Skip to content

Correlation Study of Imaging Data Acquired During CABG With Data Acquired in the Cath Lab

Collaborative Pilot Study to Determine the Correlation Between Intra-Operative Observations Using SPY® Near Infra-Red Imaging and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Physiological Assessment of Lesion Severity (PERSEUS Pilot Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02138305
Acronym
PERSEUS
Enrollment
1
Registered
2014-05-14
Start date
2014-12-31
Completion date
2019-03-30
Last updated
2019-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), Instantaneous Wave Free Ratio (iFR), Coronary Flow Reserve (CFR), Hyperemic Stenosis Resistance Index (HSR), Hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR), Wave intensity analysis (WIA), Myocardial Perfusion, SPY NIRF Regional Myocardial Perfusion Analysis

Brief summary

Visual assessment of a coronary artery narrowing (called stenosis) seen on angiography is conventionally used to infer how likely the stenosis will limit blood flow (called ischemia) under conditions of increased demand (e.g exercise). This is based on animal work and data from humans with simple single vessel disease with no co-existing conditions. These data have been extrapolated to more complex patients/ complex disease but clearly over-simplifies the situation in the majority of patients cardiologists treat. Pivotal work by DeBruyne, Pils and colleagues in the 90's convincingly showed that pressure derived measurements, called FFR, from the coronary artery during a cardiac catheterization, more accurately identify stenoses that would cause ischemia compared to visual assessment alone. A strategy of FFR guided coronary stenting with drug eluting stents significantly improved outcomes and reduced costs compared to visual assessment alone (FAME trial). Deferring treatment based on FFR has been shown to be safe (DEFER Trial). FFR has excellent sensitivity and specificity. A FFR of \<=0.80 was used as this identified ischemia causing lesions 90% of the time. Therefore, the concept of FFR guided percutaneous revascularisation and treatment deferral has a robust evidence base to support it. Coronary bypass grafting (CABG) is traditionally based solely on a visual assessment of angiography images. SPY® Infrared Fluorescence Angiography (NIRF, FDA approved 2005) is used by some cardiac surgeons to assess the patency of bypass grafts in real-time in the operating room, as a surrogate for immediate traditional coronary angiography. Dr. Ferguson observed that regional myocardial perfusion (RMP) image data was also captured in these video sequences. Study Hypotheses: 1. In patients who are likely CABG candidates, target vessel epicardial coronary arteries (TVECAs) with FFR \> 0.80 will not demonstrate an increase in RMP despite an anatomically patent bypass conduit during SPY® imaging. 2. In TVECAs with an increase in RMP during SPY® imaging, cardiac catheter laboratory measures of coronary physiology from that TVECA, namely one or a combination of FFR, CFR, HSR and HMR, will correlate with the SPY® data on myocardial perfusion, and suggest a potential mechanism for this physiologic response to TVECA grafting.

Interventions

DEVICEComboMap XT Guidewire

Intracoronary pressure and flow measurements

PROCEDURE'SPY' NIRF During CABG

FDA approved use of injection of indocyanine green for the purposes of performing pre and post coronary grafting graft patency and perfusion assessment with the SPY near infra red fluorescence system

Sponsors

East Carolina University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Volcano Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Imperial College London
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Controlled prospective observational study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18\<80 * Patients with stable angina or NSTEMI with total CK rise of \<1000 U/litre who after planned coronary angiography are going to be referred for CABG and have at least one vessel with a visual 40-80% stenosis that is interrogated with intracoronary physiology

Exclusion criteria

* Emergent status, or Cardiogenic shock * LVEF \<40% * History of actively malignant disease * Patient needing concomitant valvular surgery or other cardiac structural reconstructive surgery * As is standard of care, those vessels that are extremely tortuous, very small caliber and/or heavily calcified would not have such wires passed down them. Furthermore, those vessels that are 80-90+% stenosed, with \<TIMI 3 flow, which we would not normally pass a diagnostic physiology pressure wire, would not be studied with ComboXT wire.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation Analysis18 monthsCorrelation between anatomy, functional anatomy, FFR, SPY® RMP change, and the presence or absence of imaged competitive flow

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation Analysis18 monthsCorrelation analysis between anatomy, functional anatomy, FFR, CFR, HMR and SPY® perfusion data for each TVECA and perfusion territory.
Instantaneous Wave Free Ratio (iFR)18 monthsOffline analysis of de-identified encrypted data for each TVECA interrogated with ComboMap XT wire by Dr Justin Davies's research group, Imperial College, London for iFR determination. Correlation analysis between iFR and presence or absence of imaged competitive flow and intra-operative RMP data on SPY® NIRF
Wave Intensity Analysis (WIA)18 monthsOffline wave wave intensity analysis (WIA) of de-identified encrypted data for each TVECA interrogated with ComboMap XT wire by Dr Justin Davies's research group, Imperial College, London. Correlation analysis between WIA data and presence or absence of imaged competitive flow and intra-operative RMP data on SPY® NIRF

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026