Skip to content

Functional Performance of Voluntary Opening and Closing Body Powered Prostheses

A Clinical Trial Comparing Functional Performance of Voluntary Opening and Closing Body Powered Prosthetic Terminal Devices

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02136238
Enrollment
18
Registered
2014-05-12
Start date
2013-09-30
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2023-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Limb Amputation

Keywords

amputation, transradial, prosthesis, terminal device

Brief summary

This study will compare the functional performance of voluntary opening (VO) and voluntary closing (VC) body powered prostheses. We hypothesize that the ability to sense cable tension and produce progressively higher pinch from shoulder force will result in advantages for the VC terminal device (TRS, Grip 3) in terms of proprioception and overall function. The specific aims of this clinical trial are to: 1. Determine if accommodation with a VC Grip 3 prehensor will result in reduced compensatory motion during activity. 2. Determine if accommodation with a VC Grip 3 prehensor will result in improved function in activities of daily living.

Detailed description

To evaluate the performance of the prehensors, subjects will complete a randomized A-B crossover study with a subjective follow-up. Two subject categories will be evaluated: 1.) healthy non-amputees, and 2.) unilateral transradial amputee subjects who currently use, or are interested in using a body-powered prosthesis. We anticipate data collection data with 10 non-amputee subject, and 8 amputee subjects.

Interventions

DEVICEHosmer 5XA voluntary opening hook

Voluntary opening prosthetic terminal device (hand)

DEVICETRS Grip 3 voluntary closing hook

Voluntary closing prosthetic terminal device (hand)

Sponsors

Florida High Tech Corridor Council
CollaboratorOTHER
TRS, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of South Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Unilateral transradial or wrist-disarticulation amputee * 18 to 85 years of age * At least 1 year from date of amputation * Be able to independently provide informed consent * Be willing to comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

* History of acute or chronic skin breakdown on the residual limb * Prosthetic socket adjustment within 90 days * Any condition that would prevent participation and pose increased risk (e.g. shoulder impingement, sub-acromial bursitis, severe arthritis of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or fingers) * Injuries of the upper limb within the past 90 days (surgeries, sprains, strains, or fractures). * Unwillingness/inability to follow instructions Inclusion criteria for able-bodied subjects * 18 to 85 years of age * Able to provide independent, informed consent * Independent function by self-report * Free of any health ailment that would impair physical function

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sternal Displacement During Towel Folding TaskBased on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.Distance sternum is displaced while folding a towel was measured in meters.
Physical Function Performance 10 Test ScoreBased on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.Simulation of 10 activities of daily living (i.e. donning a shirt, sweeping, walking stairs). Measured in units of time, distance and mass to provide a singular, continuous scaled score of function (from 0-100). A score of 100 is the maximal score and indicates the highest level of independent function where a score of 0 indicates the poorest score. Persons scoring lower scores will likely be at increased risk of dependency with daily function.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Non-amputee Control Group
non-amputee healthy controls
10
Experimental Group: Unilateral TR or Wrist-disartic Amputees
Includes groups randomized to receive either TRS Grip 3 voluntary close device or Hosmer 5XA voluntary open device first.
8
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-amputee Control GroupExperimental Group: Unilateral TR or Wrist-disartic AmputeesTotal
Age, Continuous23.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
39.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants8 participants18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 80 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 80 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Physical Function Performance 10 Test Score

Simulation of 10 activities of daily living (i.e. donning a shirt, sweeping, walking stairs). Measured in units of time, distance and mass to provide a singular, continuous scaled score of function (from 0-100). A score of 100 is the maximal score and indicates the highest level of independent function where a score of 0 indicates the poorest score. Persons scoring lower scores will likely be at increased risk of dependency with daily function.

Time frame: Based on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prosthetic Hand 1 (Hosmer 5XA)Physical Function Performance 10 Test Score39.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.5
Prosthetic Hand 2 (TRS Grip 3)Physical Function Performance 10 Test Score37.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
Non-amputee ControlsPhysical Function Performance 10 Test Score68.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.2
Primary

Sternal Displacement During Towel Folding Task

Distance sternum is displaced while folding a towel was measured in meters.

Time frame: Based on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Prosthetic Hand 1 (Hosmer 5XA)Sternal Displacement During Towel Folding Task1.0 metersStandard Deviation 0.13
Prosthetic Hand 2 (TRS Grip 3)Sternal Displacement During Towel Folding Task1.06 metersStandard Deviation 0.12
Non-amputee ControlsSternal Displacement During Towel Folding Task0.88 metersStandard Deviation 0.18

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026