Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Cinacalcet in Pediatric Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on Dialysis

A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Cinacalcet HCl in Pediatric Subjects With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Dialysis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02138838
Enrollment
55
Registered
2014-05-15
Start date
2014-11-07
Completion date
2016-06-23
Last updated
2020-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease, Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Keywords

Chronic Kidney Disease, Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Dialysis, Pediatric

Brief summary

The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of cinacalcet for reducing the plasma intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level by ≥ 30%.

Detailed description

This was a 24-week, randomized, multicenter, open-label, controlled study. Participants were randomized into one of two treatment arms; oral administration of cinacalcet daily in addition to standard of care treatment, or standard of care alone. Randomization was stratified by age group (6 to \< 12 and 12 to \< 18 years of age). All participants received standard of care which could include therapy with Vitamin D sterols, calcium supplementation, and phosphate binders. Participants in both treatment groups who completed the 20-week treatment period and those who ended the study due to study closure were eligible to enroll in an open-label extension study (20140159; NCT02341417) for further safety follow-up.

Interventions

Capsules were opened and either sprinkled onto soft food (≥ 5 mg dose) or suspended into a sucrose syrup (≥ 2.5 mg dose) to create a liquid suspension for administration. Tablets were used for doses of 30 mg and higher in participants who could swallow tablets.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTStandard of Care

Standard of care therapy included the use of vitamin D sterols, calcium supplementation, and phosphate binders.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 6 - \< 18 years * Diagnosis of SHPT with the mean of the two consecutive central laboratory iPTH values ≥ 300 pg/mL during screening * Corrected calcium value of ≥ 8.8 mg/dL during screening * Diagnosis of CKD, receiving either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, for ≥ 30 days prior to screening * Parent or legally acceptable representative has provided written informed consent and subject has provided written assent when required by institutional guidelines

Exclusion criteria

* History of congenital long QT syndrome, second or third degree heart block, ventricular tachyarrhythmias or other conditions associated with prolonged QT interval * Corrected QT interval (QTc) \> 500 ms, using Bazett's formula * QTc ≥ 450 to ≤ 500 ms, using Bazett's formula, unless written permission to enroll is provided by the investigator after consultation with a pediatric cardiologist * Use of grapefruit juice, herbal medications, or potent cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors (eg, erythromycin, clarithromycin, ketoconazole, itraconazole) * Use of concomitant medications that may prolong the QTc interval (eg, ondansetron, albuterol)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline In Mean Plasma iPTH During Weeks 11 to 15Baseline and weeks 11 to 15Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels were measured at weeks 11 and 15; the mean value from these 2 measurements was calculated. This endpoint was the primary endpoint in the US only.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Plasma Intact Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment PeriodBaseline and the efficacy assessment period (EAP), weeks 17 to 20Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels were measured at weeks 17, 18, 19 and 20; the mean value from these measurements was calculated. This endpoint was specified as the the primary endpoint in all countries except the United States (US). In the US this endpoint was specified as a secondary efficacy endpoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean iPTH ≤ 300 pg/mL (31.8 Pmol/L) During Weeks 17 to 20Efficacy assessment period, weeks 17 to 20
Percent Change in iPTH From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 20Baseline and weeks 17 to 20
Change in Corrected Serum Calcium From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 20Baseline and weeks 17 to 20
Change in Serum Phosphorus From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 20Baseline and weeks 17 to 20

Countries

Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 32 centers in Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Russia Federation, Slovakia, Spain, Ukraine, and the United States.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment groups in a 1:1 ratio: cinacalcet daily in addition to standard of care (SOC) therapy or SOC therapy alone. Randomization was stratified by age group (6 to \< 12 and 12 to \< 18 years). Participants remained on treatment for 20 weeks or until the time of renal transplant or parathyroidectomy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard of Care
Standard of care therapy included the use of vitamin D sterols, calcium supplementation, and phosphate binders.
28
Cinacalcet
In addition to standard of care participants received cinacalcet at a starting dose (based on dry body weight) of 0.20 mg/kg administered once a day by mouth. Dose adjustments and withholding were based on ionized calcium levels, plasma iPTH, and corrected calcium levels.
27
Total55

