Skip to content

Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis by Intra-articular Injection of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Treatment of Osteoarthritis by Intra-articular Injection of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02123368
Enrollment
30
Registered
2014-04-25
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2017-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Mesenchimal stem cell, Knee

Brief summary

Purpose: To determine the safety, feasibility and effectiveness (clinical and radiological) of intra-articular administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patients and methods Clinical trial phase I- II, randomized , multicenter , with three treatment arms and 10 patients for each group. The investigators compare the intraarticular injection of hialuronic acid against the administration of two different doses of mesenchymal stem cells with hialuronic acid according to the following scheme: 1. Group A: intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (Hyalone®). Single dose. 2. Group B: Low Dosage of MSCs . Intra-articular injection of 10 million autologous mesenchymal progenitor stem cells cultured ex - vivo (cell suspension sterile small volume (5-10 ml ) in a vehicle suitable for intraarticular injection ) followed by an intraarticular injection Hiaurónico Acid ( Hyalone®). 3. Group C : High dose of MSCs. Intra-articular injection of 100 million autologous mesenchymal progenitor stem cells cultured ex - vivo ( cell suspension sterile small volume (5-10 ml ) in a vehicle suitable for intraarticular injection ) followed by an intraarticular injection Hiaurónico Acid (Hyalone®). The primary endpoint is safety and feasibility. The investigators registered the occurrence of complications and / or adverse effects during the study. In addition the investigators assess the response to intra-articular infusion of CMM analyzing the following parameters: * Clinical assessment of pain and function (Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months since treatment): VAS , WOMAC , KOOS , EuroQol, SF-16, Lequesne , WOMAC , KOOS. * Radiographic (baseline, 6 and 12 months since treatment): Femorotibial space. * Radiographic using MRI (baseline, 6 and 12 months since treatment): by assessing the number location of the lesions , cartilage thickness , signal intensity , subchondral bone alteration , volume and WORMS and dGEMRIC protocols.

Detailed description

Purpose: To determine the safety, feasibility and effectiveness (clinical and radiological) of intra-articular administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patients and methods Clinical trial phase I- II, randomized , multicenter , with three treatment arms and 10 patients for each group. The investigators compare the intraarticular injection of hialuronic acid against the administration of two different doses of mesenchymal stem cells with hialuronic acid according to the following scheme: 1. Group A: intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (Hyalone®). Single dose. 2. Group B: Low Dosage of MSCs . Intra-articular injection of 10 million autologous mesenchymal progenitor stem cells cultured ex - vivo (cell suspension sterile small volume (5-10 ml ) in a vehicle suitable for intraarticular injection ) followed by an intraarticular injection Hiaurónico Acid ( Hyalone®). 3. Group C : High dose of MSCs. Intra-articular injection of 100 million autologous mesenchymal progenitor stem cells cultured ex - vivo ( cell suspension sterile small volume (5-10 ml ) in a vehicle suitable for intraarticular injection ) followed by an intraarticular injection Hiaurónico Acid (Hyalone®). The autologous mesenchymal stem cells are obtained from the iliac crest and cultured ex vivo under local anesthesia and sedation. The primary endpoint is safety and feasibility. The investigators registered the occurrence of complications and / or adverse effects during the study. In addition the investigators assess the response to intra-articular infusion of CMM analyzing the following parameters: * Clinical assessment of pain and function (Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months since treatment): VAS , WOMAC , KOOS , EuroQol, SF-16, Lequesne , WOMAC , KOOS. * Radiographic (baseline, 6 and 12 months since treatment): Femorotibial space. * Radiographic using MRI (baseline, 6 and 12 months since treatment): by assessing the number location of the lesions , cartilage thickness , signal intensity , subchondral bone alteration , volume and WORMS and dGEMRIC protocols. All patients met the following inclusion and exclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria: * Males and females between 50 and 80 year old. * Diagnosis of knee OA according to the criteria of osteoarthritis of the ACR (American College of Rheumatology). * Joint pain equal or greater than 2.5 points on the visual analogue scale (VAS). * Radiological Classification: Kellgren-Lawrence scale greater or equal to 2. * Body mass index between 20 and 35 kg/m2. * Ability to follow during the study period. Exclusion Criteria: * Bilateral Osteoarthritis of the Knee requiring treatment in both knees. * Previous diagnosis of polyarticular disease. * Severe mechanical deformation. * Arthroscopy during the previous 6 months. * Intraarticular infiltration of hyaluronic acid in the last 6 months. * Systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease. * Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. * Blood dyscrasias. * Immunosuppressive or anticoagulant treatments. * Treatment with corticosteroids in the 3 months prior to inclusion in the study. * NSAID therapy within 15 days prior to inclusion in the study. * Patients with a history of allergy to penicillin or streptomycin. * Allergy to hyaluronic acid or poultry proteins.

