Skip to content

Hemodynamic Changes During One Lung Ventilation in Non-intubated Vedio-assisted Thoracoscopic Operations

Hemodynamic Changes and Fluid Responsiveness During One Lung Ventilation: Comparison in Non-intubated and Intubated Vedio-assisted Thoracoscopic Operations

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT02123173
Enrollment
71
Registered
2014-04-25
Start date
2014-05-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2014-12-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Keywords

one lung ventilation,, cardiac output, fluid responsiveness

Brief summary

Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery has been proved as an adequate alternative for management of many lung conditions such as pneumothorax , lung volume reduction, pulmonary metastasectomy, removal of lung nodules, segmentectomy and lobectomy. However, the hemodynamic changes during one lung ventilation have not been fully investigated. The goals of this study are to compare the changes of hemodynamics (including blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, pulse pressure variation, fluid responsiveness) during one lung ventilation between conventional intubated and non-intubated vedio-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) operations.

Detailed description

Non-intubated vedio-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) is proved safely performed as well as traditional intubated VATS. However, the differences of hemodynamic changes and fluid responsiveness during one lung ventilation(OLV) between these two groups were rarely reported. For complete lung collapse, spontaneous negative pressure respiration must be well maintained on non-intubated VATS. In comparison, positive pressure ventilation on dependent lung was applied during OLV in intubated VATS. This study planned to compared the changes of hemodynamics (including blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output) during OLV between groups. As functional hemodynamic monitoring (FloTrac system) was mostly utilized with positive pressure ventilation, the applicability of FloTrac in non- intubated VATS was also testified. In this study, we also measure the fluid responsiveness by FloTrac system with rapid infusion (within 10 minutes) of 10 mL/kg crystalloid fluid. We planned to compare the changes on cardiac output and the fluid responsiveness during OLV between these two groups.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. age over 20 y/o, less than 70 y/o 2. scheduled to receive VATS operations with OLV Exclusion: 1. previous thoracic surgery 2. cardiac disease ( including arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, coronary cardiac disease, etc.) 3. pulmonary disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cardiac output after one lung ventilation10-15 minutesrecord the stroke volume and cardiac output during two lung ventilation till 15 minutes after one lung ventilation

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026