverse event related to the study device or procedure within 90 days of procedure * Surgical intervention for an adverse event related to the study device or procedure within 90 days of procedure

Time frame: Up to 90 days post-procedure.

Population: Data collected for this study was retrospective in nature and only data available in the medical records could be reported. Results presented are number of subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemNumber of Participants With ER Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Surgical Re-treatments for Treatment-related Adverse Events Up to 90 Days Post-ProcedureHospital Admission 90 Days19 Participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemNumber of Participants With ER Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Surgical Re-treatments for Treatment-related Adverse Events Up to 90 Days Post-ProcedureER Visit 30 Days39 Participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemNumber of Participants With ER Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Surgical Re-treatments for Treatment-related Adverse Events Up to 90 Days Post-ProcedureER Visit 90 Days43 Participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemNumber of Participants With ER Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Surgical Re-treatments for Treatment-related Adverse Events Up to 90 Days Post-ProcedureHospital Admission 30 Days14 Participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemNumber of Participants With ER Visits, Hospital Admissions, and Surgical Re-treatments for Treatment-related Adverse Events Up to 90 Days Post-ProcedureSurgical Re-treatment 90 Days4 Participants
Secondary

Type of Hospital Stay

Summarize characteristics of the type of hospital stay (in-patient vs out-patient with an overnight stay)

Time frame: Data will be collected during the time of their hospital stay from admission through discharge

Population: Data collected for this study was retrospective in nature and only data available in the medical records could be reported.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemType of Hospital StayAdmission Type: Outpatient674 participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemType of Hospital StayAdmission Type: Outpatient overnight stay222 participants
GreenLight XPS Laser SystemType of Hospital StayAdmission Type: inpatient58 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026