Skip to content

Specific Lp(a) Apheresis for Regression of Coronary and Carotid Atherosclerosis

A 72-week, Prospective, Parallel-group, Partially Blinded, Controlled Phase IIIb Study Evaluating the Impact of Specific Lp(a) Apheresis on Atherosclerotic Disease Burden in Coronary Heart Disease Patients With High Lipoprotein(a) Level.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02133807
Acronym
LaRCA
Enrollment
32
Registered
2014-05-08
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2014-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerosis, Carotid Artery Diseases, Coronary Disease

Keywords

Lipoprotein(a);, Lp(a) immunoadsorption;, Apheresis;, Coronary atherosclerosis;, Carotid Atherosclerosis;, Intima-media thickness;, Regression;, Quantitative Coronary Angiography;, Intravascular Ultrasound;, Virtual Histology;, Plaque;, Atorvastatin;

Brief summary

To evaluate whether specific lipoprotein(a) apheresis on the top of optimal medical therapy could affect atherosclerotic disease burden in coronary and carotid arteries of coronary heart disease patients with elevated Lp(a) levels.

Detailed description

Following the hypothesis that if Lp(a) excess has a pathogenic role in atherogenesis, then specific elimination of circulating Lp(a) should affect plaque growth and stability, we evaluated the efficacy of Lp(a) apheresis on changes in coronary plaque volume and composition and carotid intima-media thickness in patients with CHD on the background of optimal medical treatment.

Interventions

PROCEDURESpecific Lp(a) apheresis

Specific Lp(a) apheresis procedures were carried out weekly with Lp(a) Lipopak columns (POCARD Ltd., Moscow, Russia) according to the standard protocol

Sponsors

Clinical Diagnostic Center MEDSI
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Moscow State Government
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Russian Cardiology Research and Production Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Stable coronary heart disease (CHD) requiring a clinically indicated coronary angiography. * Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL * LDL-C \<2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) * Signed written informed consent form to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* history of acute coronary syndrome or surgical intervention within prior 3 months to inclusion * chronic infectious and inflammatory diseases * familial hypercholesterolemia * TG ≥4.5 mmol/L (400 mg/dL) * Active liver disease (ALT or AST \>3 upper limit of normal (ULN), or total bilirubin \>1.5 ULN); * CK ≥3 ULN; * Thyroid dysfunction; * Renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault Equation) ≤30 ml/min); * Uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c ≥7.0%); * Coagulopathies; * Lipid-lowering drugs, except statins for the last month * Known statin or immunoadsorption intolerance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Percent Diameter StenosisFrom Baseline to End of Study (Week 72)The absolute change from baseline to 18 months in mean percent diameter stenosis, determined by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) as the narrowest lesion in each segment and calculated as: ((reference diameter-minimal lumen diameter (MLD))/reference diameter)x100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numbers of Coronary segments Showing RegressionFrom baseline to End of study (Week 72)Clinically relevant regression or progression was defined as a change from baseline to follow up of ≥10% for percent diameter stenosis
Number of Carotid Segments showing RegressionFrom Baseline to End of study (Week 72)Carotid IMT progression criterion for the 18 months of treatment was considered as growth rate of 0.02 mm (0.015 mm/yr). No changes or reduction in carotid IMT ≥ 0,02 mm served as criterion of stabilization and regression of carotid atherosclerosis, respectively.
Change in total atheroma volume (TAV) from baseline to 18 months post-therapyFrom Baseline to Week 72TAV at baseline - TAV at Week 72 assessed by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging of a targeted coronary artery
Change in absolute volumes of plaque componentsFrom Baseline to Week 72Mean change in absolute volumes of plaque components: fibrotic, fibrofatty, necrotic core or dense calcium, assessed by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasonographic (IVUS) imaging at baseline and 18 months post-therapy
Change in mean carotid intima-media thickness (IMT)From Baseline to Week 36 (9 months) and to Week 72 (18 months)Change from baseline in mean carotid IMT, as measured by duplex ultrasonography of common carotid arteries after 9 and 18 months.
Numbers of Coronary Plaques Showing RegressionFrom baseline to End of study (Week 72)Regression was defined as decrease in TAV for all anatomically comparable cross sectional areas of targeted coronary artery from baseline of ≥ 0,1 mm cubed
Acute change in Lp(a) levelOnce a week over 72 week period of active treatmentDifference in Lp(a) concentration before and after specific Lp(a) apheresis procedure calculated as the mean of all measurements
Change in quality of life (QOL)from baseline to week 72To evaluate the impact of the specific Lp(a) removal therapy on the quality of life using Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and Exercise stress test as compared with standard guideline-driven medical therapy of CHD patients
Change in relative amount of plaque componentsFrom baseline to Week 72Mean change in relative amounts of plaque components: fibrotic, fibrofatty, necrotic core or dense calcium, assessed by radiofrequency intravascular ultrasonographic (IVUS) imaging at baseline and 18 months post-therapy

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in hemoglobin levelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) serum levelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72Mean changes in HDL-C level over the 18-month study period
Change in creatinine levelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Change in creatine kinase (CK) levelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Change in alanine transaminase (ALT) levelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Change in aspartate transaminase (AST) levelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72
Total Cholesterol (TC) Serum LevelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72Mean changes in TC level over the 18-month study period
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) serum levelsFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72Mean changes in Lp(a) level over the 18-month study period
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) serum LevelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72Mean changes in LDL-C level over the 18-month study period
Change in corrected LDL-C (LDL-C corr) Serum levelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72Since all included patients had high Lp(a) levels, to avoid overestimation of LDL-C fraction estimated LDL-C levels were corrected for cholesterol derived from Lp(a). Corrected LDL-C (LDL-C corr) was calculated using Dahlen's modification of the Friedewald formula: LDL-C corr = TC - (HDL-C) - (TG / 2.2) - (0.3 x Lp(a) / 38.7). For values in mmol/L, Lp(a) in mg/dL
Change in triglycerides (TG) serum LevelFrom Baseline to Week 4, 36, 72Mean changes in TG level over the 18-month study period

Countries

Russia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026