Skip to content

The Efficacy and Safety of 3% Povidone-Iodine in Acne Therapy

Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 3% Povidone-Iodine in Acne Therapy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02126709
Enrollment
30
Registered
2014-04-30
Start date
2014-06-30
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2014-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acne

Keywords

Povidone Iodine, Safety, Efficacy, Acne treatment

Brief summary

Importance This will be a proof of concept study - whereby we hypothesize that Repigel may represent a paradigm shift in global acne treatment. Historically, there has been a dearth of clinical evidence in this use of povidone-iodine for inflammatory acne. This is likely due to staining related to iodine use, which is not acceptable to consumers. The trial drug, Povidone Iodine, however, becomes colourless and odourless in a matter of seconds after application on the skin. This represents an ideal product for which we may perform testing to look at its efficacy in the management of acne. A mainstay in the pathogenesis of acne involves the overgrowth and proliferation of skin micro-organisms, primarily proprionibacterium Acnes. Long term antibiotic therapy is usually prescribed for a period of 3 to 6 months or more. Previous studies have revealed this form of antibiotic therapy is ineffective, patients are usually poorly compliant, and also results in the formation of antibiotic resistant micro-organisms,which in turn reduces treatment efficacy. Potential Benefits As such, Povidone Iodine with its antiseptic property represents a promising avenue for the elimination of Proprionibacterium Acnes without the associated problems of long term antibiotic use, and the development of antibiotic-resistance. It is cosmetically acceptable, affordable, and easy to use.

Detailed description

Aim This is a proof of concept study - to determine the efficacy and safety of Povidone Iodine in the treatment of acne. Methodology This will be a single centre, double blind, randomized controlled trial. There will be 2 arms of 15 patients with a 2 month study period. Follow up at Week 0, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8 3\. Capture baseline demographics a. Age b. Sex c. Race d. Lesion counts - total, inflammatory, non-inflammatory e. FDA score 4\. Efficacy evaluation a. 5 point IGA score b. Total lesional count c. No. of inflammatory lesions d. No. of non-inflammatory lesions e. Photography (+-) f. Scoring of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index. 5\. Safety Evaluation a. Score of itchiness b. Score of scaling c. Score of erythema d. Score of pain 6\. Primary end points - a. percentage reduction in lesion counts from week 0 to week 8 i. total lesion counts ii. total inflammatory counts iii. total non-inflammatory counts b. Proportion of subjects who had a IGA score of 0 or 1 by week 8 c. Time to 50% reduction of total lesion counts 7\. Secondary end point a. Improvement of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index Povidone Iodine will be applied on the face by the patient using his own finger tips - onto his acne affected areas on the face.

Interventions

DRUGRepigel

Repigel will be used as the intervention in the treatment group

Sponsors

Mundipharma Pte Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
National University Hospital, Singapore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients diagnosed with mild to moderate inflammatory acne - grade 2 to 3. 2. Patients must be at least 12 years of age 3. No gender preference - both male and female allowed 4. Subjects who provide signed and dated written voluntary informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Thyroid Dysfunction 2. Pregnancy, Breast feeding 3. History of hypersensitivity to iodine 4. History of renal impairment 5. Using OCPs 6. Using concurrent medications known to exacerbate acne 7. Nodulocystic acne or other severe variants 8. Had a facial procedure - chemical or laser peel or microdermabrasion 2 weeks before the study 9. No topical antiacne products 2 weeks prior to study commencement till its conclusion. 10. No systemic corticosteroids 4 weeks prior to study start 11. No systemic retinoids 3 months prior to study start 12. No concurrent use of tanning booths or sunbathing 13. Any condition in the judgement of the investigator that may place the person at unacceptable risk for participation 14. Any subject who participated in another clinical trial with 30 days of study entry,

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
5 point Acne Score2 months0 Clear, indicating no inflammatory or noninflammatory lesions 1. Almost clear, rare noninflammatory lesions with no more than one papules/pustule; 2. Mild, some noninflammatory lesions, no more than a few papules/pustules but no nodules 3. Moderate, up to many noninflammatory lesions, may have some inflammatory lesions, but no more than one small nodule; 4. Severe, up to many noninflammatory and inflammatory lesions, but no more than a few nodules.
Lesional Counts2 monthsb. Total lesional count c. No. of inflammatory lesions d. No. of non-inflammatory lesions
Effect on Quality of Life2 monthsScoring of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index.
Safety2 months1. Score of itchiness 2. Score of scaling 3. Score of erythema 4. Score of pain

Countries

Singapore

Contacts

Primary ContactSam SY Yang, Dr
samsyyang@gmail.com85333992

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026