Skip to content

Simultaneous CBCT Acquisition During Arc Radiotherapy

Simultaneous Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Acquisition During Arc Radiotherapy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02123888
Acronym
SCART
Enrollment
75
Registered
2014-04-28
Start date
2011-06-30
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2015-02-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer, Lung Cancer

Keywords

Prostate, Lung

Brief summary

The cone beam image is a part of the radiotherapy treatment machine and uses lower energy xrays as the head of the radiotherapy machine moves around the patient in a circle. This takes pictures that give 3-dimensional information, somewhat like a CT scan. These images are better at showing the position of the tumour and surrounding soft tissues than the standard xrays that were previously used. Cone Beam Imaging Technology is not new and has been used regularly at The Christie for many years. The standard cone beam scan is taken before the actual radiotherapy treatment or after the treatment has been delivered. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT or Arc Radiotherapy) is a novel method of delivering radiotherapy that involves the continuous movement of the radiotherapy treatment machine head around the patient and MLC during radiation. Arc radiotherapy has been clinically implemented at The Christie for prostate radiotherapy treatments and work is in progress for implementation in lung radiotherapy. The continuous gantry rotation inherent to VMAT delivery makes this simultaneous imaging possible, although there are concerns associated with the impact that this may have on patient dose and image quality. The aim of this research is to assess whether the image quality of cone beam scans taken during treatment are as good as standard cone beam scans taken before or after treatment used to determine the accuracy of patient position and the tumour coverage by radiotherapy.

Interventions

Simultaneous Cone Beam Computed Tomography acquisition during arc radiotherapy

Sponsors

Sally Falk
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

for prostate cancer patients: * Patients to be treated with radical RT for prostate cancer * Patients to be treated with VMAT * ECOG performance status 0-2 * Patients must be able to receive and understand verbal and written information regarding the study and give written, informed consent Inclusion Criteria for lung cancer patients: * A histological or cytological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer or small cell lung cancer * Patients to be treated with radical RT or SBRT * Patients to be treated with VMAT * ECOG performance status 0-2 * Patients must be able to receive and understand verbal and written information regarding the study and give written, informed consent * Female patients must meet one of the following criteria - postmenopausal for a minimum of one year, surgically sterile, not pregnant, confirmed by β-HCG blood test and willing to use adequate contraception during study participation, not breastfeeding

Exclusion criteria

for prostate cancer patients: * Clinical judgement by the investigator that the patient should not participate in the study * Patients in clinical trials of new investigational medicinal products or treatment regimens unless there is written, prior agreement that the patient can also consent to this study, and that clinical data can also be used for this study * Prior radiotherapy or surgery in the pelvis that can make identification of normal anatomy difficult

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Equivalence of image quality12 monthsTo show equivalence of image quality from simultaneous CBCT acquisition during delivery of arc radiotherapy with that obtained from conventional CBCT acquisition in lung and prostate patients, as assessed by user-questionnaires.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantify inter-observer variation12 monthsTo quantify inter-observer variation in interpretation of anatomy, as assessed by questionaires.
Quantify impact on treatment times.12 monthsTo quantify the impact of simultaneous CBCT scans on treatment times.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactCorinne Faivre-Finn, MD PhD
corinne.finn@christie.nhs.uk0044 (0) 161 446 8290
Backup ContactJulie Stratford
julie.stratford@christie.nhs.uk0044 (0) 161 446 3506

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026