Skip to content

A Brain Centered Neuroengineering Approach for Motor Recovery After Stroke: Combined rTMS and BCI Training

A Brain Centered Neuroengineering Approach for Motor Recovery After Stroke: Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Brain-Computer Interface Training

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02132520
Enrollment
3
Registered
2014-05-07
Start date
2014-03-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2019-11-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiparesis, Stroke

Keywords

Hemiparesis, Stroke, Rehabilitation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Repetitive, Electroencephalography, Functional Neuroimaging, Brain-Computer Interface

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the combination of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and motor-imagery-based brain computer interface (BCI) training is effective for enhancing motor recovery after stroke. The PI's hypothesis is that, in comparison with traditional physical therapy alone, subjects receiving supplementary rTMS and BCI training will show greater functional improvements in hand motor ability over time as well as recovery of normal motor connectivity patterns.

Detailed description

The goal of the present study is to develop and evaluate a brain based approach to improve motor recovery after stroke, by combining rTMS and BCI training. Treatments will consist of low frequency rTMS applied to the contralesional hemisphere, followed by BCI training to encourage activity within the lesioned hemisphere. The primary objective of this study is to test the main hypothesis above in a stroke patient population. Subjects will also undergo a period of BCI only treatments after completion of the combined rTMS and BCI portion.

Interventions

DEVICErTMS

Low frequency rTMS (either real or sham) will be applied to the contralesional hemisphere at a rate of 1Hz for 10 minutes.

BEHAVIORALBCI Training

BCI training will consist of a series of EEG-based motor-imagery tasks with virtual feedback presented on a computer screen.

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18-70 years of age * Cortical or subcortical stroke with isolated unilateral motor paresis * At least 3 months but no greater than 12 months post stroke and in stable conditions as judged by patient's physician * Impaired hand function compared to nonparetic side but at least 10 degrees of active finger extension * Able to ambulate at least 50 feet with minimal stand-by assistance * Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer (Fugl-Meyer et al., 1975) score of greater than or equal to 20 out of 66 * Beck Depression Inventory (Beck et al., 1961) less than or equal to 19 out of 63 * Mini-mental State Examination score (Folstein et al., 1975) greater than or equal to 24 out of 30 * Must have an ipsilesional motor-evoked potential (MEP) in response to TMS * Must be stable outpatients currently undergoing rehabilitation consistent with the current standards of care * Must be able to communicate clearly in English * Must be able to provide consent in writing.

Exclusion criteria

* Personal history of epilepsy or seizures within the past 2 years * Previous surgical procedure to the spinal cord * Any MRI incompatible devices * Pregnancy * Claustrophobia * Breathing disorder * Hearing problems or ringing in the ears * Bilateral motor paresis or paralysis or those patients that would require significant medical monitoring or management beyond that of a stable outpatient * Cognitive deficits, other non-motor neurological impairment, bilateral motor paresis or paralysis or those patients that would require significant medical monitoring or management beyond that of a stable outpatient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Cortical Excitability and Cortical Activation Patterns as Measured by MRI and Functional MRIBaseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)The MRI and functional MRI will evaluate the extent to which cortical areas are recruited both during rest and during movement related tasks. This is quantified by a laterality index, calculated as the ratio of activations of ipsi- and contra-lesional precentral gyri during a paretic hand tracking task. A LI of -1 corresponds to entirely contralesional activation, while a value of +1 corresponds to entirely ipsilesional activation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Box and Block TestBaseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)Performance on the box and block test with the paretic hand, quantified as the number of 2.5 cm\^3 cubes grasped, lifted, and released to transfer between compartments correctly within 60 seconds.
Changes in Paretic Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Finger Tracking TestBaseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)The finger tracking test evaluates the subject's ability to track an oscillating wave with either their paretic or non-paretic finger. Subjects wore custom electro-goniometer braces on each hand, each of which included a potentiometer signaling extension and flexion of the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint. Subjects were presented with target stimuli with a random sinusoidal waveform and were instructed to move the corresponding index finger to match the target trace as the cursor moved across the screen with constant velocity. Performance was quantified by an accuracy index, calculated using the ratio of the error to the standard deviation of the target, normalized to the range of motion for each subject.
Changes in Inter-hemispheric InhibitionBaseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)Inter-hemispheric Inhibition was evaluated using paired-pulse TMS both for the stroke hemisphere to non-stroke hemisphere direction as well as for the non-stroke hemisphere to the stroke hemisphere direction. IHI was measured by applying TMS to identified left and right motor hotspots at 1 mV threshold intensity, or 130% of the RMT if 1 mV threshold could not be identified, with single unilateral pulses and paired bilateral pulses. IHI was quantified by comparing the paired-pulse peak-to-peak motor evoked potential amplitudes to the corresponding single pulse MEP amplitudes for each direction of stimulation (ipsi- to contra-lesional and contra- to ipsi-lesional).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Report of Symptomswithin 12 weeks of participationThe subject report of symptoms assesses whether subject experience any adverse effects as a result of participation in the study.
Changes in the Resting Motor ThresholdBaseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)The resting motor threshold is a measure of cortical excitability, and will be recorded for both the stroke and non-stroke hemispheres.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Subjects receiving standard-of-care physical therapy only.
0
Sham rTMS + Real BCI Training
Subjects will receive sham rTMS followed by real BCI training. rTMS: Low frequency rTMS (either real or sham) will be applied to the contralesional hemisphere at a rate of 1Hz for 10 minutes. BCI Training: BCI training will consist of a series of EEG-based motor-imagery tasks with virtual feedback presented on a computer screen.
1
Real rTMS + Real BCI Training
Subjects will receive real rTMS followed by real BCI training. rTMS: Low frequency rTMS (either real or sham) will be applied to the contralesional hemisphere at a rate of 1Hz for 10 minutes. BCI Training: BCI training will consist of a series of EEG-based motor-imagery tasks with virtual feedback presented on a computer screen.
2
Total3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingReal rTMS + Real BCI TrainingTotal
Age, Continuous37 years64.5 years55.3 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 10 / 2
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 10 / 2
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 10 / 2

