Leuplin SR 11.25 mg Injection Kit Specified Drug-use Survey: QOL Survey in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). QOL-ACD is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all \[worst response\] to 5: very much \[best response\]). Total score was calculated over score range 0-100 for item 1 to 18 as ((a sum of 18 items)/18-1)\*25). Score for physical condition and pain was calculated over score range 0-100 for item 1 to 6 as ((a sum of 6 items)/6-1)\*25)). Score for health-care and illness satisfaction was calculated over score range 0-100 for item 7 to 10 as ((a sum of 4 items)/4-1)\*25)), where less scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related quality of life. Means and standard deviations were calculated for the total score and score of each subscale from questionnaire items 1 to 18.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Efficacy assessment population where baseline assessment for total and subscale scores were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

QOL-ACD score is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. It includes 4 subscale domains: Daily Activities, Physical Condition, Social Activities, Mental and Psychological Status. Total and subscale scores are calculated as sum of items within each subscale: Daily Activity (items 1-6), Physical Condition (7-11), Psychological Condition (12-16), Social Attitude (17-21) and total (1-22). Face scale:5-point score for 1 item (22). Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all \[worst response\] to 5: very much \[best response\]). Score range for total score is 22 to 110 and subscale score range for daily activity is 6 to 30, and for physical condition, psychological condition, and social attitude is 5 to 25. Less total/subscale scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related QOL.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 12 assessment for total and subscale scores were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

QOL-ACD score is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. It includes 4 subscale domains: Daily Activities, Physical Condition, Social Activities, Mental and Psychological Status. Total and subscale scores are calculated as sum of items within each subscale: Daily Activity (items 1-6), Physical Condition (7-11), Psychological Condition (12-16), Social Attitude (17-21) and total (1-22). Face scale: 5-point score for 1 item (22). Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all \[worst response\] to 5: very much \[best response\]). Score range for total score is 22 to 110 and subscale score range for daily activity is 6 to 30, and for physical condition, psychological condition, and social attitude is 5 to 25. Less total/subscale scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related QOL.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for total and subscale scores were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

QOL-ACD score is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. It includes 4 subscale domains: Daily Activities, Physical Condition, Social Activities, Mental and Psychological Status. Total and subscale scores are calculated as sum of items within each subscale: Daily Activity (items 1-6), Physical Condition (7-11), Psychological Condition (12-16), Social Attitude (17-21) and total (1-22). Face scale: 5-point score for 1 item (22). Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all \[worst response\] to 5: very much \[best response\]). Score range for total score is 22 to 110 and subscale score range for daily activity is 6 to 30, and for physical condition, psychological condition, and social attitude is 5 to 25. Less total/subscale scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related QOL.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Efficacy assessment population where baseline assessment for total and subscale scores were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). QOL-ACD is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all \[worst response\] to 5: very much \[best response\]). Total score for QOL-ACD-B is calculated as a sum of 18 items, score range: 18 to 90 where less scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related quality of life. Means and standard deviations were calculated for the total score and score of each subscale from questionnaire items 1 to 18.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 12 assessment for total and subscale scores were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). QOL-ACD is a score used for cancer participants treated with anti-cancer drug and is a 22-item self-reported instrument assessing differences in symptom severity and health-related QOL. Participants answer each question on a 5-point scale (1: not at all \[worst response\] to 5: very much \[best response\]). Total score for QOL-ACD-B is calculated as a sum of 18 items, score range: 18 to 90 where less scores reflect greater symptom severity and symptom impact on health-related quality of life. Means and standard deviations were calculated for the total score and score of each subscale from questionnaire items 1 to 18.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for total and subscale scores were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). For questionnaire item 19 (Did you feel inferior to your child when you interact with him/her? \[due to the impact of illness and treatment\]), item 20 (Did you worry about child rearing? \[due to the impact of illness and treatment\]), and item 21 (Do you worry about pregnancy or delivery? \[due to the impact of illness and treatment\]), the calculation was based on the score of each item. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale, where 1 was the worst response and 5 was the best.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Efficacy assessment population where baseline assessment for each item were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). For questionnaire item 19 (Did you feel inferior to your child when you interact with him/her? \[due to the impact of illness and treatment\]), item 20 (Did you worry about child rearing? \[due to the impact of illness and treatment\]), and item 21 (Do you worry about pregnancy or delivery? \[due to the impact of illness and treatment\]), the calculation was based on the score of each item. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale, where 1 was the worst response and 5 was the best.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 12 assessment for each item were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

QOL-ACD-B is a part of QOL-ACD (using questionnaire items 1 to 18). For questionnaire item 19 (Did you feel inferior to your child when you interact with him/her? \[due to the impact of illness and treatment\]), item 20 (Did you worry about child rearing? \[due to the impact of illness and treatment\]), and item 21 (Do you worry about pregnancy or delivery? \[due to the impact of illness and treatment\]), the calculation was based on the score of each item. Each item was scored on a 5-point scale, where 1 was the worst response and 5 was the best.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for each item were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AE) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AE are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 48

Population: Safety analysis set was defined as participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

Serious adverse drug reactions are defined as serious adverse events (SAE) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The event was occurred in breast cancer female.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 48

Population: Safety analysis set was defined as participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, The change in agents reduced the frequency of injections by one third; for this reason, did you feel relief from physical and emotional burden? and the answers were categorized as felt extreme relief, felt slight relief, no feeling either way, felt little relief, felt no relief.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for convenience assessment were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, The change in agents reduced the frequency of injections by one third; for this reason, did you worry about the effect? and the options of the answers were not at all worried, not too worried, no thought either way, somewhat worried, and very worried.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for convenience assessment were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Was there a change in adverse drug reactions (e.g., menopausal-like symptoms such as hot flushes, injection-site abnormalities) due to the change in agents? and the options of the answers were events became much less severe, events became less severe, whether or not the events became severe cannot be determined, events became slightly more severe, and events became very severe.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for convenience assessment were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Was there a change in pain at the time of injection due to the change in agents? and the options of the answers were significantly relieved, slightly relieved, whether or not the pain worsened or was relieved cannot be determined, worsened slightly, and worsened significantly.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for convenience assessment were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Was the change in agents good? and the options of the answers were very good, somewhat good, whether or not the change in agents was good cannot be determined, somewhat bad, very bad.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for convenience assessment were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Did the change in agents reduce the frequency of your medical visits? and the answers were categorized as very much reduced, somewhat reduced, unchanged. Change in medicinal agents means participants with a historical diagnosis of premenopausal breast cancer who switched to leuprorelin acetate sustained-release 11.25 mg injection kit from a 4-week adjuvant therapy with a LH-RHa 1 month depot preparation as part of daily medical practice.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for convenience assessment were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.

The question was with regard to the assessment of convenience associated with the changes in agents, Did you feel relief from financial burden (example, 3 months' drug costs and transportation fee) due to the change in agents? and the answers were categorized as felt extreme relief, felt slight relief, no feeling either way, felt little relief, felt no relief. The sum of all the categories is not 100% because of rounding error.

Time frame: Week 48

Population: Efficacy assessment population where Week 48 assessment for convenience assessment were available. Efficacy assessment population included those participants who received at least one dose of study medication and had efficacy data available.