Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Riociguat in Patients With Symptomatic Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) Associated With Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (IIP)

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase II Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Riociguat (0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg and 2.5 mg TID) in Patients With Symptomatic Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (IIP).

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02138825
Acronym
RISE-IIP
Enrollment
147
Registered
2014-05-15
Start date
2014-06-04
Completion date
2016-09-14
Last updated
2017-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias / Hypertension,Pulmonary

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 26-weeks of treatment with riociguat vs. placebo in patients with symptomatic PH (pulmonary hypertension) associated with IIP (idiopathic interstitial pneumonias).

Detailed description

Number of participants with Adverse Events (AEs) will be reported in Adverse Events section.

Interventions

DRUGRiociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)

Active drug 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg and 2.5 mg TID/day as per individual dose titration. The starting dose will be 0.5 mg TID, and the dose will be adjusted every two weeks for ten weeks in 0.5 mg increments up to a maximum dose of 2.5 mg TID based on patient's systolic blood pressure and well-being.

DRUGPlacebo

Inactive dosed at 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg, 1.5 mg, 2.0 mg and 2.5 mg TID/day as per individual dose titration for 26 weeks

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria: * Men or women aged from ≥18 to ≤80 years * Diagnosed with one of the following (confirmed using a multidisciplinary approach, as per ATS(American Thoracic Society) / ERS(European Respiratory Society) / JRS (Japanese Respiratory Society) / ALAT(Latin American Thoracic Association) guidelines: * Major IIPs (idiopathic interstitial pneumonias) diagnosis or suspected as one of the following: * Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis * Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia * Respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease * Desquamative interstitial pneumonia * Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia * Acute interstitial pneumonia * Rare IIPs diagnosis by one of the following: * Idiopathic lymphoid interstitial pneumonia * Idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis * Unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonias * Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) ≥ 45 % * 6MWD (6 minutes walking distance) ≥ 150 m to ≤ 450 m {under stable O2(oxygen) supplementation via nasal cannula} * Diagnosis of PH (pulmonary hypertension) confirmed by right heart catheter (RHC) with (mean artery pulmonary artery pressure )mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg and (pulmonary artery wedge pressure)PAWP ≤15 mmHg at rest * Systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 95 mmHg and no signs or symptoms of hypotension * WHO functional class II-IV * Women of childbearing potential can only be included in the study if a pregnancy test is negative. Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception when sexually active. 'Adequate contraception' is defined as any combination of at least 2 effective methods of birth control, of which at least one is a physical barrier (e.g. condoms with hormonal contraception or implants or combined oral contraceptives, certain intrauterine devices). Adequate contraception is required from the signing of the informed consent form up until 4 weeks after the last study drug administration *

Exclusion criteria

* Known significant left heart disease: * Pulmonary venous hypertension indicated by baseline pulmonary capillary wedge pressure \> 15 mmHg * Symptomatic coronary artery disease * Systolic left-ventricular dysfunction with an left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<45% * Active state of hemoptysis or pulmonary hemorrhage, including those events managed by bronchial artery embolization * Any history of bronchial artery embolization or massive hemoptysis within 3 months prior to screening. Massive hemoptysis being defined as acute bleeding \>240 mL in a 24-hour period or recurrent bleeding \>100 mL/d over several days * Difference \> 15% between the eligibility and the baseline 6MWD test * Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) / Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) \<0.65 after bronchodilator administration * Initiation in cytotoxic, immunosuppressive, cytokine modulating therapy initiated within 3 months prior to screening. Such agents might include. azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, corticosteroids, etanercept, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitors and others * Any specific treatment for (pulmonary arterial hypertension) PAH/PH (pulmonary hypertension )within 3 months prior to screening * Concomitant use of the following medication: nitrates or (nitric oxide) NO donors (such as amyl nitrite) in any form, phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (such as sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil) and non-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors (theophylline, dipyridamole), * Pregnant women (i.e. positive pregnancy test or other signs of pregnancy), or breast feeding women, or women of childbearing potential not using adequate contraception (as defined in the aforementioned inclusion criterion) and not willing to agree to 4 weekly pregnancy testing from Visit 1(first administration of study drug) onwards until 4 weeks after last study drug intake

