Skip to content

Phase 4 Study to Demonstrate Prognostic Usefulness of AdreView™ Scintigraphy for Identifying Subjects With Heart Failure Who Will Experience Death During 60 Months Follow-up.

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 4 Study to Demonstrate the Prognostic Usefulness of AdreView™ Scintigraphy for Identifying Subjects With Heart Failure Who Will Experience Death During 60 Months Follow-up.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02127307
Enrollment
964
Registered
2014-04-30
Start date
2014-02-28
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2017-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure (HF)

Keywords

Myocardial sympathetic innervation, Heart failure (HF), Nuclear imaging, Radiopharmaceutical

Brief summary

This aim of the study is to investigate the prognostic usefulness of AdreView™ imaging to identify those subjects with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II or III HF who will die during 60 months of follow-up from the date of administration of AdreView™ in prior studies MBG311, MBG312, or MBG312C (hereafter included in MBG312).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

H2O Clinical LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Quintiles, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
GE Healthcare
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The subject was a HF subject who had signed informed consent for MBG311 or MBG312. * The subject was administered AdreView™ in MBG311 or MBG312. * The subject completed the late planar imaging assessments (at a minimum) required by the protocols for MBG311 and MBG312, and those images were read and judged diagnostic by at least 2 blinded readers. * In addition, all subjects must meet 1 of the following 3 inclusion criteria. * If the subject can be located, he/she provides informed consent to allow the investigator access to medical records and/or gives permission for the investigator to speak to treating physicians. * If the subject can be located and he/she declines to provide informed consent, the IRB/EC provides a waiver of consent to allow the investigator to record that the subject is alive. * If the subject cannot be located, the IRB/EC provides a waiver of consent to allow the investigator to access available medical records for care provided subsequent to last date of subject participation in MBG311, MBG312, and/or MBG313 and/or to allow collection of data from publicly available sources.

Exclusion criteria

* The subject withdrew or was withdrawn from MBG311 or MBG312 because of a protocol violation. * The subject underwent heart transplantation during MBG311, MBG312, or MBG313. * The subject was recorded to have died during MBG311, MBG312, or MBG313. * The subject voluntarily withdrew from MBG311, MBG312, or MBG313, and the IRB/EC has not provided a waiver to allow recording of subject survival status in such an instance. * The subject cannot be located, cannot be contacted, and no information can be found to establish survival status beyond the date of last contact in MBG311, MBG312, or MBG313, including information available as a result of an IRB/EC-approved waiver.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relationship Between the Occurrence of Death and 123I-mIBG Uptake on Planar Scintigraphy With Heart to Mediastinum (H/M) Ratio of <1.60 vs H/M ≥1.60From the date of administration of 123I-mIBG in studies MBG-311 or MBG-312 up to 60 monthsH/M ratio for 123I-mIBG uptake at 3 hours 50 minutes post administration was calculated by dividing the counts/pixel in the total myocardium region of interest (ROI) by the counts/pixel in the 7x7 pixel mediastinal ROI. H/M ratios were categorized as 'Low' and 'High' based on being \<1.6 or ≥1.6 respectively. The efficacy of 123I-mIBG was based on the prognostic value of the imaging data, as reflected by the H/M ratio, for identifying HF participants at lower risk of death during 60 months of follow-up.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

In the present study GE-122-016 (NCT02127307), participants previously administered AdreView™ (123ImIBG \[meta-iodobenzylguanidine\]) in studies MBG311 (NCT00126425) and MBG312 (NCT00126438) were followed to identify who died during 60 months of follow-up from the date of administration of 123I-mIBG.

Pre-assignment details

Of 964 heart failure (HF) participants included in the efficacy population of MBG311 (NCT00126425) and MBG312 (NCT00126438), 694 were contacted in this study as 101 participants died and 169 were not contacted due to participant consent not obtained and/or some sites declined to participate.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AdreView™- Heart Failure Group
HF participants who were administered AdreView™ (123I-mIBG \[meta-iodobenzylguanidine\]) in studies MBG311 (NCT00126425) and MBG312 (NCT00126438) were observed to identify who died during 60 months of follow-up at 6-month intervals from the date of administration of 123I-mIBG.
964
Total964

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath101
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyOther than specified above169
Overall StudyProtocol Violation36

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdreView™- Heart Failure Group
Age, Continuous62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.85
Sex: Female, Male
Female
192 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
772 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Relationship Between the Occurrence of Death and 123I-mIBG Uptake on Planar Scintigraphy With Heart to Mediastinum (H/M) Ratio of <1.60 vs H/M ≥1.60

H/M ratio for 123I-mIBG uptake at 3 hours 50 minutes post administration was calculated by dividing the counts/pixel in the total myocardium region of interest (ROI) by the counts/pixel in the 7x7 pixel mediastinal ROI. H/M ratios were categorized as 'Low' and 'High' based on being \<1.6 or ≥1.6 respectively. The efficacy of 123I-mIBG was based on the prognostic value of the imaging data, as reflected by the H/M ratio, for identifying HF participants at lower risk of death during 60 months of follow-up.

Time frame: From the date of administration of 123I-mIBG in studies MBG-311 or MBG-312 up to 60 months

Population: Efficacy population was 961 participants who received investigational medicinal product (IMP) and had a diagnostic 3 hour 50 minute planar image in MBG311 or MBG312. Here, 'n' signifies number of participants with available data for specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AdreView™- Heart Failure GroupRelationship Between the Occurrence of Death and 123I-mIBG Uptake on Planar Scintigraphy With Heart to Mediastinum (H/M) Ratio of <1.60 vs H/M ≥1.60Participants with H/M ratio <1.60 (n=760)292 number of death or other adverse events
AdreView™- Heart Failure GroupRelationship Between the Occurrence of Death and 123I-mIBG Uptake on Planar Scintigraphy With Heart to Mediastinum (H/M) Ratio of <1.60 vs H/M ≥1.60Participants with H/M ratio ≥1.60 (n=201)42 number of death or other adverse events
Comparison: AdreView-Heart Failure Group with H/M \<1.60 vs. H/M ≥1.60:~Data analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards model to demonstrate the relationship of consensus numeric H/M ratio and time to adverse cardiac events to identify participants with higher risk of death. Hazard (risk) of a death for a participant with H/M ratio at time t was expressed as Hl (t)/Hh (t)=Ψ,where Hl (t) and Hh (t) denote the hazard of an event at time t for participants with low H/M and high H/M respectively.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.3227, 0.6156]Cox proportional hazards model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026