Skip to content

Outcome of TKA Using Customized Cutting Block Compared With Conventional Intramedullary Cutting Guide

Comparison of Customized Cutting Block (Visionaire™) and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02128464
Enrollment
108
Registered
2014-05-01
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2016-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Knee Osteoarthritis, Total Knee Arthroplasty, Customized Cutting Block, Conventional Intramedullary Cutting Guide

Brief summary

Customized cutting block and conventional cutting guide are both effective in improving accuracy and function of OA knee patients.

Detailed description

Customized cutting block and conventional cutting guide are both effective in improving accuracy and function of osteoarthritic knee patients.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard knee cutting guides

Standard cutting guides use traditional instrumentation to determine knee implant positions. During surgery, a rod is placed in the leg bone and the cutting guide is attached to that rod.

PROCEDUREPatient specific cutting guides

Patient specific cutting guides are custom-made for each patient based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Before surgery, MRI of the knee is done and used to create a cutting guide that is formed to the exact shape of the knee. The patient specific cutting guides have platforms that can be attached to the bone, so the rod does not need to be placed in the leg bone.

Sponsors

Thammasat University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 60-90 * Diagnosis of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis of the knee and qualify for surgery, as indicated by one of the following: * Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis where one or more compartments are involved; * Correction of varus or valgus. * Willing to participate and return for follow-up study visits.

Exclusion criteria

* Vascular insufficiency * Previous deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism * Previous osteotomy * Previous patella fracture or surgery * Previous healed tibia or femur fractures * Previous joint replacement surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mechanical Axis Alignment (Absolute Value Measured in Degrees) Using 3 Feet Long Leg Films3 Months Post-operativeFemoral Valgus Angle, Tibial varus angle, Tibial slope, Femoral Flexsion/Extension angle, Implant Rotation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Intraoperative BleedingIntra-operative
Operative timeDuring the procedure
Hemoglobin levelPost-operative day1, 2, 3
WOMAC score6 weeks
Blood volume in suction drainPost-operative Day 2

Other

MeasureTime frame
WOMAC Score2 years

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026