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyStudy Closure76
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard of CareCinacalcetTotal
Age, Continuous12.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
12.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
12.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
Age, Customized
12 to < 18 years
19 participants18 participants37 participants
Age, Customized
6 to < 12 years
9 participants9 participants18 participants
Intact Parathyroid Hormone Level1228.43 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 732.08
945.72 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 635.35
1092.31 pg/mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 695.53
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black (or African American)
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
4 participants0 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic/Latino
24 participants27 participants51 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
23 participants19 participants42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 3020 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 304 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Plasma Intact Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Period

Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels were measured at weeks 17, 18, 19 and 20; the mean value from these measurements was calculated. This endpoint was specified as the the primary endpoint in all countries except the United States (US). In the US this endpoint was specified as a secondary efficacy endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline and the efficacy assessment period (EAP), weeks 17 to 20

Population: The full analysis set (all randomized participants) was used for this analysis. For participants with no iPTH values in the EAP, the mean of the last 2 available postbaseline values was used. If only 1 postbaseline value was available, this value was used. If no postbaseline value was available, the participant was considered a non-responder.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of CarePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Plasma Intact Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Period32.1 percentage of participants
CinacalcetPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline in Mean Plasma Intact Parathyroid Hormone During the Efficacy Assessment Period22.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: A hierarchical testing procedure was used to test the primary and biochemical secondary endpoints. The primary endpoint was tested at a 2-sided significance level of 0.05. The secondary endpoints were tested using Holm's method at 0.05 (2-sided) should the primary endpoint achieve a significant result.p-value: 0.4295% CI: [-33.3, 13.4]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline In Mean Plasma iPTH During Weeks 11 to 15

Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels were measured at weeks 11 and 15; the mean value from these 2 measurements was calculated. This endpoint was the primary endpoint in the US only.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 11 to 15

Population: The analysis was conducted using the full analysis set; participants who had no week 11 or 15 iPTH values were considered non-responders (non-responder imputation).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of CarePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline In Mean Plasma iPTH During Weeks 11 to 1517.9 percentage of participants
CinacalcetPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a ≥ 30% Reduction From Baseline In Mean Plasma iPTH During Weeks 11 to 1525.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.4895% CI: [-13.7, 29.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change in Corrected Serum Calcium From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 20

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 17 to 20

Population: This analysis was conducted using the full analysis set using last value carried forward imputation. Participants with no post-baseline values available were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CareChange in Corrected Serum Calcium From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 200.06 mg/dLStandard Error 0.126
CinacalcetChange in Corrected Serum Calcium From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 20-0.28 mg/dLStandard Error 0.135
p-value: 0.05995% CI: [-0.7, 0.01]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Serum Phosphorus From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 20

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 17 to 20

Population: This analysis was conducted using the full analysis set using last value carried forward imputation. Participants with no post-baseline values available were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CareChange in Serum Phosphorus From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 20-0.09 mg/dLStandard Error 0.258
CinacalcetChange in Serum Phosphorus From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 200.67 mg/dLStandard Error 0.266
p-value: 0.03995% CI: [0.04, 1.48]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean iPTH ≤ 300 pg/mL (31.8 Pmol/L) During Weeks 17 to 20

Time frame: Efficacy assessment period, weeks 17 to 20

Population: This analysis was conducted using the full analysis set. For participants with no iPTH values in the EAP, the mean of the last 2 available postbaseline values was used. If only 1 postbaseline value was available, this value was used. If no postbaseline value was available, the participant was considered a non-responder.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard of CarePercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean iPTH ≤ 300 pg/mL (31.8 Pmol/L) During Weeks 17 to 2017.9 percentage of participants
CinacalcetPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Mean iPTH ≤ 300 pg/mL (31.8 Pmol/L) During Weeks 17 to 207.4 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.2595% CI: [-27.7, 6.8]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percent Change in iPTH From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 20

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 17 to 20

Population: This analysis was conducted using the full analysis set using last value carried forward imputation. Participants with no post-baseline values available were excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of CarePercent Change in iPTH From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 20-11.3 percent changeStandard Error 11.1
CinacalcetPercent Change in iPTH From Baseline to the Mean Value During Weeks 17 to 207.7 percent changeStandard Error 11.73
p-value: 0.2395% CI: [-12.5, 50.5]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026