Interventions

100 million of Bone marrow mesenchimal stem cells

DRUGHyaluronic acid

Single intraarticular injection of Hyaluronic acid (Hyal One)

BIOLOGICAL10 million Bone marrow mesenchimal stem cells

10 million of Bone marrow mesenchimal stem cells

Sponsors

Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females between 50 and 80 year old. * Diagnosis of knee OA according to the criteria of osteoarthritis of the ACR (American College of Rheumatology). * Joint pain equal or greater than 2.5 points on the visual analogue scale (VAS). * Radiological Classification: Kellgren-Lawrence scale greater or equal to 2. * Body mass index between 20 and 35 kg/m2. * Ability to follow during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

* Bilateral Osteoarthritis of the Knee requiring treatment in both knees. * Previous diagnosis of polyarticular disease. * Severe mechanical deformation. * Arthroscopy during the previous 6 months. * Intraarticular infiltration of hyaluronic acid in the last 6 months. * Systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease. * Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus. * Blood dyscrasias. * Immunosuppressive or anticoagulant treatments. * Treatment with corticosteroids in the 3 months prior to inclusion in the study. * NSAID therapy within 15 days prior to inclusion in the study. * Patients with a history of allergy to penicillin or streptomycin. * Allergy to hyaluronic acid or poultry proteins.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Baseline Visual analogue scale (VAS)prior to the initial dose on day 1Baseline Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Baseline value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos).Prior to the intervention on day 1Prior to the intervention on day 1 value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos).
Baseline Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC).Prior to the intervention on day 1Prior to the intervention on day 1 Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC).
Baseline SF-36 valuePrior to the intervention on day 1Prior to the intervention on day 1 SF-36 value
Baseline euroquol 5D valuePrior to the intervention on day 1Pretreatment euroquol 5D value
Baseline Lequesne indexPrior to the intervention on day 1Prior to the intervention on day 1 Lequesne index
Baseline femorotibial distancePrior to the interventionPrior to the intervention femoritibial distance on rosenberg x-ray view
Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse EventsFollow upDuring the follow up
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at on month1 monthVisual analogue scale (VAS) at on month
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 3 months3 monthsVisual analogue scale (VAS) at 3 months
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months6 monthsVisual analogue scale (VAS) at 6 months
Visual analogue scale (VAS) at 12 months12 monthsVisual analogue scale (VAS) at 12 months
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 1 month1 monthValue of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 1 month
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 3 month3 MonthsValue of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 3 month
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 6 month6 monthsValue of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 6 month
Value of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 12 months12 monthsValue of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (Koos) at 12 months
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 1 month1 monthWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 1 month
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 3 month3 monthsWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 1 month
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 6 month6 monthsWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 6 month
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 12 months12 monthsWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC) at 12 months
SF-36 value at 1 month1 monthSF-36 value
SF 36 value at 3 months3 monthsSF 36 value at 3 months
SF 36 value at 6 months6 monthsSF 36 value at 6 months
SF 36 value at 12 months12 monthsSF 36 value at 12 months
Euroquol 5D value at 1 month1 MOnthEuroquol 5D value at 1 month
Euroquol 5D value at 3 months3 monthsEuroquol 5D value at 3 months
Euroquol 5D value at 6 months6 monthsEuroquol 5D value at 6 months
Euroquol 5D value at 12 months12 monthsEuroquol 5D value at 12 months
Lequesne index at 1 month1 monthLequesne index at 1 month
Lequesne index at 3 months3 monthsLequesne index at 3 months
Lequesne index at 6 months6 monthsLequesne index at 6 months
Lequesne index at 12 months12 monthsLequesne index at 12 months
Femorotibial distance at 6 months6 monthsFemorotibial distance at 6 months
Femorotibial distance at 12 months12 monthsFemorotibial distance at 12 months
Baseline MRI WORMS protocolPrior to the interventionPrior to the intervention MRI WORMS protocol
MRI WORMS protocol score at 6 months6 monthsMRI WORMS protocol score at 6 months
MRI WORMS protocol score at 12 months12 monthsMRI WORMS protocol score at 12 months

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026