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Cortical Excitability and Cortical Activation Patterns as Measured by MRI and Functional MRI

The MRI and functional MRI will evaluate the extent to which cortical areas are recruited both during rest and during movement related tasks. This is quantified by a laterality index, calculated as the ratio of activations of ipsi- and contra-lesional precentral gyri during a paretic hand tracking task. A LI of -1 corresponds to entirely contralesional activation, while a value of +1 corresponds to entirely ipsilesional activation.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)

Population: The laterality index was not calculated for one subject in post-test 2 as no activation overlapped with the ipsilesional or contralesional precentral gyrus.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Cortical Excitability and Cortical Activation Patterns as Measured by MRI and Functional MRIBaseline0.71 Laterality index
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Cortical Excitability and Cortical Activation Patterns as Measured by MRI and Functional MRIPost-test 1-0.25 Laterality index
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Cortical Excitability and Cortical Activation Patterns as Measured by MRI and Functional MRIPost-test 21 Laterality index
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Cortical Excitability and Cortical Activation Patterns as Measured by MRI and Functional MRIBaseline0.72 Laterality index
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Cortical Excitability and Cortical Activation Patterns as Measured by MRI and Functional MRIPost-test 10.81 Laterality index
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Cortical Excitability and Cortical Activation Patterns as Measured by MRI and Functional MRIPost-test 20.80 Laterality index
Secondary

Changes in Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Box and Block Test

Performance on the box and block test with the paretic hand, quantified as the number of 2.5 cm\^3 cubes grasped, lifted, and released to transfer between compartments correctly within 60 seconds.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Box and Block TestBaseline26.0 Number of blocks
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Box and Block TestPost-test 132.3 Number of blocks
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Box and Block TestPost-test 239.4 Number of blocks
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Box and Block TestBaseline2.67 Number of blocks
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Box and Block TestPost-test 11.66 Number of blocks
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Box and Block TestPost-test 22.84 Number of blocks
Secondary

Changes in Inter-hemispheric Inhibition

Inter-hemispheric Inhibition was evaluated using paired-pulse TMS both for the stroke hemisphere to non-stroke hemisphere direction as well as for the non-stroke hemisphere to the stroke hemisphere direction. IHI was measured by applying TMS to identified left and right motor hotspots at 1 mV threshold intensity, or 130% of the RMT if 1 mV threshold could not be identified, with single unilateral pulses and paired bilateral pulses. IHI was quantified by comparing the paired-pulse peak-to-peak motor evoked potential amplitudes to the corresponding single pulse MEP amplitudes for each direction of stimulation (ipsi- to contra-lesional and contra- to ipsi-lesional).

Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Inter-hemispheric InhibitionBaseline, ipsi-to-contralesional1.28 PP/SP ratio
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Inter-hemispheric InhibitionPost-test 1, ipsi-to-contralesional0.90 PP/SP ratio
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Inter-hemispheric InhibitionBaseline, contra-to-ipsilesional1.26 PP/SP ratio
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Inter-hemispheric InhibitionPost-test 1, contra-to-ipsilesional0.31 PP/SP ratio
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Inter-hemispheric InhibitionBaseline, contra-to-ipsilesional0.42 PP/SP ratio
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Inter-hemispheric InhibitionBaseline, ipsi-to-contralesional0.64 PP/SP ratio
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Inter-hemispheric InhibitionPost-test 1, contra-to-ipsilesional1.62 PP/SP ratio
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Inter-hemispheric InhibitionPost-test 1, ipsi-to-contralesional1.41 PP/SP ratio
Secondary

Changes in Paretic Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Finger Tracking Test

The finger tracking test evaluates the subject's ability to track an oscillating wave with either their paretic or non-paretic finger. Subjects wore custom electro-goniometer braces on each hand, each of which included a potentiometer signaling extension and flexion of the index finger metacarpophalangeal joint. Subjects were presented with target stimuli with a random sinusoidal waveform and were instructed to move the corresponding index finger to match the target trace as the cursor moved across the screen with constant velocity. Performance was quantified by an accuracy index, calculated using the ratio of the error to the standard deviation of the target, normalized to the range of motion for each subject.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Paretic Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Finger Tracking TestBaseline0.005 Accuracy index
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Paretic Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Finger Tracking TestPost-test 10.008 Accuracy index
Sham rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Paretic Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Finger Tracking TestPost-test 20.009 Accuracy index
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Paretic Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Finger Tracking TestBaseline-0.028 Accuracy index
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Paretic Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Finger Tracking TestPost-test 1-0.011 Accuracy index
Real rTMS + Real BCI TrainingChanges in Paretic Hand Motor Function as Measured by the Finger Tracking TestPost-test 2-0.008 Accuracy index
Other Pre-specified

Changes in the Resting Motor Threshold

The resting motor threshold is a measure of cortical excitability, and will be recorded for both the stroke and non-stroke hemispheres.

Time frame: Baseline, Post-Test 1 (3 weeks), Post-Test 2 (6 weeks)

Other Pre-specified

Subject Report of Symptoms

The subject report of symptoms assesses whether subject experience any adverse effects as a result of participation in the study.

Time frame: within 12 weeks of participation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026