Skip to content

Oral Rehydration Therapy in Burn Patients

Oral Rehydration Therapy in Burn Patients Phase 1

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02124265
Acronym
ORT
Enrollment
3
Registered
2014-04-28
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2019-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burn Any Degree Involving 20-29 Percent of Body Surface, Burn Any Degree Involving 30-39 Percent of Body Surface, Burn Any Degree Involving 40-49 Percent of Body Surface, Burn Any Degree Involving 50-59 Percent of Body Surface, Burn Any Degree Involving 60-65 Percent of Body Surface, Fluid Resuscitation

Keywords

Oral Rehydration Therapy

Brief summary

In patients with moderate to severe thermal injuries (\> 20% TBSA) adequate fluid resuscitation is the main priority to achieve successful outcomes. Soon after burn injury substantial amounts of fluid accumulate rapidly in the wound while more is lost in the third space. Without intervention this process leads to hypotension and shock. The Parkland formula was devised to calculate how much intravenous (IV) fluid, i.e. crystalloids, is needed for adequate resuscitation during the first 24 hours post-burn. However, IV resuscitation can lead to overexpansion of (third space) volume, leading to severe complications such as compartment syndrome or pulmonary edema. In major population centers, catastrophic events causing mass casualties will disrupt many hospital and emergency services, potentially delaying acute IV fluid resuscitation. Burn patient case reports have shown that oral rehydration therapy (ORT) used to supplement or in place of IV therapy is efficacious. ORT could be easily applied in mass burn casualties. ORT is generally known in the third world for treating life-threatening dehydration due to diarrhea. The glucose-sodium co transport mechanism enables the affected human intestine to absorb a sufficient amount of water and electrolytes to replace large fluid losses due to severe diarrhea, even under adverse field conditions. No electrolyte disturbances have been recorded in such cases. Studies on enteral resuscitation in animal burn models showed high rates of small intestinal absorption which should be adequate for resuscitation following major burn injury. The optimal composition of oral rehydration solution for resuscitation in burn wounds has not been determined. In cholera patients, Ceralyte® has proven superior to the World Health Organization Oral Rehydration Solution, increasing fluid absorption of the intestine. The Ceralyte® 90 solution, with 90mEq/L sodium and a low osmolarity of \<275mOsm, may also contribute to optimal intestinal fluid uptake without causing electrolyte disturbances in thermal injury. ORT use might reduce the occurrence of compartment syndrome and pulmonary edema since fluid is regulated by the intestine according to physiologic requirements. The investigators propose to conduct a prospective study using Ceralyte® 90 to show that oral resuscitation therapy (ORT) in burns can reduce the total amount of IV fluid needed for adequate resuscitation and to test the efficacy and safety of ORT in the resuscitation of burn patients.

Detailed description

Primary objectives * To show that ORT in burns (using Ceralyte® 90) can reduce the total amount of intravenous fluid needed for adequate resuscitation. * To test the efficacy and safety of ORT in resuscitation of burn patients Secondary objectives. * To encourage further research on the use of ORT in large thermal injuries and mass casualty situations.

Interventions

DRUGCeraLyte 90

1. This is a prospective pilot study of patients with moderate-major burn wounds (20-65% TBSA). 2. Patients who meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study upon admission to the Burn Unit. 3. Fluid requirements will be calculated according to the Parkland Formula (4 cc/kg/% Total Body Surface Area) administered over 24 hours since time of injury. 5\. Patients will be monitored according to standard of care. a. If gastric residuals are \>300cc, ORT will be stopped and only IV fluid resuscitation will be used.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients aged 18-65 years * Partial- to full-thickness burn injuries involving 20-65% of total body surface area (TBSA)

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of inhalation injury * Hypotension or shock * Concomitant serious traumatic injury (i.e. head/ spine trauma) * Gastric Bypass Surgery * Small Bowel Obstruction * Delay in resuscitation \>2 hrs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With a 20% Decrease in Required IV Fluid.24 hours post-burnNumber of participants whose IV fluids were reduced to less than or equal to 80% of the Parkland Goal IV resuscitation formula within the first 24 hours of initial burn injury. To test the efficacy and safety of Oral RehydrationTherapy in resuscitation of burn patients

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants aged 18-65 years with 20-65% of total body surface area (TBSA) partial- to full-thickness burns were recruited from the burn unit from May 2013 through May 2015.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Oral Rehydration Therapy
Ceralyte 90® was administered during first 24-hours post-burn. Fluid requirements were calculated according to Parkland Formula: 50% administered during first 8 hours, 50% administered over next 16 hours. During first 2 hours IV fluids were started at Parkland goal minus 250cc, which was administered using Ceralyte via oral, NG, or dobhoff tube. ORT and IV fluids were monitored with additional doses given hourly. Urine output was monitored hourly and gastric residuals were monitored every 2 hours, with adjustments made as needed to ensure adequate fluid resuscitation.
3
Total3

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOral Rehydration Therapy
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Age, Continuous50.7 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With a 20% Decrease in Required IV Fluid.

Number of participants whose IV fluids were reduced to less than or equal to 80% of the Parkland Goal IV resuscitation formula within the first 24 hours of initial burn injury. To test the efficacy and safety of Oral RehydrationTherapy in resuscitation of burn patients

Time frame: 24 hours post-burn

Population: All participants who received the treatment (Ceralyte 90)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Oral Rehydration TherapyNumber of Participants With a 20% Decrease in Required IV Fluid.0 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026