Skip to content

AcoArt Ⅱ/ BTK China: Drug-eluting Balloon for Below-The-Knee Angioplasty Evaluation in China

Prospective, Multi-center and Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Verify Effectiveness and Safety of Drug-eluting Balloon in PTA Procedure of the Infrapopliteal Artery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02137577
Enrollment
120
Registered
2014-05-14
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2020-12-17
Last updated
2021-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Artery Disease

Keywords

drug eluting balloon catheter

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether DEB is more effective than common PTA balloon using under in long-term vessel patency and inhibiting restenosis in the infrapopliteal artery.

Detailed description

PTA is an established alternative to open surgical bypass for the treatment of infrainginual disease of critical limb ischemia. DEBs are designed to promote arterial patency by reducing neointimal proliferation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDEB catheter

DEB catheter (trade name: Litos/Tulip)

PROCEDUREcommon PTA balloon catheter

common PTA balloon catheter

Sponsors

Acotec Scientific Co., Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 85 years * Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), with Rutherford classification between 4 and 6 * an occlusion or a minimum grade of stenosis Primary over 70% in the below popliteal artery * The expected survival time is more than 1 year * signed Patient informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Serum creatinine clearance rate less than 30ml/min in patients * patients with acute thrombosis requiring lysis or thrombectomy * patient with a lysis or an lower limb intervention as a therapy within the last 6 weeks * patient requiring intervention in both lower limbs at the same time * In-stent restenosis in the blow-knee popliteal artery * target lesion can't be cross by the guide wire * the stenosis rate of proximal outflow more than 30% with or without intervention * the length of the stenosis or occlusion in proximal outflow(including the Iliac artery, the superficial femoral artery, the Popliteal artery) more than 150mm before intervention * stenosis or occlusion of distal outflow for below-the-ankle artery. * expected major amputations at the index limb before intervention * known hypersensitivity to aspirin, heparin, clopidogrel,paclitaxel, contrast medium, etc. * patients participating in another clinical trials with interfere with this trial in the same time * pregnancy and lactating woman * untreatable bleeding diatheses

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Patency [Time Frame: 6 months]6 monthsFreedom from target vessel occlusion and clinically driven target lesion reintervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
device success rateduring the operation(after using the DEB catheter)DEB catheter can reach the target lesions, expand as expected(not broken), and withdraw successfully.
technical success ratesduring the operation(after using the DEB catheter)The blood supply of the target lesion recovered after treatment, and residual stenosis less than 50%
operation success rateduring the operation(after using the DEB catheter)both device succeed and technical succeed, and without clinical complication
if occured clinically driven TLR( target lesion revascularization)6 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 monthsClinically driven TLR is defined as revascularization performed on a patient who returns with clinical symptoms such as: resting pain occur again, ulcer deterioration, new foot ulcers
target lesion late lumen loss 6 months6 monthsmeasure difference of the MLD(minimal lumen diameter) at 0 time and 6 months
Ulcer healing rate6 months, 12 monthsHealed or not, if not, improving,stagnant, worsening
Ulcer healing time6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 monthsHealed or not
Change from baseline ankle brachial index(ABI) at 6 months6 monthsmeasure ankle brachial index \>1.3 Vascular wall calcification is severe 0.9\ 1.1 Normal range 0.5\ 0.8 Mild and moderate ischemia of lower limb arteries \<0.5 severe ischemia
change from baseline Rutherford stage at 6 months6 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 monthsbased the following definition of Rutherford stage, evaluate the stage of patient. Then compare the stage of patient just after procedure and 6 months after treatment Stage clinical symptom 0 asymptomatic 1. mild claudication 2. moderate claudication 3. severe claudication 4. ischemic rest pain 5. minor tissue loss 6. ulceration or gangrene
limb salvage in surviving subjects30 days, 6 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 monthsNo Amputation of target limb

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026