Skip to content

Comparison of Thrombgolytic and Anticoagulation Therapy in Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

Comparison of Thrombgolytic and Anticoagulation Therapy in Submassive Pulmonary Embolism in Context of Pulmonary Hypertension, Right Heart Failure and Patient Functional Ability

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02132689
Acronym
CONTACT-SPE
Enrollment
100
Registered
2014-05-07
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2018-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Embolism

Keywords

Moderate Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Brief summary

Currently there is no clear guidance for the treatment of moderate risk of pulmonary embolism. The aim of the study is to compare two different therapeutic modalities - standard anticoagulation versus thrombolytic treatment followed by anticoagulation in standard regimen as stated in the pulmonary embolism guidelines.

Detailed description

Standard treatment of moderate risk pulmonary embolism constitutes of sole anticoagulation therapy. In case of troponin positivity and/or echocardiographic findings as i.e. thrombi in RV thrombolytic therapy should be considered. The aim of this trial is to compare the two treatment modalities in their ability to reduce/predict 12 month end-point: pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular failure, exercise capacity.

Interventions

DRUGActilyse (Thrombolytic therapy)
DRUGHeparine (Standard anticoagulation therapy)

Sponsors

Municipal Hospital Ostrava Fifejdy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Silesian Hospital Opava
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital Ostrava
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* moderate risk pulmonary embolism as defined by the European Society of Cardiology /ESC/ guidelines * signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* patient not willing to sigh informed consent * absolute contraindication of thrombolysis * inability to obtain meaningfull echocardiographic images¨ * pulmonary arterial hypertension * known right ventricular failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical manifestations of right ventricular failure and pulmonary hypertension and cardiovascular-related death12 monthsThe primary outcome of the study is to follow clinical manifestations of right ventricular failure (assessed according to the New York Heart Association /NYHA/ classification).
Pulmonary hypertension12 monthsThe primary outcome of the study is to follow pulmonary hypertension (measured in mmHg).
Cardiovascular-related deaths12 monthsThe primary outcome of the study is to follow the number of cardiovascular-related deaths within the time frame of 12 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Echocardiographic manifestations of right ventricular failure and pulmonary hypertension.12 monthsThe secondary outcome measure of the study is to follow echocardiographic manifestations of right ventricular failure (TdiSm).

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026