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) From Baseline to Week 26Baseline to 26 weeksThe 6MWD test is designed to evaluate a patient's exercise capacity while performing an everyday activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical WorseningFrom baseline to week 26The combined endpoint time to clinical worsening, made up of the following components, defined by the first occurrence: all-cause mortality; need for hospitalization due to worsening cardiopulmonary (CP) status, attributable to progression of disease (including but not limited to increased shortness of breath or increased leg swelling); \>15% decrease in the 6MWD test; worsening of WHO functional class.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Portugal, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Overall, 229 participants were enrolled into the study centers in 19 countries worldwide, from 04-Jun-2014 (first patient first visit) to 14-Sep-2016 (last patient last visit).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 147 participants were randomized and entered the main study phase, of whom 73 were assigned to riociguat and 74 to placebo.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)
In the main study treatment phase participants received Riociguat titrated to optimal dose within range of 0.5 mg TID (3 times a day) to 2.5 mg TID for 10 weeks followed by maintenance period of 16 weeks. This phase was followed by a long-term extension (LTE) phase, which included a blinded sham titration phase of 10 weeks followed by an open-label extension phase. During the open-label extension phase participants were to be treated with Riociguat until commercial access in the indication of pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) or until an agreed time point is defined with the individual country, local regulatory authority and the Sponsor's global team.
73
Placebo
In the main study treatment phase participants received sham titration within range of 0.5 mg TID to 2.5 mg TID for 10 weeks followed by maintenance period of 16 weeks. This phase was followed by a long-term extension (LTE) phase, which included a blinded titration phase to optimal dose of Riociguat of 10 weeks followed by an open-label extension phase. During the open-label extension phase participants were to be treated with Riociguat until commercial access in the indication of PH associated with IIP or until an agreed time point is defined with the individual country, local regulatory authority and the Sponsor's global team.
74
Total147

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Long-term ExtensionStudy termination by sponsor3238
Main Study TreatmentAdverse Event113
Main Study TreatmentDeath12
Main Study TreatmentMedical decision10
Main Study TreatmentProtocol Violation22
Main Study TreatmentSponsor decision1218
Main Study TreatmentStudy terminated by sponsor109
Main Study TreatmentWithdrawal by Subject31
Safety Follow-upAdverse Event43
Safety Follow-upclinic worsening10
Safety Follow-upDeath115
Safety Follow-uplogistical difficulties01
Safety Follow-upprogressive disease02
Safety Follow-uptoo unwell to attend the visit01
Safety Follow-uptreatment unblinded01
Safety Follow-upwithdrawal by PI10
Safety Follow-upWithdrawal by Subject53
Safety Follow-upwithdrawn due to lung transplant01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPlaceboRiociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)
6 minute walking distance (6MWD) category
< 320 m
75 Participants32 Participants43 Participants
6 minute walking distance (6MWD) category
>= 320 m and <380m
40 Participants28 Participants12 Participants
6 minute walking distance (6MWD) category
>= 380 m
32 Participants14 Participants18 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 - <75 years
80 Participants45 Participants35 Participants
Age, Customized
<65 years
37 Participants17 Participants20 Participants
Age, Customized
>=75 years
30 Participants12 Participants18 Participants
Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia
Acute interstitial pneumonia
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia
Cryptogenic organizing pneumonia
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia
Idiopathic lymphoid interstitial pneumonia
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia
Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia
23 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
103 Participants49 Participants54 Participants
Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia
Resp. bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Classification of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia
Unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonias
16 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) subtype (Nice Clinical Classification)
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) subtype (Nice Clinical Classification)
PH owing to respiratory disease and /or hypoxia
147 Participants74 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants29 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
95 Participants45 Participants50 Participants
World Health Organization (WHO) functional class
Class II
38 Participants22 Participants16 Participants
World Health Organization (WHO) functional class
Class III
95 Participants45 Participants50 Participants
World Health Organization (WHO) functional class
Class IV
14 Participants7 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
54 / 7352 / 7426 / 3232 / 38
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 7317 / 7412 / 3221 / 38

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) From Baseline to Week 26

The 6MWD test is designed to evaluate a patient's exercise capacity while performing an everyday activity.

