Skip to content

Hepatectomy Versus Chemoembolization for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria

Hepatic Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization as the Initial Treatment for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02138981
Enrollment
436
Registered
2014-05-15
Start date
2014-05-01
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2018-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria

Keywords

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Milan Criteria

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the survival outcomes between hepatic resection and transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) used as the initial treatment in patients with Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria.

Detailed description

For patients with large/multiple, and resectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread, the choice of treatment remains largely controversial. For these patients, transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as a palliative therapy. On the other hand, many authors still believe that hepatic resection is the only potential curative treatment in these patients because it is still feasible to remove all macroscopic tumors safely at surgery. With advances in surgical techniques, more large/multiple HCCs are now resectable, and long-term results have been reported that ranged from 30% to 58% at 5 years; even patients with large bilobar multiple HCC could reach a survival rate of more than 20% at 5 years after hepatic resection. Until now, there have been only a few studies that compared the outcomes of hepatic resection and TACE in the treatment of multiple HCCs, and these have reported controversial results. Some studies showed that hepatic resection had survival benefi t over TACE, but other studies showed the opposite result ( 11-15 ). Therefore, the investigators performed this prospective study in consecutive patients with large/multiple, and resectable HCCs to compare the outcomes in patients who underwent hepatic resection or TACE as the initial treatment.

Interventions

PROCEDUREChemoembolization and Response-Dependent Resection

patients underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as initial treatments, and only patients who showed good response were subjected to surgical resection.

PROCEDUREImmediate Resection

patients received immediate surgical resection.

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Kaiping Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First People's Hospital of Chenzhou
CollaboratorOTHER
Dongguan Shi People's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sun Yat-sen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A diagnosis of HCC based on the diagnostic criteria for HCC used by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). * The patient has not been previously treated with surgery, radiation therapy, radiofrequency ablation, percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection, or cryoablation. * The tumor beyound milan criteria. * The tumor was evaluated to be resectable by a same group of surgeon. * Patients must have at least one tumor lesion that can be accurately measured according to EASL criteria * No serious concurrent medical illness * Not pregnant or breast-feeding patients * Cirrhotic status of Child-Pugh class A only * The following laboratory parameters: * Platelet count ≥ 80,000/µL * Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL * Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL Serum albumin ≥ 35 g/L * ASL and AST ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal * Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal * INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \>1,500/mm3 * Ability to understand the protocol and to agree to and sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion criteria

* Tumor vascular invasion or distant metastases * Significant renal impairment (creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/minute) or patients on dialysis * On anticoagulation or suffering from a known bleeding disorder * Unstable coronary artery disease or recent MI * Known history of HIV * History of organ allograft * Known or suspected allergy to the investigational agents or any agent given in association with this trial. * Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy * Patients with clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding within 30 days prior to study entry. * Any other hemorrhage/bleeding event \> CTCAE Grade 3 within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug * Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, or bone fracture * Known central nervous system tumors including metastatic brain disease * severe Arterioportal Shunts or Arteriavein Shunts

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
overall survival time5 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
disease free survival5 years
Number of Adverse Events30 daysAll severe adverse events for the entire course of treatment, including treatment for primary tumor and recurrent tumor.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMing Shi, MD
shiming@mail.sysu.edu.cn86-2087343154
Backup ContactRong Ping Guo, MD
guorongp@mail.sysu.edu.cn86-2087342266

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026