Time frame: Baseline to 26 weeks

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) analysis set: participants randomized and received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Mean Change in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) From Baseline to Week 263.63 MeterStandard Deviation 60.8
PlaceboMean Change in 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) From Baseline to Week 26-15.94 MeterStandard Deviation 63.7
Comparison: The evaluation of primary efficacy endpoint will be based on change from baseline in 6MWD using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with baseline 6MWD, treatment arm and region as factors.p-value: 0.207495% CI: [-8.75, 51.71]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Worsening

The combined endpoint time to clinical worsening, made up of the following components, defined by the first occurrence: all-cause mortality; need for hospitalization due to worsening cardiopulmonary (CP) status, attributable to progression of disease (including but not limited to increased shortness of breath or increased leg swelling); \>15% decrease in the 6MWD test; worsening of WHO functional class.

Time frame: From baseline to week 26

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) analysis set: participants randomized and received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Participants With Clinical Worsening>15% decrease in 6MWD9 Participants
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Participants With Clinical WorseningHospitalization due to worsening CP status15 Participants
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Participants With Clinical WorseningAll-cause mortality1 Participants
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Participants With Clinical WorseningWorsening of WHO functional class9 Participants
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Participants With Clinical WorseningNo clinical event39 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical WorseningWorsening of WHO functional class12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical WorseningNo clinical event38 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Worsening>15% decrease in 6MWD17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical WorseningAll-cause mortality0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical WorseningHospitalization due to worsening CP status7 Participants
Comparison: The difference in incidences in clinical worsening and mortality will be analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel weights, stratified by region.p-value: 0.3437Mantel Haenszel
Post Hoc

Number of Deaths Per Study Phase for Placebo Group

In the main study treatment phase participants received Placebo until 26 weeks. This phase was followed by a long-term extension (LTE) phase, during which participants were treated with Riociguat. At the time of study termination, all treated participants were taken off study drug and started the safety follow-up phase, regardless of whether they were in the main phase or in the LTE.

Time frame: From start of treatment to end of study

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) analysis set: participants randomized and received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Deaths Per Study Phase for Placebo GroupMain study treatment3 Participants
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Deaths Per Study Phase for Placebo GroupLong-term extension: received Riociguat8 Participants
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Deaths Per Study Phase for Placebo GroupSafety follow-up: only treated with Placebo3 Participants
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Deaths Per Study Phase for Placebo GroupSafety follow-up: received Riociguat in LTE1 Participants
Post Hoc

Number of Deaths Per Study Phase for Riociguat Group

In the main study treatment phase participants received Riociguat until 26 weeks. This phase was followed by a long-term extension (LTE) phase, during which participants continued with Riociguat treatment. At the time of study termination, all treated participants were taken off study drug and started the safety follow-up phase, regardless of whether they were in the main phase or in the LTE.

Time frame: From start of treatment to end of study

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) analysis set: participants randomized and received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Deaths Per Study Phase for Riociguat GroupMain study treatment8 Participants
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Deaths Per Study Phase for Riociguat GroupLong-term extension1 Participants
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Deaths Per Study Phase for Riociguat GroupSafety follow-up3 Participants
Post Hoc

Number of Serious Adverse Events During Safety Follow-up Phase

At the time of study termination, all participants entered safety follow-up phase regardless of whether they were in the main phase or in the LTE. Participants who had the End of Treatment visit prior to the implementation of the 120-day safety follow-up were followed-up for at least 30 days.

Time frame: From start of safety follow-up phase until end of study

Population: Safety analysis set: participants randomized and received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Riociguat (Adempas, BAY63-2521)Number of Serious Adverse Events During Safety Follow-up Phase18 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Serious Adverse Events During Safety Follow-up Phase14 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026